UK Bad Drivers & Driving Fails Compilation | UK Car Crashes Dashcam Caught (w/ Commentary) #77
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ย. 2024
- ⭐This video featuring driving fails, instant karma, close call, road rage, hit and run, car crashes, good drivers, bad drivers, and many more... This video can be utilized as a learning tool, so the viewers can learn from other mistakes, not their own.
*Driving safely should be your number one concern behind the wheel. Following these defensive driving tips from our videos to improve your own road safety.
⭐Ruby Dashcam Academy provides actual footage of road incidents captured on dash cams. There's a story-line & our own unique contributions (TEXT COMMENTARY & VOICE-OVER) throughout the video. We have also added the special editing effects, trimming, zooming, etc with the footage throughout the compilation. This whole process required our 3-5 days for producing a video.
⭐These videos with own unique contributions can be used as an educational and informative resource for viewers to analyze and evaluate situations, stay alert and get out of a potentially dangerous situation on the road in the future.
⭐Visit our official website for defensive driving tips: rubydashcamaca...
⭐ALL VIDEOS USED WITH LICENSING AGREEMENT FROM COPYRIGHT OWNER!
If we made a mistake or you just want to remove your clip, please let us know here: hannahbruntnell114@gmail.com
⭐Submit your clip for the feature here: rubydashcamaca...
---------
Thank you for watching and stay safe!
#ukdashcam #ukcarcrashes #baddrivers #drivingfails
#1.... it was obvious what was about to happen and you could have avoided the collision by backing out of it. Being stubborn won't get you anywhere.
Came to say the same thing, fix other peoples mistakes and make it a non-event
@@two-countiesdashcam My thoughts exactly. yes the other van was wrong but so was the "cammer" for not easing off and CAUSING the obvious accident. (P.S. I drove lorries for 45+ years)
@@squareggs insurance company could deem you at fault if you can avoid the collision but decide not to.
@@DaveDoc1984 wouldnt the video show the other driver could have equally avoided the collision since they were the aggressor trying to push. imo if youre in the wrong lane you are in the wrong. the cam car had absolutely no obligation to let them in.
@@michaelh7741 but the cammer was on the horn constantly when they could have easily just backed out of it.
0.39 'although my horn was sounding, I could not find the brake pedal'
He found the horn and the accelerator. Hope it was worth the hassle of an accident rather than avoiding said accident. Completely avoidable what a donut
Came to say the same thing, fix other peoples mistakes and make it a non-event
#4 does he also run over pedestrians at zebra crossings? They don't pay (vehicle-related) taxes either.. what an entitlement
Yeah, no wonder he didn't wait for the cyclist, he doesn't think they're legit road users to begin with.
And the cyclist was probably insured (most cycle commuters/regular cyclists are) and pays as much or more tax than the person in the car (they have jobs and most own cars too).
@@benhartley2486ironically he was in a cycle lane too
A bellend driving an Audi. Who'd have thought it?! 🙄🙄
Yeah he needed more than just reeducation. Someone with that type of mentality is deadly in an X ton vehicle.
Side note, as a cyclist I wouldn't actually mind paying for a cyclist tax if it meant we got some proper cycling infrastructure. Separated protected cycle lanes and paths.
6:44 HGV driver had plenty of space and time to slow down even when the black ford pulled in front and you do not see the front end dip until he's roughly 3 cars lengths away. So he's leaving it way too late to slow down in his big rig which he chooses to mention trying to shift the blame across.
Trying to punish other road users for non-issues because he's insecure and thinks attempting to intimidate others with an HGV will bring his ex-wife and kids back.
You do realise heavier vehicles take longer to slow down? Obviously not.
@@garyboyle695I'm pretty sure everyone knows that but this driver had plenty of time to slow down, he just chose not to so he could upload a clip of a non event.
@@garyboyle695 stopping 5m from the car infront while stopping "as fast as he can" is shit driving, which is what would have apparently happened if this other car didnt go infront. it could have stopped earlier by far but choose not to.
ppl here are wild when it comes tot hinking trucks are just these massive lumbering boats that cant see, turn or stop
could have been slowing using the exhaust brake
The first one is on the camera car really.
