Shake-speare's TREASON
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ส.ค. 2024
- The True Story of KING HENRY IX Last of the Tudors
by Hank Whittemore & Ted Story
Starring Hank Whittemore
Shake-speare’s Treason
AUDIENCE RESPONSE HAS BEEN OVERWHELMING!
“Riveting, inspiring, entertaining ... amazing and thought provoking
... The words of the Sonnets finally make sense
and the story is more personal and exciting than ever
imagined!”
The year 2009 marks the 400th anniversary of the
mysterious book entitled SHAKE-SPEARES SONNETS,
printed in 1609. This 90-minute show dramatizes a
treasonous political diary about royal blood and succession
to the throne - a wild ride performed by Hank
Whittemore and based on his landmark work THE
MONUMENT.
“The most important book on Shakespeare’s sonnets in
four centuries”
- Dr. Daniel Wright, Concordia University, Portland OR
SHAKE-SPEARES TREASON is directed by co-writer and o-Broadway
director Ted Story. This show was filmed live at the Hudson House,
Nyack, NY. Fore more information about the show and about booking,
email us at hankw@optonline.net or call at 845-548-2788. Visit our
developing website www.ShakespearesTreason.com and
also visit www.ShakespearesMonument.com to learn all about
THE MONUMENT.
Filming by Asaf Blasberg & Tara Krieger
DVD Authoring by Asaf Blasberg (www.asafblasberg.com)
Mastered in 1080i HD
Filmed with Canon HD Cameras
Absolutely masterful, and finally a timeline marked by works written at each crisis. Thank you so much.
Phenomenal and so incisive and clear ,it amazes me that nobody else could see Edward De vere's beautiful narrative in the "Sonnets" in their true historical context .
She was Bacon.
BACON, dupe.
What an interesting, fascinating presentation. It actually strengthens the Prince Tudor theory enormously. It all fits really well.
Amazing!!!! You answered many questions I’ve had in understanding some of these events and opened my eyes. Thank you for posting this.
From 51:15 is the absolutely clearest explanation....why else leave her for 6 years! Brilliant lecture! BRAVO!
Your narrative rings so true and explains the mysteries of the sonnets in an entirely natural way. The puzzle pieces of events don't feel as if they're being forced into place as many other explanations have done. Truly wonderful performance!
+twothecat Hey thanks very much! Hope more can appreciate the truly amazing masterwork of the sonnets.
Bravo, Hank! Nothing is truer than truth!
Accept the truthiness of truth.
A magnificant performane from Hank who, with his readings, brings the subterranean meaning of the sonnets to life. He not only explains the meaning of the sonnets but also incorporates into his talk the Shakespeare Authorship Controversy; both themes being inextricably connected. Act Four Scene two of Titus Andronicus is, for no apparent reason, all about the changeling child of the empress Tamora. I have also read somewhere that Southampton was again imprisoned when James I died.
Brilliant story teller.....dare I say....just like Shakespeare :)
omg, this has given me chills. the browne's would not have let him down. they knew the importance of the bloodline. remember the virginia company was theirs. truth has always loomed hard in my upbringing. always truth. this is great, i feel much better. now i need to find my sonnets, and reread and watch you again. thank you so very much. those were hard times. you have explained them beautifully. janeene browne blank. [i have to think, maybe more later.] 3/14/17.
Are you related to Edward De Vere?
Tremendously enjoyable! What skill and energy! Many thanks.
And Truth is Stranger than Fiction! Thanks to You, Hank Whittemore & Ted Story, for this telling of Truth. Edward would be (and is, as an Immortal Spirit) proud of You. (Tears on my keyboard. Among other personal connections to this history,, February 8 is my birthday.)
A small amount of research and guess who I find as a descendent of Henry, Lady Diana Spencer and mother of the most famous redhead Harry.
Also consider how many brothers were in mythology: Enlil & Enki, Set & Osiris, Moses & Aaron, Jacob & Esau... And what would happen to the bloodline if Diana had been pregnant when she died. Just wondering.
@@dmiller4511 Just would be more offspring that would not get anywhere near to the throne, I expect Charles to step aside and let William be next. Harry had no chance and is even second seat in his marriage ;)
@@milantrkulja7200 Wrong! But Charles III is giving his son good training.
zing................now Shakespeare makes sense, has a diary and journal.............many thanks...........it takes an American to make sense of England's lost history...............Thankyou sir!
