Peoples In Kerala, Before 8th century they spoke Tamil, after that Aryans (namboothiri & Nair) migrated to Kerala , Tamil mixed with Sanskrit then Malayalam formed
"The social stratification of Sangam Tamil Society was confined to the Uyarpirappalar or High Born as comprising of the Paarppanar (Brahmanas), Arasar (Rajas), Vaisiyar (Vaishya) and the Izhipirappalar or Low Born." - R. Gurukkal (historian) : K. Mavali Rajan (Tamilan historian) - "The 'pulaiyan' and 'pulaitti' (the feminine form of pulaiyan) of Tamil society were referred to as 'izhicinan' (outcaste, low or uncivilized person), and 'izhipirappalan (person of low birth, outcaste) in the Early Tamil text Purananuru." Appar (Tamilan Vellalan Poet) - "I will worship the sincere devotee of Lord Shiva even if he is an untouchable 'Pulaiya' who revels in skinning cows and eating its flesh." Tamilans and Malayalam speakers of Pandi ancestry pretend to be 'Anti-Aryan, Anti-Brahmin etc' on social media but their main intention is to claim that only Tamilan Brahmins (iyer, iyengar etc) and Tamilan Low-Castes including 'Pulaiyan' alone existed in Kerala and Tamil Nadu until the 8th Century C.E. The caste-group of Kerala (Malabar) referred to as 'Bhatta (Bhattathiri), Vellala, Kammala (Vishwakarma), Ezhava, Paraya, Pulaya, Kurava etc' in the inscriptions and literary works of Kerala (Malabar) since the 9th Century C.E to 20th Century C.E had nothing to do with the Tamil speaking immigrants of Kerala (Malabar) referred to as 'Pandi Pattar (Iyer), Pandi Vellala, Pandi Kammala (Vishwakarma), Pandi Ezhava (Nadar), Pandi Paraya, Pandi Pulaya, Pandi Kurava etc' in Kerala (Malabar) history. For Example: "Pulaya is a caste of Malabar region (Kerala) as well as Madurai and Coimbatore region (Tamil Nadu)" - Census of India 1901
മലയാളികളും കന്നഡരും തെലുങ്കും ഒരിക്കൽ തമിഴ് സംസാരിച്ചിരുന്നു.മലയക്കാരും കന്നഡരും തെലുങ്കും തമിഴരും ആദി ദ്രാവിഡ സംസാരിച്ചിട്ടില്ല. ഒന്നാമതായി, ആദി ദ്രാവിഡ ഭാഷ എന്നൊന്നില്ല. ദ്രാവിഡ ഭാഷാ കുടുംബത്തിന് പേരിടുന്നത് തെറ്റാണ്. ദ്രാവിഡ ഭാഷാ കുടുംബത്തിന് തമിഴ് ഭാഷാ കുടുംബം എന്ന് പേരിടണം. കാരണം തമിഴ് മലയാളത്തിന്റെയും കന്നഡയുടെയും തെലുങ്കിന്റെയും മാതൃഭാഷയാണ്
"The social stratification of Sangam Tamil Society was confined to the Uyarpirappalar or High Born as comprising of the Paarppanar (Brahmanas), Arasar (Rajas), Vaisiyar (Vaishya) and the Izhipirappalar or Low Born." - R. Gurukkal (historian) : K. Mavali Rajan (Tamilan historian) - "The 'pulaiyan' and 'pulaitti' (the feminine form of pulaiyan) of Tamil society were referred to as 'izhicinan' (outcaste, low or uncivilized person), and 'izhipirappalan (person of low birth, outcaste) in the Early Tamil text Purananuru." Appar (Tamilan Vellalan Poet) - "I will worship the sincere devotee of Lord Shiva even if he is an untouchable 'Pulaiya' who revels in skinning cows and eating its flesh." Tamilans and Malayalam speakers of Pandi ancestry pretend to be 'Anti-Aryan, Anti-Brahmin etc' on social media but their main intention is to claim that only Tamilan Brahmins (iyer, iyengar etc) and Tamilan Low-Castes including 'Pulaiyan' alone existed in Kerala and Tamil Nadu until the 8th Century C.E. The caste-group of Kerala (Malabar) referred to as 'Bhatta (Bhattathiri), Vellala, Kammala (Vishwakarma), Ezhava, Paraya, Pulaya, Kurava etc' in the inscriptions and literary works of Kerala (Malabar) since the 9th Century C.E to 20th Century C.E had nothing to do with the Tamil speaking immigrants of Kerala (Malabar) referred to as 'Pandi Pattar (Iyer), Pandi Vellala, Pandi Kammala (Vishwakarma), Pandi Ezhava (Nadar), Pandi Paraya, Pandi Pulaya, Pandi Kurava etc' in Kerala (Malabar) history. For Example: "Pulaya is a caste of Malabar region (Kerala) as well as Madurai and Coimbatore region (Tamil Nadu)" - Census of India 1901
@@Nithin90 paarpanar is not brahmins,brahmins are known as "Abrahmar", paarpanar its only words for using saints. *Pula means Knowledge in tamil, brahmins to degrad used pula as they given meaning as pollution.
Beauty of tamizh No other languages in india have this speciality. Vowels- all languages they are called swaras including malayalam since it is copied from sanskrit.In Tamil it is referred as soul( uyir) Consonants - in all languages they are called vyangans. But in tamil it is called body( mei) When soul and body interact life is produced.
Yan maravar pandiyas⚔⚔⚔🎠🎠 king tamil maravar.... Chera cholas pandiya king maravar anum.... 🏹🏹🏹🗡🗡🗡🗡⚔⚔⚔⚔🎠🎠🎠🎠🎠🎠...old king Ivaranu.. Veeran warriors🏀🌉🏀🌉🏀🌉....
