When and How Much to Continuation Bet - Now You Know How The Best Poker Players Do It!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 มี.ค. 2018
- www.PokerCoaching.com. Finally, when and how much to continuation bet is explained by 2x WPT Champion Jonathan Little.
You can follow me at:
Twitter: / jonathanlittle
Facebook: / fieryjustice
Instagram: / jcardshark
Download my FREE Tournament Cheat Sheet here:
pokercoaching.com/yt/cheatsheet/
Download my FREE Poker Workbook here:
pokercoaching.com/yt/workbook/ - เกม
Two thumbs down? There are some class A idiots in this world!
Oh to have half the skill Johnathon Little has...Jason Somerville agrees he is one of the best so good enough for me!
2 people would downvote because they don't like his haircut or the font of the powerpoint. There's no point reading anything into such a tiny proportion of downvotes.
I feel like I need to be a brainiac on adderall to play poker now. Lol.
Nootropics are very good investments
Better off with coffee and weed lol
Some kratom lol.
So basically a tweaker?
I got to meet this guy in Sacramento. He's an awesome and astonishingly good player.
We are both legit ones.
@Moan I would be very very happy to meet both off thetable and lighting money on fire if I was playing against them. 🙃
Thank you Mr Little, more fantastic info on how to play NLHE. This vid alone will save we in chat a decent amount
Great video Johnathan learnt a lot already on just watching this video I am a beginner player therefore will be watching this couple of more times to improve my game. Keep these great videos coming. 👌
This video is really useful for a project that I am working on. I'm a software dev and an aspiring poker player. I've found a lot of the tools available for analyzing poker situations to be lacking in some way or another. To maximize study time efficiency I've started developing my own solver like app using open source libs with the intention of also releasing it open source. So far I've completed a simulator that is similar in some ways to flopzilla and pokerstove. It uses a javascript based port of pokerstove for evaluating hands but also supports ranges(and weighted ranges). The output equities almost mirror that of equilab for range evaluation. The next steps are a range trainer(user defined ranges) and post flop action evaluation based on user defined ranges(think pokersnowie with user defined ranges). This video is really useful for a basic protocol for dealing with a super common post flop situation.
Jonathan, thanks for all of the amazing content that you produce. I'm a regular listener/viewer of your weekly poker hand and have read a couple of your books. It's really improved my game as I've moved up through the stakes.
Great information. So much to unpack. Thank you Johnathan. You are a great coach
awesome work! Ur video made me understand some basics Cbet tips i was missing!
straight to the point, absolutely love this video, thumbs up !!!
Another great video for someone looking to improve their c betting aggression
Thanks JL
This is amazing! Thanks for all the content Jonathan !!
Thanks! I'm glad you enjoy it!
Commendable presentation.
Very informative! Much appreciated!
Great video. Very clear for a spanish spoken poker player. Thumbs up!
Like you suggested in the inner circle yesterday I watched the video. It was really helpful. Regards B
Thanks! I am glad it was helpful.
Jonathan, you're the man.
Started playing on America's Cardroom with my $5 free deposit today. Incredibly tight players in the penny games.
Hey Jonathan, great video, Just had a question regarding the examples you gave.
so in the example you give you have a standard EP opening range and then an MP opening range, with AQ3 then 876 with your range equity vs the defending range as roughly 64% and 53% respectively on those boards. Then categorize us as having a huge or Tiny range advantage and then employing either a frequent small or an infrequent large style strategy. My question is, what defines a tiny or large range advantage? say we had a board that gave us a 58% equity range vs range advantage, is that classified as large or small, or something in between, and if so, what should our betting strategy be? Thanks!
Thank you great video !
Thank you, this was extremely helpful. Will check out your website 👍
Over looked your videos for far to long. Gonna go through and watch some of your stuff. New to subscribe here any suggestions where to start this rabbit hole?
GG also Ty 4 the free book
Thanks for the great info, was part of the last Insider Webinar..any others coming soon?
It was not. I made it just for you. It is a question I am commonly asked, so I figured I might as well answer it.
Nice video. Love your content.. thanks
Really good stuff.Just one question.When using the range chart around the 12 minute mark to determine which holdings to bet you include draws(including weaker draws)
Now I assume you are talking continuation bets when it checks to the preflop raiser (with a range advantage)
Betting draws (including gut shots/backdoors flushes with an over) in this example is recommended as there is good fold equity.
