WHAT YU-GI-OH DOES BETTER THAN MAGIC: THE GATHERING

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ย. 2024
  • Avram clears Jace, sorry.
    Edited by direYGO:
    ► / direygo
    Merch:
    ►streamlabs.com...
    Buying cards on TCGPlayer? Use my affiliate link:
    ►bit.ly/2mQgHn8
    Want customized sleeves and playmats? Use the code MBT10YP for a discount at:
    ►yourplaymat.com/
    Patreon:
    ► / mbtyugioh
    Twitter:
    ► / mbtyugioh
    Twitch:
    ► / mbtyugioh
    Discord:
    ► / discord
    #YuGiOh #MBT #Stream

ความคิดเห็น • 1K

  • @TheoJay615
    @TheoJay615 2 ปีที่แล้ว +402

    I completely agree on the "Reprint Season" point. Some players get all snobby saying that lack of reprints "protects the value of their cards" and that is so painful to hear.
    Sure there are players *asking* WOTC and Konami to NOT reprint the cards, but there are even more players who will gladly *pay* up for easier access to these cards.
    Yugioh players give Konami a lot of deserved shit for short-printing, but the fact that there are MORE new copies in circulation is better than NO new copies in circulation.

    • @ArceusShaymin
      @ArceusShaymin 2 ปีที่แล้ว +50

      Plus, the general notion that lack of reprints protects the value of their cards only holds true in the super short-term. If we reprinted Black Lotus today in, like, a commander pre-con that sold a billion copies or something, that doesn't suddenly mean that Alpha Black Lotuses will go down to 50 cents.
      There's more to collectability pricing than reprints, especially when practically all aspects of the cards have changed over time AND COLLECTOR'S INFO EXISTS ON THE CARDS, and the only reason MtG finance cucks continuously pearl-clutch the reserve list is so they can pinch like a couple hundred more out of their cards that are already worth like THOUSANDS.
      *Fucking reprint format-dependent lands, WotC. I shouldn't have to start selling weapons to both sides of a civil war to afford a Legacy deck.*

    • @alexbrangan2885
      @alexbrangan2885 2 ปีที่แล้ว +56

      As someone who paid $110 for a Baronne de Fleur, please Konami, I'm begging you, reprint Baronne de Fleur. Reprint her into the ground. I wanna look like a complete doofus who should never be trusted with money.
      The fact that MTG cards can be bought and sold like Dutch tulip vouchers without any of their owners actually PLAYING THE GAME WITH THEM is an indictment of Wizards' crummy reprint policy.

    • @goozilla132
      @goozilla132 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      I really wish that tcg released cards like the ocg does so we're not screwed from the get go.
      Still better than magic though. *Sobs in premium products that end up increasing prices*

    • @cax1175
      @cax1175 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Konami gets props for not having something stupid like the reserve list.

    • @Dominator150395
      @Dominator150395 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Players buy cards to play with them, and collectors buy cards to keep them. Those who but cards to sell them are speculators, and they're a cancer on any hobby.

  • @OizenX
    @OizenX 2 ปีที่แล้ว +483

    I like the fact that Yugioh doesn't have a distinguished art style in its game. While Magic probably has hgiher quality art as a whole, when viewed all together they kinda just blend together in my mind. Meanwhile Yugioh is completely fine with art styles like Madolche or Prank Kids fighting Burning Abyss or Orcrust. Saying this as someone who barely plays either of them and just likes pretty card artwork

    • @wolfgod6443
      @wolfgod6443 2 ปีที่แล้ว +104

      I don't think there is anything funnier than Melffy fighting something like Vendreads.

    • @evansageser6943
      @evansageser6943 2 ปีที่แล้ว +78

      I feel like this has a lot to do with how the anime guided game design. Back in the early days yugioh design was pretty unified but Pegasus kind of lit the fuse when Takahashi decided that most of his cards would be goofy cartoon characters because it reflected his character.
      The whole impetus for archetypes was that by GX they were starting to make characters whose decks were really reflective of who they were, and since GX was also considerably less serious than Duel Monsters (most of the time) that also meant that archetypes could be anything, from Superheroes to Tarot cards to Toy Cars with Googly Eyes. And once you're at that point the floodgates are open and practically anything can be an archetype.

    • @dhanyl2725
      @dhanyl2725 2 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      Bruh there are battleship sized sushi in ygo that are apparently edible

    • @kauanjos3199
      @kauanjos3199 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      For me at least modern Yugioh cards are way better then magic ones, the old ones oh boy there's some really bad stuff

    • @wolfgod6443
      @wolfgod6443 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@kauanjos3199 I prefer older Yugioh art generally because most had a strong, unique aesthetic. It's nice to acknowledge the stand outs in artwork from modern Yugioh, but let's be honest, most of the modern cards are cute anime characters or over-designed robot dragons and they all look the same.
      Though maybe this is more an issue with creative design rather than artwork specifically.

  • @NinjaFrog65
    @NinjaFrog65 2 ปีที่แล้ว +477

    As a primarily MtG player (though I've been playing more YGO since Covid and Master Duel are a thing), I will say that the archetypes of YGO are one of the main things that got me. I've always found stuff like tribal decks very neat and fun, but some of the tribes I enjoy (Frogs, Clerics, or Sea Monsters) are either under-supported or don't have a lot of internal consistency. Whereas in YGO the archetypes are basically tribal decks, where every card is meant to be playing similarly enough that you don't have that second issue. Unfortunatelym sometimes you have the issue where you don't have enough cards to make a whole deck so you have to make that archetype work (please Konami give me more Suships).
    Also, if you couldn't tell from my earlier comment, I love frogs! In MtG they're not really worth paying any attention to, but in YGO, *woah boy!*

    • @pablorosada9788
      @pablorosada9788 2 ปีที่แล้ว +75

      I'm sorry for your loss
      #Fsforronin #tobefairitdidbreakthefrogenginebyitself #swapdidnothingwrong

    • @UMAtronic
      @UMAtronic 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Its nice finding a fellow frog enjoyer.

    • @felixdaniels37
      @felixdaniels37 2 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      Yu-Gi-Oh also generally have much better theming in archetypes, due to the "anything goes" mentality the series has. You can have Vampires, Circus animals, demons, cartoon parodies, superheroes, etc. There's a deck for everybody to enjoy in Yu-Gi-Oh.

    • @NinjaFrog65
      @NinjaFrog65 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@pablorosada9788 I actually never got to play the lists using Ronin, as when I was first getting into YGO (before Covid) Paleofrogs was a tiered deck. So I was just playing a janky deck with my friends for fun. It had stuff like T.A.D.P.O.L.E. and Des Frog, but I enjoyed it nonetheless. Though I did have 2 Toadally Awesomes due to some lucky pack pulls, but that's neither here nor there.

    • @dazaiosamuda3634
      @dazaiosamuda3634 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Another fellow suship enjoyer!

  • @yaketyyakumo3315
    @yaketyyakumo3315 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    To explain the whole Borborygmos thing: there was an incident a while back where a player cast Pithing Needle (essentially equivalent to Prohibition in YGO) naming “Borborygmos” (which is a card that essentially saw zero play) instead of “Borborygmos, Enraged” (which was a meta-defining card that it had already been established his opponent was playing)
    His opponent responded by playing Borborygmos, Enraged.
    At the time, the judge allowed it, but the rulings on the card have since been changed to essentially “we know what you fucking mean, don’t be dumb”.

    • @xolotltolox7626
      @xolotltolox7626 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      The judge should not have let that fly. At minimum he should get an unsportsmanlike conduct warning, and tbh, if it was up to me i'd have DQd him

  • @erlanddrow7950
    @erlanddrow7950 2 ปีที่แล้ว +64

    Tbh the main thing I enjoy about Yu-Gi-Oh as someone who plays both games is how different the archetypes are. It's fun having a deck full of intimidating dragons fight a circus, anime girl insects, holy clerics or digital bugs

    • @roge2342
      @roge2342 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Amazement, traptrix, exosister and digital bugs respectively?

    • @kbrxion5620
      @kbrxion5620 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@roge2342 could also be performapals for the first one

    • @roge2342
      @roge2342 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@kbrxion5620 how could I literally forget the main circus deck

    • @monkey_blu
      @monkey_blu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Wait, is there an anime girls insects archetype? Traptrix are anime girls carnivorous plants.
      And if not, they should make a mahou shojou with the insect motif. We have many Tokusatsu and Power Rangers inspired archetypes, why not magical girls?

    • @roge2342
      @roge2342 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@monkey_blu some traptrixs are insects, like myrmeleo and allomerus

  • @yourfriendalex6852
    @yourfriendalex6852 2 ปีที่แล้ว +67

    I play both games. Thousand of dollars in both. Mythic and Diamond respectively in mtga and MD. MBT is the only human on youtube that can make these videos without me getting mad. Thanks for that. I think the identity=Deck is a lot stronger in yugioh. The way I moved some yugioh players to magic was getting them to play Tribal decks. I told the magic players that yugioh was like vintage magic without the price tag. I see no reason for rivalry. Why would anyone who likes card games not play the two best ones?

    • @iBloodxHunter
      @iBloodxHunter 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      People just don't think, that's why.

    • @HazeEmry
      @HazeEmry 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Superiority complex

    • @LynnLyns
      @LynnLyns ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Most of the MTG players has a big ego for playing Magic and YGO players don't like resource managing in the game.
      That could be a reason.

    • @NCemloen
      @NCemloen ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@LynnLynshave you ever played Yu-Gi-Oh? The entire game has resource management built into it. Every card is a precious and valuable resource to be used in some way or form. Like, wtf do you mean Yu-Gi-Oh players don't like resource management? And what makes you think this issue isn't even worse in mtg. Because... It is. The issue is called land cards. Benefits aside. Land cards are just extremely costly to ditch. Which leads to not being able to play the game in general. Which is worse than Yu-Gi-Oh where Every Card Is A Resource.