Sir, Kerala was one of the 7 janapadas (kingdoms) of Bharata (i.e Indian subcontinent) along with Tulanga (tulu region), Konkana (konkan region) etc that were collectively known as the 'Parashurama Kshetra' (i.e creation of parashurama) and Kerala was one of the 3 janapadas (kingdoms) of Dravidadesha (dravida region) meaning the southernmost region of Bharata (Indian subcontinent) along with Pandya Kingdom and Chola Kingdom as according to the Sanskrit scripture's (i.e Puranas) since known history. : The land of 'Kerala or Keralajanapadha or Keralaputhra' in Indian history since the 3rd Century B.C to 12th Century C.E referred to as Malayalam, Malanadu, Malamandalam etc in Kerala history after the Sanskrit word 'Malaya' as denoting the western ghats did not consist of any region east of the Ghats or the region of Tamil Nadu once referred to as 'Kongu-Nadu, Pandi-Nadu, Chola-Nadu etc' in Indian history hence the 1st century and 2nd century European travelers specifically refers to the capital of Keralaputhra as situated 20 stadia (3 km) inland from the sea-coast or in present day Kerala. : The kings of Kerala are referred to as belonging to the Keralakula (i.e Kerala-Dynasty) in the Oldest Sanskrit works of Kerala as the sovereign of Kerala was titled as ‘Keralaputhra’ in Sanskrit since the 3rd Century B.C and similarly Yakshan Keralan, Godha Keralan, Kerala Narayanan, Keralan Srikumaran etc are the various other personal names of Keralites as present in the Oldest Inscriptions of Kerala in Old Malayalam since the 9th century C.E as the Kerala-Country and its capital was under the dominion of the Naaduvaazhikal (i.e vallabhapattanam king, mahodhayapattanam king, kolambhapattanam king etc) as attested by native records and foreign travelers including Al-Biruni since the 11th century C.E : For Example: "Malabar (i.e Malayalam Country) is a great province lying towards the west 'of the province of Bandi (i.e Pandya)' and the people here have a language of their own and a king of their own and pay tribute to nobody." - Marco Polo (13th century C.E). : It is accepted by Tamil Nadu scholars that the Sanskrit term 'Chola' was written as 'SoRa' in the various Tamil inscriptions of the Chola-Dynasty and similarly, the 'Kerala' kings were referred to as 'SeRa' in the inscriptions of the Invaders from Tamil Nadu until the 12th century C.E as the term 'Sera or Seralan' in Tamil is the transliteration of 'Kerala' in Sanskrit whereas the term 'Pandi or Pandiyan' in Tamil is the transliteration of 'Pandya' in Sanskrit as the term 'Sora or Soran' in Tamil is the transliteration of 'Chola' in Sanskrit hence the land of Kerala was referred to as Cheraman-Nadu, Cheraman-Loka, Chera-Bhumi etc in Kerala records itself. : For Example: "...sarvam eve anupashyata tathaiva Andhran cha Pundran cha Cholan, Pandyan, Keralan." - Valmiki Ramayanam - Kishkindha Kanda : The 7th century to 12th century inscriptions of Tamil Nadu refers to multiple Pandya kings and Chola kings as having invaded the region of “Malainadu or Kerala” and the Tamil Nadu king Raja Raja Chola (985 C.E -1014 C.E) in his inscriptions on the conquest of Kerala claims that his army invaded the country which was the Creation Of Parashurama (Kerala) and plundered the town of Vizhinjam, Kollam, Kodungallur etc which itself shows that the land of Kerala was known as the Parashurama Kshetra (i.e creation of parashurama) among even the non-keralites in history. : The ancient European travelers of the 1st and 2nd century C.E have referred to the geographical region of North India or the land between Himalaya mountains and Vindhya mountains as 'Ariaca' after the Sanskrit word 'Aryaka' (i.e Aryadesha) whereas they referred to the geographical region of Kerala (i.e Keralaputhra) as 'Damirica' after the Sanskrit word 'Dramidaka' (i.e Dramidadesha) meaning the southernmost region of Bharata (i.e Indian subcontinent) hence the Oldest literary works and inscriptions of Kerala itself refers to the geographical region of Kerala as 'Dramida' in which the city of Mahodayapuram (i.e Makkothayarpattanam in Old Malayalam) or Thiruvanchikulam (i.e Srianjanakhalam in Sanskrit) or Muyirikodu (muziris) in Old Malayalam as situated on the banks of the river Periyar (i.e Mahanadhi, Choorni etc in Sanskrit) was the capital of the Kerala king titled as 'Keraladhinatha' in Sanskrit or 'Cherabhumishvara' in Malayalam (i.e Keralabhasha). : For Example: "Keralaanaam dramida shabdhavaachythvaad apabhramshena tadbhaasha tamizh ithyuchyathe" - Lilathilakam - Meaning - "The language of Kerala is known as Tamizh in the vernacular through the phonetic modification of the word Dramida." : The term 'Tamizhakam' in the Tamil grammar Tolkapiyam itself is the transliteration of 'Dramidaka' in Sanskrit and not denoting a single culture or language or kingdom or history but a common geographical region as consisting of KL and TN thereby the author has recognised 12 regional dialects in which 5 dialects are pertaining to Kerala and 7 dialects are pertaining to Tamil Nadu just as the Tamil grammar Nannul of the 13th century hence the Kerala records have also differentiated the language of Dramida (i.e Tamizh) into Pandyabhasha (pandi language), Cholabhasha (chola language) and Keralabhasha (malayalam language) in history. : The inscriptions of Kerala as dated between the 9th century C.E and 12th Century C.E is referred to as 'Old Malayalam' by linguists because the inscriptions of Kerala as dated between the 13th century C.E and 16th century C.E shows linguistic continuity with minimal differences hence it is termed as 'Middle Malayalam' by linguists.Malayalam language (i.e Keralabhasha) is just as old and classical as any other Dravidian languages including Tamil hence the phonology and vocabulary of Keralites to this very day are found in the Oldest mythological literary works and inscriptions of Tamil Nadu (ex. njan, njandu, thudangi, pettu, aliyan, achan etc) as the grammatical principles of Malayalam language (i.e Keralabhasha) was contrasting from the ‘Tamizh’ of the inhabitants of Tamil Nadu due to the phonological and morphological differences between the regional languages of the East and West of the Ghats mountain ranges since known history. (Ex. Njan in Malayalam is Nan in Tamil) : The terms 'Tamizh, Naazhi, Pazham, Pavizham, Makizham etc' in Old Malayalam are all derived from the Sanskrit words 'Dramida, Naadi, Phala, Pravala, Makula etc' as such phonetic modifications or transliterations of Sanskrit words are present in all the Dravidian languages since known literary history and similarly, the terms 'Ketala, Choda, Pada' etc in the Ashoka Edicts of the 3rd Century B.C in Prakrit language are the transliterations of the Sanskrit word 'Kerala, Chola, Pandya' etc as attested by all linguists today. : The terms Cherakon (i.e Keralakularaaja in Sanskrit), Kunnalakon (i.e Shailabdhishvara in Sanskrit), Valluvakon (i.e Vallabhakshoni in Sanskrit), Piraamanar (i.e Brahmana in Sanskrit) etc as found in Old Malayalam and Middle Malayalam inscriptions and literary works are NOT denoting the people of Tamil Nadu or 'Tamilans' irrespective of caste referred to as a 'Pandi, Chola, Konga, Thonda' in all of known Indian history but the people of Kerala referred to as 'Keralar' and 'Malayalar' alone in Indian history. : For Example: The kings of Kerala were referred to as 'Malayala Thiruvadi' in the inscription of South India as dated to the 13th Century C.E while the kings of Tamil Nadu were referred to as Pandya and Chola in the same inscription of the Kakatiya Dynasty of South India because the people of Tamil Nadu now known as 'Tamilans' were referred to as a 'Pandi, Chola, Konga, Thonda' in all of known Indian history including Kerala literary works until the 14th Century C.E while the people of Kerala including the Kings were referred to as 'Keralar' and 'Malayalar' alone in Indian history. : The region of modern Tamil Nadu as consisting of dharmapuri, salem, coimbatore etc as comprising of an earlier independent territorial unit known as ‘Kongu-Nadu’ were under their local chieftains referred to as 'Adiya or Adiyaman' until the 12th Century C.E in Indian history whereas it is the land of Kerala as comprising of the independent territorial unit known as ‘Malayalam’ or 'Malabar' who were under the local chieftains referred to as ‘Chera or Cheraman’ until the 12th century C.E in Indian history. : For Example: "The pagans (Hindus) of Malabar (Kerala) believes that a king (i.e a King of Kerala or Cheraman) had once ascended up to heaven and they continue to expect his descent therefore they assemble at cranganore (Kodungallur) and keep ready there wooden sandals, water and adorn the place with lamps and decorations on a certain night of the year" - Tuhfat al Mujahidin (16th Century C.E) : The Dravidian languages of Malayalam, Tamil, Tulu, Kannada, Telugu etc including the Tribal Languages (ex. Irula, Kurumba etc) as consisting of common/similar words are all emerging from a Proto-Dravidian language meaning an undocumented common spoken language in pre-history as attested by all linguists today hence there are places with common names in Kerala and Tamil Nadu even today (ex. Thondi, Musiri etc) thus it doesn't mean that the places of Kerala or 'Keralaputhra' referred to as Tyndis, Muziris etc by the travelers in the past were referring to the settlement of the people of Tamil Nadu or ‘Tamilans’ referred to as a 'Pandi, Chola, Konga, Thonda' in all of known Indian history including Kerala literary works until the 14th Century C.E but the people of Kerala referred to as ‘Keralar' and 'Malayalar' alone in Indian history. : For Example: “Among all the places in the world I have seen none equal to the Port of Alexandria except Kawlam (Kollam in Kerala) and Calicut (Kozhikodu in Kerala) in India” - Ibn Battuta (14th century C.E)
You lack the basic idea of classical languages. Classical language is something that stands on its own without the help of other language. Only Tamil and Sanskrit stands on this rule in Hindi. If Tamil grammar is just a copy of another language how can Tamil be one of the classical languages of the world... Kindly don't spread false info..
