Non-Muslims Reacts To [Shocking Truth]- Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is mentioned in Bible - Mind Blowing
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ก.ย. 2024
- ▶︎MEMBERSHIP: / @bambi_tv
▶︎ Facebook: web.facebook.c...
▶︎ Twitter: / onyedumhonour
▶︎ Instagram: / onyedumhonour
▶︎TH-cam: / @bambi_tv
▶︎LINKEDIN: / honour-onyedum-21184522a
▶︎TIKTOK: www.tiktok.com...
⚠ IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: IF you don't like any of my uploads for whatever reason, please don't make a scene - contact me here on TH-cam by sending me a private message or an e-mail at: honour2244@gmail.com & I will happily cooperate and take it down!
© Copyright Notice:
We make these videos to motivate people and inspire them to do a better workout. We do not own the clips and music we use in most cases. Our understanding is that it is in correlation to Fair Right Use, however, given that it is open to interpretation, if any owners of the content clips would like us to remove the video, we have no problem with that and will do so as fast as possible. Please email us if you have any concerns at honour2244@gmail.com
#RationalBeliever #Bible #Prophet
Original Video: www.youtube.co....
FAIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
* Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is permitted by copyright statutes that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational, or personal use tips the balance favor of fair use.
1)This video has no negative impact on the original works (It would actually be positive for them)
2)This video is also for teaching purposes.
3)It is positively transformative in nature.
4)I only used bits and pieces of videos to get the point across where necessary.
"Keyword"
"Prophet Muhammad mentioned in Bible"
"Rational Believer"
"Allah"
"prophet of Allah"
"messenger of Allah"
"islam"
"challenging questions"
"islamic reminders"
"mindblowing"
"The throne of Allah"
"The kingdom of Allah"
"merciful Servant"
"mercy to mankind"
"Muhammad"
"Muhammed"
"Mohammad"
"محمد"
"رسول الله"
"ابرمرد تاریخ"
"محمد کی بود"
"who was Muhammad"
"Old testament"
"new testament"
"Ahmad deedat"
"Bible"
"Torah"
"injil"
"Zakir naik"
"muhammad"
"bible"
"reaction"
"new"
"reactt"
"reacting"
Prophet Muhammad mentioned in Bible, Rational Believer, Allah, prophet of Allah, messenger of Allah, islam, challenging questions, islamic reminders, mindblowing, The throne of Allah, The kingdom of Allah, merciful Servant, mercy to mankind, Muhammad, Muhammed, Mohammad, محمد, رسول الله, ابرمرد تاریخ, محمد کی بود, who was Muhammad, Old testament, new testament, Ahmad deedat, Bible, Torah, injil, Zakir naik, muhammad, bible, reaction, new, reactt, reacting
![CHRISTIAN REACTS to [Shocking Truth] Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is mentioned in Bible - Mind Blowing](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/yKUlJSP1eSo/mqdefault.jpg)
![Non-Muslims Reacts To [Shocking Truth]- Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is mentioned in Bible - Mind Blowing](/img/n.gif)
Learn bible from original language, Jesus language, if any. The english translation corrupted. The fact already shown, you still blind or deny?
He said that there were seven spirits they are prophets peace and blessings be upon them there's only one archangel who you call the holy Ghost which is Goofy because he's not a holy ghost he's the archangel he has 600 wings and they're dripping with pearls and gems and his wingspan reaches from the heavens to the Earth 🌍 the archangel peace and blessings be upon him and the prophets all of them peace and blessings be upon them show respect or respect is due seek refuge in the Lord Almighty from the devil and clear your mind and know that you have been blessed and the truth has come to you you do not worship other than the creator of the heavens and the Earth and you follow the profits and you live a kosher lifestyle io and pray and prostrate like the prophets did peace and blessings be upon them all you are not a Muslim if you do not believe in the profit Jesus Christ the anointed one born of a virgin peace and blessings be upon them mother Mary he was sent for the lost sheep of Israel and Muslim means submitting your will to your creator not to the creation you do not need a mediator you pray to the Lord Almighty directly especially in the middle of the night before the dawn you prostrate to your lord and ask him whatever you want and you shall receive it health wealth knowledge beneficial knowledge always ask for beneficial knowledge and always seek refuge from the hellfire and always ask to be on the straight path believe in the Lord Almighty the created the heavens and earth do not follow your whims and desires
Exactly
That line of what has the holy ghost shown you for the last 2000 years gives you goosebumps. He is right. Besides that the Bible's are changing by the hands of people and no divine guidelines. I am happy to be a Muslim... may Allah bless us and keep us firm on islam. Amin.