Hank's The Monument is the greatest, truly pioneering book about the Shakespeare-authorship question. I wish he'll break through with it - rather sooner than later.
I've got to make time to read it soon!
I love this! And Hank's book The Monument. What an inspirational man thank you Hank!
Sonnet 87! My goodness, I'll never read it the same.
Hank, your performance is fantastic, captivating and awakening!
"Fantastic" is correct. Pure fantasy. The notion that Oxford even on h is best day could write Shakespeare on his worst is preposterous. The jerk died in 1604, before the great tragedies came out!!!!!!
Thanks!
Bruce Robbins
Not as fanciful as attributing the greatest works since ancient Greece to a country boy made good even though he could barely write his name.
The first version of a conspiracy theory is the hardest to dislodge. but it’s day is finally almost done. That’s no great achievement gives how outlandish it was in the first place.
To replace it with the Truth will not be easy but eventually the Truth will out.
There’s more than a semblance of it here.
Bravissimo. A True tour de force. 👏
Magnificent and The BOOK is by far the best on the sonnets.
Does this mean, then, De Vere's family has a right to the current throne of England?
No. Even if they ever did (bastards have no claim, plus this is all bee ess), the family line died out a long time ago. Plus the existing dynasty ended when George I of Hanover took the throne in 1714.
@@Jeffhowardmeade thank you. Also, you have a cool TH-cam name. Have a good day.
No, but he thought he had a claim to the throne after Elizabeth I, until the Stuart's took over.
@@joecurran2811 thank you
the Earl is buried in Poets corner the Westminster..
Thought he died of the plague too.
...’neath the statue of Shakspeare, no doubt
There is technology now to xray archeaological sites, can't we just xray all of Westminster Abbey, see where all the bodies are buried...
@@dmiller4511 No. Ground Penetrating Radar can't differentiate between decomposed remains and the soil they're buried in. They can spot vaults, voids and coffin nails, grave goods, etc., but none of those were used in church burials at the time.
@@Jeffhowardmeade thank you.
Incredible so exciting
Amazing one-man show! Thank you.
Bravo! Shakespeare wasn't a man, they were a secret society. "By Will, I am Shakespeare.
Will I am Pallas Athena
A brand name!
Brilliant, bravo.
"Nothing truer than truth"
Hits really hard nowadays. Right in the guts. How does it feel so good, if it hurts so much?
what a fabulous talk
EXCELLENT
The pyramids were not tombs! But that's another story! 😅
lol 👍
To Egyptians tombs were not places of death but where the Pharaoh resurrects as a god. We calook at what they did and why they did it with the eyes of the 21st century, just as we must see the sonnets and Shakespeare in the truth of who he was through historical events and the thinking of men and women in those times.
This would make an amazing good movie, better by far than 'Anonymous." 'Decadent' de Vere redeemed to eternity through a son he could not claim...explains the love of the fair youth as the true and future King.
Phyllis Neilson-Terry as Queen Elizabeth in Louis N. Parker’s Drake, His Majesty’s Theatre, London, 3 September 1912
(photo: Daily Mirror Studios, London, 1912)
Louis N. Parker’s pageant play, Drake, produced by the author and Sir Herbert Beerbohm Tree, opened at His Majesty’s Theatre, London, on 3 September 1912. The cast was headed by Lyn Harding in the title role, Amy Brandon-Thomas as Elizabeth Sydenham and Phyllis Neilson-Terry as Queen Elizabeth, Herbert Waring as John Doughty and Philip Merivale as Thomas Doughty. During the play’s 221 performance run the part of Drake was also played by Frederick Ross, Harding’s understudy. The costumes, designed by Seymour Lucas, were supplied by B.J. Simmons and L. & H. Nathan. footlightnotes.wordpress.com/tag/drake-pageant-play/
The best interpretation - yet.
BRILLIANT
I would hold that the sonnets were written by Thomas Kyes to Edward VI and was sent on to be used by his son, William Kyes (William Stanley) to keep the Shakespeare’s name alive after Edward Dever died.
William Keys had gone on a prolonged tour of Europe and the Middle East with William Stanley in 1580 with only one person who could assert that fact that he was William Stanley until 3 years of litigation was successfully completed.
After his brother’s death, “William Stanley” undertook the ownership of the only acting company for whom Shakespeare would write for and the only person among the Shakespeare, group, mainly based about about Edward Dever, whom had any physical contacted with Willam Shakespeare.
