Make sure you check out the entire 'Equations Stripped' playlist - there are 7 more waiting for you right here: th-cam.com/video/DktE2TD8LwI/w-d-xo.html
I see that there is a positive correlation between the stripping and the understanding of the equation. If this is the case, taking your boxers off should reveal the answer to the millennium prize problem. Worth a try.
Sir, I've recently done BS(hons.)Mathematics from University of Education, Lahore and I've interest in Pure Mathematics... Can you please suggest me any university for higher Education?
I am not in the study of physics but i was captured by your piece on explaining the Navier -Stokes equation and thank you for opening another door to understand fluid dynamics
My late-father was a maths prof. I would have loved for him to see this. He would have enjoyed it. I'm pretty sure he wouldn't have used the stipping method of teaching, but it is an attention grabber. Way to go, Mate!
Is my man just standing in an Oxford lecture theatre in his pants and recording it to post on the internet? You can't even walk on the college grass in a lot of that uni, how tf is this allowed lmao
The reason that the Navier-stokes equation fails is because it is based upon things like conservation of mass and energy, when the reality is that intermolecular collisions are inelastic, hence the conservation rules are only rough approximations that completely fail in things like turbulence. Please see my paper that just came out. Google journal "EJERS" click on "Archives" click on "Jan 2020" and my paper is near the bottom of the list title "Illusions of elastic..." by Kent w Mayhew. "Navier-stokes" is nothing more than "oh what a tangled web we weave when at first we fail to perceive" Thanks for your time Kent
I've never been so conflicted in my life. On the one hand, I was hoping you'd strip the equations down further. On the other hand, I had no desire to see your member.
I have never been more entertained learning fluid mechanics in my life and I have studied mechanical engineering at the university for years XD This was so damn funny and interesting. I couldn't help but smile and laugh throughout the video. Tom, my friend, you really do rock :P
2:10 the description of F=ma given here is incorrect. F describes the net force that ball of mass m would need to have that particular acceleration a. Force that it would impart on a wall is related to the time that the collision took and involves impulse.
Navier-stokes does not model "any fluid we know". It just models newtonian fluids, like water and air. Ketchup, as you mentioned, is a non-newtonian fluid.
The Navier-Stokes Equations don''t model catsup because it's a non-Newtonian fluid. Therefore, catsup's viscosity depends on it's velocity, and this dependence isn't modeled in NSE.
I had a maths teacher who taught simplifying expressions using some weird analogy about undressing Britney Spears. I believe he is now on the sex offenders register - true story.
Though it was difficult to concentrate, this video describes the phenomena easily, i fell in love and also kind of obsessed with this equation, i'm still trying to understand the stokes hypothesis and like how the stresses(tensors) affect the form of the differential element, and how could he just define the stress and strain rate relation but well right now i'm justrelaxin and hoping for the bloppers of these videos.
Unfortunately it was off camera, but at one point the cleaner walked in and just looked utterly confused/terrified before turning round and walking back out.
0:09. Thank you! Im trying to explain to my friends that maths is beautiful, and as of 15/05/2021 they're not agreeing me me *cries*. It sounds like you think the same but I cant see or facial expression cuz im blind (IDK if u know that) conhere. I wcsh I could though...
Nice explanation. But is your version of the navier stokes equation applicable to compressible flows where the density is also changing ?! I don't think so. Would love to see what happens in that case.
For compressible fluids you need the second equation for conservation of mass. I purposefully left it out here so I could just concentrate on one equation, but it is equally just as important.
I was always wondering with the navier stokes incompressible bit , if the that equals zero how come the terms in the navier equation doesnt vanish as well for example du/dx term in the continuity equation must be zero , so that term in the navier stokes equation must vanish too , yet it’s still in there multiplied by u, being udu/dx
Ah, be careful. du/dx will only be zero for the 1D case. Otherwise, it's the sum of velocity derivates that is zero, which means you can't necessarily simplify the second equation.
Thanks for the video! this is the worst equation for me ever, and you just made me understand! I just have one question about the "u.∇u". So the first "u" means the velocity and the "∇u" means the direction of this velocity?
Happy to help :) both u terms are the velocity, but yes the u by itself is just the velocity vector and the Grad(u) term represents the change in velocity with space. So it's not the direction of the velocity per se, more the way the velocity changes as you move in space.