All he had to do was slow down.
do you always blame the victim of a crime?
@@bestwaytodie1 No.
Do you enjoy having crashes?
@@bestwaytodie1lol, the 'victim' literally had to slow down for 3 seconds but would rather cause a crash! In what world is that normal behaviour?
@@bestwaytodie1 he drove aggressively and dangerously, so yeah. he was mostly to blame for that.
@@lornachapman3870 who broke the law there?
4:17 Blocks the road to call someone a twat. And he thinks he’s in the right🤦🏻♂️
you can see in his wing mirror there's noone waiting behind him. He did absolutely right to call out that bellend driving the van
Not very astute are you, no one behind him and comments may make the driver think twice in pulling such a shitty manoeuvre again.
Hahahahaha we’re gonna need a bigger boat for Mike and Gaz 😂
Excellent tape and situations. At 03:06 I'd have to say "It's an Audi".
0:20 It might have been their mistake but you could have fixed it easily and gone about your day with only a few seconds of delay.
doubt it was a mistake. 70% or higher of these type of mistakes are made intentionally to get ahead in the queue. it should actually be an offense, its worse than speeding.
@@michaelh7741 Agreed.
At 4:32 - I go round that junction multiple times a week (not quite as much as the cammer) and it's such a horrible layout, but the number of people who stop in the middle of the road when there is no giveway is insane. It doesn't show in the clip as well, but the road is also a pretty steep drop down and you can gain a lot of speed without really putting much trottle into your car and the corner is pretty sharp.
We are thinking of getting a dashcam after watching these videos.
Any advice please would be welcome
Then a hero comes along. We'll done for telling van man.
00:15, #1, even the lorry was ashamed of the driving and decided to block the cameras view. Without knowing the roundabout signs, the lorry just drove into the side of the van…
Where I live break check someone, and lose your licence for 5 years. And have to re-take your driving test.
Drivers should be selected at random to retake test. I'm sure that would take the idiots off the road
5:49 scooby chav
03:00, you can park on double yellows to pick up or drop off, loading if aloud, or even if they’re seasonal… But no, let’s block them in on purpose.
Love me some road rage with a British accent👏
What's a British accent?
Clip 1 50:50 blame, pair of numptys.
First one, whilst tailgating car in front to f, could have let van in, decided to crash into him instead then acts like he was in the right.
Clip one, just let him in and avoid the inevitability of a bump.
that last one......hahahahahahaha karma
7:23 As there's an awful driver on the road, an Audi driver can't miss the opportunity to become the dumbest one and make his/her dumb things. It's genetics.
As I've learned on the roads.... Audi= absolutely useless douchebag idiots.
BMW comes in close second as BMW = bitc*, Moron and Wanker.
Stay safe out there, lol.
Lorry drivers , fustrated at their low speeds always trying to catch cars out , always too close and self righteous
#1 - just let them in ffs, now you have weeks of irritations, broken van, etc etc just because you "were in the right" or "its my right of way" - sure it was, no one disputes that, but ffs have some common bloody sense
😂😂😂😂😂😂 I Live in a Beautiful place 🎉 very little traffic and everyone happy 🤪🤪🤪🤪 2:45
Why don’t drivers who get cut up just let it go as opposed to tailgating etc so bloody childish, just chill there’s loads of cars in front of those pricks so forget it.
#1 Sorry, but the cammer could have - should have - given way rather than be involved in an accident. Yes the other driver was at fault, but still, if there' some doubt, then there's the question of what's the right thing to do rather than what's the legal thing to do... Discuss :)
3:32 Get yourself round man. If you were dawdling in front of me, you'd get an earful. You'd get a lot worse if you accosted me like that.
Van driver is a prick there mate, deserves a fucking row just for pulling that flying tit manoeuvre anyways
Interesting that he’s the same guy from a previous video where the same thing happened (albeit after he was sat waiting for an eternity)
If the same thing keeps happening, you are the problem
@@chrisclarke8451No the problem is people like you. I guess you missed the cars coming the other way that the van nearly ran in to.