It's not about about what you feel, it's about what's true, young man.
so true
He's saying prophet Muhammad is " the spirit of truth" not the holy spirit.
(Peace & blessings be upon him)
Muhammad lied and so did this Muslim preacher. Jesus identified who the comforter was in John 14:26... read it and tell me who it is.
The only way you can learn is open your heart and mind with sincerity, you will find the truth.
Deedat is The most intelligent person that I have ever seen,he knows the Bible too well, if u listen to him u will know what your Bible said about everything,his title was Muslim scholer of Christian Bible, amazing oldman
Please, don't come up with such statements. Deedat was no scholar in classic Hebrew. Moreover, he was not even officially educated at all. Never did Deedat refer to a Hebrew dictionary or scholar in classic Hebrew to prove his point. His statements in this video are filled with mistakes. The first mistake in here is that many islamic apologists say מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים is ‘muhamaddim’. But that is wrong, it is ‘ma-kha-madim’. Just check every high valuated Hebrew dictionary or lexicon. So there is no pronunciation of Muhammad.
The other mistake made by islamic apologists is that they say that ‘מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים' is a name. Again wrong because מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים is a masculine plural noun, so it is not a name. Just check every dictionary or lexicon in classic Hebrew.
And because it is not a name it is impossible that it refers to name of Muhammad.
But in front of an ignorant and gullible audience, he made up the unproven conspiracy that the Hebrew מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים, ‘ma-kha-madim’ is wrongly translated. And his audience in their ignorance and gullibility believed him blindly.
Also did he pronounce the Hebrew מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים not as 'ma-kha-madim’ but wronly as ‘muhamaddim’. Also here in the same way his ignorant and gullible audience believed him blindly.
And also made Deedat the deceptive false premise the Hebrew ‘מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים' as a name, meanwhile it is not a name. And also here his ignorant and gullible audience accepted this lie blindly.
Clearly Deedat was a showman, a liar and a deceiver.
But if I'm wrong, then please correct me with clear evidence. Just show me one high valuated Hebrew dictionary or lexicon which clearly states that the Hebrew מַחְמַד is a name or pronounced as 'Muhammad'.
الله يهديهم يارب للحق ويهدي كل مسيحي نصراني فعلا قلوبهم طيبه وذكر الله ذلك عنهم فالقرآن بانهم اقرب للمؤمنين وتفيض دموعهم فالله يهديهم ياارب للحق 🤲🏻.
Islam makes you think with proofs.
Brother Swarggard said as a very educated man in Hebrew and Greek language he can't find Muhammad name mention in the Bible but when Ahmad Deedat read the Song of Solomon clearly Muhammad name is mention in the Bible 🤔
And who is Ahmed Deedat to make such a statement? Deedat was no scholar in classic Hebrew. Moreover he was not even officially educated at all. And never did Deedat refer to a Hebrew dictionary or scholar to prove his point.
The first mistake by Deedat is that he pronounced מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים as ‘muhamaddim’. But he is wrong, it is ‘ma-kha-madim’. So there is no pronunciation of Muhammad.
The other mistake made by Deedat is that he said that ‘מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים' is a name. Again he is very wrong because מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים is a masculine plural noun, so it is not a name. And because it is not a name it is impossible that it refers to the name of ‘Muhammad’.
Also Deedat's claim that the plural 'im' (or 'eem') in ma-kha-madim in the Hebrew language was ‘added for respect’ is in this case false. First of all, nowhere in Songs of Solomon 5 it speaks about אֱלהִים, elohim, the masculine noun for a godhead. But Song of Solomon 5 speaks about ממתקים, mamtaqim and מחמדים, ma-kha-madim. So you can't compare apples with oranges. Biblical poetry is typically built on pairs of metaphors, for example "they were swifter than eagles, they were stronger than lions". In Song of Songs 5:16 it's "His mouth is most sweet, ממתקים, he is altogether lovely, מחמדים. So מחמדים, ma-kha-madim is equivalent to ממתקים, mamtaqim. So the addition ‘-im’ is just a superlative of ‘desire', so it means 'most desire'. Exactly in line with the other words in vers 16: ‘mamtaqim’ = most sweet and other places ‘partamim' = most noble.
