Do correct me if i'm wrong. but the question @20:26 asks about the no. of orders that would be visible, since we calculated maximum order of each wavelength wouldn't all the orders preceding would also be observed? For wavelength having max order=3, 1& 2 will be visible and for m=5, 1,2,3,4 and 5 would be seen.
At 19:30, there is a correction. Lines/inch into lines/cm, divide it by 2.54. Sorry for the mistake
Bsc part2 physics hons question prisson and Laplac equation in cartesian co- ordinat and give their solution
it is correct no need for correction
@@rohan8767 no it's not
i am from ethiopia and i like it very much it helps me alot
You utopia
you gained a subscriber maam with this video
The best explanation is here 🎉🎉
But Ma'am....What was ur first 3 4 words starting of lectures 😒😒???
Mam at 17:12 why u consider minima condition they not mention anything in question
minima condition is not taken the equation is used as normal to the data given in question
10:41 also they not mention whether it is maximum or minimum why u r taking everytime maxima condition mam
Great explanation, Thanks ma'am.
🙏
4:41 mam they not mention it is Maxima but why u take that condition mam
Do correct me if i'm wrong. but the question @20:26 asks about the no. of orders that would be visible, since we calculated maximum order of each wavelength wouldn't all the orders preceding would also be observed? For wavelength having max order=3, 1& 2 will be visible and for m=5, 1,2,3,4 and 5 would be seen.
I guess you are right
between 5000 and 7000 is the question, you are answering some other question
great
🙏🙏
you are always best mam
🙏🙏
GOAT in physics 😍
😊
Thank you miss
Thank you too
Thank you madam so helpful
🙏
Underrated
🙏
@@physicsjessy7746 You helped me with my exams ma'am.. Thank you so much
I am getting 9×10^-8 answers to the last question
Thank you so much
🙏
thank you ma'am
Peaks madam
Mam hindi me bol kr padhaye
Love u baby