John Dee either exposed it in the tarot cards he helped to change to their current form, jesus's wife mary is queen of cups, the rose, their blood line supposedly extended down in time to kings and queens, but Dee also seems to have embedded a message in it that it is also a lie, which might be why the queen began to hate him.
Ben Jonson's poem in the First Folio is entitled "To The Reader"
To The Reader is an anagram for "Reed The Taro"
The poem itself is filled with card-playing allusions
By 1943 the outcome of the war was pretty much known. So he starts with an error, not a good sign. Also is he talking to children?
Genius.
In several ways phenomenal.
I am sorry but I do not buy the idea this video. for instance, as even Oxfordians have noted, the portraits of Elizabeth I and De Vere show no family resemblance to the likeness in the portrait of Southampton. This is not true with the regards of the portrait of Southampton's official Mother with which he does have some resemblance to.
yea, it is TRUE, de Vere wrote the Sonnets!! then who wrote the plays??
i am so pleased to hear your treason performed. excellent. in the pit of my stomach i would say this is what actually happened. you never mentioned his adoptive mother mary browne, anthony browne's twin sister. at thirteen she was basically sold too. i would imagine money came from the browne's. we continue to be prosperous and well educated. i had a similar past life experience with a young man i met at the highland games. we knew it was past life, and it was amazing. now i see it imitated this. i am basically trapped in an loveless relationship with a sinclair. the story repeats and repeats itself. have you been to cowdray? you must go. thank you, janeene browne blank. 3/14/ 17.
I have meant to thank you!
I think Hank Whittemore is brilliant and totally solved the mystery of the sonnets with the whole PrinceTudor Theory. Unfortunately, I think the pomposity of his acting performance belies the quality of his theory. It may be a generational thing, but if he had simply presented rather than "acted" (in that hokey pompous, (today fake seeming) pedantic style of the "Boomer" generation), his presentation, it would have more power to persuade. His writings do not involve his acting persona, and as such, are far more persuasive. His contribution to Oxfordian scholarship is inestimably great.
OK zoomer
come off your high horse
I thought he was great.
Future generations did not unlock the truth!
Excellent
V jolly
Why are there no subtitles?
John Heminges, Henry Condell, and Richard Burbage, three actors of The Lord Chamberlain's Men, a famous acting company that included William Shakespeare, were given money by William Shakespeare of Stratford in his Last Will and Testament in 1616. Two of these actors, John Heminges and Henry Condell, were responsible for having 36 of Shakespeare's plays published in the First Folio in 1623.
Rosicrucian brethren Francis Bacon and Ben Jonson put Oxford's works into the First Folio.
Why didn't Shakspere remember any Poets or Playwrights in his Will? Why didn't he remember the only person that Shakespeare ever dedicated a work to - Henry Wriothesley 3rd Earl of Southhampton? And if they were such great pals, why didn't Shakspere remember Ben Jonson, the man who is believed to have written all the poems in the First Folio (despite having signed each of them with a different pen name)?
'The Prince Tudor' theory is a fascinating theory for sure .... analysing the theory through the sonnets of The Dark Lady is a revelation - as i always questioned Shakespeare loving a younger boy and 'The Dark Lady' (an ebony beauty), as it just seemed very wild and outlandish for Shakespeare ... being Qu Elizabeth I illegitimate son and Qu Elizabeth I as the Dark Lady makes a lot more sense. However, was De Vere the poet who wrote the 'Shake-speare' sonnets and plays??? ... i am still not sure - i think there were a few writers under that pseudonym ...
You must be American to be so skin color obsessed as to think "The Dark Lady" referred to an African.
@@beaulah_califa9867 You clearly don't read too well ... and you are clearly African obsessed if you think the Dark Lady was African ...
TH-cam’s algorithm has decided i need more Shakespeare conspiracy cheese in my feed. Like a flat-earther reveling in the notion that he’s uncovered a secret goes down a rabbit hole and now rejects all science and ignores the beauty and awesomeness of the cosmos, these brave truth-revealers melt into a Dan Brown-esque melodrama and forever miss the genius of Shakespeare’s words. Get over yourself and go read King Lear.
stop rejecting science
impressive
ty Ser
Why didn’t he sign his name to these works?
Stigma Of Print
Now this ill-wresting world is grown so bad mad slanderers by mad ears believed be
This video has a lot speculation and very little evidence.