Forms of the same Hebrew word are also used elsewhere in the Old Testament, yet Islamic ‘scholars' do not claim that those passages refer to Muhammad. Rightly so, since those verses cannot be forced to fit the notion that Muhammad is under consideration. For example, Isaiah 64:11 mourns the destruction of Jerusalem: “Our holy and beautiful temple, where our fathers praised You, is burned up with fire; and all our pleasant things are laid waste.” “Pleasant things” is a form of the same word in Song of Solomon 5:16. Would Deedat contend that Muhammad was “laid waste” in Jerusalem?
Additional occurrences of the same word are seen in 1 Kings 20:6; 2 Chronicles 36:19; Lamentations 1:10,11; Ezekiel 24:16,21,25; Hosea 9:9,16; Joel 3:5. Is in this cases also Muhammad mentioned? If yes, why? If not, why not?
So in Songs of Solomon no Muhammad.
O Allah! Upon Muhammad and the Family of Muhammad be blessings, according to the number of every illness and cure. Bless and grant peace to him and them, many times, endlessly. And praise belongs to Allah, Lord of the Worlds. ❤️
He is saying muhammed is next prophet of God following Jesus. He was saying Christian’s interpret the spirit of truth as the Holy Spirit. His argument is just beucsee it says the word spirit it doesn’t mean it is the Holy Spirit. Muhammed is the spirit of truth because he is spreading the message of God(the truth). The truth is hard to accept but you have to be open minded. The Christian belief leaves you confused and wondering. Gods religion is not hard to understand. It should be understandable to everyone. I can’t solve the “mystery of the trinity. It makes no sense.
Hey Smart Ass since my reply got deleted and you like to call people names I will say it again- Mohammad is not in the bible and this man has no authority to interprete the bible and neither do you, or King James.
You are so right
Broo you're saying facts 👏🏻
No mahoma
*YES JESUSCRISTOS FOREVER*
@@UniquenessInIslam no mahoma
YES JESUSCRISTOS FOEREVER
Hear they hear not.. See they see not
To all unbelievers if you do not accept mohamed as the Last prophet now you Will realize it in the day of jugement but it Will be to late
from muslim uderstanding The Holy Spirit that is mention in the Bible is Angel Gabriel. The Quran refers to rūḥ as Ruh al-qudus (Arabic: روح القدس, "the holy spirit" or "spirit of holiness") and ar-ruh al-amin ("the faithful/trustworthy spirit"). The holy spirit is more commonly known as archangel Gabriel (Arabic: جبريل, Jibrīl or جبرائيل, Jibrāʾīl), the messenger to all the prophets.
Angel gabriel/ The Holly Sprit is already there even before Jesus was born. when Angel Gabriel comes to Mary to tell her about her having a son. When Jesus said 'Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you'. The Christian said that Comforter is The Holy Sprit. However, The Holy Spirit is already there in the time of Jesus and even before that.
' Each depiction of the Holy Spirit arose from different accounts in the Gospel narratives; the first being at the baptism of Jesus in the Jordan River where the Holy Spirit was said to descend in the form of a dove as the voice of God the Father spoke as described in Matthew, Mark, and Luke;' . so who is it then that Jesus mention He must go in order for the comforter to come? but The Holy Spirit /Angel Gabriel is already there even before jesus time.
It says Muhammad, was Muhammad a word with meaning back before Muhammad was born? No, especially in the Jews? Was that a word? No, not even anyone was named Muhammad before our prophet was born. He was the first one
If anyone has never in his life read the quraan Evan the translation quraan then you will be confuse forever. This go out to all religions.
In Islam the holy spirit is Angel Gibreal pbuh
Brother you watched a video and react too it.. the man explained everything and showed you the Bible and Quran… yet no believes you need to make your research before reacting too a video
Because…
John 14:16-17
16 And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever; 17 Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you.