However in the scenario in the video( flop 9h-7h -3c) with holdings say Kc 10c are you recommending to proceed the same with a bet in front?
Should we call the bet and proceed or fold as we lost fold equity?
Thanks
Hi, thanks for your videos it have inproved my game a lot :) Just won a first plays in a 5$ rebuy add on tournament for 600$ looking to inprove my game eatch day and your videos helping me a lot. Nise that there is people like you who are sharing there game patterns big respect to you and big thanks for what you are doing :) Good luck and see you maybe one day on the tabble ;)
Congrats!
You rock dude!
Great video. What about if you are OOP(out fo position)? MP raise (hero) villain calls on button. What about it?
omg, you are the best, thanks for the vid
Absolutely outstanding!
Go blues
Great video and thanks for the essential poker tips. I'm not understanding range advantage. In the example he showed, where the cards came 9 7 3, does he not have range advantage because of the flop? Or is it because he is playing from middle position against BB? I thought BB plays a wider range, so doesn't that mean his range is weaker than middle position?
great vid two thumbs up way up!!
These videos are great if you are a serious poker player or just a regular recreational player. I play for recreation but I still want to make money.
Hi Jonathan thanks for the great video. I need to clarify something if you can help me. On the 2-3 minutes you talk about the profitable bluffs formula. I want to phrase this differently but I am not sure if this is how it works. For example, if we know that a player is calling 60% to a c-bet on the flop, it means that he folds a maximum of around 40%.
As far as I understand it and using the formula, betting 65% of the pot size (65/165 = 39.3%) means that I take my opponent to the maximum limits of his folding frequency. Is my understanding correct? So is 65% the MAXIMUM bet sizing we should use in such a case?
And another question: is there a way to calculate the MINIMUM bet sizing we should use for our c-bet bluffs?
Great tips as always..thanks Jonathan :-)
So Ive watched this video a few times. Ive been barrelling pretty light, esp when people float the flop and fold the turn just because. However, i get in sticky situations when i all of a sudden get looked up with A high with these players. I get wayyy too aggro trying to get folds.
Ive actually been trying to develop a checking range to stop myself getting in trouble. Essentially i try to look at range advantage, but im not good at it, and in 10nl, i feel like opponents dont look at range advantage, and even if i bet from UTG and flop is AKJ, and i have 99 for example, i get floated with J9s or something, and it just...it gets hairy quick.
Thank you for this video, theres a lot of information to think about, especially exploitatively. I know i have leaks, so this is definitely a huge one
LoonTink id say in low stakes cash games like 10NL not many players are considering range advantage and they are probably very ABC, meaning it’s obvious what their range is
You should only continue to double/triple barrel with value generally against these opponents if they’re not folding bottom pair (calling station). So change your betting range to be more value (second pair, bottom pair) instead of more range-based because your opponents are only looking at their two cards
It was great Jonathan I learned alot
Thanks Billy! Glad you found it useful.
Thanks for the video--learned a ton! When you bet your draws, do you have any advice for when you don't make the draw? Aren't you in a bad position to bluff if your opponent can see that a straight/flush was nearly missed after the river card?
Jonathan in this example UTG v BB on 9.7.3 what do we do if we are donked into? Maybe a good idea for a "c-bet" follow up?
Hey I have a question. So if the board is wet you should bet big to protect your equity right ? But what if you have a flush draw with ace as a kicker or if you already have the nut flush ? How are you suppose de play/bet ? Cause in this case if you bet large you will not get paid very often and you don't need to protect you hand if you have a the best flush draw or nut flush.
Brilliant video
Thanks!
I signed up for the premium on your black Friday deal. I feel I've made a great investment and want to take this moment to say thank you. My game has gotten better and I'm just scratching the surface of my potential. Leaving with profits in cash games and running deep in tournaments on one buy in (I don't rebuy and besides when I've been eliminated there's no more rebuying anyway.lol) I want to take these skills I'm learning as far as I can take them and possibly make something of myself with this game. Again Mr Little. Thank you.
You're welcome. I hope you learn a ton!
Do the actions for the four types of hands remain the same when we are out of position for example we raise from middle position but the button calls instead of the big blind
Awesome!
Should we make our value cbets smaller on dry boards and larger on wet boards? Like say we have AQ and one flop comes Qc8d3h scenario 2 we have the same AQ but the flop comes QcTc 7h. Should we bet a larger amount in scenario 2
Could we use it in micro stakes ?
how should you adjust you c bet sizing if they're are no antes?
