Math Olympiad Challenge: Exponential Problem Solved Without a Calculator | Geendle

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ย. 2024
  • Hello friends! Welcome to Geendle!
    Please kindly ask for your signature. You help me a lot.
    In this video I solve an exponential without calculator a calculator.
    #squareroot ,#crossmultiplicationmethod ,#division ,#fraction ,#maths ,#algebra ,#subtraction ,#calculus , #Math, #mathematics , #Algebra, #Geometry, #Calculus, #Trigonometry, #statistics , #probability , #linearalgebra , #numbertheory , #Topology, #mathproblems , #mathhelp , #mathtutorial , #MathLessons, #MathEducation, #MathTeacher, #mathstudent , #MathFun, #MathPuzzle, #mathhistory , #mathexplained , #MathForKids, #MathChallenge, #mathisfun
    This comprehensive list covers a wide range of topics that can be addressed in math-related content.
    Algebra:
    Equations
    Inequalities
    Polynomials
    Functions
    Systems of Equations
    Exponential and Logarithmic Functions
    Geometry:
    Euclidean Geometry
    Coordinate Geometry
    Trigonometry
    Geometric Transformations
    Solid Geometry
    Geometric Proofs
    Calculus:
    Limits
    Derivatives
    Integrals
    Differential Equations
    Multivariable Calculus
    Sequences and Series
    Statistics and Probability:
    Descriptive Statistics
    Inferential Statistics
    Probability Theory
    Random Variables
    Probability Distributions
    Hypothesis Testing
    Linear Algebra:
    Vectors
    Matrices
    Determinants
    Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors
    Vector Spaces
    Linear Transformations
    Number Theory:
    Divisibility
    Prime Numbers
    Modular Arithmetic
    Diophantine Equations
    Cryptography
    Fermat’s and Euler’s Theorems
    Discrete Mathematics:
    Combinatorics
    Graph Theory
    Logic
    Set Theory
    Algorithms
    Boolean Algebra
    Topology:
    Topological Spaces
    Continuity
    Compactness
    Homotopy
    Fundamental Group
    Manifolds
    Functional Analysis:
    Banach Spaces
    Hilbert Spaces
    Linear Operators
    Normed Spaces
    Spectral Theory
    Fourier Analysis
    Mathematical Logic:
    Propositional Logic
    Predicate Logic
    Model Theory
    Proof Theory
    Set Theory
    Computability Theory
    Abstract Algebra:
    Groups
    Rings
    Fields
    Modules
    Galois Theory
    Homomorphisms
    Applied Mathematics:
    Numerical Analysis
    Optimization
    Differential Equations
    Mathematical Modeling
    Control Theory
    Game Theory
    Recreational Mathematics:
    Puzzles
    Magic Squares
    Mathematical Games
    Mathematical Paradoxes
    Mathematical Art
    Fractals
    History of Mathematics:
    Ancient Mathematics
    Medieval Mathematics
    Renaissance Mathematics
    Modern Mathematics
    Biographies of Mathematicians
    Development of Mathematical Theories
    Mathematics in Computing:
    Algorithms
    Data Structures
    Computational Complexity
    Cryptography
    Information Theory
    Machine Learning
    Mathematics in Natural Sciences:
    Mathematical Physics
    Mathematical Biology
    Mathematical Chemistry
    Environmental Mathematics
    Financial Mathematics
    Actuarial Science
    Exam Preparation:
    SAT Math
    ACT Math
    GRE Math
    GMAT Math
    Math Olympiad
    College Entrance Exams
    Thanks for visiting!

ความคิดเห็น • 26

  • @davidbrisbane7206
    @davidbrisbane7206 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The function in a on the LHS is an ever increasing function as it goes to infinite where a ≥ 1. The difference keeps increasing and starting at a = 1, then the LHS of the equation equals 1. We now know there is one and only one real solution to the LHS = 175.
    By observation, we see that a = 4 is the one and only solution where a is greater than 1.

  • @pavelushakov5078
    @pavelushakov5078 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Why it's assumed that a is intiger? I don't recall that it was mentioned. Without this assumpton this proof is wrong.

    • @defhermann
      @defhermann 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not really

    • @Geendle
      @Geendle  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      "a" must be an integer for this problem. I forgot to mention or write in the thumbnail. Thanks for remember.

    • @defhermann
      @defhermann 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Geendle but isn't it implied that a is an integer by the setup given that we most likely won't get to 175 if the bases are integers?

  • @gontusandeep2972
    @gontusandeep2972 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    But 'a' doesn't have to be an even number. So, we cannot resolve it as a/2 *2 in the exponent.

    • @frax5051
      @frax5051 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Elaborate

    • @gontusandeep2972
      @gontusandeep2972 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​@@frax5051 this same method could not be applied to this question :
      a^a - (a-1)^a = 2101
      the answer is a = 5.
      Prime factors of 2101 are 11, 191. But if you use the above method you can't get the answer because a is odd integer. The above method assumed a to be an even number even before finding it.

    • @defhermann
      @defhermann 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@gontusandeep2972 I'm getting 7 tho

    • @Geendle
      @Geendle  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      "a" must be an integer for this problem. I forgot to mention or write in the thumbnail. Thanks for reminding me.

    • @gontusandeep2972
      @gontusandeep2972 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Geendle for the above method doesn't it need to be an even integer

  • @frenchmarty7446
    @frenchmarty7446 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    a = 4
    Now let's see if I'm right.

    • @pavelushakov5078
      @pavelushakov5078 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's easy and now proof that there are no other solutions

    • @davidbrisbane7206
      @davidbrisbane7206 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂

    • @Geendle
      @Geendle  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yesh! you are!

  • @ahchi4238
    @ahchi4238 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How to know 5x35 being wrong?

    • @Geendle
      @Geendle  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The factors of 175 that lead us to a positive integer solution are just 7 and 25. The others are not. Thank you.

  • @Facedfrog
    @Facedfrog 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I tried to calculate using the 5x35 and it yield different result, i was wondering how you managed to know it was 7 x 25 that has the correct answer ? Is it hit or miss or did you take the multiplication with the least difference

    • @Geendle
      @Geendle  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The factors of 175 that lead us to a positive integer solution are just 7 and 25. The others are not.

  • @ВиталикБойко-ч6д
    @ВиталикБойко-ч6д 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Congratulations ! What does it means? The ''factors'' of 175 that lead us to a positive integer solution are just 7 and 25. Thanks!

    • @Geendle
      @Geendle  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      www.youtube.com/@user-bx8tu3sj3w, that's it! Thank you!

  • @EkaBachtiarEffendiSitorus
    @EkaBachtiarEffendiSitorus 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Terimakasih bro

    • @Geendle
      @Geendle  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hello my friend! Thank you!

    • @EkaBachtiarEffendiSitorus
      @EkaBachtiarEffendiSitorus 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Geendle you are welcome

  • @finmat95
    @finmat95 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is why i hate math.

    • @Geendle
      @Geendle  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Could I help you with somthing you don't understand well?