    • @brofst
      @brofst 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@NCemloen Every card game has cards as a resource. YGO doesn't have a *separate* resource.

  • @gabrielpelletier6202
    @gabrielpelletier6202 2 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    I have to say, the fact that archetypes all have themes to their playstyles is a really great thing about Yugioh. Because once you understand the mechanics of Yugioh itself, it's easy to understand whether or not an archetype has something you're interested in. You might not always understand how to play an archetype, but you can understand whether you're interested in learning.

    • @ether2275
      @ether2275 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      That's probably one of the best things about the game. You can see it in how dedicated players are to certain archetypes like HERO, BA, Blackwings, Madolche, Orcust and so on. There are communities formed around certain decks, archetypes and playstyles which is one of my favorite things about this game. This is how I fell into the Albaz Branded hole and the cards and lore are probably my favorite thing about the game so far. I just saw that little dragon boy with the superpoly effect and I saw potential. And later Konami actually rewarded us by giving us broken support. And granted not all archetypes get the same treatment it's still reassuring knowing that every random archetype out there has probably a few loyal followers who love it. You can see it now in with new naturia support reveal and suddently so many people got hyped Konami breathed new life into their deck.

    • @iBloodxHunter
      @iBloodxHunter 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Literally that's the thing I hate about Yugioh.

    • @gowford
      @gowford 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@iBloodxHunter why

    • @iBloodxHunter
      @iBloodxHunter 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@gowford Everybody uses pre-built decks and combo's, most of which simply shouldn't have been printed (Verte lines, Halq lines, Zoo lines ect.) And think that they're good for doing it.
      Now the only deckbuilding fun is to see which archetypes have abusable mechanics, like Dragunity and Gusto don't mix very well because their levels and playstyle are too different but if you srick a Simorgh and a Dragunity engine in a Gusto deck you can abuse the absolute worst Dragunity Synchro, the lvl 6 that searches Winged-beast or dragon(but discard) to search and immediately pitch Gusto Griffin. The entire thing is just a new and lame way to put a barrier statue on the board. Yay.

    • @brofst
      @brofst 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@gowford I think I also hate this too --- While I prefer certain strategies and archetypes in MTG I think being able to play all archetypes is extremely important and it feels impossible to do in YGO

  • @praetoratraxa8521
    @praetoratraxa8521 2 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    In my experience a big thing that YGO has over MtG is that YGOPROs pack opener blows any of MtGs pack openers out of the water, that along with no great manual sims make progession series extremely impractical for MtG which is a shame.

    • @adamgalloy9371
      @adamgalloy9371 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Disagree, I've been doing an MtG progression series with my brother and I haven't really had any problems. There are quite a few different pack/draft simulators out there (I use mtgen) and Cockatrice is a pretty competent manual simulator. I've also used Tabletop Simulator for Commander games with my friends.
      Other MtG web tools like Scryfall and EDHRec seem more developed than what Yu-Gi-Oh has as well, but I'm not as familiar with Yu-Gi-Oh so I can't speak too authoritatively on that.

    • @doodimgood
      @doodimgood 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I play a lot of commander on table top simulator with friends. It's a bit weird to get the hang of, but the only thing that beats it is playing IRL. I've been doing a sealed league of magic that is progression like, but we also do it IRL. Some would rather move it to tabletop sim because money.

    • @windknife
      @windknife 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@adamgalloy9371 YGOprodeck is the closest thing we have to Scryfall. Masterduelmeta is getting there as well.

  • @galesturms
    @galesturms 2 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    The upside to having locals on opposites of town means I can play Commander on Friday for fun once a week and chill, then play YGO against those same people, see them break under the pressure of bricking for the fifth game in a row, and threaten to sell their deck.

  • @BubblyBatty
    @BubblyBatty 2 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    Angle shooting in MTG is just like, accepted and kind of part of the rule. In ygo if you miss an activation and you catch it quick enough typically you roll back the game state, in MTG if you miss an activation is just whiffs. Theres something called chalice checking where you activate a card just to see if your opponent remembered that they have a card that negates it activation (usually chalice of the void hence the name) and its not only legal but accepted play by the community

    • @willgiesbrecht9318
      @willgiesbrecht9318 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Really depends who your playing with, most of the people I play with are generally quite forgiving with that kind of stuff

    • @BubblyBatty
      @BubblyBatty 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      @@willgiesbrecht9318 True, but like from a rulings standpoint technically in tournament play its supposed to fall through

    • @willgiesbrecht9318
      @willgiesbrecht9318 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@BubblyBatty alot of the angle shooting stuff (from what I'm aware of) has been sort of fixed

    • @BubblyBatty
      @BubblyBatty 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@willgiesbrecht9318 Chalice Checking is still legal

    • @qedsoku849
      @qedsoku849 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      Yeah, Yugioh has some nice rules like if there’s a mandatory effect, it’s the responsibility of both players to remember it, and if one is missed, the gamestate rolls back.

  • @AidenSohn
    @AidenSohn ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I just love how diverse the archetype designs are. Like you can play something that is based off of toys like Fluffal then you can play something about war like raidraptors

    • @Dori_Dorifto
      @Dori_Dorifto ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ah yes, the canon war betwen evil plushies and metal birb

  • @CuriousLumenwood
    @CuriousLumenwood 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I feel like the Digimon TCG is one of the worst at doing keywords. They have a set amount of them and each one could be easily described in a little “How To Play” pamphlet or something that you get when you buy a booster pack or set.
    Instead every single card has something like [Draw 1](Draw 1 card from the top of your deck). I feel like having the keyword there and then explaining it on *every single card* defeats the purpose of even having the keyword. You would actually save space if you just removed the keyword

    • @brandonbackup873
      @brandonbackup873 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Not all of them, actually, but a lot of the basic ones do, so kind of like how magic does keywords on cards meant for beginners.

  • @kennydarmawan13
    @kennydarmawan13 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Just not having the reserved list is already one huge win Yu-Gi-Oh! has over Magic: the Gathering.

  • @Alumnnia
    @Alumnnia 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    As a magic player, I really like yugioh fast and broken game style (and also the reprint policy), the few times I've played it, I always feel I could go further in many different directions, but don't know how as I lack the experience.

    • @ether2275
      @ether2275 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Master Duel is a good way to start although I hate so many things about MD ranked ladder. No game is perfect of course.

  • @CatchTheseMechanicalHands
    @CatchTheseMechanicalHands 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    we really do need a modern duel devastator soon. Konami’s clearly trying to cheapen droplets anyway

    • @tcoren1
      @tcoren1 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well

  • @louc.6735
    @louc.6735 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Definitely prefer the aesthetic of Yugioh. While Magic art is nice, you can kinda imagine it on any mid quality western fantasy novel's cover. Yugioh is immediately iconic in a lot of its designs, and I appreciate it for that.
    I think most of the reason I don't play Magic is because playing it online is actually hell, tho. Otherwise it seems like a perfectly fine game.

    • @TheKaijudist
      @TheKaijudist 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      MTG Arena is an incredibly fun video game but as someone who wants to use it to practice for in-person play, its economy is doo doo

  • @connerpaul9401
    @connerpaul9401 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I always love with Yugioh that you're not constrained by resource management. In old Yugioh it meant you had to restrain yourself and know when to go all in, in new Yugioh it means you can combo like crazy which is something no other card game does.

    • @jmurray1110
      @jmurray1110 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Well a hard recourse system yugioh resources are things like cards in hand, the normal summon, hard and soft once per turn that sort of things you balance you numerous points of interaction to mitigate running out of recourses in field and in the hand
      It’s more maluable that a true mana system where there’s a hard limit with how often you can cast

  • @tora148
    @tora148 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    As an ex-Hearthstone player, having played for like 3 years, master duel and even paper are such a blessing. In Hearthstone free-to-play is basically synonymous with hard-stuck Silver no matter how good you are, and Wild is completely inaccessible, because you will use basically all your resources to craft one playable deck in a season, maybe 2 if you’re really grinding.

  • @haosbeast5054
    @haosbeast5054 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    It'll never happen but I would adore if mbt had a crossover with the professor.

  • @J0non0
    @J0non0 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    genuinely what drwe me to yugioh was the lack of real set rotation. coming from vanguard i was devastated when i couldnt play my deck anymore cause my locals only held the mixed format (or whatever theyre called) tounaments like once every 2 months

  • @jnet124
    @jnet124 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    As someone who loves alternate art cards, shiny foils, and and overall a player who is mostly what cards look like rather than what they do in when i want to make a deck, MTG pretty much offers that more in droves, especially when you start digging deep through time and all of the cards. with YGO in my personal experiences a lot of the archtypes i wanna try end up having to really lean on other engines and such to function and i dont really jive with that, though its been a while since i've looked back on ygo stuff so maybe stuff i like is more supported and i'll give it a look!

    • @ether2275
      @ether2275 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Some decks do and some decks don't. I'll give some examples. There's decks like D/D/D that can basically be run pure with pretty much no downsides as they are well supported and have a bit of a toolkit for everything. Then you have decks like the so called "based" or "kitchen synch" or I guess to be more specific the Rose Dragon Adventure Sangan pile of card that was considered tier 1 for a while. You know, just a bunch of good cards that that work well together but have absolutely nothing to do with each other in terms of aesthetic. I gave you 2 extreme examples but it's a good way to start.
      Now in modern yugioh unfortunately alot of times, if you want to run a deck with a relatively small engine it is recommended to play different good engines that pair well with it because engines have become such an essential part of the game nowadays. For example, a deck that I played was Shaddolls and Shaddolls were always good but they could do more when paired with Trains. And of course in a more modern setting I realized that using the Invoked engine was much more beneficial than trying to play pure in this case and later added Dogmatika as well. You could always try and play pure or at least as pure as possible which is fine but alot of the times you'll find that certain decks lack something to be better. In the case of shaddols, the deck never really had a normal summon and so Invoked, Dogmatika or Despia paired well with them cause they were that missing piece the deck needed.
      Not saying you can't play pure of course. Best way to play yugioh is find a group of friends that are also interested, build fun decks and create your own game essentially where you just all have fun doing your own thing. If you want to play more competitive or go to locals your deck will definitely be lacking if you're playing pure alot of the time although there are plenty of exceptions you can find and look into.