Make sure you check out the entire 'Equations Stripped' playlist - there are 7 more waiting for you right here: th-cam.com/video/DktE2TD8LwI/w-d-xo.html
Some mathematician: "I could teach Navier-Stokes in my sleep "
Tom: Hold my pants.
This made me LOL - well played.
@@TomRocksMaths never would i have thought an oxford prefessor , would ever have tattoos, piercing and lastly say LOL , rare combo🤣
Shirtless math is not what I wanted to see until I saw it and now I only want this.
HA - it worked then...
@@TomRocksMaths Anything that gets people into Maths is worth it. And this certainly was. ;)
That is because you are homosexual.
Came for the science, stayed for the abs
got here for the science, came for the abs
I feel that "came for the math, stayed for the abs" sounds better, no?
haaa
I came for the abs. Twice.
@@captainobvious1415 ROFL now that's funny, mate! funny as! And, um, yeah...me too. lol
I would be so weird if some one enters in the room, sees a man in underwear, alone in room taking to camera, teaching the navier stocks...
Salam Kailash Singh this actually happened
@@TomRocksMaths I hope they just closed the door the way they opened it, saying stretched, "NOPE!"
@@अण्वायुवरीवर्त pretty much!!
But would Tom Scott would use this method. lol
His bulge in his Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles underwear is covering up the forces in the Navier Stokes Equation. Never thought I'd type that comment.
I think you mean the Navier Strokes question. *eyebrow waggle*
reddit.com/r/brandnewsentence
She: Tease me with dirty talk
Tom :
Nice.
Real Dirty talk!!
This is probably the strangest maths video I've ever seen but anything navier stokes is always worthwhile
I see that there is a positive correlation between the stripping and the understanding of the equation. If this is the case, taking your boxers off should reveal the answer to the millennium prize problem. Worth a try.
If only...
Holdup, wait a minute
The most wierd video I've ever seen in TH-cam
You Are Really Right !!!
Will that become the new Gangnam style ?
Believe me, this is nothing.
emre can Dude, I use TH-cam to watch this kind of videos, and believe me, this is nothing :P
check out flammable maths
You forgot the last layer: The units :P
Sir, I've recently done BS(hons.)Mathematics from University of Education, Lahore and I've interest in Pure Mathematics... Can you please suggest me any university for higher Education?
Beautyfull!!! 💕
Jesus Christ is our lord and Saviour.
Haider Ali see this
th-cam.com/video/t-0y9hVcAE0/w-d-xo.html
units are unnecessary in mathematics
Damn it! I watched all the way till the end and he never took off his pants 😾
Pretty sure that would get me banned...
for the fifth layer, check out his OnlyFans. :)
As a student who loves math, I think I found the teaching method I learn from the best.
Would you like to verify yourr love for math?
Only just discovered this channel, and I wasn't expecting "stripped equations" to be so literal. Not that I'm complaining.
Welcome :)
I admire any person who not only recognizes their own hotness, but also uses it to draw people into learning about complex mathematics.
Fluid Mechanics just got a lot more interesting!
My girlfriend doesn’t believe that, I watched a naked guy taking about an unsolvable equation at 3am on TH-cam
I am not in the study of physics but i was captured by your piece on explaining the Navier -Stokes equation and thank you for opening another door to understand fluid dynamics
This video sums up why I think Brits are weird.
Can't disagree.
Good weird though.
I wonder if there are any female teachers out there in TH-cam explaining Navier-Stocks equation *_*.
and take off the clothes, I mean the clothes of NS eqn of course, layer by layer?
watch this space.
Than finally some educational video would be on "Trending" with #1
I should suggest that to my teacher and take all the Fs
Not the F that I want ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Rofl
Studying for fluid physics midterm, needed this.
Glad it helped :)
not my proudest nut
at least it wasnt in november
If only my Fluid Dynamics classes in school were taught like this, I always would have showed up to class. ^.^
Came for the abs, stayed for the haircut
keep striping of the secrets of science.
You know it.
How have I not seen this gem till now
AHHHHHH, THAT IS HOT. THAT'S HOT.
My late-father was a maths prof. I would have loved for him to see this. He would have enjoyed it. I'm pretty sure he wouldn't have used the stipping method of teaching, but it is an attention grabber. Way to go, Mate!