This is what I do.
1)If you don’t mind information leakage, *generally* bet your strongest hands and the hands just at and below the weakest calling range. I call this the strongest folding range. Draws a little too weak to call and vulnerable hands like under pair or pocket pair with lots of overcards that could make it weaker pair on the flop.
So J72 flop... with 2 suits to a flush
You will check/call your 88-TT and A2 and A7. Your sets you almost always raise. You will usually call and sometimes bet/raise AJ and QQ+. Check/call 98 with backdoor draws, your AK, your T9 with backdoor draws. your AQ you sometimes bluff raise, sometimes check/call, your AT you usually bluff raise, your pocket pair you bluff raise 22-66. You can float 2 facecards with backdoor straight and flush possibilities with some bluff raises. Your single high card backdoor draw like A9 you usually bluff raise, sometimes fold, occasionally float. Hands with 2 overs to the 7 like Q9 with backdoor flush you can sometimes fold sometimes raise. Without flush draw usually fold sometimes raise. Many other weaker hands
Yes it depends on opponent but you have to continue often enough to avoid exploitation as the baseline strategy and be able to go after it the proper amount so opponent can’t just bluff catch all day or on the other side never bluff catch. So it doesn’t change too much if opening hand ranges are roughly the same.
On turn
on say a J728 board with 2 suits you might bluff hands like:
KQ with flush draw
A2-A6 with flush draw.
A9
AT
KQ no flush draw
A7
A2
Generally fold weaker hands. Call bluff catchers, raise strong hands.
2)If you do want to conceal information leakage your have to use board texture and static/dynamic flops to determine whether to bet almost all or almost always none (almost always check) (you can also cbet 100% of flops if the field is generally weak and still conceal info)
So A72 board if I’m in position and it checks to me I check. A77 I check. A98 I check A98 with 2 or 3 suits I may bet
K72 I check, K98 I check, KQJ I bet.
Q72 I usually check.
J72 I mix up checking and betting.. JTx I bet
T72 and lower I usually bet.
From out of position it’s sort of the opposite since no card can come on A77 flop that will change the nature of the hand so out of position doesn’t give away any info and have threat to keep betting.
The actual best strategy might be a bit of a blend where you simply increase the percentage of the time that you check or bet based on flop texture.
For most purposes doing the best decision 75% of the time and 25% of the time mixing it up for deception is probably good enough.
3)Tournaments.
In tournaments the later you get and the more blinds rise relative to stacks, and the more I believe pot control is needed. So early on I am more aggressive with betting, use larger bet sizes and larger preflop bet size early and then taper it down as tournament goes. I also increase the frequency I check whether it’s on the turn or flop or both. I usually do this by flop texture then after a few hands I might do the strategy that forks my range and gives away information but tournaments information leakage isn’t that bad of a problem.
Thanks Jonathan! You rock!
Is flopping trips with a poor kicker with 2 cards on the board giving people potential flush draws a premium hand or a marginal hand? If I'm playing against people who have no obviously flaws (like he just arrived at the table), is this good? What if I'm against someone who overvalues pocket pairs and might just be holding a full house?
Accurate info.
HAPPY BIRTHDAY 🎂🎉
If you bet bluff preflop the opponent in position he perceives you to have a range advantage unless he has a 61 percent draw
I bet about 47% c bet online. Is that high enough? And it's usually a low blocker bet if i have an ace or king so i can bet larger of that card comes in.
This has been very helpful and has givin me allot to think about. I know that I have holes in my game and you just have me one hell of a plug.
Thank sincerely
Christine ( AKA) Viper
I'm glad this video was helpful to you. Good luck in your games!
Great video and great analysis on playing your range not the hand itself. Checking back AA and KK is fine some of the time but what I don't get is what do you mean when AA and KK won't get outdrawn that often. Could someone explain? Thanks !
Pretty sure he means that you are less worried about overcards. If you check the flop with JJ, you’re giving your opponents’ Broadway combos the ability to peel another card, so any Q, K or A on the turn can counterfeit you. This is less of a concern with AA and KK.
aftrglw thanks I was confused too but my dummy brain is only thinking draws are to straights and shit when in reality most players have something like KQ, you got AA and a K comes out, they bet, you’re happy!
Nice video! I wanted to try messing around with this in a more visual way like you have at 10:10. I like the color coding. Is there a program you used to do this (with some specific key-combo)? I looked at combonator, Equilab, and Flopzilla but honestly I can't figure out how to make them do much besides range selection and equity calculations. If you did do this on a poker program were you able to make a handy legend like that in the program? Seems like those features would heavily streamline the process for the more visual learners.