Results of when the 'simple minded' get behind a steering wheel.
4.30 in. Van man said indicate. If you wasn’t indicating the he may of thought you was parked up. He couldn’t see the parked car. 🛎️
7:18 ok so instant tailgating, cammer is already down 50 points, another 50 off for the rain making it way more dangerous. you cant bitch about what might be a scam when you spread you cheeks that wide ot welcome it
#14 audi drive just being audi drivers
1:57. The cyclist has a flashing front light. I thought that this is dangerous at night. Aren’t the flashing options for front and rear bicycle light for daytime? To make them more visible. At night the flash is distracting, potentially hurts the eyes of other road users and makes it harder to judge the distance to them. Not sure.
It must be terribly disorientating, particularly as you pass them immediately before the left-hand turn you want to take...
Most studies show flashing lights are better.
@@garyboyle695
My observation is that a glashing light in a mirror make it nearly impossible to work out exactly where the light is, unlike a steady one.
A flashing light makes it easier to know it's there, but much harder to know where there it is - an excellent example of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
Cars drive at us cyclists in the dead of night and blind us entirely with their headlights rendering us in danger of being hit due to them driving like maniacs, but sure, a tiny lamp flickering to let drivers know where cyclists are is the problem.
most of those were a non event ! Anybody who considers buying a modern french car should have a compulsory re-test, maybe their guide dog could do the driving.
"modern french car" A Stalantis that make half the cars on the road. I bet you drive a Vauxhall lol
@@cannavaras lol .have to drive old motors to steer clear of the excessive plastic parts.
Emergency diabetes pen in place of the spare tyre.
@@goodyeoman4534 and a pocket for a colostomy bag in the centre console.
2:53 "Perhaps" if you're waiting for lights and something happens that literally doesn't affect you, you behave yourself?
That's a great mantra to live your life by. Idiot.
6:50 if you were going to just stop with 5m to spare from the car infront, you are not a good driver to start with.
The first clip is typical of that roundabout, 2 lanes means the right lane is RIGHT ONLY... The amount of clueless idiots that try the same move
#6 If you just left a gap for them to pull out, instead of being Lord Self Righteous, nothing happens, and yours, and their, day continues unbothered.
or how about don't be an absolute nobhead and park on double yellows against traffic?
I just hate being in that mercedes spot and someone thinks just because they have no hood they can stop 0.2cm from your rear bumper. Couldn't care less about the audi parked like a tit, if the cammer gets rear ended, so does the car in front
You've obviously quoted the wrong clip
#6 or you could have held back and let him out. Wouldn't have inconvenienced you in the slightest
Let's just forget the other driver was parked where he shouldn't have been and against the flow of traffic. Go you.
@@garyboyle695 So? That's no reason to be selfish and obstructive. There are two kinds of people in this world, those who make things better and those who make things worse, I guess you're in the latter group along with the cammer from that clip.
I quit driving trucks in February after 25 years of this shit.
The state of some of the comments which are adamant its a "merge in turn" in the first video.
Look it up for yourself on google maps: Its the roundabout at Winchester Trade Park, Easton Ln, Winchester SO23 7FA
Look at easton lane leading towards it to and tell me where it states that both lanes go straight over? or the exit where there is more than one lane to turn off into? Because there isnt and in fact there is a dashed box to make it easier to understand that there is only one lane leaving that exit and its for the left lane hence why it points towards it.
If you're still struggling then here: www.gov.uk/giving-up-your-driving-licence
first clip is a prime example of why you should just let some of these things go. Was being stubborn and resulted in an accident. easily avoidable.
Can apply the horn but not the brakes.
And what would the guy learn from it? Be an asshole and get through with it.
Next time, he will maybe remember that.
Yes, the hassle with insurance and car repair is crap, but sometimes you have to stand your point.