  • @fhialsdhkt43tg72
    @fhialsdhkt43tg72 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    YuGiOh card design has just so much more charm and personality imo. Maybe thats just childhood nostalgia, but they are so playfull and pleasant, also never generic looking. I really like the creativity.

    • @jonathannorris9475
      @jonathannorris9475 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Yu-Gi-Oh monsters really do be ranging from generic dragons to gundems to sentient burgers.

    • @Merilirem
      @Merilirem ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sometimes I do wish they would do more classic stuff or make some "generic" looking cards like you have in other games. Then they make Gate Guardian stuff and I forget myself and am happy again.

  • @kitsunewarlock
    @kitsunewarlock 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sharking: I've been a competitive player and judge for Magic and Yu-Gi-Oh! and I'd rather judge a Magic tournament 99 times out of 100. In addition to thieves, judging Yu-Gi-Oh! tournaments means constantly having to run from player to player making calls and there is always at least one table with a hand in the air. Magic I can go entire rounds without having to stand up.

  • @mrruniccross1226
    @mrruniccross1226 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I would argue that MTG also has nostalgia bait in the terms of planes.

    • @priinceoftiime
      @priinceoftiime 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      No new Alara set, no new Lorwyn set, no new Tarkir set. Just an Incorrect take

    • @mrruniccross1226
      @mrruniccross1226 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@priinceoftiime While fair we have returned to Dominaria, Ravnica, and Innistrad which are all deeply popular planes. It's not like Konami hits ALL the nostalgia bait.

    • @thestormtrooperwhocanaim496
      @thestormtrooperwhocanaim496 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mrruniccross1226 exactly where is my laval support konami? Where is my man eater bug omni negate. I cry

    • @mrruniccross1226
      @mrruniccross1226 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@thestormtrooperwhocanaim496 I mean there are people who are patiently waiting for more Volcanic support, fossil stuff (or maybe that's just me lol), Red-Eyes with a cohesive game plan, etc. It's not perfect but I'm not claiming that either game does it perfectly just that they both do it.

    • @priinceoftiime
      @priinceoftiime 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@mrruniccross1226 I'm waiting on my tier 0 hungry burger retrain, but those are my top 3 planes that I wish we would go back to

  • @Heroism4499
    @Heroism4499 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I feel like you can't both have Yugioh's really good reprint policy and have Magic The Gathering's style of set rotation. Yugioh's reprint policy is born from every card being legal so if they need to be constantly turning out reprints of multihundred dollar cards like S:P, Diabellstar, and Lubelleon. We treat staple cards like depreciable assets that we can sit on for +5 years and still retain value. conversely MTG every card has a set life span and in order to keep a format healthy they'll choose not to print cards that would be nice to have in Advanced/Commander but not in Modern/Popper.
    But also the most expensive cards in a Commander Box are going to be like $20 (the Jace from the Thunder Junction set was short printed in a high rarity and was $15 and that was "steep") which is an upside.

    • @jmurray1110
      @jmurray1110 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Doesn’t mtg literally have modern sets designed to boost the format without affecting standard

  • @gabrielemarogna9444
    @gabrielemarogna9444 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yeah, the stack is where it's at, I hate the chain, I hate that it's different from OCG and TCG, I hate spell speed (specifically cause every time I had to teach Yu-Gi-Oh to people I was like "spells are during your turn, traps on anyone's turn, if you set them... Oh, and quick play.. oh, and counter traps.. oh, and careful if there's a battle effect, cause then you can activate during battle step.." - in magic I can just say "sorcery your main phases, instants any time, BAM")
    Like seriously, either the guy's trolling or he literally can't play either of the games

  • @Rizvi365
    @Rizvi365 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The fact that I can tribute two monsters...then pause for dramatic effect to tribute a THIRD monster to bring forth, while reciting ancient text and exclaiming thy name, a literal GOD, and send people to the Shadow Realm from whence they came, is reason enough for me. ❤

  • @Cool-rx2ry
    @Cool-rx2ry 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I like the complexity and different playstyles that are not floodgates or generic like halq like I like playing generaiders ( common dire w ) yet I also liked playing zombie tear and I love ojama
    is there anything that brings these decks together not at all yet I love em and I will continue loveing them and in the future fall in love with new playstyles

  • @danielmarino6783
    @danielmarino6783 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have always liked that Yugioh doesn't restrict deck building to certain colors. Like how Magic and Pokémon you have to use certain colored lands/energies. Or how Digimon and One Piece make you build the deck around a color or 2. Or Cardfight has clans

    • @yoggalo1766
      @yoggalo1766 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It’s a deck building trade-off not a restriction, 4/5 color decks exists competitively

  • @zeusalternative1270
    @zeusalternative1270 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Something I like about YGO over MTG is that you can splash a lot of things together if they have no restrictions, just look at AIDS (Albaz, Invoked, Dogmatika, Shadoll) and I can easily play Eldlich in my fluffal deck. In MTG if the card you wanna play isn't in your color you need to splash the color which means going out of your way and get mana screwed sometimes.

    • @iBloodxHunter
      @iBloodxHunter 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That's literally what mtg does better. You are acting like you're never gonna draw 2 Sanguine a Poly and a couple of Edge Imps.

    • @darkira2129
      @darkira2129 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lmao, I played Branded Live★Twin. The plain is to go with Evil★twin first, then tilt them with despia stuff

  • @jaggededge11
    @jaggededge11 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Man, "The Stack" (In MTG) is way easier to understand (And to play with) than Chain Links (And that''s not even including stuff like Chain blocking, missing timing, or good ol' KSS). Where MTG gets more difficult is the outcomes off all the complex interactions that come from effects (Like replacement effects) and lets not even get started on Layers.
    One thing I like in MTG is WotC being unafraid of shutting down strategies by printing specific hate cards (Like the Leylines for example). In Yu-gi-oh, Mystic Mine being legal is putting salt mines out of business.

    • @GG_Nowa
      @GG_Nowa 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mine isn't targeted hate tho. It's just a blanket hit to everything from tier 1 to untiered.
      More targeted hits are cards like d barrier that have big power against deck types like sword soul, branded or even splight to an extent

    • @TeamSprocket
      @TeamSprocket 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Bro Chain Links are just a list, it's literally a simplified stack.

  • @ArceusShaymin
    @ArceusShaymin 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Both YGO and MtG's reprint policies could learn a thing or two from Flesh and Blood, that's for sure. F&B reprints its older sets after they aren't the newest thing. Once the set's First Edition has run out, they print them in Unlimited Editions which are WAY cheaper. A booster box of Welcome to Rathe (the first set of the game) Unlimited Edition is FIFTY DOLLARS for 24 packs of 15 cards each - the exact same specs as Magic: the Gathering draft booster boxes but for literally like half of the price.
    Now, it's important to mention you don't get any of the fancy Cold Foil printings of any cards in the Unlimited print runs, but if you're just looking for cards that you need to play with? Waaaaay cheaper AND you still get the gacha-game high of cracking a booster pack.

    • @doodimgood
      @doodimgood 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Pls give a Fyendal's Spring Tunic Lol :)

    • @hazavair5755
      @hazavair5755 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      That's because FAB is a stock market pretending it's a card game, aiming directly at all of the mtgfinance people.

    • @doodimgood
      @doodimgood 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hazavair5755 Mtg hold out coping that Fab is the scam and not the pump and dump scam that wotc has been pulling off for the last few years.

    • @xolotltolox7626
      @xolotltolox7626 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      FaB does reprints in white border, that should be enough to tell your their reprint policy is doo doo

  • @colgatelampinen2501
    @colgatelampinen2501 ปีที่แล้ว

    Magic foils used to be good, but their quality plummeted some time ago. I still remember when there was Legacy tournament where player played Kess, dissident mage and their opponent immediately called judge about marked cards and indeed so it was ruled. Opponent also wanted to play Kess in that tournament, but as it was only printed in foil couldn't find noncurled Kess to play and knew that opponent's card must have been curled as well. After that tournament there was rules change about issuing proxies for cards that only have foil prints.