@@stevenhershkowitz2265 except for the evidence... lol
@@stevenhershkowitz2265 not much evidence? Meaning, there is evidence? More than you can say though huh?
@@stevenhershkowitz2265 you’re the one who started with “not much evidence” , now all of a sudden it’s zero. Make up your damn mind so I can argue with you properly lol
@@stevenhershkowitz2265 lol, where did you look, the vegetable aisle at the grocery store? Sure Ill help you out, here’s a bunch of that evidence you can’t seem to find ..
shakespeareauthorship.com/howdowe.html#0
@@stevenhershkowitz2265 lol no. You asked for evidence , there you go. No secret codes required lol. If a killer left twenty pieces of evidence behind but no handwritten note , you would call him innocent? Nope. Never mind the fact that we’re talking about 400 years ago. What a silly argument you have
Bunk
You can tell this guy got hit by a truck.
right under the monument to guess who???
Sorry, but there was no Henry IX. Elizabeth I was the last of the Tudors.
Does this mean the 2nd Earl of Southampton was offed?
Thank you Henry Neville (aka William Shakespeare).
Edward de vere earl of Oxford
Neville was more the poet but the mastermind was his cousin Francis Bacon
I believe in oxfordian theory but this dude bores the hell out of me. He doesn’t possess the stage charisma as he pictured himself have.
Oscar Wilde writes of Shakespeare.
Hundreds of years later..
Shakespeare was a consortium...but why 😂
Shakespeare of Stratford Is the Bard.
Sorry to be boringly conventional about interpreting Shakespeare's Sonnets but I think they reveal a bisexual man declaring his loves.
@@stevenhershkowitz2265 I just go with the simplest theory that fits the facts. The poet declares love (apparently going beyond platonic) for male and female so I think him bisexual. And I think the works were done by the person people always said did it Shakespeare. If you want to go with a more complicated theory that is up to you.
Correct. If you interpret the sonnets through the eyes of De vere they completely make sense and add autobiographical depth to the intriguing Elizabethan courtesans. In order to do this you have to read them contextually, understand the culture and society at the time, understand epigrams, nobility gossip, Masonic cultural Renaissance, the veil of moral and religious indignation, the influence of John Dee’s popularisation of gematria the politics of court and contemporary thespians.
Where have all the Stratfordians gone?
De Vere had no interest in women.
Queen Elizabeth was a woman; he had interest in her (although to what extent is a debate)
He had interest in his 3 daughters (Elizabeth, Bridget, Susan), and possibly the mother who gave birth to them (Anne Cecil)
He was interested in the woman (Anne Vavasour) who bore his love child
He was probably interested in his second wife (Elizabeth Trentham) who bore his heir
Shakespeare did not use a hyphen. Neither did Oxford. Printers did. "The Oxford Hoax" explains all this, available on Amazon. Read it and wise up.
True. Shakespeare of Stratford couldn't even write his own name, if six barely legible signatures indicate anything.
@@stevenhershkowitz2265 Since you can't read Secretary Hand, how would you know?
@@Jeffhowardmeade Here is a funny one: William Shakespeare is an anagram for "he's like a pis-warm ale"
@@stevenhershkowitz2265 The only funny thing is that you fail to recognize the random nature of anagrams.
Did it ever occur to you that changing your username might have altered your ranking? Actually, has ANYTHING but what you want to believe ever occurred to you?
@@Jeffhowardmeade Of course it occurred to me. The video dissappeared so I changed my username to see if it might have an effect, as well as other things I did to the details of the video of itself. I am, as usual, way ahead of you.
Speaking of you, the guy who claims that anagrams are random has not been able to randomly generate any anagrams. So really your claim has not been proven. Just a premise that makes sense but lacks evidence.
Never Before Imprinted = "MR Vere, Poet Friend - B.I" (M = 40, R = 17, B.i. = Ben Jonson, or Boam and Iachim the pillars of Freemasonry)
Drivel
Another idiot trying to make money out of conspiracy theories.Shakespeare got the authorship payments for his plays .How else did he get the money to buy a large house ,a share of theatres.and a property in London.
Shakspur of Stratford bought his house in 1597, at least a full year before Shake-speare was publicly credited with writing any plays. We can be confident that Stratford did not pay for his house from the authorship of plays that had not yet been written. Perhaps was paid to leave London and go home to Stratford and pretend he was the author of plays that were soon to be published under the name Shakespeare...
That could be true and not contradict the Oxford theory one bit.