The problem with driving in this country is everyone is so aggressive. Sharing the road is supposed to be a team effort and these videos are filled with minor stuff that happens to me almost daily, yet I don't make a fuss. I just slow down a bit, let the other driver do his thing and carry on. No time lost, no crash, no rage.
@@JuergenHoppe1 maybe avoid the accident and report them to the police with the video? the cammer probably got found to be partially at fault anyway. What lesson can you take from that? Is it worth it?
@@InevitableMayo Although I agree with everything you have said here, I am not sure in this case which driver was being the more aggressive! The guy who simply stood his ground or the one who blatantly tried to jump the queue and shove his way in front. The scenario I always come back to with these is - how would you react if someone shoved their way in front of you in the queue in the supermarket. I know I wouldn't just take that on the chin, but you can hardly have a polite word with another driver who does this... This is exactly the same.
#1 I wish that I could have been there when you had to explain it to your boss, after he had seen the footage. Must have taken some doing.
You deliberately sped up instead of losing 5 seconds to let him in.
He was in the wrong but you caused the crash.
First clip ‘although my horn was sounded I didn’t press the brake and caused an accident I could’ve avoided’
#1 you weren't letting the van in, no matter what the cost, were you?
You accelerated and almost hit the Smart car in your efforts to not let the van in.
Yes, the van was in the wrong, but it would have cost you nothing to just let it go
Came to say the same thing, fix other peoples mistakes and make it a non-event
but why exactly should he let the van in? he doesnt have any obligation to.
@@michaelh7741 No, he doesn't have to let anyone in.
What he does have to do now is take his works vehicle off road, fill in insurance forms, wait for a hire/replacement vehicle and just carry on putting himself in situations that could have been avoided
@@2212db he didnt put himself in that situation, the van did.
@@michaelh7741 Yes, the van did. But he could have avoided the collision if he'd backed off. Instead, he chose to accelerate towards the Smart car. He now has a buggered van and an insurance claim.
The collision could have been avoided, but he decided the van wasn't getting in.
number 13 truck driver should be banned for dangerous driving at the least. car done nothing wrong but truck driver didnt like being overtaken so had to go right up the cars arse to intimidate the car.
yep he didnt apply the brake until way too late as a "punishment". another retard
and this is exactly why people need to re take there test. Your are so wrong its unbelievable, ignorance times a million.
Clip 1 - gotta know the result of the insurance claim if/when you hear.
1st one totally avoidable by both parties.
Imagine caring that much about who is 20 foot in front of who 😂
Learn to share the space be willing to submit or be willing to spend weeks sorting shit out with insurers and potentially paying out of pocket for damage and if in a company car maybe loosing your job.
#4 i really hope the cyclists avoid generalising all motorists after that as I'd like to think most of us would hold back to turn left. Doagraceful from the audi.
I hope that was a sarcastic comment.
Speaking as someone who leaves his car at home Monday to Friday and uses a bicycle to commute, I'd say that it's probably less than 10% of motorists who display this kind of attitude towards cyclists and pedestrians. The problem is that the sheer number of drivers on the road means you're going to encounter this kind of thing regularly.
@@garyboyle695 we no the sort car driver you are a w###ker
First driver showing that it's more important to be right than just backing off and avoiding an incident. Yeah I crashed my vehicle, have to deal with insurance, pay out my excess, get a courtesy car, be inconvenienced for a month or 2...but at least I was right and I can get views online. Muppet.
Ah excellent, this week's edition of Nobody Knows How To Stop Pressing The Accelerator
#1 Tailgates the Smart and then uses the horn instead of the brakes and hits the van. Grade A wazzock.
Came to say the same thing, fix other peoples mistakes and make it a non-event
The main problem is he tried to cause an accident anyway by forcing the van into incoming traffic.
Karma for the van driver and his horn fetish
For that first clip: if the other driver want so to be that much of a dick, let him be; it's not really worth it, just to make your own point. Now, for the sake of saving 5 seconds, you've cost yourself several minutes, and some repairs to your own van.