"Oh Uthiyan Seralathan, Even if the day loses its lustre, and the Four Vedas fail to propagate the truth, you will reign gloriously forever" - Sangam Literature. : Please don't support the dishonest historians sir. The kings of Kerala are referred to as 'Kerala, Keralaputhra, Keraladhinatha, Keralakularaja, Keralavarma etc' in all of known Indian history including Kerala literary works. The south Indian invaders from Tamil Nadu, Karnataka etc have referred to our Malayali kings as 'Sera, Serala, Chera, Cherama etc' in their Dravidian languages and as 'Kerala' in Sanskrit until the 12th century C.E in Indian history as it is our Malayali kings alone in the historical accounts of Kerala since the 9th Century C.E as consisting of the chieftain Kolathiri of Kolathunadu, Kurumpiyathiri of Kurumpranadu, Eralathiri of Eranadu, Vellathiri of Valluvanadu, Onathiri of Odanadu, Venathiri of Venadu etc who were the rulers of Kerala (Malabar) until the 18th Century C.E in Kerala history. : For Example: The 15th century inscription of Kanyakumari in Tamil Nadu refers to the Kerala king 'Jayasimha Deva' of Kollam (i.e Kolambhapuri in Sanskrit) as the 'Crowned Monarch' of the 'Sera Lineage' in Matrilineal succession whereas the 16th century inscription of Chidambaram in Tamil Nadu refers to the Kerala king 'Ramavarma Maharaja' of Thiruvanchikulam (i.e Srianjanakhalam in Sanskrit) as the 'Royal Descent' of the mythological king 'Seraman Perumal Nayanar' in Matrilineal succession hence even the foreign traveler Ibn battuta in the 14th Century C.E have also stated that "In Malabar (Kerala), the Kings transmit their sovereignty only to their sisters Son". : The origin of Marumakkathayam or the matrilineal inheritance is attributed to the mandate of 'Parashurama' in an epoch known as 'Treta Yuga' in the Kerala tradition thereby as per the traditional Kerala history, a King of Kerala or 'Cheraman' known as 'Ramavarma' had once ruled the entire land from Gokarnam to Kanyakumari after Lord Parashurama in an epoch known as 'KalI Yuga' and he divided the land among the nobles and his throne among his nephew (i.e mahodhayapattanam king) and his crown among his son (i.e kolambhapattanam king) with Kodungallur (i.e thiruvanchikulam) and Kollam (i.e thenvanchi) as their capital within the Kerala-Kingdom (i.e Keraladesha, Keralavishaya etc) hence even the foreign traveler Friar Jordanus in the 14th Century have also stated that “In this India (Kerala) never do even the sons of great kings or nobles inherit the goods of their parents, but only the sons of their sisters" : Duarte Barbosa (1480-1521) - “In this land of Malabar (Kerala) from cumbla (kasaragod district) to cape comorin (kanyakumari district), all men use one tongue only which they call Maliama” (i.e Malayalam) : The literary works as found from tamil nadu and sri lanka now called as 'sangam literature's' by modern scholars which refers to the kings and regions of Kerala (i.e sera) are not historical documents but a collection of Hindu, Jain and Buddhist mythology as written in Tamil language between 8th century C.E and 13th century C.E. (ex. pattitrupattu, purananuru, agananuru, silapathikaram, manimegalai etc) as per several historians whereas the oldest Kannada literature is dated to the 9th century C.E , and the oldest Telugu literature is dated to the 11th century C.E, and the oldest Malayalam literature is dated to the 12th century C.E : : For Example: 'Ilango Adikal' was the brother of 'Senguttuvan' and their father was 'Nedumseralathan', who is said to have conquered all of India until the Himalayas (i.e Imayamalai) and his father 'Uthiyanseralathan' is said to have fed the armies in the Mahabharata war from Kuttanadu in Kerala (i.e seralam in tamil) ex. Paripadal. : There existed no 'illango adikal, senguttuvan, nedumserlaathan, uthiyanseralaathan etc' in Kerala history or Indian history during the period of Ptolemy, Pliny or Ashoka's time when the sovereign of Kerala was titled as 'Keralaputhra' in Sanskrit. (Ex.Kerobothros by Ptolemy or Keprobotros by the author of the Periplus or Kaelobothras in Pliny's text or Ketalaputho in the Ashoka Edicts of 3rd century B.C). : The terms ''sangam age' and 'second chera empire' are made up by historians to create an 'historical time period' for the occurrence of the mythological events and kings as relating to the hindu, jain, buddhist mythology as written in Tamil language hence the 'Chera' aka Kerala Kings such as 'Rama Rajashekharan' and 'Sthanu Ravi Kulashekharan' in Kerala History are falsely assumed to be the 'Seraman perumal nayanar', a Hindu shaivite king and 'Kulashekhara Azhwar', a Hindu vaishnavite king' of Hindu mythology in Tamil. (i.e divya prabandham, periyapuranam) : For Example: In the traditional Hindu mythology, The Chera aka Kerala king 'Maharaja Kulashekhara' was born in Kerala to 'Maharaja Dridhavratha' more than 5000 years ago when the territory as ruled by the Chera aka Kerala king covered the largest portion of Dravidadesha (dravida region) including vast regions of modern Tamil Nadu once referred to as 'Kongu-Nadu, Pandi-Nadu, Chola-Nadu etc' in Indian history. : For Example: The term 'Vendar or Vendan' in Tamil is the modification of the Sanskrit word 'Indra' as attested by Tamil Nadu historians themselves hence the kings of Kerala were titled as 'Keralendra' meaning 'the Indra or the king of Kerala' in Kerala history itself just as the sovereign of Kerala was titled as 'Keralaputhra' in Sanskrit since the 3rd century B.C as the Oldest literary works of Kerala and the inscriptions as denoting the Kerala kings itself refers to only three main political entities or Trikshatra in Sanskrit (i.e Kerala, Chola, Pandya) in Dramida or Dramidaka (KL and TN) just as the Oldest literary works of Tamil Nadu itself refers to only three main political entities or Muvendar in Tamil (i.e Sera, Sora, Pandiya) in Tamizhakam (i.e Dramidaka in Sanskrit). : The Vrishni branch of Yadava kings or Kupakas, the southernmost lunar-dynasty (somakshathriya) of Kerala and the Haihaya branch of Yadava kings or Mushakas, the northernmost lunar-dynasty (somakshathriya) of Kerala as found in the historical accounts and in the literary works of Kerala are fabricated to be the successors of the various unhistorical hill-chieftains of the local Tamil Nadu mythology by