  • @imwithyou38
    @imwithyou38 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    in my whole time in yugioh there has been 1 single time that i got a judged called on my for sleeves that were a lil old but they obivously has no noticeable pattern to mark the cards.....i was on the top table undefeated at an sjc and my asshole opponent called a judge over on me for a lil more than slighted used slevves because i preferred how older sleeves shuffled and how i processed thinking because i have to keep my hands busy so i shuffle my cards a lot and there is many times in the past ive dropped a card face up due to slick sleeves even if they wee matte. i was 6-0 the dude was an asshole the whole game. there was nothing more than i wanted to destroy him first game and then destroy him 2nd game by causing him to put in several hard bricks in his hard due to how my deck functioned and the extremely common side deck cards to take advantage of it which i did which then have i looked him in the eye and said good game while flipping over half my side deck that got sided out every 2nd game. this was at sjc long beach and there was 2 sjcs over a month time that the deck i was playing was legal. one of the pro players i knew from other sjcs and he topped with a deck(kris maroivich i think was his name it was along time ago) so i played what was a creation of my teammate and then i changed 3 cards in the deck as i was known for playing monarch among people on the west coast and some of the bigger players because i built several monarchs decks on spot for 2 different people and they both got top 8m which myu dude threw me his box of prize support for building it for him the day before gencon anahiem. anyways what my deck was triple thest, 2 drop off, 3 time deal, reaper, several mask of darkness to lock them out so every 2nd game i would sided in at least 8 cards every game and sometimes i sided up to 12....so after that ga,e when i took half of my side deck out and and purposely flipped over 3 thestalos, 2 drop off, 1 mod, reaper, then there was a few more cards that fit within those cards specifically the guy literally got up and threw his chair in anger because in game 2 when he saw some different cards and then he ended up drawing 3 tribute dark world months which 1 he tributed over because i put in sand worm and he couldnt get over it. the amount of anger he got have 2 games that i beat him in less than 10 mins between both games i had never seen a player so fucking mad in my life......,my only loses were to the person who won the tourny and adam "i love to stack my deck corn" who draws 4 out of the exact same 6 cards in both games but it wasnt known he was a cheater yet. my lose to the guy who due to the new sleeves my cards clumped together super hard even after pile and clean shuffle.......1 game i didnt draw a single monster but 1 monarch in 11 draws in a deck with 21--22 monsters. i draw 3 monsters in 2 games.......i hate new fucking sleeves

  • @frisodenijs
    @frisodenijs ปีที่แล้ว

    I had to pause on the Roe v Wade screenshot to read it, but I refuse to google it for verification to protect what little faith in humanity I have left...

  • @unaffectedbycardeffects9152
    @unaffectedbycardeffects9152 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    17 seconds from upload, damn. Didn't even get notified.

  • @phorchybug3286
    @phorchybug3286 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Simple. There's no boring useless lands.
    Mana is fine. As long as it's not stupid crap like land or energy.

  • @kye4216
    @kye4216 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Maybe I just got a bad batch but I bought a few structure decks and they curled like crazy.

  • @chilvistempler8369
    @chilvistempler8369 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I LOVE YUGIOH

  • @chrismcdonald6079
    @chrismcdonald6079 ปีที่แล้ว

    The dice, coins, and deck boxes are just added to the cost of entry if you think about it

  • @Elleraiser
    @Elleraiser 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    i'd watch the shit out of naruto the card game content

  • @codeofzero1
    @codeofzero1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Ok one for both
    For magic the commander format is just the best format for any card game
    Yugioh the willingness to reprint more but wizard are getting better but it is taken time

    • @eleonarcrimson858
      @eleonarcrimson858 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      “The best format” that sounds subjective as hell

    • @TheoJay615
      @TheoJay615 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'd say "most popular"

    • @codeofzero1
      @codeofzero1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TheoJay615I love commander before it was cool lol

    • @iBloodxHunter
      @iBloodxHunter 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@eleonarcrimson858 You uh, not from around the Mtg community eh?

    • @eleonarcrimson858
      @eleonarcrimson858 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@iBloodxHunterdoes that matter?

  • @xelic1996
    @xelic1996 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The reprint system doesn't even make the game much more affordable because right after they reprint it they make a new ultra special better version of it.

  • @BorksBonur
    @BorksBonur 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    As a player of both, more on the side of magic. The reprint policy yugioh has is so much better, anything good rarely gets reprinted in magic.

  • @ryanchase9332
    @ryanchase9332 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I mean, YGO can be cheaper... to an extent... eventually. Unless you want to play the best deck in the format (AKA one of the newest). In which case you're throwing down $80-90 a pop on the Secret Rare that makes the deck work.
    That's what drove me away from YGO. Locking the most powerful and needed card for decks designed to the best in the format at Secret Rare.

    • @like17badgers
      @like17badgers 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      yeah that's my biggest problem with yugioh, if you want just one deck and plan to stick with it, you can get it for cheap, but if you want to keep up with relevant decks in the meta you have so constantly be shelling out new cards. but once those cards are not meta relevant anymore now THEY are cheap and you're out however much you spent
      meanwhile I've got a Cpt Jhoira edh deck that I sleeved up 4 years ago, I've added maybe 3 cards since then and it's still competitively relevant and is worth almost the same as when I sleeved it

    • @luminous3558
      @luminous3558 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      People are out here playing Tear without the field spell because even without it the deck is still insane even if its weaker than full power.
      Unless you are actually competing at a high profile tournament with intention to go far there isn't really a need to go full ham on the best version of the best deck.

    • @AlluMan96
      @AlluMan96 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The fucked up part is that even with that considered, MTG decks still are orders of magnitude more expensive. You might be throwing down 300-400$ on a Tearlament deck right now, but if you want a competitive Magic deck, you're spending anything between 800-2000$ on those bastards.

    • @ryanchase9332
      @ryanchase9332 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@AlluMan96 Depends on the format. Standard may be in a rough patch, but a deck is only around $400 (Only right?). Modern and Legacy are exponentially more expensive, but Legacy in particular is dying because so many people have been priced out of the format. Commander just depends on who you're playing against the most. People who want cEDH 10/10 kill you on 4 with Force of Will backup will spend 2000-4000 dollars, but a good fun deck to play that still wins a lot can be under $500 (with most of the cards being format staples).

    • @AlluMan96
      @AlluMan96 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ryanchase9332
      The problem with Standard tends to be it's limitations and it's temporary nature. A standard deck is all well and good and is generally how I would recommend people get into Magic, because it is the most affordable at a casual level, but the inevitable will come and they'll have to adapt when the format shifts. Once your deck is phased out of Standard, that deck will be competing in Modern, Vintage and Legacy mostly, at which point your deck will suffer from the fact that deckbuilding is just so very different in these formats. This leaves you with either keeping up with Standard, which means a new deck every cycle or you migrate your deck into the older formats, but the investment will still cost you due to needing staples to keep up with it's much more aggressive pace.
      Of course, on the more casual level, things look different between the games and the answer is more up in the air. You can get into Pauper really cheap in MTG, but you're just gonna have to accept that it's a very different beast. You can generally also make some goofy shit in YGO for very cheap. I have plans to make a Ghostrick/Penguin flip monstrosity and the grand majority of the cards in that package is like under 50c each. I think on that lower end of the scale, YGO generally wins out and where this perception of YGO being cheaper comes from. It's generally cheaper to make a casual deck that still has some choice staples and budget equivalents of said staples (Thank you Solemn line for being more than just judgement) than it is to get a functional MTG deck with a relative budget.

  • @indigo1296
    @indigo1296 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The sharking issue in MTG lies in their rules team. The behavior would die out real fast if they were punished, but a history of cheaters/angle shooters getting away with it have normalized the behavior.

  • @pandapig192
    @pandapig192 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The amount of Yu gi oh players just being straight up wrong in that thread and these comments is insane. They are literally just making up shit. Yu gi oh players, you don't understand rotation lol. MTG has more cards, not less. Not saying no good points were made, but yu gi oh players don't understand other card games at all. To be fair though, they don't even understand Yu gi oh. (The dire first turn comment especially hurt, google is not hard to use, yall)

    • @luminous3558
      @luminous3558 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Mtg has a lot more worthless cards yes. Standard is pretty much printing 99% garbage that will not see play after 2 years in any eternal format.
      Yugioh is printing around 3 archetypes per set that can be playable at various levels of competition way past their release.

    • @pandapig192
      @pandapig192 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@luminous3558 this makes me wonder if you play either game, tbh. Mtg players have been complaining abiut too many cards making it into eternal formats and yu gi oh has a ton of joke/chaff cards. Most card games have a fair bit of them. I think you are being generous with how many viable archetypes release per set

    • @kichiroumitsurugi4363
      @kichiroumitsurugi4363 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@pandapig192 Well, at least it was that way in TOSS format. Still miss it to this day

    • @darkira2129
      @darkira2129 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Kevin Hamill I mean if konami do want to sell new sets, probably they gonna make they new set better. Since the standard format in yugioh is the eternal formal, yugioh kinda have power creep problem. Also the joke cards in Yugioh since like you have so many tech card, so many engine, some people actually try to make gimmick deck... like the "joke" cards is really fun.

  • @sunlightgamer8431
    @sunlightgamer8431 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is it sad that as a magic player i immediately knew what set those curled foils were from based of the curl angle?

  • @Salacavalini
    @Salacavalini 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The lack of mana. I'd genuinely rather deal with degenerate combo decks, than be told I don't get to play the game because I didn't draw a mountain, or drew too many mountains, or don't have enough mountains for all of the cards in my hand.

    • @zztzgza
      @zztzgza 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      First of all, if you build an mtg deck without enough resources to play your cards you're just bad at deckbuilding. Second, mtg decks, even casual ones don't need more than 4 lands to do anything big or cool or impactful. Third, there is so much mana ramp in mtg that it's hard to believe that the game suffers from lack of mana or lack of resources to play cards. A problem that is more common in mtg is mana flooding rather than being mana screwed.

    • @Salacavalini
      @Salacavalini 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@zztzgza Didn't ask, thanks. It's just not an element of the game I like or care to think about, you don't need to persuade me otherwise.

    • @luminous3558
      @luminous3558 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@zztzgza Still sucks and its why every other resource based cardgame has moved away from locating energy in the deck, or in the case of pokemon just lets you draw a billion cards to alleviate any issues.

    • @iBloodxHunter
      @iBloodxHunter 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Salacavalini Yawn, a brick is a brick. Git gud scrub.

  • @OriginalDad
    @OriginalDad 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The comments on this video just reinforce my belief that most Yugioh players don't play any other card games.

