Math Olympiad Challenge: Exponential Problem Solved Without a Calculator | Geendle
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ย. 2024
- Hello friends! Welcome to Geendle!
Please kindly ask for your signature. You help me a lot.
In this video I solve an exponential without calculator a calculator.
#squareroot ,#crossmultiplicationmethod ,#division ,#fraction ,#maths ,#algebra ,#subtraction ,#calculus , #Math, #mathematics , #Algebra, #Geometry, #Calculus, #Trigonometry, #statistics , #probability , #linearalgebra , #numbertheory , #Topology, #mathproblems , #mathhelp , #mathtutorial , #MathLessons, #MathEducation, #MathTeacher, #mathstudent , #MathFun, #MathPuzzle, #mathhistory , #mathexplained , #MathForKids, #MathChallenge, #mathisfun
This comprehensive list covers a wide range of topics that can be addressed in math-related content.
Algebra:
Equations
Inequalities
Polynomials
Functions
Systems of Equations
Exponential and Logarithmic Functions
Geometry:
Euclidean Geometry
Coordinate Geometry
Trigonometry
Geometric Transformations
Solid Geometry
Geometric Proofs
Calculus:
Limits
Derivatives
Integrals
Differential Equations
Multivariable Calculus
Sequences and Series
Statistics and Probability:
Descriptive Statistics
Inferential Statistics
Probability Theory
Random Variables
Probability Distributions
Hypothesis Testing
Linear Algebra:
Vectors
Matrices
Determinants
Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors
Vector Spaces
Linear Transformations
Number Theory:
Divisibility
Prime Numbers
Modular Arithmetic
Diophantine Equations
Cryptography
Fermat’s and Euler’s Theorems
Discrete Mathematics:
Combinatorics
Graph Theory
Logic
Set Theory
Algorithms
Boolean Algebra
Topology:
Topological Spaces
Continuity
Compactness
Homotopy
Fundamental Group
Manifolds
Functional Analysis:
Banach Spaces
Hilbert Spaces
Linear Operators
Normed Spaces
Spectral Theory
Fourier Analysis
Mathematical Logic:
Propositional Logic
Predicate Logic
Model Theory
Proof Theory
Set Theory
Computability Theory
Abstract Algebra:
Groups
Rings
Fields
Modules
Galois Theory
Homomorphisms
Applied Mathematics:
Numerical Analysis
Optimization
Differential Equations
Mathematical Modeling
Control Theory
Game Theory
Recreational Mathematics:
Puzzles
Magic Squares
Mathematical Games
Mathematical Paradoxes
Mathematical Art
Fractals
History of Mathematics:
Ancient Mathematics
Medieval Mathematics
Renaissance Mathematics
Modern Mathematics
Biographies of Mathematicians
Development of Mathematical Theories
Mathematics in Computing:
Algorithms
Data Structures
Computational Complexity
Cryptography
Information Theory
Machine Learning
Mathematics in Natural Sciences:
Mathematical Physics
Mathematical Biology
Mathematical Chemistry
Environmental Mathematics
Financial Mathematics
Actuarial Science
Exam Preparation:
SAT Math
ACT Math
GRE Math
GMAT Math
Math Olympiad
College Entrance Exams
Thanks for visiting!
The function in a on the LHS is an ever increasing function as it goes to infinite where a ≥ 1. The difference keeps increasing and starting at a = 1, then the LHS of the equation equals 1. We now know there is one and only one real solution to the LHS = 175.
By observation, we see that a = 4 is the one and only solution where a is greater than 1.
Why it's assumed that a is intiger? I don't recall that it was mentioned. Without this assumpton this proof is wrong.
Not really
"a" must be an integer for this problem. I forgot to mention or write in the thumbnail. Thanks for remember.
@@Geendle but isn't it implied that a is an integer by the setup given that we most likely won't get to 175 if the bases are integers?
But 'a' doesn't have to be an even number. So, we cannot resolve it as a/2 *2 in the exponent.
Elaborate
@@frax5051 this same method could not be applied to this question :
a^a - (a-1)^a = 2101
the answer is a = 5.
Prime factors of 2101 are 11, 191. But if you use the above method you can't get the answer because a is odd integer. The above method assumed a to be an even number even before finding it.
@@gontusandeep2972 I'm getting 7 tho
"a" must be an integer for this problem. I forgot to mention or write in the thumbnail. Thanks for reminding me.
@@Geendle for the above method doesn't it need to be an even integer
a = 4
Now let's see if I'm right.
It's easy and now proof that there are no other solutions
😂
Yesh! you are!
How to know 5x35 being wrong?
The factors of 175 that lead us to a positive integer solution are just 7 and 25. The others are not. Thank you.
I tried to calculate using the 5x35 and it yield different result, i was wondering how you managed to know it was 7 x 25 that has the correct answer ? Is it hit or miss or did you take the multiplication with the least difference
The factors of 175 that lead us to a positive integer solution are just 7 and 25. The others are not.
Congratulations ! What does it means? The ''factors'' of 175 that lead us to a positive integer solution are just 7 and 25. Thanks!
www.youtube.com/@user-bx8tu3sj3w, that's it! Thank you!
Terimakasih bro
Hello my friend! Thank you!
@@Geendle you are welcome
This is why i hate math.
Could I help you with somthing you don't understand well?