It was made using the FloatTheTurn Range Analyzer at floattheturn.com/wp/tools/range-analyzer/
Perfect, thanks!
I get it.. ranges, math, etc. I do.
Ive been playing since 06 or so and Ive played around 1,200,000 hands. 95% of what Ive played has been online.
I used to play before I went to work, and when I got home until I went to sleep. Then Friday night til late and all day Saturdays and Sundays.
From all my experience, Ive developed my own style of play that works pretty well for me, but I know... I KNOW that there are areas where I could improve. For instance, I know that sometimes I give up on hands too easily. I often just fold and move on because I dont want to engage in the "my crap hand is better than your crap hand" game. I want to CRUSH them.... which means that my playing style requires me to start with strong hands and hit flops.
What concerns me about coaching or lessons is that the style of play that Im learning may be counter to my natural style of play which means that it would be difficult for me to make a positive adjustment even if I wanted to.
I'm not a pokey, loosy, jabby, bluffy, any two cards, type of player. I'm a tight aggro nit. Suited connectors, occasional stuff like 9-10, pocket pairs, and premium hands is all I play and when I play them depends entirely on position.
When I dont get dealt ANY of those hands (like last night...) I just fade away to the blinds and Im out after I make my last stand with A5 off and get 3 calls.
That said, I'm seriously considering these courses. I'd like to be able to cherry pick the stuff that would be most helpful to my game and apply it.
So you're saying last night you were card dead? Card dead for a standard player would mean you didn't get anything worth seeing a flop with. IF all you're playing with is suited connectores, 9-10, pairs and premiums you are just not playing enough hands. How many times has your AK been beat by a flopped two pair, flush, etc. You can't always just be the guy who gets sucked out on with premium hands. You needd to balance your playing range so that sometimes you will be the guy who flops a set, straight, two pair against AK or other great hands.
You definitely shouldn't cherry pick the tips from videos like these. These guys know what they're doing and if you wanna really win at poker you can't just play like that
That's all fine and legit, but how do I deal with that in the real game? Obviously, you can't use that program for every hand. Do you have any advice for let's say 5 ground rules which cover like 90 percent of what you can find in that program?
how do you play against unknown players?
Soo John I have a question, lets say you have a really unlucky night pre-flop literally getting junk constantly or never hitting flops.. Would you consider bluffing more ? Otherwise it seems like you fold fold fold fold fold and suddenly bet.. people think you have a big hand? so this should give me more incentive to bluff? While when I'm in the hotseat I have less incentive to bluff (unless I constantly show the winning hand)
Certainly your image is important. If you're playing very good players they will realize that you folding a lot is not an indication of you being tight, but if the players think that you are a very tight image you can exploit them by bluffing more.
Hi Jonathan you said with no to small range advantage bet infrequently and large but on the chart it says to bet with draws
Correct.
If i know someone is going to always cbet and i nail the flop i will check, if first to act so i can reraise their cbet and get them to fold or build the pot. It of course comes to the point they will stop c betting with me in the hand then i change my own strategy.
Before I get further, will someone clarify what a continuation bet is?
Hey, JL...did you ever get a chance to play against Doug Polk? I really enjoy both of your content on poker, just wondering...??
Not that I recall.
i flopped top set on a rainbow board, but my opponent caught running 4's, for quad 4's...i dont' see how to play that in the chart? :)
So... If my 30 bet into 100 needs to work 23% of the time and my opponent makes a pair or draw 40% of the time, I see this is an immediately profitable bet. That is less clear is when my opponent should NOT fold. If he has no pair and no draw, where can he find the necessary calls I know everyone says you cannot play fit or fold poker, yet if you are the BB and called a raise and now the flop leaves you with no pair and no draw, what can you do to overcome or at least attenuate this problem.
Two thumbs up!
Thanks!
Was just watching and noticed an inconsistency (which may be me misunderstanding). At 11:25 you say that you want between a 2:1 and 1:1 ratio of bluffs to draws. But, then the math you describe is actually Draws to Premium Made Hand ratio (the 24% vs 18%). I'm assuming you meant the 2:1 to 1:1 ratio you describe should be Draws to PMH ratio? Thanks
Love your material.
Correct. On the flop, you want to keep roughly a 2:1 bluff (draws) to value (PMH) ratio.