Came to say the same thing, fix other peoples mistakes and make it a non-event
Not just that he was to close to the car in front,if he had to slam the anchors on he would have rear ended them.given he was too close to it at the start of the clip i wonder what happened before.
#4 I love that argument of "do you pay taxes" to cyclists. Yes, the exact same taxes as you mate. Anyone who thinks we pay "road tax" should probably look up when it was abolished (hint: there hadn't been a 2nd World War yet).
Abolished due to politicians could use the environment as an excuse to charge people more, do you really think it goes towards the environment ?
Oh yes, that old argument again! You don`t pay it, you can`t use it o the roads! Confusing to call it "Excise Duty" because you pay that on cigarettes and alcohol too! At least calling it road tax you know why you`re paying it, even if it`s being used elsewhere!
@@josephgittos3787 Most of the VED goes to our masters in Europe in the way of fines
@@josephgittos3787 Do you think when Road Tax was abolished in 1937 there was any thought or concern for the environment?
Yep, its amazing how many people believe a Road Tax still exists. Plus, just because someone is riding a bike at one particular time doesn't mean they don't have a car too.
Why do the big trucks always stop super close to the car in front during traffic stops? What if someone rolls back there is no way they won't hit the lorry or bus or whatever. I thought they were more professional and should know to leave some space when stopping behind cars in traffic.
10. It's traditional to wait for the green light and the junction to clear before blindly accelerating.
There needs to be a law introduced that if someone breaks check you then you have the right to drive into the back of them and they get the points and their insurance has to pay.
There is already that law - you just need to prove they were driving dangerously, and that you had no way to stop on time and that you were in no way driving dangerously - in the case of that footage in this video, the lorry would have been ok as they had proof of the dangerous driving of the other vehcle, and were not driving dangerously themselves.
I’m not on about that I’m on about having the right to smash into the back of the car that break checked you whether you could or couldn’t stop. Think of it as legalised road rage.
@@klashnacovak47 No problem, you can have that law. Under one condition: I also get a law that allows me to roast any tailgater (like you probably) that annoys me with my rear flamethrower
Only as long as it lets me know to get the marshmallows ready.
@@grassyranks8917I feel your pain. People can't seem to spell the singular of lenses either.
1:07 another example how just leaving some space saves you having to deal with any of this bs, if someone wants to drive like an idiot let them get on with it.
I'd rather have them in front of me where I can really keep an eye on them!
LOL, 2:00 since when are cyclists exempt from paying income tax? And I have insurance for my bike as well.
Given that "Road Tax" was abolished in the 1920s, I very much doubt he is paying road tax either.
4:55 getting over 3 lanes after puling out with speed in a truck? good luck, ppl dont even let you over when you indicate 300 meters before a motorway roundabout
First guy is a tool, how much time was wasted just to prove a point. Should be prosecuted for careless driving.
First clip. Stupid driving by the cammer. Bet the company he drives for would if loved watching the footage. Ps I know the van was in the wrong lane but its simple to hold back and just let him in
Came to say the same thing, fix other peoples mistakes and make it a non-event
That first one yes the van driver was at fault.
But the driver filming made it worse by trying to stop him getting in.
Both are idiots
The cammer was also at fault for boxing the van into onconing traffic. Where was the van meant to go once he'd made a mistake?
@@JB_inks should brake and pull in behind or not attempt the manoeuvre anyway
The driver of the peugeot needs better tyres, to skid that easily at that speed.....hilarious.
#1 Seems like "merge in turn" is just lost on you 😂 Not to mention driving way, way too close to the Smart car in front of you!
Exactly, you can see he's deliberately trying to box out the white van for an ego tickling exercise or dashcam footage. Being *technically* correct isn't worth an accident - especially when you're up against a white van. You know you're going to lose one way or another.
I would certainly brake and avoid an accident here, it's just not worth it to claim territory - and we all saw the result.
Pretty sure that wasn't a merge in turn spot. Still a dumb move by the cammer and not worth a hassle just to be in the right.