    • @kichiroumitsurugi4363
      @kichiroumitsurugi4363 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      When the difference is as staunchly different as YGO compared to other TCGs, it's not hard to see why

  • @goozilla132
    @goozilla132 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    >chain links are easier to grasp than mtg's stack
    Hyuuuuge ygo L.

    • @OriginalDad
      @OriginalDad 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Dude. Stacking blocks on top of each other and then taking them off one at a time is way too complicated. It would take a genius to figure that out!

    • @goozilla132
      @goozilla132 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@OriginalDad that's literally the mtg stack but you can't miss timing or start another chain.
      Ygo is I'm going to build a stack of blocks but midway I'm going to build another stack so my opponent can't respond directly to the last block of the first stack and also I can miss timing of stacking blocks.
      Sounds like a ygo L.

    • @OriginalDad
      @OriginalDad 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@goozilla132 I know. I was agreeing with you. I hate how chains work.

    • @goozilla132
      @goozilla132 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@OriginalDad myb dude

    • @luminous3558
      @luminous3558 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Chains are so much better.

  • @TheProfesorZ
    @TheProfesorZ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    In the end though the Pokemon tcg is better than both Magic and Yugioh

    • @like17badgers
      @like17badgers 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      1. who asked
      2. outside of the aftermarket's hilarious predatory nature for ptcg, anything to back that statement up

    • @TheProfesorZ
      @TheProfesorZ 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@like17badgers though I originally made this comment to see how many yugioh and magic nutters would come complaining I'll humor you and give you the pros of ptcg.
      1. Pokemon has several formats that are all competitively supported allowing for a wide variety of ways to play
      2. Though you say the ptcg market is predatory I'd argue that all tcg markets are now a days. Pokemon though has been releasing increasingly impressive products that allow for easy access to competitive play and now that things are calming down unless your activity collecting cards the markets not bad foe competitive play.
      3. Decks for standard play are usually $100 or less and like yugioh once you build one deck you uselly have the staple cards to build many others
      4. The whole rotation vs. no rotation thing is an argument that will rage till the end of time but Pokemons rotation is a staple to the game which allows for cards to be designed more freely without constant fear that standard ( the most represented format) will die because of a card made 15 years ago
      5. Pokemon tournaments provide both trinkets for participating and cash prizes for top 64 ( though as of late there have been calls for the cash prizes to be increased) there's also travel rewards which can help with the expenses of travel

  • @YGOHERO
    @YGOHERO 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    We are actually playing a fun game

    • @trippersigs2248
      @trippersigs2248 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yugioh is a fun game. It's a shame that players don't get to actually enjoy it.

    • @ttkrystal8329
      @ttkrystal8329 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@trippersigs2248 their choice completely

  • @SepherOfFire
    @SepherOfFire 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I could never get into Magic cause chain resolution was too hard-wired into my brain
    "Wtf do you mean you add something on top we already decided how this interaction was gonna resolve"

  • @lack_of_reality
    @lack_of_reality 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Did we do Pokémon TCG vs YuGiOh yet? Next twitter thread perhaps? Would love that or Digimon TCG vs YuGiOh

  • @AndrewCrimefighter
    @AndrewCrimefighter 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Someone did reverse engineer the naruto tcg, it's called "Primal"

  • @gerharddamm5933
    @gerharddamm5933 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Roe V Wade post was WILD.

  • @ellabill8967
    @ellabill8967 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Man is spitting absolute facts about the Naruto ccg Bandai pls reboot it was perfect.

  • @imwithyou38
    @imwithyou38 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    master duel is hands down not a real gotcha, they made cards accessable even if u dont pull them unlike hearthstone. the amount of dust and gems you get. i havent spent a single sent, and i have 3-4 no comprised meta decks and i only play a lil

  • @byssted
    @byssted 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    the spamton fade in? glorious. dire you get me fr

  • @kenosgaming9937
    @kenosgaming9937 2 ปีที่แล้ว +207

    The big appeal with yugioh for me is trap cards. You can have untapped lands in MTG, you can have unspent mana in Runeterra, you can have secrets in Hearthstone but none of them have the energy of a face down spell trap in yugioh.

    • @dontmisunderstand6041
      @dontmisunderstand6041 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      In MTG, untapped lands with card-in-hand is functionally identical to trap cards, though I'd admit it doesn't have the same psychological impact as literally seeing a card on the table. You have to know things to understand your opponent might be baiting you in MtG, in Yugioh it's obvious.

    • @Razr750
      @Razr750 2 ปีที่แล้ว +59

      There is nothing better than shouting "YOU'VE ACTIVATED MY TRAP CARD!" at your friends. lol

    • @iBloodxHunter
      @iBloodxHunter 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Lol just put your counterspells facedown and fabricate that energy.

    • @cephery8482
      @cephery8482 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@dontmisunderstand6041 nah traps hit harder, if your mana flooded you’ll have untapped lands and cards in hand and be harmless. There is in theory (although bluffing exists in practise) no good reason to set a dead spell card. It’s like a declaration of power.

    • @dontmisunderstand6041
      @dontmisunderstand6041 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@cephery8482 1, I already said most of that, and 2, there are a lot of very good reasons to set a "dead" spell card.

  • @TengoSuenho
    @TengoSuenho 2 ปีที่แล้ว +586

    Something that I always thought is very interesting of YuGiOh archetypes is that they almost feel like a fighting game character. You not only have a favorite, you have Mains. You not only love their intricacies, interaction and combos, but also their personalities, their feel, their vibes. This is part of the reason why whe associated archetypes to certain content creators, tho not having rotating formats also helps with that.

    • @YohananYGO
      @YohananYGO 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      But sadly archetypes are not made equally strong :( look at forgotten archetypes like ursarctic and vernusylph

    • @TengoSuenho
      @TengoSuenho 2 ปีที่แล้ว +87

      @@YohananYGO Just like fighting game characters XD

    • @ether2275
      @ether2275 2 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      @@YohananYGO Forget that and can we talk about the injustice that's been done to my boy Summoned Skull. Such an iconic and meta impactful card like Summoned Skull you'd expect go get tons of support right? Wrong, instead we get tons of useless Dark Magician and Red-Eyes support that are better in other decks than their own archetypes. I mean I get it, they're anime fan favorites but come on now. Summoned Skull was alot of kid's favorite monster from the show and it had actual meta relevance. And all it has gotten so far are trash ass extra deck versions of itself like the level 6 Synchro one. Cards like Summoned Skull and Jinzo I believe deserve some much needed attention.

    • @YohananYGO
      @YohananYGO 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@ether2275 I like the art on the ritual and xyz ones so much

    • @JudojugsVtuber
      @JudojugsVtuber 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@YohananYGO day 3437 of waiting for more majespecter and monarch support.

  • @maxumusjesus
    @maxumusjesus 2 ปีที่แล้ว +145

    I'm surprised nobody said that Yu-Gi-Oh has Elemental HERO Clayman with his clay body built-to-last and how he'll preserve his Elemental HERO colleagues at any cost.

    • @Dori_Dorifto
      @Dori_Dorifto ปีที่แล้ว +10

      true

    • @Brawler_1337
      @Brawler_1337 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That would dredge up too many bad memories.

  • @AiEbihara
    @AiEbihara 2 ปีที่แล้ว +333

    As a storm player in mtg the reason I love yugioh is that every deck is storm with past in flames

    • @bobbywalker2980
      @bobbywalker2980 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yugioh is better.

    • @thestormtrooperwhocanaim496
      @thestormtrooperwhocanaim496 2 ปีที่แล้ว +74

      @@bobbywalker2980 depends on what you want. Mtg has multiple formats that are official. Ygo only got one. Ygo has archetypes and anime art. Mtg is western and has playstyles over archetypes. Ygo is cheaper than mtg at a competitive level. But mtg has a deeper card pool to mess with. Both has stinky player bases but also fun people that are not so stinky. So really it comes down to flavor.
      I play both. Ygo is fun as a pick up game. Mtg has better budget competitive power. But i hit locals for both.

    • @bobbywalker2980
      @bobbywalker2980 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@thestormtrooperwhocanaim496 cap

    • @ashikjaman1940
      @ashikjaman1940 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      @@bobbywalker2980 mediocre b8

    • @bobbywalker2980
      @bobbywalker2980 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ashikjaman1940 go phone scame someone

  • @Ragnarok540
    @Ragnarok540 2 ปีที่แล้ว +67

    Master Duel really is free to play. You could spend money if you want to build a deck quickly. Or you just do all missions daily and still be able to build a good number of different decks, but you have to be patient, I have been doing the later and it works.

    • @JudojugsVtuber
      @JudojugsVtuber 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      this for sure. I have like 6-7 decks built including decently meta decks like SwordSoul, adamancipator, and Shaddoll Invoked Branded Despia (if i could pull a single branded fusion instead of 6 borrelend dragons...) as well as stuff like Tellarknights, Pend magician, Traptrix, and Majespecter. All this and I frequently take month or so long breaks from the game and don't even grind ranked that often.

    • @xCorvus7x
      @xCorvus7x ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JudojugsVtuber Does Master Duel have a trading mechanic?

    • @JudojugsVtuber
      @JudojugsVtuber ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@xCorvus7x nope but all the cards are craftable so if you need a specific card it's not too terribly grindy to get. The worst crafting material investment you have to make it for staples like handtraps and boardbreakers. But I got by just fine for awhile with just a few good handtraps and some structure decks. They have much better structure decks out now too. Salamangreat and Dragonmaid give you two solid tier 2.5-3 decks that can steal wins from the big bois and give you lots of cards you could use in other decks.

    • @xCorvus7x
      @xCorvus7x ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JudojugsVtuber Right, I forgot about the crafting mechanic ^^'
      With so many Borrelends you should have enough material for one or two Branded Fusions so you wouldn't have a use for a copy of mine traded for a Borrelend (at first glance it seemed like an easy way for me to get a Dragon Link boss monster).