And yet you people didn’t believe in him Prophet Muhammad like Jesus said in John the world didn’t receive prophet Muhammad ( peace be upon him )
PLEAES READ THE BIBLE AND THE QURAN MAKE YOUR RESEARCH 🧐
By the wat al haqq(the truth) is one of the name's of Allah subhaan ahoe wa ta3ala
Allah has sent 124000 massengers on the face of earth from very first man on earth Adam. He was the first prophet to till Muhammad PBUH. We recognize that 5 mightious messanger Noah (The Prophet of Ark), Ibrahim, Moses, Jesus Son of Marry and Muhammad. Allah tells every messanger about Muhammad and every previous scriputre Muhammad mention in every state.
The following is simply to explain a few things that you may not be aware of.
The word CHRISTIAN was introduced centuries after Jesus (AS) ascended. The word JUDAISM was also introduced centuries after Moses (AS). Jesus (AS) never heard the word Christianity. Similarly Moses (AS) never heard of the word Judaism.
So, when Jesus (AS), Moses (AS) or any other Prophet were asked what it is that they follow; they would reply that 'THEY SUBMIT THEIR WILL TO GOD' which is the very definition of a MUSLIM.
Muslim beliefs are the same as Jews, the same as Jesus (AS) and the same as ALL the Prophets. We (Muslims) differ from Christians because, despite Christians often referring to Jesus (AS), they have rejected his teachings and now follow the teachings of Paul and the Church in the form of the New Testament. We (Muslims) ONLY worship ALLAH (swt). The ONE true GOD who Christians refer to as ‘THE FATHER’.
ALLAH (swt) is the Arabic word for GOD. The word ALLAH (swt) is used in Bibles that are written in Arabic.
If being Christian means following, the teachings of our beloved prophet Jesus (AS), then we Muslims are more Christian than Christians (shoutout to Dr Zakir Naik). This is true because when Jesus (AS) says do something we actually DO IT.
'ISLAM' is the Arabic word for 'SUBMISSION TO GOD' and a 'MUSLIM' is the Arabic word for 'A PERSON WHO SUBMITS THEIR WILL TO GOD '. So, Jesus (AS) was a Muslim; Abraham (AS) was a Muslim, Moses (AS) was a Muslim, David (AS) was a Muslim, Solomon (AS) was a Muslim, Noah (AS) was a Muslims,
Adam (AS) was a Muslim, as well as all the Prophets in between including, of course, the final Prophet being Muhammad (PBUH).
Westerner’s idea of a Muslim comes from the deliberate negative programming of the masses. If Muslims were around, in the time of Jesus (AS), we would follow Jesus (AS). If Muslims were around in the time of Moses (AS); we would follow Moses (AS). The same applies to ALL the prophets as their purpose is to merely convey Allah’s (swt) or God’s message.
Ignore the lies that the media and so called ‘experts’ portray about Islam. The religion was NOT spread by the sword; this is absolutely forbidden. The Quran (which is the actual words of Allah (swt)/ God/ The Father) states that ‘THERE IS NO COMPULSION IN RELIGION’. [Surah 2:256]. Meaning that you cannot ‘force’ anyone to follow Islam. This is strictly forbidden!
Another BIG LIE is that those, misguided people, who carry out atrocities are promised over 70 virgins in heaven. This is NOT in the Quran or the authentic Hadiths [Hadiths are things that prophet Muhammad (PBUH) said that Allah (swt)/God/The Father said]. In fact the Quran states clearly that “If anyone slays an innocent person, it would be as if he slew the whole people: and if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all of the people.” [Surah 5:32] (l paraphrased the verse for brevity)
Just to clear, l am not trying to bash anyone’s religion; I am simply trying to give everyone the correct understanding of what it is to be a Muslim.
You are new here is normal to disagree with something at first,but letter by seek the truth,u will get to understand things
This is what happens when you follow the church instead of bible
The first mistake by Deedat is that he pronounced מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים as ‘muhamaddim’. But he is wrong, it is ‘ma-kha-madim’. So there is no pronunciation of Muhammad.
The other mistake made by Deedat is that he said that ‘מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים' is a name. Again he is very wrong because מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים is a masculine plural noun, so it is not a name (like יְהוִֹה, Yhvh). And because it is not a name it is impossible that it refers to Muhammad.