pseudo-historians (Ex. Kari, the chieftain of Kollimalai (namakkal district) in Tamil Nadu or Pari, the chieftain of Parampumalai (sivaganga district) in Tamil Nadu etc) and similarly, it is only a traditional mythological history of Tamil Nadu in which the Vedic sage Agasthya Muni is believed to have brought various Velirs including Ay-Vel from Dwaraka to the various hills of Tamil Nadu including Pothiyilmalai (tirunelveli district) and not part of Kerala history. : The chieftains of Kerala (i.e Malanadu) such as ‘Chadayan Karunanthar, Sri Vallabhan Karunanthadakan, Vikramaditya Varagunan’ etc as occupying Vizhinjam, Aruviyoor etc in history are belonging to the lineage of the Yadavas and it is known in history that in the 13th century, the Venadu king ‘Kotha Marthanda Varma' sister Umadevi married the Yadava chieftain Jayasimha and their son ‘Ravivarma Kulashekharan’ became the King of Venadu as per the matrilineal order of succession. : These Yadava chieftains of Kerala has never referred to themselves as 'Ay' or 'Ay dynasty' in any of their inscriptions. The Ayar or the 'Aioi tribe' as mentioned by the Greek traveler Ptolemy in the 2nd century C.E were an agro-pastoral community of Kerala whereas the Kareioi (Karaiyar tribe) and Battoi (Vedar tribe) as mentioned by Ptolemy are the fishing and hunting community of Tamil Nadu and not a separate Kingdom. : The literary works of tamil nadu now called as 'sangam literature's' by modern scholars as found written in a mixture of Tamil script, Grantha script and Telugu script which refers to the kings and regions of Kerala (i.e seralam in tamil) and numerous other chieftains of the mountainous tracts and elsewhere in Tamil Nadu region such as Andiran, Nandan, Pekan, Nalli, Ori, Kari etc are not historical documents or historical figures but a collection of Hindu, Jain and Buddhist mythology of Tamil Nadu as written in Tamil language between 8th century C.E and 13th century C.E. (ex. pattitrupattu, purananuru, agananuru, silapathikaram, manimegalai etc) as per several historians whereas the oldest Kannada literature is dated to the 9th century C.E , and the oldest Telugu literature is dated to the 11th century C.E, and the oldest Malayalam literature is dated to the 12th century C.E. : For Example: The characters of 'Kannagi and Kovalan' in the Jain prequel 'Silapathikaram' and the Buddhist sequel 'Manimegalai' of Tamil Nadu is 'Kanyavu and Balakan' in the native Old Malayalam ballad of Kerala known as 'Thottam Paattu' in which 'Kanyavu' killed the Pandian king and burned down Madurai and Lord Shiva established her abode at Thiruvanchikulam (i.e Kodungallur) in the Kerala tradition. : The Jain prequel 'Silapathikaram' and the Buddhist sequel 'Manimegalai' of Tamil Nadu are abounded in the references to Brahmanas, Vedic Yajnas and even the art forms of Kerala as present to this very day but the story and the pseudonym or the characters of Ilango adikal, Kannagi, Kovalan, Senguttuvan, Nedumchezhiyan etc are neither historical figures nor historical documents but fictional characters of the traditional mythology of Tamil Nadu and not part of Kerala tradition.
@@Nithin90 Tamil not from dramika Understand Tamil meaning first. Tha - a sound Mi - e sound Zhu changed to zh - u sound a,e u are basic sounds. When the word Thamiz repeated several times it sounds Amizhtham ie is nectar. Ancients saints made this word Thamil. It is nothing to do with sanskrit.
@@Nithin90 Sanskrit came into existence into India only around 1AD. It is a language that has no script on its own but adapted from devanagari script. Before Sanskrit Prakrit was a language that was used even during Asoka times. So it should be the other way around that Sanskrit has taken words from Tamil and other European languages just like how it has taken devanagari script... !!! Dramila is a word given by Greek merchants and not by Sanskrit scholars as Sanskrit did not exists that time... !!
സംഘം തുടങ്ങിയത് മധുരൈ.. പലതും സംഘകാലത്തെ പറ്റി പറഞ്ഞത് തെറ്റ്. കുട്ടിക്ക് കിട്ടിയത് എഴുതിയിരിക്കുന്നെ. അത് കുറവല്ല. കൂടുതൽ അറിയാൻ ശ്രമിക്കുക. ഒരു ആഴക്കടലാണ് അത്..
lmeenavarmulkai_Qatar(cow herdsmaravarneithal_meenavaruzhavarpaalai_maravarKiribatimarutham_uzhavartheir caste kurunji_KiribativtCultivation . UThe term ezhava is sankritizationof uzhava the people who live in marurham land the land of water and agri culture the nambootris put them under untouchables grab their land and push them into stage of mere labours and sla very And in sangam age the people classified based on land not on their
Madurai kanchi have some poems which refers Onam.. Which is celebrated in Madurai and entire Thamizhagam... Now only KL is celebrating it
Peoples In Kerala, Before 8th century they spoke Tamil, after that Aryans (namboothiri & Nair) migrated to Kerala , Tamil mixed with Sanskrit then Malayalam formed
"The social stratification of Sangam Tamil Society was confined to the Uyarpirappalar or High Born as comprising of the Paarppanar (Brahmanas), Arasar (Rajas), Vaisiyar (Vaishya) and the Izhipirappalar or Low Born." - R. Gurukkal (historian)
:
K. Mavali Rajan (Tamilan historian) - "The 'pulaiyan' and 'pulaitti' (the feminine form of pulaiyan) of Tamil society were referred to as 'izhicinan' (outcaste, low or uncivilized person), and 'izhipirappalan (person of low birth, outcaste) in the Early Tamil text Purananuru."
Appar (Tamilan Vellalan Poet) - "I will worship the sincere devotee of Lord Shiva even if he is an untouchable 'Pulaiya' who revels in skinning cows and eating its flesh."
Tamilans and Malayalam speakers of Pandi ancestry pretend to be 'Anti-Aryan, Anti-Brahmin etc' on social media but their main intention is to claim that only Tamilan Brahmins (iyer, iyengar etc) and Tamilan Low-Castes including 'Pulaiyan' alone existed in Kerala and Tamil Nadu until the 8th Century C.E.
The caste-group of Kerala (Malabar) referred to as 'Bhatta (Bhattathiri), Vellala, Kammala (Vishwakarma), Ezhava, Paraya, Pulaya, Kurava etc' in the inscriptions and literary works of Kerala (Malabar) since the 9th Century C.E to 20th Century C.E had nothing to do with the Tamil speaking immigrants of Kerala (Malabar) referred to as 'Pandi Pattar (Iyer), Pandi Vellala, Pandi Kammala (Vishwakarma), Pandi Ezhava (Nadar), Pandi Paraya, Pandi Pulaya, Pandi Kurava etc' in Kerala (Malabar) history.