C-bet a big range advantage: bet 3/4 pot OFTEN. Is random 75% often enough? Or is there a better balance?
See my video When to Continuation Bet and How Much on youtube.
i feel like beting AhXo is better than QJo since you can naturally turn that into a bluff turn and river thanks to the backdoor nut flush draw but maybe that's just me
what is the idea behind betting larger on a board where your opponent has a range advantage (or where your have none)? seems counter intuitive but is it because you are naturally bluffing more on such a middling / connected board? is it also to deter your opponent from raising?
When you are betting large in that situation, it is with the stronger portion of your range, which is in fine shape against your opponent's range.
@@PokerCoaching ok but you are also betting a lot of draws (25% of range) some of which are weak backdoor flush draws and even Khi Qhi. Do we want to put a lot of money in the pot with such hands knowing our opponent can be strong? (are these bet with a different sizing?) should all these bluffs intend to barrel off turn and river even when unimproved?
so all KTs QJs QTs and JTs are betting as bluffs/draws? while only AQcc or AQhh is betting as a draw? if all Ax suited in spades and diamonds is checking as junk (also KQ and KJ suited with no fd or bdfd) there should be more than 36 combos of junk (KQo and KJo account for 24). or are AK hi AQhi also betting?
these Ax hands (+KQ hi KJ hi) must be in the marginal made hands.
Interesting concept, the key issue to me seems to be the bet frequency. In your example from 9:45 you mention 'bet about 75% pot', however it is unclear how you reached this number. Anybody have any ideas?
You typically want to bet large as you are betting less frequently.
@@PokerCoaching Thank you for replying! I understand the concept you describe (that there is an inverse relationship between bet sizing and frequency, such that we use a large sizing at a low frequency - which, intuitively, makes sense); however, this does not explain how we determine the exact frequency. For example, why 75% and not 80%?
@@consumer61 If the pot was $4 and you bet 75% ($3),
Imagine:
Risk = n (a call)
Reward = m (old pot size + bet size)
n / (m +n)
3 / (7 + 3) = 3/10 = pot odds 30%.
However, to justify calling 75% of the pot, the villain would need to win +30% to make a profit, or needs 30% equity to complete the draw. If villain pays this only to see one more card, he or she would need 14 outs to complete the draw! Most hands rarely have 14 outs, flush draws have 9 outs, straight draws have 8, gut shots 4, so calling 3/4 of the pot is a mistake...unless, you add implied odds, so you'll need to study that as well.
Note, that at the moment that YOU bet 75%, you only need to win 43% of the time to break even. Everything above 43% is profit. I believe flopping a pair happens ~30% of the time, so if villain folds everytime they don't flop a pair (a tough assumption), you're already winning more than 43% (Study bluff break even points to understand this).
Study the rule of 2 and 4 to understand drawing equity.
Study pot odds to understand what fraction of the pot to bet.
Remember:
Equity > than pot odds % = call
Equity < pot odds % = fold
A9 off is a check on that board? Is that correct. On the part where you show the check/bet graph of hands. Is that to keep your checking range strong?
He wouldn't have had this hand in his range to begin with ❤️
It would have already been folded before the hand started
I dont understand what you mean by if you only bet with your strong draws, then you’re going to have more junk in your range. But on your chart it says to bet the strong draws everytime
it means that u have to also bet ur weaker draws, like backdoors.
👍
Im new to poker, so can you please explain: The math you told me only works if you are only 1 other player left right? Bcs if 2 other ppl are left , and they both fold 40% of the time, then there is a bigger chance that i would be called by at least 1 person
Generally you learn to make small adjustments, playing a progressively tighter range the more players are at the table, and adjust according to how tight they are playing generally.
Why is QJo c betting?
Aces
Oh man, I am going to play #2 every day when I wake up and sit down to play cards.
Why is A9 and K9 suited a made hand with the red box? Would that make the hands in between them made hands as well.
I am not sure what you are asking.
I get what you're asking, its because they have the top pair (9) and a big kicker, any lower kicker or pair loses to often so isn't a made hand
now they check-raise bluff
Can you make a video on when to dunk bet? Or are we suppose to check our entire range against our opponent who’s the preflop raiser?
You should only consider leading when you have a severe range advantage, which means you should essentially always check.