And also about 1 John 4 was Deedat very wrong. Let's analyse 1 John 4:
“Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world.”. But the verse is clear e.g. in the word ‘because’. In Greek “ὅτι’ = ‘hoti” which means ’that’ or ‘since’ or ‘because’. Clearly this verse only states that spirits are the result of the presence of false prophets in the world. So 1 John 4:1 clearly states that false prophets are the course and spirits are the result. That makes clear that prophets and spirits are NOT the same, they are two different types of entities.
3 things Jesus talk about the signs of the comforter or the spirit of truth.. in JOHN 16: 8- 13
1 . He will not say on his own but what God ask him to say
2. He will fight against all sins
3. He will glorify me(Jesus)
And all these 3 matched Muhammad
1 وما ينطق عن الهوى، ان هي إلا وحي يوحي
He doesn't say on his own expect what God ask him to say
2. ولا تقرب الزنا
Don't go close to furnication.....
3 ... Jesus name came in the QURAN MANY TIMES.. A CHAPTER CALLED SURAH MARY IN THE QURAN...
PLS brothers and sisters think
Brother, watch more of Ahmed Deedat with an open mind.
16 חכו ממתקים וכלו מחמדים זה דודי וזה רעי בנות ירושלם׃. This is in Hebrew I swear to you. The fourth word from the right is Muhammad. In the anthem of song
Brother, the fact is very clear. What can't you understand?
And watch Ahmed deedat videos
If listen and reason you grow.
The Qur'an contains 114 units Bee unit 16. Male bee chromosome 16. Is this a coincidence
Please react to Abdullah Gonda and Abdullah Sameer's video. ❤🧡💛💚💙
You know, when something wrong comes from your Bible, this is the safe answer for that, you just cannot translate bible by reading word by word..you cannot understand what it's actually told..you can't understand bcoz you don't have holy ghost...know it already bruh🤣🤣🤣🤣.
please react to ( conversation between jesus and allah ) i would say 90% similarity between islam and christianity , i recommend you watch that before making judgment , give it a chance and react to more brother , may god bless you and your family , also allah is unique word for god , example god = male god , godess = female god , but allah is genderless / no gender and unique word for the creator
Is Muhammad predicted in Songs of Solomon 5:16?
חִכֹּו֙ מַֽמְתַקִּ֔ים וְכֻלֹּ֖ו מַחֲמַדִּ֑ים זֶ֤ה דֹודִי֙ וְזֶ֣ה רֵעִ֔י בְּנֹ֖ות יְרוּשָׁלִָֽם׃
ḥikwō maməṯaqqîm wəḵullwō maḥămadîm zeh ḏwōḏî wəzeh rē‘î bənwōṯ yərûšālāim:
“His mouth is most sweet; he is altogether lovely. This is my beloved, and this is my friend, O daughters of Jerusalem.”
The first mistake by Deedat is that he pronounced מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים as ‘muhamaddim’. But he is wrong, it is ‘ma-kha-madim’. So there is no pronunciation of Muhammad.
The other mistake made by Deedat is that he said that ‘מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים' is a name. Again he is very wrong because מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים is a masculine plural noun, so it is not a name (like יְהוִֹה, Yhvh). And because it is not a name it is impossible that it refers to Muhammad.
Also the claim that the plural 'im' (or 'eem') in ma-kha-madim in the Hebrew language was ‘added for respect’ is in this case false. Biblical poetry is typically built on pairs of metaphors, for example "they were swifter than eagles, they were stronger than lions". In Song of Songs 5:16 it's "His mouth is most sweet, ממתקים, he is altogether lovely, מחמדים. So מחמדים, ma-kha-madim is equivalent to ממתקים, mamtaqim. So the addition ‘-im’ is just a superlative of ‘desire', so it means 'most desire'. Exactly in line with the other words in vers 16: ‘mamtaqim’ = most sweet and other places ‘partamim' = most noble.
Forms of the same Hebrew word are also used elsewhere in the Old Testament, yet Islamic ‘scholars' do not claim that those passages refer to Muhammad. Rightly so, since those verses cannot be forced to fit the notion that Muhammad is under consideration. For example, Isaiah 64:11 mourns the destruction of Jerusalem: “Our holy and beautiful temple, where our fathers praised You, is burned up with fire; and all our pleasant things are laid waste.” “Pleasant things” is a form of the same word in Song of Solomon 5:16. Would the Islamic ‘scholars' contend that Muhammad was “laid waste” in Jerusalem?