For Example: "Pulaya is a caste of Malabar region (Kerala) as well as Madurai and Coimbatore region (Tamil Nadu)" - Census of India 1901
കൊടുന്തമിഴ്+സംസ്കൃതം=മണിപ്രവാളം -
ഉത്തമ മണിപ്രവാളം -നമ്പൂതിരി മലയാള ഭാഷ
അധമ മണിപ്രവാളം - ( നാട്ട്ഭാഷ ) മലയാളഭാഷ
Naale xmnu vendy nokkunnavr ondo
The Sangam period that belongs to Tamil Mozhi is explained in Malayalam without any controversy in this video..... THANKS 🙏
മലയാളികളും കന്നഡരും തെലുങ്കും ഒരിക്കൽ തമിഴ് സംസാരിച്ചിരുന്നു.മലയക്കാരും കന്നഡരും തെലുങ്കും തമിഴരും ആദി ദ്രാവിഡ സംസാരിച്ചിട്ടില്ല. ഒന്നാമതായി, ആദി ദ്രാവിഡ ഭാഷ എന്നൊന്നില്ല. ദ്രാവിഡ ഭാഷാ കുടുംബത്തിന് പേരിടുന്നത് തെറ്റാണ്. ദ്രാവിഡ ഭാഷാ കുടുംബത്തിന് തമിഴ് ഭാഷാ കുടുംബം എന്ന് പേരിടണം. കാരണം തമിഴ് മലയാളത്തിന്റെയും കന്നഡയുടെയും തെലുങ്കിന്റെയും മാതൃഭാഷയാണ്
உங்கல் புரிதலுக்கு நன்றி தோழர்
Correct
"The social stratification of Sangam Tamil Society was confined to the Uyarpirappalar or High Born as comprising of the Paarppanar (Brahmanas), Arasar (Rajas), Vaisiyar (Vaishya) and the Izhipirappalar or Low Born." - R. Gurukkal (historian)
:
K. Mavali Rajan (Tamilan historian) - "The 'pulaiyan' and 'pulaitti' (the feminine form of pulaiyan) of Tamil society were referred to as 'izhicinan' (outcaste, low or uncivilized person), and 'izhipirappalan (person of low birth, outcaste) in the Early Tamil text Purananuru."
Appar (Tamilan Vellalan Poet) - "I will worship the sincere devotee of Lord Shiva even if he is an untouchable 'Pulaiya' who revels in skinning cows and eating its flesh."
Tamilans and Malayalam speakers of Pandi ancestry pretend to be 'Anti-Aryan, Anti-Brahmin etc' on social media but their main intention is to claim that only Tamilan Brahmins (iyer, iyengar etc) and Tamilan Low-Castes including 'Pulaiyan' alone existed in Kerala and Tamil Nadu until the 8th Century C.E.
The caste-group of Kerala (Malabar) referred to as 'Bhatta (Bhattathiri), Vellala, Kammala (Vishwakarma), Ezhava, Paraya, Pulaya, Kurava etc' in the inscriptions and literary works of Kerala (Malabar) since the 9th Century C.E to 20th Century C.E had nothing to do with the Tamil speaking immigrants of Kerala (Malabar) referred to as 'Pandi Pattar (Iyer), Pandi Vellala, Pandi Kammala (Vishwakarma), Pandi Ezhava (Nadar), Pandi Paraya, Pandi Pulaya, Pandi Kurava etc' in Kerala (Malabar) history.
For Example: "Pulaya is a caste of Malabar region (Kerala) as well as Madurai and Coimbatore region (Tamil Nadu)" - Census of India 1901
@@Nithin90 paarpanar is not brahmins,brahmins are known as "Abrahmar", paarpanar its only words for using saints.
*Pula means Knowledge in tamil, brahmins to degrad used pula as they given meaning as pollution.
One of the oldest language in the world, older than Sanskrit.
Nammalum thamilarum onnu thanne aanu.
Another speciality of Tamizh .
When the word tamizh is repeated it sounds Amizhtham ie is nector
സംഘകാലം ജാതി ഇല്ലാ 🐅🙏❤
Chozha not chola.Tamil is the first language used 'zha'
ழ, ள, ல
Iveda Vakkan Kerala thil Kozhikode Vindaloo
'ழ' ழி Aanu'
கோழிக்கோடு Ennulluthanu Alley
Karnataka and Andhra was not a part of ancient Tamilakam, sangam refers it as foreign countries... speaking different languages..
கடல் கரை நாடு > கர்நாடக
Wrong information
@@GraceNettikat💯
@@PrapakaranKowarthanan what's wrong?
Thank you. Nale exam ആണ് video ഒരുപാട് ഉപകാരപ്പെട്ടു
തമിഴ്❤
തമിഴ് , தமிழ் , Tamil .
തമിഴ് < അമൃതം .
தமிழ் < அமுதம் .
Tamil < Nectar .
ജാതി വേർതിരിവുകൾ ഇല്ലാതെ വളരെ സന്തോഷത്തോടെ ജീവിച്ചിരുന്ന ഒരു ജനത. അതാ അവിടേക്ക് ചിലർ (ആര്യൻമാർ) കടന്നു വരുന്നു :ഠമാർ പടാർ ഡേ 🥴
Malayali Poli 🔥❤️🔥 cheras cholas..padias ❤️🖤🔥
Maläyalam APO Ila😂...
Wherever you are ... whatever language you speak but..... without tamil there is none of language that speaking major of the world
Ok.
Adipoliyan nannayit manasilavunnund
Informative
തമിഴ് ഭാഷാ കുടുംബം
ആദി ദ്രാവിടഭാഷ? ലിബി ഏതാണ്?
ഗ്രന്ഥ
ഗ്രന്ഥ പല്ലവ രാജാക്കന്മാരുടെ കാലത്ത് ഉത്ഭവിച്ചതാണ്. തമിഴും, സംസ്കൃതവും ചേർന്നത്.
Good video
Good presentation 👏
മലയെ ഭരിക്കാൻ കഴിയുന്നവർ എന്നർത്ഥമുള്ള തമിഴ് പദമാണ് മലയാളം
Best
Beauty of tamizh No other languages in india have this speciality.
Vowels- all languages they are called swaras including malayalam since it is copied from sanskrit.In Tamil it is referred as soul( uyir)
Consonants - in all languages they are called vyangans. But in tamil it is called body( mei)
When soul and body interact life is produced.
Ningalu trissur analle
வரலாற்றை தவராக்காதீர்....திராவிடம் என்று ஒரு மொழி இல்லை....தவறான தகவலை பரப்ப வேண்டாம்
Yan maravar pandiyas⚔⚔⚔🎠🎠 king tamil maravar.... Chera cholas pandiya king maravar anum.... 🏹🏹🏹🗡🗡🗡🗡⚔⚔⚔⚔🎠🎠🎠🎠🎠🎠...old king Ivaranu.. Veeran warriors🏀🌉🏀🌉🏀🌉....
Maravar a tha kerala la pulayar nu soluvom...