Jonathan Little copy ty. I’m gonna get on 15 hour flight so gonna buy your ebook and study and learn
@@PokerCoaching This is something that keeps coming back and confusing me (and actually why I'm looking up bet sizing videos at 2:30AM). When we have a range advantage on the flop, you say in the video that we should bet small. This is also something that I've seen empirically to mostly make sense, since we can bluff at a high frequency and put our opponents' weaker hands in tough spots. What I don't understand is why this changes on the turn and the river--why do we go from betting our range advantage small on the flop to betting large or even overbetting on later streets?
Thank you so much by the way for making this video. It's really excellently made and easy to understand.
@@lobsterworldwide When you bet all three streets, your range should usually be mostly premium made hands and bluffs. When you are polarized, you typically always want to bet large. I explain this in Mastering Small Stakes NLHE at JLPoker.com/mastering.
Are we using our draws as bluffs?
Essentially.
Why would you bet big if you dont have the range advantage ? Wouldn't that make you lose more money ?
I was wondering how u know if u have a range advantage because you can not see there cards?
You assign your opponent a range and compare it to your range. The actual cards do not matter.
How do u know what range to assign them? Do u just look on the table and see what they could have?
Absolute double dutch to me!! I'm an absolute beginner, trying to find out a bit more about poker and this stuff just went straight over my head. Not a clue what JL was talking about - I think I need to spend some time on the basics before coming to stuff like this. Hand range??! What is that all about??!!
David Brittain I was in the same spot about 2 weeks ago. Now, I’m following everything he says with ease. Just keep doing research and you’ll pick it up really quick 😁
PS: Hand Range all of the possible hands that you or your opponent has, and is a really good starting point to start your research
Most poker coaches advise not to play play money...but as an absolute beginner suggest signup Ignition or ACR but don't deposit money...even if it's not a "real" game it will help you understand the concepts...watch a lot of videos ...I particularly suggest ones where Jonathon shows how to play AA KK QQ Aks JJ as these will be the exciting hands that we all play poker for...and when you get them you won't be so excited you blow it... Enjoy and in a little bit you will be surprised...ps poker coaching.com and a Little Coffee with Jonathan 👍
Say you opened preflop with TT on UTG 6 handed. Dealer or blind calls. Flop is AK6 rainbow. According to video I should rather check, but wouldn't it be good to bet 1/3 in that situation? And if in position maybe even cbet on turn? Let's assume the opponent is not tight.
Yes not capping your range by making small bets (25%-33% pot with a balanced range) can be a very effective strategy in certain situations. I use that play often with good results especially on the turn IP when I want to get a check on the river so I can check back. If I check back turn I'll often face a bigger bet from a polarized range on the river which can suck. By not capping my range and betting small my opponent is somewhat handcuffed.
If you have the range advantage, you can bet small with everything.
Just remember,in many games you just have to show a hand. It’s that simple, especially against a player who will keep calling with little or nothing
Isn’t c betting 1/3 pot giving villain good pot odds to call?
Yep!
@@PokerCoaching great
Jonathan, I gotta ask about the intro to this video. You said you've accumulated $6.5M in live tournament earnings (I'm sure it's a lot more by now considering this was 3 years ago). My question is: when people list players' career earnings, do those numbers net out all of their buy-ins?
Just curious... it would annoy me if it's not netted out. Someone could be the top earner of all time just by playing the most volume, but if they've lost more in buy-ins than they've won... they're not gonna have a good time.
It does not.
It seems to me that with that strategy I cbet ~40% of time. I know that's a bad argument, but I get the feeling like everyone on the web is saying that ~60% is much better. Following the herd is probably not a good idea, but I hesitate. On the other hand I feel like whenever I play against someone with 60% cbet and he does cbet OOP on flop like K75, If I have 78 I'll surely call it and more often than not on micros I'll get a check on turn and win the pot at the end.
Why is it in the last example 9,7 offsuit are a fold?
It's because he would have never played with that hand in the first place so he won't have it
Shouldn’t T8o and 86o be bets, not folds, on 9h7h3c board?
T8o and 86o aren't in our range to begin with so we wouldn't have them on the flop
Doesn't checking only marginal hands and junk cap your range and make you easy to play against when checking?
Capping your range is fine as long as it is protected by the presence of hands that can easily call down. If your opponent decides to try to exploit this by only value betting top pair and better, it will result in you winning all the small and medium pots, and also picking it up with many of your bluffs.
Huh?
I can’t find the app what’s it called?
FTT Poker. A URL to the actual website is: floattheturn.com/wp/tools/pushfold-app/