    • @Dori_Dorifto
      @Dori_Dorifto ปีที่แล้ว +1

      true, through all the time i've played MD i got, symphonic warriors, dinomist, infinitrack, earth machine, malefic, raidraptor, T.G. vendreads, swordsoul, flunderzee, timelords, mekklords therions and many more without spending money

  • @bioniclelegend7
    @bioniclelegend7 2 ปีที่แล้ว +220

    One thing I am surprised was not mentioned was the extra deck. I love how at all times both players can have a tool box they can access to do other plays without always relying on the out being the in the deck. I find yugioh is some of the most fun when I am looking into my extra looking for a play to be made. Of course this can be double edged sword when cards get too generic like halq and verte.

    • @sirtart7043
      @sirtart7043 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Magic does have wish cards which makes it some what similar in feeling.

    • @zztzgza
      @zztzgza 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Mtg has a sideboard that is accessible with mechanics on main deck cards, also the companion mechanic exists, and a new set is coming out that will add more extra decks to mtg.

    • @hannessteffenhagen61
      @hannessteffenhagen61 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      @@sirtart7043 Yes, although they're typically not really "generic" and require a lot more work to make use of than EDs in yugioh. Not to mention that anything you can wish in MTG you could've just put into your deck in the first place, so it's more like an improved way to play situationally good garnets than a comparison with the ED.

    • @Ghost26968
      @Ghost26968 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Magic created the companion mechanic, which is the closest to the extra deck we've ever gotten, and it broke multiple formats, required a sweeping errata to nerf them, and ultimately got the best companion banned almost across the entire board. No thanks, don't want the extra deck.

    • @Y0G0FU
      @Y0G0FU 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Well the Extra Deck now is not a toolbox its essentially an extension of your Hand that doesnt care about your hand size limit. In most games i see people summon 5+ Monsters out of the Extra as part of their bread and butter combo. the other 10 are situational removal, extra copies of important Combo Pieces or Prosperity fodder to get that sweet carddraw.

  • @BadData45
    @BadData45 2 ปีที่แล้ว +153

    they have since changed the naming cards with pithing needle and other cards like it by adding a rule thats says as long as both you and your opponent know what card your referring to they cant shark like that anymore. in fact it was in response to this exact situation

    • @WhipLash42o
      @WhipLash42o 2 ปีที่แล้ว +55

      Yeah it was changed due to Bob Huang scumming Bradley Carpenter in a Modern Open. Carpenter named Borbyrygmos with his Pithing Needle, when the correct target was Borbyrygmos, Enraged (these are 2 totally different cards). The issue here, is that there is absolutely zero chance Bob Huang couldn't have known that Carpenter didn't mean Borb Enraged, why? Because his decklist was open, Carpenter knew the entirety of it, there was zero trick or surprise that could have caused him to misunderstand what he was naming.

    • @GenesisAkaG
      @GenesisAkaG 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      There were numerous other sharking incidents in magics history. Like going into battle, skipping mandatory pre-battle effects, and probably quite a few more that escape me at the moment.

    • @aliesterus1.023
      @aliesterus1.023 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@GenesisAkaG How... How common are these? Yu-Gi-Oh rule sharking can get absurd, but I'm almost certain it's not as common as some of the stories that I'm seeing be put up for MTG are implying.

    • @mattr791
      @mattr791 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      @@aliesterus1.023 its just a difference in culture. in mtg if you forget a mandatory trigger it just whiffs and you get nothing compared to yugioh where its responsibility of *both* players to maintain legal gamestate so if someone forgets a trigger u can usually roll back the gamestate to fix an error

    • @LegendLeaguer
      @LegendLeaguer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      @@GenesisAkaG that skipping start-of-combat thing was really more of the judges sharking the player. They ruled that the *way* he said he wanted to go to combat was a "shortcut" and thus skipped past the time where he would be able to activate his triggers, even though he basically said to activate his triggers in the same breath as going to battle. And this was done to someone in English to who spoke English as a second language

  • @victikirby15
    @victikirby15 2 ปีที่แล้ว +123

    I’ve always liked how YuGiOh has a good balance between cute anime girls and badass dragons. Unlike MtG, it appeals to my inner weeb, but it’s still a game I wouldn’t be ashamed to show to my peers, unlike something like Cardfight Vanguard.

    • @Thestar17x
      @Thestar17x 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      There is a card in one of the "newer" sets of mtg done by the artist of fist of the north star

    • @ether2275
      @ether2275 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      Just waifus and dragons? We have so much more! We have warriors of all kinds, samurais, wizards, demons, secret agents, time traveling thieves, dragons, maids, dragonmaids, vtubers, crazy space robots, star wars x wizard of oz, pirates, zombies, myutants, scary plants and cute plants, scary animals and cute animals and even fucking house appliances. This game is stacked with creativity when it comes to card design and archetype ideas. It's a game where Melffy and Vendread are both a thing.

    • @cephery8482
      @cephery8482 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      I play 3 decks, fighter plane birds, gundam bears and literal capitalist monarchy running demons.

    • @HazeEmry
      @HazeEmry 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@ether2275 not only that, a lot of archetypes have stories and lore in their art. Some interspersed throughout random cards (Freed and Inpachi, that one little sad goblin kid, Different Dimension) and some with multiple Archetypes (Duel Terminal and World Legacy)

    • @eugenechaud4966
      @eugenechaud4966 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I'm sure your peers definitely wouldn't judge you for playing Traptrix

  • @manjoumethunder6282
    @manjoumethunder6282 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    ok, I might be a little bit late to the comment section, but I am surprised that not many people are talking about the summoning mechanics
    like, yeah, mtg does have split cards and double sided cards which are kinda cool, but like yugioh has fusion, synchro, xyz, pendulum and link
    in mtg you get to what, evolve a card, or flip it to other side when the day phase changes or whatever and that is it
    in yugioh you get to
    -use this spell card to fuse two of your monsters into a different stronger monster which is just summoned and does not need to be in your hand or deck, it is somewhere else
    -use this tuner monster to tune it to a non tuner monster and add their levels together to bring out a high level powerfull monster made by two low level weak monsters
    -accel synchro even...like, I do know it is only an anime thing but when you get to synchro on your oponents turn there is always that small reminder to yusei doing it while epic theme was playing and bringing out this cool looking dragon
    -stack two same level monsters on top of each other to xyz summon a monster on top of those two monsters
    -use a spell card to rank up an xyz monster, so stack another stronger, higher rank monster on top of that xyz monster you already have
    -place those two special monsters in spell/trap zones where monsters shouldnt normaly be and pendulum summon monsters from your hand or face up extra deck of which level is higher than the low scale and lower than the high scale
    -link summon by linking off some other monsters to get out this monster in this special zone that players share and that points at your field and monsters it points to have special benefits from it
    Yugioh summoning methods just have so much more personality
    though I might be wrong because my mtg knowledge is limited, so someone can correct me if I am

    • @Zero3384
      @Zero3384 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      as a MTG player...played for about 20 or more years, but the main difference is that first off....in Yugioh, you can have only 5 creatures in play....in MTG, you can assemble an army with a vast number of abilities
      sure there's really only one real summoning mechanic
      "i tap 1 swamp and 2 other lands...i play this creature"
      simple and straight forward, but then we have morph creatures which you cast face down and then pay the morph cost to flip them face up and trigger their abilities...there's also transforming creatures which when you reach a certain requirement....they more or less evolve into brand new creature or even a powerful spell....some monsters even join a legion and share abilities with each other....Slivers are a MTG nightmare because think Xenomorphs...for every Sliver in play, they all get that much stronger due to their ability to share strengths with one another...IE: all slivers get flying....all slivers have haste....all slivers can not be blocked
      it's not so much about the summoning as it is about each ability you can trigger....i once played a goblin deck...goblins are fast and aggressive, most of my goblins had abilities that let me fill my field with goblins in 1-2 turns simply by either playing them....attacking with them....or tapping them for an ability...by turn 3, my opponent may have 2-3 creatures while i have 6-7 goblins
      in yugioh...obviously, monsters that have large attacks or board clearing strengths are king (forgive me if I am sounding stupid, haven't played Yugioh in almost 20 years)
      In MTG, sure big hitters are great...but so are how many you have and what you can do with them

    • @xolotltolox7626
      @xolotltolox7626 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@Zero3384consideting how many ESH games just devolve into people having every inch of their playmat covered in tokens, maybe there should be a limit to how many creatures you can have

    • @Zero3384
      @Zero3384 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      probably....especially since in MTG, there are infinite creature creation methods
      for example: splinter twin which allows one to tap a creature to create a copy of that creature with all abilities
      throw it on a creature that can untap itself and spend the next hour creating creature tokens that can attack that turn
      with 1 spell, you can create an infinite number of attackers@@xolotltolox7626

    • @aislaksana3222
      @aislaksana3222 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@Zero3384 well actually yu gi oh card that have less attack are more warry since they alway got effect that really powerfull, so its not only about buffing your attack point of one card, but in the advance yu gioh play its how to negate your oponnent play, and making your opponent can't play, yu gi oh even have many card with 0 attack and defence point but got in the meta, even yu gi oh have card that by only having it in your hand you will win because of it,
      i mean yu gi oh in modern days have really much playstyle depending of the archtype ,same like others tcg games, but the major diff is yu gi oh take card combo more advance and with infinite card building there are infinite possibilty deck and play to make in yu gi oh

    • @Zero3384
      @Zero3384 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@aislaksana3222 Again...I'm not going to pretend I know the ins and outs of Yugioh....I last played it back in like 2001
      I was just replying to the original poster and his opinions of MTG's summoning mechanics and how he seemed to just gloss over and simplify it which I didn't think was very fair

  • @RunicSigils
    @RunicSigils 2 ปีที่แล้ว +117

    YGO cards curl as well. It's literally just how the foiling reacts to humidity.
    There's a reason I keep every playset of Super or above in toploaders and it's so they aren't curled by the end of the week of opening the pack.

