@@brianlv2682 unfortunately I did not win one. Was certainly disappointed, but happy for those that did. Such a cool piece. Hopefully most are going to true enthusiasts, and not just flippers. Max Busser in an interview noted that they had tried at one time to prevent such flipping, but pointed out that only a small % of sales are flipped like that, and that it wasn’t worth the drain of resources, but did point out that those caught would be noted. The MAD1 launch and raffle process has only made me a bigger fan of Max Busser & team.
Nice! May I know the strap length you chose? I have a 6.25 to 6.3 inches wrist and not sure if I should go with the medium (70x110mm) or the small (60x105mm) size.
Hi. My wrist size is 6.5” and I’m using the medium strap. I’m on the second last hole for tightest position. I think with 6.3” you might be able to use medium on the last hole. If you reduce wrist size, then it will likely get loose. You’re probably better to go with small as the medium strap will just barely cover you (on the last hole). Just my thoughts.
I dont know, seems gimmicky. If you make a watch to show the movement, you better have a nice movement to show. Then, make it manual wind, so the rotor is not blocking the view? The time telling device is at least original, ill concede that, but this is extremely overpriced for the movement alone.
You're not just buying a movement. You're buying much more than that: What you're buying is a unique design for a watch that's been created by a genius in watchmaking.
Thanks for sharing but this is really off for me. Why to put on the dial such of a ugly mechanism, this is to hide not to put on your eyes the all day, moreover it looks as a tower on the wrist, and even reading the time is complex. Also the mechanical engineering in there is really not that impressive, honestly. All in all to me it seems just a useless experiment, unless the aim is just to attract attention and “what is this thing” questions. But again, thanks for sharing something surely not common - and hopefully this thing will remain only a rarity ;)
1) It's not ugly. But of course, you would not know because you've never seen one, let alone, worn one. 2) Reading the time is not complex. If you think it is then you're quite clearly not that bright. 3) If it was is easy to create, why didn't you conceive it? Clearly, this watch is innovative and it's proven by the fact that so many want the watch but only about 450 lucky few can.
Great Video and great watch. So good to see MB combining watch making and art.
As if I haven’t been completely taken by this watch since I first saw it! Great vid per usual.
Great vid!!
Same here! Did you win one ken? I didnt unfortunately
So sad to see the first one on chrono already
@@brianlv2682 unfortunately I did not win one. Was certainly disappointed, but happy for those that did. Such a cool piece. Hopefully most are going to true enthusiasts, and not just flippers. Max Busser in an interview noted that they had tried at one time to prevent such flipping, but pointed out that only a small % of sales are flipped like that, and that it wasn’t worth the drain of resources, but did point out that those caught would be noted. The MAD1 launch and raffle process has only made me a bigger fan of Max Busser & team.
Madder than Mad Jack McMad, the winner of last year's "Mr. Madman" competition.
I'm far too conservative for this watch, but wouldn't knock someone for wanting one. Wonderful review, thank you Hafiz 👍🙂
Love the video and the watch! Has that Richard Mille vibe going. And it’s not six figures! Thanks for all you do
Nice! May I know the strap length you chose? I have a 6.25 to 6.3 inches wrist and not sure if I should go with the medium (70x110mm) or the small (60x105mm) size.
Hi. My wrist size is 6.5” and I’m using the medium strap. I’m on the second last hole for tightest position. I think with 6.3” you might be able to use medium on the last hole. If you reduce wrist size, then it will likely get loose.
You’re probably better to go with small as the medium strap will just barely cover you (on the last hole). Just my thoughts.
@@HafizJMehmood thank you for the suggestion!
Interesting time piece 🇬🇧👍🏻
This watch reminds me of the Perrelet Turbine
somethimg different, something new. liiks very interesting. Thanks for the video
Looks like something that Dr Claw would wear 😉
Anyone ever remember when spinner rims were a thing? In and out.
I just can’t imagine trying to wear this and have a normal conversation with someone.
Its somthing alse and i hope i win on shufle 26.09.23 and by watch im crayzi i cant wait . Only i don't hawe no luck :( but maybe
I was so sad when I got the email that I couldnt buy It.
Watch Movment is not justifying watch price $3000
You know you Indian when you wear striped shirt with jeans 😂😂😂. Great video by the way
too hectic for me otherwise impressive
It’s a thick boy
Why no one on this video wear a belt?
I dont know, seems gimmicky. If you make a watch to show the movement, you better have a nice movement to show. Then, make it manual wind, so the rotor is not blocking the view? The time telling device is at least original, ill concede that, but this is extremely overpriced for the movement alone.
You're not just buying a movement. You're buying much more than that: What you're buying is a unique design for a watch that's been created by a genius in watchmaking.
You do know the movement is refinished.
Thanks for sharing but this is really off for me. Why to put on the dial such of a ugly mechanism, this is to hide not to put on your eyes the all day, moreover it looks as a tower on the wrist, and even reading the time is complex. Also the mechanical engineering in there is really not that impressive, honestly. All in all to me it seems just a useless experiment, unless the aim is just to attract attention and “what is this thing” questions. But again, thanks for sharing something surely not common - and hopefully this thing will remain only a rarity ;)
1) It's not ugly. But of course, you would not know because you've never seen one, let alone, worn one. 2) Reading the time is not complex. If you think it is then you're quite clearly not that bright. 3) If it was is easy to create, why didn't you conceive it? Clearly, this watch is innovative and it's proven by the fact that so many want the watch but only about 450 lucky few can.
Moist
Might as well tape a fidget spinner on your wrist