Sir, Kerala was one of the 7 janapadas (kingdoms) of Bharata (i.e Indian subcontinent) along with Tulanga (tulu region), Konkana (konkan region) etc that were collectively known as the 'Parashurama Kshetra' (i.e creation of parashurama) and Kerala was one of the 3 janapadas (kingdoms) of Dravidadesha (dravida region) meaning the southernmost region of Bharata (Indian subcontinent) along with Pandya Kingdom and Chola Kingdom as according to the Sanskrit scripture's (i.e Puranas) since known history.
:
The land of 'Kerala or Keralajanapadha or Keralaputhra' in Indian history since the 3rd Century B.C to 12th Century C.E referred to as Malayalam, Malanadu, Malamandalam etc in Kerala history after the Sanskrit word 'Malaya' as denoting the western ghats did not consist of any region east of the Ghats or the region of Tamil Nadu once referred to as 'Kongu-Nadu, Pandi-Nadu, Chola-Nadu etc' in Indian history hence the 1st century and 2nd century European travelers specifically refers to the capital of Keralaputhra as situated 20 stadia (3 km) inland from the sea-coast or in present day Kerala.
:
The kings of Kerala are referred to as belonging to the Keralakula (i.e Kerala-Dynasty) in the Oldest Sanskrit works of Kerala as the sovereign of Kerala was titled as ‘Keralaputhra’ in Sanskrit since the 3rd Century B.C and similarly Yakshan Keralan, Godha Keralan, Kerala Narayanan, Keralan Srikumaran etc are the various other personal names of Keralites as present in the Oldest Inscriptions of Kerala in Old Malayalam since the 9th century C.E as the Kerala-Country and its capital was under the dominion of the Naaduvaazhikal (i.e vallabhapattanam king, mahodhayapattanam king, kolambhapattanam king etc) as attested by native records and foreign travelers including Al-Biruni since the 11th century C.E
:
For Example: "Malabar (i.e Malayalam Country) is a great province lying towards the west 'of the province of Bandi (i.e Pandya)' and the people here have a language of their own and a king of their own and pay tribute to nobody." - Marco Polo (13th century C.E).
:
It is accepted by Tamil Nadu scholars that the Sanskrit term 'Chola' was written as 'SoRa' in the various Tamil inscriptions of the Chola-Dynasty and similarly, the 'Kerala' kings were referred to as 'SeRa' in the inscriptions of the Invaders from Tamil Nadu until the 12th century C.E as the term 'Sera or Seralan' in Tamil is the transliteration of 'Kerala' in Sanskrit whereas the term 'Pandi or Pandiyan' in Tamil is the transliteration of 'Pandya' in Sanskrit as the term 'Sora or Soran' in Tamil is the transliteration of 'Chola' in Sanskrit hence the land of Kerala was referred to as Cheraman-Nadu, Cheraman-Loka, Chera-Bhumi etc in Kerala records itself.
:
For Example: "...sarvam eve anupashyata tathaiva Andhran cha Pundran cha Cholan, Pandyan, Keralan." - Valmiki Ramayanam - Kishkindha Kanda
:
The 7th century to 12th century inscriptions of Tamil Nadu refers to multiple Pandya kings and Chola kings as having invaded the region of “Malainadu or Kerala” and the Tamil Nadu king Raja Raja Chola (985 C.E -1014 C.E) in his inscriptions on the conquest of Kerala claims that his army invaded the country which was the Creation Of Parashurama (Kerala) and plundered the town of Vizhinjam, Kollam, Kodungallur etc which itself shows that the land of Kerala was known as the Parashurama Kshetra (i.e creation of parashurama) among even the non-keralites in history.
:
The ancient European travelers of the 1st and 2nd century C.E have referred to the geographical region of North India or the land between Himalaya mountains and Vindhya mountains as 'Ariaca' after the Sanskrit word 'Aryaka' (i.e Aryadesha) whereas they referred to the geographical region of Kerala (i.e Keralaputhra) as 'Damirica' after the Sanskrit word 'Dramidaka' (i.e Dramidadesha) meaning the southernmost region of Bharata (i.e Indian subcontinent) hence the Oldest literary works and inscriptions of Kerala itself refers to the geographical region of Kerala as 'Dramida' in which the city of Mahodayapuram (i.e Makkothayarpattanam in Old Malayalam) or Thiruvanchikulam (i.e Srianjanakhalam in Sanskrit) or Muyirikodu (muziris) in Old Malayalam as situated on the banks of the river Periyar (i.e Mahanadhi, Choorni etc in Sanskrit) was the capital of the Kerala king titled as 'Keraladhinatha' in Sanskrit or 'Cherabhumishvara' in Malayalam (i.e Keralabhasha).
:
For Example: "Keralaanaam dramida shabdhavaachythvaad apabhramshena tadbhaasha tamizh ithyuchyathe" - Lilathilakam - Meaning - "The language of Kerala is known as Tamizh in the vernacular through the phonetic modification of the word Dramida."
:
The term 'Tamizhakam' in the Tamil grammar Tolkapiyam itself is the transliteration of 'Dramidaka' in Sanskrit and not denoting a single culture or language or kingdom or history but a common geographical region as consisting of KL and TN thereby the author has recognised 12 regional dialects in which 5 dialects are pertaining to Kerala and 7 dialects are pertaining to Tamil Nadu just as the Tamil grammar Nannul of the 13th century hence the Kerala records have also differentiated the language of Dramida (i.e Tamizh) into Pandyabhasha (pandi language), Cholabhasha (chola language) and Keralabhasha (malayalam language) in history.
:
The inscriptions of Kerala as dated between the 9th century C.E and 12th Century C.E is referred to as 'Old Malayalam' by linguists because the inscriptions of Kerala as dated between the 13th century C.E and 16th century C.E shows linguistic continuity with minimal differences hence it is termed as 'Middle Malayalam' by linguists.Malayalam language (i.e Keralabhasha) is just as old and classical as any other Dravidian languages including Tamil hence the phonology and vocabulary of Keralites to this very day are found in the Oldest mythological literary works and inscriptions of Tamil Nadu (ex. njan, njandu, thudangi, pettu, aliyan, achan etc) as the grammatical principles of Malayalam language (i.e Keralabhasha) was contrasting from the ‘Tamizh’ of the inhabitants of Tamil Nadu due to the phonological and morphological differences between the regional languages of the East and West of the Ghats mountain ranges since known history. (Ex. Njan in Malayalam is Nan in Tamil)
:
The terms 'Tamizh, Naazhi, Pazham, Pavizham, Makizham etc' in Old Malayalam are all derived from the Sanskrit words 'Dramida, Naadi, Phala, Pravala, Makula etc' as such phonetic modifications or transliterations of Sanskrit words are present in all the Dravidian languages since known literary history and similarly, the terms 'Ketala, Choda, Pada' etc in the Ashoka Edicts of the 3rd Century B.C in Prakrit language are the transliterations of the Sanskrit word 'Kerala, Chola, Pandya' etc as attested by all linguists today.
:
The terms Cherakon (i.e Keralakularaaja in Sanskrit), Kunnalakon (i.e Shailabdhishvara in Sanskrit), Valluvakon (i.e Vallabhakshoni in Sanskrit), Piraamanar (i.e Brahmana in Sanskrit) etc as found in Old Malayalam and Middle Malayalam inscriptions and literary works are NOT denoting the people of Tamil Nadu or 'Tamilans' irrespective of caste referred to as a 'Pandi, Chola, Konga, Thonda' in all of known Indian history but the people of Kerala referred to as 'Keralar' and 'Malayalar' alone in Indian history.