That's awesome - thank you!
AWESOME! I had considered making a Naked Math Proofs channel, but it looks like you're on the way to beat me to it.
Good explanation bro.
This show you are learn Navier equation by heart .
Don't mind what people says, keep it up .
Thanks Mukund!
Hey Tom! I don't know if you'll see this, but I love your fun-loving approach to math and physics. I'm obsessed! You're pretty great, keep going ❤️
Thank you for making my day Gio
I fucking cracked up when the coat and tshirt suddenly came off LOL What the fuck
This is what I call literally crazy smart! I’d love to have him as my professor!
Thanks - you're too kind!
Is my man just standing in an Oxford lecture theatre in his pants and recording it to post on the internet? You can't even walk on the college grass in a lot of that uni, how tf is this allowed lmao
i don't follow the rules...
@@TomRocksMaths I like it lad, keep up the good work
Jessie Pinkman 10 years after Heissenberg died, circa 2025
I like this reference, well played.
Great explanation.... I am trying to figure out some fluid equations and CFD calculation lately.
awesome video.
me 2, trying to remember some college stuff after 10 years or so
Thanks - and good luck!
This is so dreamy.. I love this guy
Thank you for this lesson, it has been very useful for my anatomy drawing study.
The reason that the Navier-stokes equation fails is because it is based upon things like conservation of mass and energy, when the reality is that intermolecular collisions are inelastic, hence the conservation rules are only rough approximations that completely fail in things like turbulence. Please see my paper that just came out. Google journal "EJERS" click on "Archives" click on "Jan 2020" and my paper is near the bottom of the list title "Illusions of elastic..." by Kent w Mayhew. "Navier-stokes" is nothing more than "oh what a tangled web we weave when at first we fail to perceive" Thanks for your time Kent
well done! This is very creative and very well explained! I love it!
Thanks!!
😍😍Mathematics of 21st century
I've never been so conflicted in my life. On the one hand, I was hoping you'd strip the equations down further. On the other hand, I had no desire to see your member.
I have never been more entertained learning fluid mechanics in my life and I have studied mechanical engineering at the university for years XD This was so damn funny and interesting. I couldn't help but smile and laugh throughout the video. Tom, my friend, you really do rock :P
Awesome - thanks Sanchita!!
Tom Rocks' fluids.
Science and Love all rolled in to one. I love him!!!
Thanks Ernst!
he looks like hes trying not to laugh in anticipation of about to strip LOl
Yep, well spotted!
hahah, is that a tattoo of a fossilized animals? I actually was paying attention lol
Well spotted - any idea which?
2:10 the description of F=ma given here is incorrect. F describes the net force that ball of mass m would need to have that particular acceleration a. Force that it would impart on a wall is
related to the time that the collision took and involves impulse.
I followed all the steps and did one step more at the last.....Sexiest Explaination.
I learned faster from ur explantion. Thank you bro. Keep it up.
You're very welcome Vu!
Thanks. I'm trying to understand partial differential equations. Please do a video on Laplace equations
Thank you, this makes a whole lot of sense now.
Glad to help!
U just know this dude's done a ton of shrooms
Navier-stokes does not model "any fluid we know". It just models newtonian fluids, like water and air. Ketchup, as you mentioned, is a non-newtonian fluid.
For the version in the video you are correct, however, with some slight modifications the equations also work for non-Newtonian fluids.
came for the science, stayed for the accent
I was thinking of another example of a thick and sticky fluid that's just as yummy
First conceptual explanation I'
ve understood. Thank you.
Happy to help Sean!
i really loved the explanation...keep it up bro :D
Thanks Zap!
Excellent explanation, no need for the strip concept 😂 I was waiting for the 5th Layer
Thank you
i want more of such type of fluid dynamics problems
Then I suggest my 'Fluid Dynamics' playlist: th-cam.com/video/0lEsNMh03LI/w-d-xo.html
oh good, it's a new channel
Better than many other TH-cam videos on subject. Many things are missing, i.e. why fluid behavior is so rich and complicated.
Thank you for your teach!! This is a fundamental equation. I can learn it quickly in your video. :)
You're very welcome - glad it was helpful.
You area Brilliant teacher and your lectures always keeps me engaged lol
Awesome, thanks Craig!
YEAH! My dream come true!
Glad you enjoyed it Gonzalo!