Additional occurrences of the same word are seen in 1 Kings 20:6; 2 Chronicles 36:19; Lamentations 1:10,11; Ezekiel 24:16,21,25; Hosea 9:9,16; Joel 3:5. Is in this cases also Muhammad mentioned? If yes, why? If not, why not?
So in Songs of Solomon no Muhammad.
Also the context, the Song of Solomon is about a beautiful young girl (Shulammite maiden) who is in love with a young shepherd boy. One day Solomon spots her and has her eventual brought to his residence where he tries to entice her to become another of his wives. The young shepherd follows and finds her and assures her of his love. She resist all the enticements, charms, riches, and luxurious life of a wife to the King. Finally she escapes and returns to her true love the humble shepherd boy. So it has nothing to do with Muhammad.
Pls copy paste 1 more time
Shaikh ahmed deedat the speaker does not say the holy spirit is mohammad he says in the verse spirit of truth is mohammad
The Spirit of Truth is a title for the Holy Spirit.
My brother in Old testament Name of prophet Muhammad s.a.w been mentioned but why in new tastement this Word Muhammad not been translated the way it should be translate.. Unfortunately translated to be other meaning.. All together lovely.. Try translate all together Lovely is it meaning Muhammad.. Think my brother and read Al quran with your open heart
Read the Quran bro , Assumptions made the bible how it is now . Full of Fabrication of historian ,emperor and popes and came contradictions with it . Quran is the only Religious Book there is no contradiction . Read it and try to prove to me wrong :)
Kamu boleh berkata apapun dan membenarkan sesuai pemikiranmi, tapi pelajari sejarah bible atau alkitab, asal usul dari mana, bahasa aslinya apa dan terjemahannya benar atau tidak dari yang aslinya
Assalamualaikum.
Nur of Prophet Muhammad pbuh existed before Prophet Adam was created.
No wonder if the name of the Prophet Muhammad pbuh is written in all the religious books exist in this world. continue sleep brother dont waste ur time headache.hahaha..🤭
Brother first of all Jesus said I have many things to say to you but you can't bear them now ,when he will come he will guide u all things so what the holy Ghost teach something which Jesus couldn't say ,further it says whatsoever he shall hear he shall speak ,so what holy Ghost hear and what did he speak ,so clearly it's not holy Ghost.
Have you done theology
you didn't even complete listening to his point and you're saying that '' he said prophet muhammad (peace be opon him) is the holy spirit, that's false and you're putting words into his mouth, try watching with an open heart and mind next time and may Allah guide you to the truth
Bother Bambi :- Mohammed is the a spirit , but not the holy spirit .. because the holy spirit which is not clearly identified in Christianity , is nothing but ANGEL Gabriel or Jibreel in Islam ... Can jesus Christ send an angel to people ?????
You always say, "I think" or "I feel like". But you have to go with proofs and facts right
In the video mr Deedat referred to some sayings of Jesus Christ in the Gospel via John chapter 16. But Deedat deliberately omitted the context. Because when you read John 14-16 then it will become clear that the Paracletos does NOT fit Muhammad at all. First of all in John 14-16 Jesus Christ was speaking to His disciples. And Muhammad was NOT with the disciples. Muhammad was NOT in the disciples after Jesus Christ's ascension. Muhammad was NOT sent in Jesus name. Muhammad was NOT the Holy Spirit. Muhammad did NOT teach the disciples. Muhammad did NOT remember the disciples everything what Jesus Christ has said to them. Muhammad is NOT sent by Jesus Christ. Muhammad did NOT testify about Jesus Christ to the disciples. Muhammad did NOT guide the disciples in all truth. Muhammad did NOT disclose it to the disciples. Muhammad did NOT glorify Jesus Christ. Muhammad did NOT become his 'revelation' from Jesus Christ. So the Paracletos is definitely NOT Muhammad.
It is not mind blowing, it is meant to rattle daf.s and intentionally stu..d
And also about the seven spirits made Deedat the wrong conclusion. The seven spirits in the Book of Revelations discribes the seven attributes of one Holy Spirit:
1) The Spirit of the LORD
2) The Spirit of wisdom
3) The Spirit of understanding
4) The Spirit of counsel
5) The Spirit of power
6) The Spirit of knowledge
7) The Spirit of the fear of the Lord
These 'seven spirits of God' in the book of Revelation are a reference to the Holy Spirit in the perfection of His manifold ministry.