I agree he forced this but merge in turn is not in play here when there is one exit from the roundabout and the van is cutting into a lane that isnt his. I think anyone that knows the Winnall junction will see him as wrong. But again..agree that the white van forced it when dropping back would have saved himself a headache claiming on insurance.
Its not really a merge in turn, lane 1 has priority where there is only one lane on the exit of a roundabout. Bit silly getting into an accident though.
I would have informed the Audi driver that it’s always a c#nt driving one
4.47. So you get impatient with the ruck and car and go across the white lines. Well done 🛎️
I think its clear 14 did not feel safe going as fast as everyone else given how wet the road was and puts the indicator on letting you know to pass the fact it skids on the aroundabout shows the driver was right to be going slower.
Yep. I thought the same. No reason to think it was a scam. Audi got annoyed so brake checks the Peugeot. Cammer could have been holding back more as they were a little close.
The indicator comes on just as the blue P for parking sign comes into view so I think they intended to pull over to let the back log clear up. They may have slid once already and that's why they are going at a snails pace. The white Audi is impatient and overtakes at least 2 vehicles to get to the front and then decides to punish the blue car by break checking them. This winds up the blue car who tries to then overtake the Audi and when that fails they sit very close to it's bumper. This is too much for the Pug and it spins out again. I'd bet those tires are bald on the Pug, definitely in MOT fail territory.
I almost agreed with you but then noticed the blue car tried to dangerously overtake the white car. It wouldn't do that if safety was their priority.
@@goodyeoman4534probably trying to pull alongside the Audi to tell them to go F Themselves for brake checking.
At the end of the day there is no minimum speed limit, it could've been anything from a puncture to a knackered gearbox.
Should've used his hazards though if there was a problem.
Doesn't excuse the Audi being a twatt.
@@goodyeoman4534This. As soon as the Audi went around then they were on it and ready to go
Really enjoyed that first clip… guys ego wouldn’t allow the other guy in, now his van is off the road 😅
the van shouldn't be passing there, the truck shouldn't have to let him in.
@@stevied653 you’re a moron
1st clip, the driver recording, well done you Bell End 😂
0.29 That is what happens when your ego gets in the way of safety and common sense !
Reading the various comments about clip #1 there seem to be still a lot of sensible people around. On the flipside there also seem to be a lot of people whose inscription on their gravestone will read, "he died being right / having right of way / having priority / standing his ground" (or similar).
I'm always reminded of the episode of the Brittas Empire which ends with Gordan Brittas covered in bandages/plaster in a hospital bed saying "But it was my right of way"...
And risking hitting the car in front if it has to emergency stop
1st clip sure that van driver was wrong at cutting you off, but you had all the time and chances to prevent that accident as well! Just pressing the horn and continue ist just as stupid!
#4 A BMW driver using indicators? Must be a rental.
0:29 when two equally pigheaded drivers meet 😂
Wait until the default 20mph comes into force in Wales. You’ll have some great footage!
5:43 making a mountain out of a molehill
Aye, blue car's view was obviously obstructed, just cos cammer can see them, doesn't mean blue car can.
What is supposed to have happened at #13? I didn't spot anything.
the car pulled in front of the HGV into what he thinks of as his braking space, it looks to me like there was no danger of hitting him or any need to brake much harder than he would have anyway given the stopped traffic. Just an HGV driver who decided to try and climb in his boot to give him a scare.
@@TheKalzuneTry watching it again, the real issue was how late they left the merge. It was bad driving. Fact you didn't see that is worrying.
lol. #1 I hope you showed this to your boss. Why didn't you just let the van in? Incredible!
why should they have let the van in? they were in the wrong lane.
@@michaelh7741 to avoid an accident? To avoid the company van having to be taken off the road for repairs, meaning loss ot business?
@@ArminGrewe why is it on the cammer to prevent it and not the bellend in the van? the cammer was holding position, which he has 100% right to do. the van should absolutely not be taking that exit so they are at fault.
@@michaelh7741sure the van is in the wrong but the cammer could have prevented the crash altogether at the loss of a few seconds. I would rather an employee brake and lose a few seconds than let tiny dick ego force a crash and lose hours/days of work
@@michaelh7741you're right. Don't the let van in under any circumstances and instead keep it in the outside lane so it crashes into onconing traffic. You genius.