:
For Example:
The kings of Kerala were referred to as 'Malayala Thiruvadi' in the inscription of South India as dated to the 13th Century C.E while the kings of Tamil Nadu were referred to as Pandya and Chola in the same inscription of the Kakatiya Dynasty of South India because the people of Tamil Nadu now known as 'Tamilans' were referred to as a 'Pandi, Chola, Konga, Thonda' in all of known Indian history including Kerala literary works until the 14th Century C.E while the people of Kerala including the Kings were referred to as 'Keralar' and 'Malayalar' alone in Indian history.
:
The region of modern Tamil Nadu as consisting of dharmapuri, salem, coimbatore etc as comprising of an earlier independent territorial unit known as ‘Kongu-Nadu’ were under their local chieftains referred to as 'Adiya or Adiyaman' until the 12th Century C.E in Indian history whereas it is the land of Kerala as comprising of the independent territorial unit known as ‘Malayalam’ or 'Malabar' who were under the local chieftains referred to as ‘Chera or Cheraman’ until the 12th century C.E in Indian history.
:
For Example: "The pagans (Hindus) of Malabar (Kerala) believes that a king (i.e a King of Kerala or Cheraman) had once ascended up to heaven and they continue to expect his descent therefore they assemble at cranganore (Kodungallur) and keep ready there wooden sandals, water and adorn the place with lamps and decorations on a certain night of the year" - Tuhfat al Mujahidin (16th Century C.E)
:
The Dravidian languages of Malayalam, Tamil, Tulu, Kannada, Telugu etc including the Tribal Languages (ex. Irula, Kurumba etc) as consisting of common/similar words are all emerging from a Proto-Dravidian language meaning an undocumented common spoken language in pre-history as attested by all linguists today hence there are places with common names in Kerala and Tamil Nadu even today (ex. Thondi, Musiri etc) thus it doesn't mean that the places of Kerala or 'Keralaputhra' referred to as Tyndis, Muziris etc by the travelers in the past were referring to the settlement of the people of Tamil Nadu or ‘Tamilans’ referred to as a 'Pandi, Chola, Konga, Thonda' in all of known Indian history including Kerala literary works until the 14th Century C.E but the people of Kerala referred to as ‘Keralar' and 'Malayalar' alone in Indian history.
:
For Example:
“Among all the places in the world I have seen none equal to the Port of Alexandria except Kawlam (Kollam in Kerala) and Calicut (Kozhikodu in Kerala) in India” - Ibn Battuta (14th century C.E)
Never
Tamil is the world's oldest language
You lack the basic idea of classical languages. Classical language is something that stands on its own without the help of other language. Only Tamil and Sanskrit stands on this rule in Hindi. If Tamil grammar is just a copy of another language how can Tamil be one of the classical languages of the world... Kindly don't spread false info..
"Oh Uthiyan Seralathan, Even if the day loses its lustre, and the Four Vedas fail to propagate the truth, you will reign gloriously forever" - Sangam Literature.
:
Please don't support the dishonest historians sir. The kings of Kerala are referred to as 'Kerala, Keralaputhra, Keraladhinatha, Keralakularaja, Keralavarma etc' in all of known Indian history including Kerala literary works. The south Indian invaders from Tamil Nadu, Karnataka etc have referred to our Malayali kings as 'Sera, Serala, Chera, Cherama etc' in their Dravidian languages and as 'Kerala' in Sanskrit until the 12th century C.E in Indian history as it is our Malayali kings alone in the historical accounts of Kerala since the 9th Century C.E as consisting of the chieftain Kolathiri of Kolathunadu, Kurumpiyathiri of Kurumpranadu, Eralathiri of Eranadu, Vellathiri of Valluvanadu, Onathiri of Odanadu, Venathiri of Venadu etc who were the rulers of Kerala (Malabar) until the 18th Century C.E in Kerala history.
:
For Example:
The 15th century inscription of Kanyakumari in Tamil Nadu refers to the Kerala king 'Jayasimha Deva' of Kollam (i.e Kolambhapuri in Sanskrit) as the 'Crowned Monarch' of the 'Sera Lineage' in Matrilineal succession whereas the 16th century inscription of Chidambaram in Tamil Nadu refers to the Kerala king 'Ramavarma Maharaja' of Thiruvanchikulam (i.e Srianjanakhalam in Sanskrit) as the 'Royal Descent' of the mythological king 'Seraman Perumal Nayanar' in Matrilineal succession hence even the foreign traveler Ibn battuta in the 14th Century C.E have also stated that "In Malabar (Kerala), the Kings transmit their sovereignty only to their sisters Son".
:
The origin of Marumakkathayam or the matrilineal inheritance is attributed to the mandate of 'Parashurama' in an epoch known as 'Treta Yuga' in the Kerala tradition thereby as per the traditional Kerala history, a King of Kerala or 'Cheraman' known as 'Ramavarma' had once ruled the entire land from Gokarnam to Kanyakumari after Lord Parashurama in an epoch known as 'KalI Yuga' and he divided the land among the nobles and his throne among his nephew (i.e mahodhayapattanam king) and his crown among his son (i.e kolambhapattanam king) with Kodungallur (i.e thiruvanchikulam) and Kollam (i.e thenvanchi) as their capital within the Kerala-Kingdom (i.e Keraladesha, Keralavishaya etc) hence even the foreign traveler Friar Jordanus in the 14th Century have also stated that “In this India (Kerala) never do even the sons of great kings or nobles inherit the goods of their parents, but only the sons of their sisters"
:
Duarte Barbosa (1480-1521) - “In this land of Malabar (Kerala) from cumbla (kasaragod district) to cape comorin (kanyakumari district), all men use one tongue only which they call Maliama” (i.e Malayalam)
:
The literary works as found from tamil nadu and sri lanka now called as 'sangam literature's' by modern scholars which refers to the kings and regions of Kerala (i.e sera) are not historical documents but a collection of Hindu, Jain and Buddhist mythology as written in Tamil language between 8th century C.E and 13th century C.E. (ex. pattitrupattu, purananuru, agananuru, silapathikaram, manimegalai etc) as per several historians whereas the oldest Kannada literature is dated to the 9th century C.E , and the oldest Telugu literature is dated to the 11th century C.E, and the oldest Malayalam literature is dated to the 12th century C.E
:
:
For Example: 'Ilango Adikal' was the brother of 'Senguttuvan' and their father was 'Nedumseralathan', who is said to have conquered all of India until the Himalayas (i.e Imayamalai) and his father 'Uthiyanseralathan' is said to have fed the armies in the Mahabharata war from Kuttanadu in Kerala (i.e seralam in tamil) ex. Paripadal.
:
There existed no 'illango adikal, senguttuvan, nedumserlaathan, uthiyanseralaathan etc' in Kerala history or Indian history during the period of Ptolemy, Pliny or Ashoka's time when the sovereign of Kerala was titled as 'Keralaputhra' in Sanskrit. (Ex.Kerobothros by Ptolemy or Keprobotros by the author of the Periplus or Kaelobothras in Pliny's text or Ketalaputho in the Ashoka Edicts of 3rd century B.C).