    • @Insulin_Ingo
      @Insulin_Ingo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +49

      That's true, but mtg cards are extreme on the curling. Doesn't even have to be humid

    • @delta3244
      @delta3244 2 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      I mean, you've just demonstrated one reason why Yu-Gi-Oh!'s foils are superior: you can rely on your cards not being curled out of the pack.

    • @l.schraier4515
      @l.schraier4515 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      I have foil yugioh cards I've owned since grade school that are still in good condition despite basically just sitting in a shoebox for a decade. Meanwhile every foil magic card I own needs to go through a special five step containment process or it becomes a half-pipe within a week.

    • @TheArcv2
      @TheArcv2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      The problem with MTG foils is the quality of the card board , it just can't stand up to the curling force of the foil layer meaning it come out of the pack curled

    • @mat99rich
      @mat99rich 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      A few sets that came out I believe in 2015 from MTG the cards were so badly curled that they made the actual packs bend. Making it where the cards that were not even foil be bent. That is what MBT was talking about. And after like 2009 the card stock that WotC started using was sub par. It is something MTG players have been complaining about well over a decade. The sad part is Pokemon cards are made on better card stock which makes MTG fans even more mad.

  • @Asmodean1111
    @Asmodean1111 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Thank you for agreeing that Chain vs stack is dumb. Coming from MTG, it's just weird to know that chain blocking is a thing and kind of makes control decks not as playable as they might be in MTG. What do you mean I can't just stop that effect because you have two different things happening at once and decided that one I want to stop is C1.
    Also MTG finance is aids and hurts the older formats to the point I expect in the next 5 to 10 years that Vintage to be unplayable in person.

    • @countjondi9672
      @countjondi9672 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Vintage is already unplayable for the vast majority of people my guy, the cheapest meta deck on MTGGoldfish is still 34,000´$+ in paper

    • @ixchel3330
      @ixchel3330 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      It's wild to me that, because every vintage deck plays things like lotus and ansestral recal, the number of vintage decks that can exist at any one time is in the thousands.

    • @Ms666slayer
      @Ms666slayer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well the thing about the number of decks being limited because of the number of cards is true in theory and false in practice, there this thing that people will allow proxies of the cards in Vintage if you can prove you own the cards that even applies in tournament in order to protect the card from damage, si if you have 1 black Lotus you can build a million decks with black Lotus if you use that many proxies, most Vintage played build lots of decks because of that, and only use their real valuable cards on their favorite deck or sometimes never

  • @adrianluna346
    @adrianluna346 2 ปีที่แล้ว +62

    As someone who plays both YuGiOh and MtG, a chain is so much easier to understand. In magic you can add cards to the stack while the stack is resolving. In YuGiOh the only confusing this is “when…you can” effects

    • @Deception975
      @Deception975 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      For me, it's the opposite. It's that missed timing thing that fucks me up. There have been so many times where an effect couldn't be triggered. Because something else was resolving, that had nothing at all to do with the chain, i.e. not a counter. So, for me a stack in MTG is easier to follow.

    • @josephcourtright8071
      @josephcourtright8071 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I greatly suspect that you will think the one you learned first is easier. That being said missing the timing feels way more of a rules gotcha than anything mtg does.

    • @Brawler_1337
      @Brawler_1337 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@josephcourtright8071I learned chains first, but the stack feels so much more intuitive. It feels like you should be able to use Formula Synchron to synchro into Stardust and negate something. Chains don’t let you do this, but the stack would.

    • @grimrapper5202
      @grimrapper5202 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@Brawler_1337 so you can summon any monster without any window of response whatsoever? Sounds dumb to me

    • @Brawler_1337
      @Brawler_1337 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@grimrapper5202 The response window is when the creature spell goes onto the stack. Think of it like every summon starts a chain, with CL1 being the monster you’re summoning. The main difference between the stack and chains is that with the stack, there’s a round of priority before and after every “chain link” where you can add more fast effects onto the stack.

  • @thismonkeyjustworks1255
    @thismonkeyjustworks1255 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Yugioh has more personality than Magic. Like magic artwork look’s really nice, but I also find it generic and could easily get it confused with something else.

  • @Dile0303
    @Dile0303 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    One of the things i love about yugioh is the aura of menace you exhale right after you set 2 or more cards in your spell/trap zone and pass. You don't produce that same presence when you pass the turn with unspent mana
    Also, junks and synchrons. There's just something so damn fun about looking at your hand and then spending an entire turn improvising literally everything until it works out, and then not even remembering what you just did, or how you did it because you had to bullsh*t a combo into existence using what you had

    • @Dori_Dorifto
      @Dori_Dorifto ปีที่แล้ว +6

      when you have no hand or field and u draw a S/T, u set it and ur opponent has no way to pop it, negate it or their monsters cant resist a mirror force is the ultimate psycological game experience

  • @NAAAAAIL
    @NAAAAAIL 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Ive only ever liked yugioh my entire life, some friends were trying to get me into mtg arena and even after I bought the 5 dollar welcome bundle, even after I entered this laundry list of free codes, I STILL couldn't make the deck I wanted to make. master duel came out I had a bewd, eldlich, and numeron deck within a month of the game's release and spent exactly 0 dabloons on it.

    • @Chucky5525
      @Chucky5525 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Spend 1 month in mtg arena and you'll have the same if not more cards. Judging from what you said you didn't spend enough time playing and doing the free missions to get gold and buy packs which in turn give you wild cards to use on any card

    • @Chucky5525
      @Chucky5525 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Looks to me like you went in without the motivation and drive to continue playing

    • @NAAAAAIL
      @NAAAAAIL 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Chucky5525 I went in with the exact motivation I had for master duel. it is a video game at the end of the day and im not gonna force myself to play either. master duel was just objectively more new player friendly with upfront currency. cope more ig.

  • @sharktenko267
    @sharktenko267 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Comparing ygo to magic is like comparing chess to go, both are complicated but in vastly different ways
    Though I do wish mtg would be more aggressive with there reprint policy

    • @PhyrexianFleshgorger
      @PhyrexianFleshgorger 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Shut your mouth. They reprint nonstop and some of us like our $150 boxes to have more EV than 25 bucks.

    • @sharktenko267
      @sharktenko267 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ok i dont care if you like it, nor do i care if your "investment" becomes pennies.@@PhyrexianFleshgorger

    • @xolotltolox7626
      @xolotltolox7626 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      ​@@PhyrexianFleshgorgeraverage magic player intelligence on full display

    • @videogamesarecool9280
      @videogamesarecool9280 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think its more like comparing chess to call of duty: modern warfare 2

  • @drigon100
    @drigon100 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Next Video: What OCG YGO Does Better than TCG YGO
    Main point: OCG has Secret Rares as an alternate rarity in additon to Super rare versions of THE SAME CARDS.
    Unlike us TCG Plebs who get the super rares ripped out and we have to get secret rares.

    • @GodLikesSnacks
      @GodLikesSnacks 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I cannot stand Secret as a rarity! Sure, some of the cards look nice, but in most cases it just ruins the visibility of the picture and makes the art an ugly mess. I prefer UR any time.

    • @StigmaKRL
      @StigmaKRL 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      OCG Ls: VJMP promos still exist in the OCG and depending on where you're from, good luck finding them, and they reprint waaaay less than the TCG so cards are either stupid expensive or hard to find. And then recently there's their obsession with blind boxes (looking at you Secret Shiny Box)

  • @Raminator243
    @Raminator243 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    As unbalanced as modern Yugioh can be, It’s amazing to see decks like Madolche still be playable for YEARS thanks to legacy support. You just don’t get that in a game with set rotation.

    • @DracoX-hz3tu
      @DracoX-hz3tu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      There are a massive amount of MTG formats that don't rotate, to the point where most players are playing non rotating formats these days

    • @Asmodean1111
      @Asmodean1111 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      As said by someone else, there is formats that don't rotate, and thanks to rotation we don't see bans of 10+ year old cards like Smoke grenade due a deck being able to break it.

    • @zztzgza
      @zztzgza 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      You really don't know anything about mtg past the standard format lol

    • @luminous3558
      @luminous3558 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@DracoX-hz3tu Yes and A do those formats get support once every blue moon and B are they all competitive to the point where only really broken decks can even compete.
      Standards existence prevents a lot of legacy support for older decks in exchange for preventing powercreep.
      I don't know how people play any MtG format without being either annoyed at rotation in standard or the insanely stagnant eternal formats.
      Its like if Yugioh was permanently stuck in GX era.

    • @countjondi9672
      @countjondi9672 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@luminous3558 I think you make a fair point, and the biggest answers MTG has for that right now, is that Limited play is really sweet, and Commander is still an incredibly diverse eternal format.

  • @SoloWing88
    @SoloWing88 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Yugioh is a fantasy kitchen sink, where what ever plot can grow. I only started playing again last year but my Exosisters deck runs Super Dora and Gustav max. Supernatual fighting Nuns call in their support a Rail Canon? Only in ygo
    Also I like planes and Yugioh is one of two TCG's with planes in it. Why?

    • @dudono1744
      @dudono1744 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Mfw when the space robot dragons summon a frickin disco ball.

  • @CapnCarlSails
    @CapnCarlSails 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    what kind of bugs me about magic the gathering is definitely a lack of reprinting for cards that should be reprinted.
    example? tropical island. people say this card is too powerful, but I disagree 100%.
    I am actually looking to get into Yu-Gi-Oh, but have no idea how to start.