You just earned a subscriber.. gr8 explanation
Thanks Rajat!
Dude!!!
Unique way to explain Unique equation,,
i like the way you explain beauty of this equation bro!!
Respect!!
Thanks Nelson!
Great explanation!
Thanks Gwen!
Wish there would've been a fifth layer of the equation you could strip.
I will never forget the Navier-Stokes equation.
Nice. It was nice and quick.
teach me daddy
The Navier-Stokes Equations don''t model catsup because it's a non-Newtonian fluid. Therefore, catsup's viscosity depends on it's velocity, and this dependence isn't modeled in NSE.
They would need to be slightly modified from the version in this video, yes, but the equations would still be Navier-Stokes.
I had a maths teacher who taught simplifying expressions using some weird analogy about undressing Britney Spears. I believe he is now on the sex offenders register - true story.
😂😂
With the last peel-away transition, I had hoped the underwear would come off so that this video wouldn’t have been a total waste.
like it. might do my own version in fact, i like it taht much.
The graph at the bottom of the blackboard seems to have a positive definite Hessian matrix.
more layers need to be stripped for me to fully understand this equation!
Did he mention that this is the incompressible variant of the equation? But I guess so are his abs...
Navier should have added another layer.
Uh, i like that style of English and Math. Thank you for the video
Bro really was teaching fluid flow practically
okey.... actually explained really well. thanks
No problem Adam!
I am still looking forward to seeing what's inside the last layer...hehe
The pizza that Leonardo and Rafael hold
Though it was difficult to concentrate, this video describes the phenomena easily, i fell in love and also kind of obsessed with this equation, i'm still trying to understand the stokes hypothesis and like how the stresses(tensors) affect the form of the differential element, and how could he just define the stress and strain rate relation but well right now i'm justrelaxin and hoping for the bloppers of these videos.
Unfortunately it was off camera, but at one point the cleaner walked in and just looked utterly confused/terrified before turning round and walking back out.
@@TomRocksMaths jajajaja guess he didn't expect that, sad you couldn't catch the moment on video :c .
Wow, what a video! I just hope that you won’t need to go to the 5th layer,otherwise the video will be age restricted 😁😁. PS: thanks for the video.
You're very welcome Aniruddah!
Hope you retained your interest in Fluid Mechanics, Aniruddah 😉
What do you mean solve it? Why can't you just plug in values?
good layer by layer
Nice explanation
0:09. Thank you! Im trying to explain to my friends that maths is beautiful, and as of 15/05/2021 they're not agreeing me me *cries*.
It sounds like you think the same but I cant see or facial expression cuz im blind (IDK if u know that) conhere. I wcsh I could though...
Man, what a package! :-)
Nice explanation. But is your version of the navier stokes equation applicable to compressible flows where the density is also changing ?! I don't think so. Would love to see what happens in that case.
hi , sushant this is the link to full NS equations www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/nseqs.html
For compressible fluids you need the second equation for conservation of mass. I purposefully left it out here so I could just concentrate on one equation, but it is equally just as important.
Me thinks : What if he just got an exhibition fetish m8?
great content man, but d'you want to maybe stand off to the side a bit all the way through so that one can see the whole board at the same time??
nice explanation! can I see your boundery layer? ;)
lol
From the moment this video started, I had a feeling that at some point we were going to see his abs. I just knew it. The Navel-Stokes equation.
I was always wondering with the navier stokes incompressible bit , if the that equals zero how come the terms in the navier equation doesnt vanish as well for example du/dx term in the continuity equation must be zero , so that term in the navier stokes equation must vanish too , yet it’s still in there multiplied by u, being udu/dx
Ah, be careful. du/dx will only be zero for the 1D case. Otherwise, it's the sum of velocity derivates that is zero, which means you can't necessarily simplify the second equation.
Thanks for the video! this is the worst equation for me ever, and you just made me understand! I just have one question about the "u.∇u". So the first "u" means the velocity and the "∇u" means the direction of this velocity?
Happy to help :) both u terms are the velocity, but yes the u by itself is just the velocity vector and the Grad(u) term represents the change in velocity with space. So it's not the direction of the velocity per se, more the way the velocity changes as you move in space.
@@TomRocksMaths aaah! Thanks for the help!
Nice explanation!
Glad it helped!