:
The terms ''sangam age' and 'second chera empire' are made up by historians to create an 'historical time period' for the occurrence of the mythological events and kings as relating to the hindu, jain, buddhist mythology as written in Tamil language hence the 'Chera' aka Kerala Kings such as 'Rama Rajashekharan' and 'Sthanu Ravi Kulashekharan' in Kerala History are falsely assumed to be the 'Seraman perumal nayanar', a Hindu shaivite king and 'Kulashekhara Azhwar', a Hindu vaishnavite king' of Hindu mythology in Tamil. (i.e divya prabandham, periyapuranam)
:
For Example: In the traditional Hindu mythology, The Chera aka Kerala king 'Maharaja Kulashekhara' was born in Kerala to 'Maharaja Dridhavratha' more than 5000 years ago when the territory as ruled by the Chera aka Kerala king covered the largest portion of Dravidadesha (dravida region) including vast regions of modern Tamil Nadu once referred to as 'Kongu-Nadu, Pandi-Nadu, Chola-Nadu etc' in Indian history.
:
For Example:
The term 'Vendar or Vendan' in Tamil is the modification of the Sanskrit word 'Indra' as attested by Tamil Nadu historians themselves hence the kings of Kerala were titled as 'Keralendra' meaning 'the Indra or the king of Kerala' in Kerala history itself just as the sovereign of Kerala was titled as 'Keralaputhra' in Sanskrit since the 3rd century B.C as the Oldest literary works of Kerala and the inscriptions as denoting the Kerala kings itself refers to only three main political entities or Trikshatra in Sanskrit (i.e Kerala, Chola, Pandya) in Dramida or Dramidaka (KL and TN) just as the Oldest literary works of Tamil Nadu itself refers to only three main political entities or Muvendar in Tamil (i.e Sera, Sora, Pandiya) in Tamizhakam (i.e Dramidaka in Sanskrit).
:
The Vrishni branch of Yadava kings or Kupakas, the southernmost lunar-dynasty (somakshathriya) of Kerala and the Haihaya branch of Yadava kings or Mushakas, the northernmost lunar-dynasty (somakshathriya) of Kerala as found in the historical accounts and in the literary works of Kerala are fabricated to be the successors of the various unhistorical hill-chieftains of the local Tamil Nadu mythology by pseudo-historians (Ex. Kari, the chieftain of Kollimalai (namakkal district) in Tamil Nadu or Pari, the chieftain of Parampumalai (sivaganga district) in Tamil Nadu etc) and similarly, it is only a traditional mythological history of Tamil Nadu in which the Vedic sage Agasthya Muni is believed to have brought various Velirs including Ay-Vel from Dwaraka to the various hills of Tamil Nadu including Pothiyilmalai (tirunelveli district) and not part of Kerala history.
:
The chieftains of Kerala (i.e Malanadu) such as ‘Chadayan Karunanthar, Sri Vallabhan Karunanthadakan, Vikramaditya Varagunan’ etc as occupying Vizhinjam, Aruviyoor etc in history are belonging to the lineage of the Yadavas and it is known in history that in the 13th century, the Venadu king ‘Kotha Marthanda Varma' sister Umadevi married the Yadava chieftain Jayasimha and their son ‘Ravivarma Kulashekharan’ became the King of Venadu as per the matrilineal order of succession.
:
These Yadava chieftains of Kerala has never referred to themselves as 'Ay' or 'Ay dynasty' in any of their inscriptions. The Ayar or the 'Aioi tribe' as mentioned by the Greek traveler Ptolemy in the 2nd century C.E were an agro-pastoral community of Kerala whereas the Kareioi (Karaiyar tribe) and Battoi (Vedar tribe) as mentioned by Ptolemy are the fishing and hunting community of Tamil Nadu and not a separate Kingdom.
:
The literary works of tamil nadu now called as 'sangam literature's' by modern scholars as found written in a mixture of Tamil script, Grantha script and Telugu script which refers to the kings and regions of Kerala (i.e seralam in tamil) and numerous other chieftains of the mountainous tracts and elsewhere in Tamil Nadu region such as Andiran, Nandan, Pekan, Nalli, Ori, Kari etc are not historical documents or historical figures but a collection of Hindu, Jain and Buddhist mythology of Tamil Nadu as written in Tamil language between 8th century C.E and 13th century C.E. (ex. pattitrupattu, purananuru, agananuru, silapathikaram, manimegalai etc) as per several historians whereas the oldest Kannada literature is dated to the 9th century C.E , and the oldest Telugu literature is dated to the 11th century C.E, and the oldest Malayalam literature is dated to the 12th century C.E.
:
For Example:
The characters of 'Kannagi and Kovalan' in the Jain prequel 'Silapathikaram' and the Buddhist sequel 'Manimegalai' of Tamil Nadu is 'Kanyavu and Balakan' in the native Old Malayalam ballad of Kerala known as 'Thottam Paattu' in which 'Kanyavu' killed the Pandian king and burned down Madurai and Lord Shiva established her abode at Thiruvanchikulam (i.e Kodungallur) in the Kerala tradition.
:
The Jain prequel 'Silapathikaram' and the Buddhist sequel 'Manimegalai' of Tamil Nadu are abounded in the references to Brahmanas, Vedic Yajnas and even the art forms of Kerala as present to this very day but the story and the pseudonym or the characters of Ilango adikal, Kannagi, Kovalan, Senguttuvan, Nedumchezhiyan etc are neither historical figures nor historical documents but fictional characters of the traditional mythology of Tamil Nadu and not part of Kerala tradition.
@@Nithin90 Tamil not from dramika
Understand Tamil meaning first.
Tha - a sound
Mi - e sound
Zhu changed to zh - u sound
a,e u are basic sounds. When the word Thamiz repeated several times it sounds Amizhtham ie is nectar. Ancients saints made this word Thamil. It is nothing to do with sanskrit.
@@Nithin90 Sanskrit came into existence into India only around 1AD. It is a language that has no script on its own but adapted from devanagari script. Before Sanskrit Prakrit was a language that was used even during Asoka times. So it should be the other way around that Sanskrit has taken words from Tamil and other European languages just like how it has taken devanagari script... !!! Dramila is a word given by Greek merchants and not by Sanskrit scholars as Sanskrit did not exists that time... !!
സംഘം തുടങ്ങിയത് മധുരൈ.. പലതും സംഘകാലത്തെ പറ്റി പറഞ്ഞത് തെറ്റ്. കുട്ടിക്ക് കിട്ടിയത് എഴുതിയിരിക്കുന്നെ. അത് കുറവല്ല. കൂടുതൽ അറിയാൻ ശ്രമിക്കുക. ഒരു ആഴക്കടലാണ് അത്..
പുലൈവാഞ്ചി
Ippo ulla malayalikku ithu onnum aryillallo tamilanmaarayum TN yum kandaal puchamalle.
Tamil poet's kka padikkum pole ariyaam athinta kaalankkal ethra varusankalukku munbu ullathu ennu ariyaam
Ippozhum Sangha kaalam aanu😅
lmeenavarmulkai_Qatar(cow herdsmaravarneithal_meenavaruzhavarpaalai_maravarKiribatimarutham_uzhavartheir caste
kurunji_KiribativtCultivation . UThe term ezhava is sankritizationof uzhava the people who live in marurham land the land of water and agri culture the nambootris put them under untouchables grab their land and push them into stage of mere labours and sla very And in sangam age the people classified based on land not on their
അകം 400 പുറം 400 വായിക്കുക