Never understand why people have to take silly risks to save a second of time only to lose so much more time when they reach traffic lights or traffic que...
Ohhhh....well waddya know - first.
#14 - I think you're right, really only logical explanation, especially seeing the way they drove off with each other at reasonable speed after failing. The dickhead in the Peugeot couldn't drive anyway.
Great collection again. Thank you.
5:42 A-Hectic-Hillbilly Did he say slow down? You were doing about 5mph, how slow did he want you to go?
The problem on a car park like that, and at many junctions, is you can't see what's coming until you've nosed the front of your car out of the junction into oncoming traffic. People see the front of your car and expect you to have seen them, as if your eyes are on the end of your bonnet rather than in your head.
0:39 what a cut up! bonnet flips open and blocks view - Is that one of Lenhams trucks?
In the first clip, the dashcam driver is the bigger idiot in my opinion.
Sure, his road positioning was correct, but as soon as he hit's the horn, he decides "No, I will NOT let you cut in!"... and then pushes forward into a narrowing wedge where a collision was inevitable.
If he'd just backed off and let the white van cut in, he'd be able to day "You idiot!" and we'd all agree!
#1 - honking loudly does not make you right - they shouldn't have cut you up, you should have been the better person and slowed down... #6 retest I feel... #7 everyone boycott SCH Build! #11 both in the wrong ...
#1 yes the van driver was a d-head, but why not be pragmatic and just fix the issue? Being stubborn caused you far more delay. 🙄
#9/#10/#12 where's the police when you need them 🙄
No. 1, Two wrongs do not make a right, white van definitely transgressed but the Cammer had ample time to avoid what became inevitable. No.6, one of my pet gripes, the Audi is breaking so many rules of the road, on a double yellow, facing the wrong way close to a junction with traffic lights too.
That’s before carrying out a reckless, dangerous and illegal manoeuvre to extricate himself from his original, selfish and dangerous errors. That one deserves 6 points in my reckoning.
It seems that his mate was parked over the road on a double yellow within 10 years of the junction too!
Man I wish Dashcammers would stop ruining having a Dashcam ... it gives so many people a complex where they think they can accelerate into danger when someone is doing something wrong because "they have proof someone did something wrong" .. ughh ..
#14 Cash for crash? I think not. They've had some prannet tailgating them, and the left indicator is to say "Look the solid white lines have ended, overtake me you idiot". As the cammer probably isn't too bright I'll point out, just for them - the rest of us have worked it out, that the cammer is the tailgater.
#9 - 5:12 shouldn’t that be ‘Pity there wasn’t a truck coming the other way !’ ? 🤣😂
#1 you blocked that white van driver on purpose, despite him indicating frantically to “merge in” what’s wrong with you buddy?
1.49 in. You crossed over the staggered white lines to deliberately cut the other car up. Then sends a clip in condemning another driver. Sort yourself out.
Prat in the first clip …Keep your distance and let people in Makes the 🌍🌎🌏 Go Round 👍🤪🤪🤪
#7 "nob clown" 😆😆😆
That first collision could so have been prevented if the cammer had employed an emergency stop...he could see the white vans intention but carried on anyway.
Has anybody else noticed that it used to be Volvo drivers, then BMW drivers, and now it’s Audi drivers by far.
Let me take this opportunity to apologise for the standard of driving in the U.K. as you can see there is an incredible amount of Neanderthals behind the wheels of cars over here .
#3, you were absolutely crawling until you saw them in your mirror then put your foot down to stop them from getting through.
hgvs cant typically accelerate at the same rate as other vehicles
#14 looks like they're limping it home. They're going slow, but not dangerously slow and overtakes are possible after the solid lines. Looks to me like the driver of the white car was offended by this and decided to punish them for it.
Limping it home, but decided to send it so hard they spun out straight after?
Geez, all the Winchester clips this time. Found myself recognising it all 😂