  • @reinatheomni-panda7028
    @reinatheomni-panda7028 2 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    I love archetypes and I love the design philosophy of the archetypes. I don't think there is a single other game with such a wide breadth of design space and it is amazing. Where Magic feels extremely limited in design where basically everything has to stay within the realms of high fantasy (though that boundary has been pushed more than usual recently) and everything has this one large grandiose overarching story to it, in Yu-Gi-Oh, archetypes can aesthetically be anything or any wild and wacky combination of things and they aren't afraid to have small self-contained things that have absolutely nothing to do with whatever the main story is. Reprints are a big plus obviously and its something Magic needs to learn from. Like, seriously, WotC, listen, you are not a fucking bank. Magic finance people can honestly die in a fire. Way back when WotC decided to implement the Reserve List to appease collectors who just wanted to use Magic to make money rather than, y'know, play a game (because it's a game), they made a deal with the devil, so to speak, in my opinion. Their insistence on retaining the Reserve List despite massive public outcry and doing next to nothing to reprint chase cards in enough quantity for people to actually have access to them makes me honestly want to not play with real cards if at all. Of course, at the rate they're going in Magic, extremely old formats like Legacy are essentially moribund anyway, because sleeve-playable copies of Reserve List cards like original dual lands are in attrition.
    Also, fuck Secret Lairs and Universes Beyond.

  • @tyranitararmaldo
    @tyranitararmaldo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    4:46 Also this. So many MTG "players" do this as an aside, or just don't play and just use the cards for money laundering. They are not fun to have to interact with, especially if they are in your damn workplace all the time...

  • @zeusalternative1270
    @zeusalternative1270 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I play MTG, YGO and Pokemon TCG and the difference between those games is what drives me to play them all and not settle in just 1.

    • @engiopdf8745
      @engiopdf8745 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I envy your mental fortitude for playing Pokemon TCG which has embraced "it's okay bro, it will rotate out" balance mentality in all but name (yes, they allegedly have a banlist, but it's a joke). Getting sacked by Marnie would make me want to commit an act of violence.

    • @cephery8482
      @cephery8482 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And it’s why they’re the big 3. No other games could be. That they all offer something so different that any ‘superior’ game is solely on preference. That’s how they can coexist.

  • @WhatDaHeckIsThat
    @WhatDaHeckIsThat 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Also, Yugioh's community autosims are way better designed and supported than Magic's. With Yugioh, you can just hop on Omega, EDOPro, or even Dueling Nexus, and get a game reasonably easily, and you even get automatic matchmaking in 2/3 of those. With Magic, all of the autosims are filled with archaic bullshit like port forwarding, and they're all dead as a result.
    Of course, this is probably a result of WotC getting in the market early with MTGO, a game designed to cater to the exact cardboard investor shitheads that ruin Magic for everyone else.

  • @SolidChozo
    @SolidChozo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    It's actually astounding how many yugioh players both in that twitter thread and in these comments don't research. Mtg has eternal formats guys, standard is the format with rotation.

  • @posajnejkwahb
    @posajnejkwahb ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The reprint thing I 1000% agree with, and as a Mtg player who dabbles in Master Duel, I'll never drop a 'Komoney' reference or such since comparatively they're altruistic next to Wizards

  • @7thHourFilms
    @7thHourFilms 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Little late on this but for me I love that Yu-Gi-Oh has a defined playmat. Anytime I look at physical MTG, it looks horrendous. Creatures, lands and crap just placed wherever the hell you want and in Commander with 4 players it's an eyesore. YGO has 10 Zones to play in for each player plus 2 extra. Deck, GY, Field Zone, and Extra Deck all in a nice grid. The only thing it needs is a zone for Banished cards but that's pretty minor. I recently got into Pokémon TCG and was very happy to find a similar board. All they need is a zone to activate items/supporters but again it's minor. MTG is a mess and not even sims like Arena really clean it up.

    • @ThermiteKitty
      @ThermiteKitty 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Digimon TCG and its clones like the One Piece TCG are also definitely inspired by YGO's firm playmat, and it makes them so easy to understand.

  • @theradams97
    @theradams97 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Perhaps the single leading reason I couldn't get into MTG is set rotation. If I wanted to play magic I'd be forced to build a brand new deck entirely from scratch every 3 years. Now, in ygo I definitely build decks way more often than 3 years, but I can rotate staples, keep playing as long as the game exists and never once felt like I built the deck just to keep playing the game, but instead because I liked the deck and enjoy playing it

    • @ashutoshmohapatra7320
      @ashutoshmohapatra7320 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Alternate formats exist in Mtg. You don't have to change your deck three years. I still sleeve up my Jund deck from 2012 with a few upgrades here and there. In fact, you don't even have to play Standard (the rotating format). There's like half a dozen non rotating formats in MTG officially supported by WotC.

    • @xolotltolox7626
      @xolotltolox7626 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@ashutoshmohapatra7320yeah, in fact, nobody is playing standard anymore, everyone has junped ship to eternals

  • @lioneart19
    @lioneart19 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Special summons and how common they are, other games feel restrictive in comparison. The lack of a resource to dictate how much you can do definitely seems to set YGO apart. I also love trap cards and how they work.

    • @dudono1744
      @dudono1744 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The thing with ygo is that there is no ramp, so you start on late game. Normal/Pend summons are technically ressources.

  • @OblivionZX
    @OblivionZX 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Archetypes are definitely the biggest draw. I think it's why I loved Slivers and (M12) Illusions in MTG the 2 times I got into it for a while or Lost March in Pokemon TCG; they feel like archetypes because of the gimmick that ties multiple different cards together.

  • @tyranitararmaldo
    @tyranitararmaldo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I never played Magic outside a few drafts but I did have a lot of friends that play and I gotta agree with the sharking. Hooooo boy are MTG players willing to go above and beyond to prove how absolutely they do not want to play MTG in a tournament setting.

  • @MakeVarahHappen
    @MakeVarahHappen ปีที่แล้ว +2

    As a magic player, the worst part of this video was being compared to Lin Manual-Miranda.

  • @DorianTheReaper
    @DorianTheReaper 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    As a fairly casual magic player the thing that drove me away from yugioh was that games are over in 2 to 3 turns. I love grindy strategies that require a few turns to set up and generate an overwhelming amount of resources/damage (think Muldrotha or Wilhelt). I also like the mana system that magic has. I will say that i still love my blackwing deck and that i have many fond memories of yugioh. I like both games but im just more of a mtg player at heart

  • @GG_Nowa
    @GG_Nowa 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I'm amazed mentioned the set names being printed in short like POTE or DANE both easy to search and you get the whole set list easily. Magic and it's icons can jog on they're the most annoying Thing to try remember

  • @Sam-db4xs
    @Sam-db4xs 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Oh my god the fuckin Roe v Wade Reddit post for MTG had me fucking laughing

  • @AZ-rl7pg
    @AZ-rl7pg 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Archetypes are definitely the big win for YGO. It's just unfortunate that mostly thanks to no set rotation/powercreep so many of them quickly become unplayable. For instance when are archetypes like Naturia and Dinomist going to get modern support?

    • @Rairiky
      @Rairiky 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Literally in the next set lol and believe it or not naturia is very likely becoming meta

    • @sobbles6242
      @sobbles6242 ปีที่แล้ว

      i played against a naturia deck and its kinda scarry going first natura beast is io at home and they got some got negate options

  • @Vhuebes
    @Vhuebes 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    whoever is editing these is doing a banger of a job

    • @velphidrow
      @velphidrow 2 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Uncommon dire W

  • @RedsHitpostMedia
    @RedsHitpostMedia ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Some things i like Yugioh over MTG for is its unique archetypes and tribes. Many decks can similar things but each have their own unique way of doing them. The other is the swing potential of games. Even in the anime which it often happens 1 card can literally turn the tides of a match in otherwise impossible situations. MTG you tend to get steamrolled and the situation becomes unrecoverable if you fail to maintain a board. Another huge thing is that Yugioh is essentially Etetnal where cards dont rotate like they do in MTG so you can keep your old decks with minor updates not completely have to revamp everything every 2 years.

  • @pretzschy
    @pretzschy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    All that I've learned from these is someone should slap Joseph with a stack to make him do a TMT on MBT

    • @doodimgood
      @doodimgood 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Donation goal for next charity event, play a game of magic on stream.

    • @krullachief669
      @krullachief669 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Maybe we'll finally have a video of him playing Mono Blue Tron.

    • @dontmisunderstand6041
      @dontmisunderstand6041 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The stack is literally the simplest possible way to chain effects in sequence. It's self-explanatory and 100% intuitive. You just READ THE TOP FUCKING CARD OF THE STACK. That's it, that's the entire way it works.

    • @pretzschy
      @pretzschy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@dontmisunderstand6041 I meant a stack of cash...

    • @DEClimax
      @DEClimax 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@dontmisunderstand6041 ironically, it seems like reading was an issue here

  • @7swordquanta459
    @7swordquanta459 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    1. No need for lands/mana for paying costs. In MTG, cards without mana costs are often expensive and OP. In YGO, zero mana costs are just built-in.
    Then again, this can also be seen as a con in some cases, especially for OP decks.
    2. YGO (personally) is a good starting pt for kids when it comes to understanding complex card interactions. Chains/stacks are pretty much similar in concept. Although stacks in MTG are more free-flowing, the chains in YGO do provide some sort of powerscaling as to what types of cards should resolve first. This can actually help kids understand the logic of complex card interactions that is suited for their age. In my case, I only got into MTG in 2020 (so past my childhood), but I was able to understand stacks better when I somehow think it in terms of chains.

    • @dudono1744
      @dudono1744 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No land and no mana are 2 very different things. You don't get manascrewed/manaflooded in Hearthstone for example.