The holy spirit was there already brother it didn't need to come
The holy spirit is not a man the verse clearly refers to a man
The church is who most Christians follow not the bible
Try to learn the quaran too ok
WE THE NONE MUSLIMS ARE NOT SHOCK ABOUT THIS TRUTH AT ALL;AS A MATTER OF FACT; WE THE NONE MUSLIMS BELIEVE MORE STRONGLY THAN ALL THE MUSLIMS THAT NOW LIVE AND ALL THE MUSLIMS THAT LIVE BEFORE AND ALL THE MUSLIMS THAT WILL LIVE AFTER;ALLOW ME TO GO A STEP FURTHER ;THE SHOCKING TRUTH IS THAT(I DON'T MEAN TO BE DISRESPECTFUL) WE THE NONE MUSLIMS WE EVEN BELIEVE MORE THAN THE MUSLIMS'S allah THAT MOHAMMED IS MENTIONED IN THE BIBLE AND IS FIND IN THE GOSPEL OF Matthew 7 verses 15-16 (thanks for taking the time to read my comment)
that is ridiculous thanks for the laugh!
@@GirloftheValley- bless your wonderful heart my sister
@@waterfrancis4794 well muslims should know certainly Mohammad is not in the bible or they will embarass themselves when they debate religious scholars. It is so intellectually dishonest you can only laugh. Cheers
@@GirloftheValley- DEBATING MUSLIMS IS LIKE A CAMEL GOING THROUGH THE EYE OF A NEEDLE matthew 19;24(IMPOSSIBLE IMPOSSIBLE) I HAVE LISTEN TO LOADS OF DEBATES AND I HAVE SPOKEN TO A FEW MUSLIMS MYSELF; THE ONE THING I FIND COMMON AMONGST THEM IS THAT THEY LOVE TO WIN AN ARGUMENT AND HAVE ZERO LOVE FOR THE TRUTH
@@waterfrancis4794 i do not debate- only point out the fact that they do not have the authority to interpret the bible as it is not their book. Take good care
the word "im" is showed in the native language to express to a name. That's the key. Look at the translation the words before muhammad'im "...he is muhammad'im.." but they translate it to "...he is all together lovely" (people don't say "he is all together lovely" but instead just say "he is lovely", if you read the whole chapter of Songs Of Solomon, you easily see the connection).. easy to manipulate, why they manipulated it? The Jews is waiting for this last prophet but they expect he should come from Jews, when they found all the marks and sign that showed clearly as the torah told, then they found the prophet that as per Torah descriptions emerged from Arabs (one of their historical enemy - the descendant of Hagar, Ishmayel), they cannot accept it and twisted everything even the Torah... it is normal for them as they been doing bad things to all prophets that came before that from their nation.
Muhammad meant "the praised one" but you cannot translate "muhammad'im" because it is clearly mentioned / marked that it is a name of people. In our modern language, "im" is almost the same as Mr/Sir. It fit like a glove if the translation like this: ...he is Mr Muhammad... instead of "he is all together lovely..." Where they want to hid the word "im" from it? even though it is two letters, it clearly meant something.
Hey brother good react please react to the throne of allah by merciful servant thank you
Sorry, But from the beginning of the video, I observed you were watching to deny. Your mind has already decided that this video is full of deception and I am not gonna be deceived. In order to analyze something you have to come on neutral phase. I know sometimes your love towards your religion or beliefs do not let you see or analyze the true facts. I wish GOD (ALLAH) helps you to be on a right path but for that you have to show interest for seeking truth. Because GOD guide those who wanna be guided.
It's a shame you have been given the proof about the word Muhammad is in the bible and yet you still won't believe it, the bible was changed and corrupted but some verses remains there and yet the christians don't do what the bible says, don't drink alcohol, don't eat pork, don't have tattoos, don't do idol worship, etc etc, you see, my point is, the book might be tainted but the people only do what they think benefits them, because they're afraid when they start to believe in the evidence, they would lose what they have right now, trusts, family, friends, fame, wealth, or anything. But Allah already promised if you believe in him and live in his path, you shouldn't be afraid, for Allah is the only provider, protector, and guider that will always be on your side. What you will lose, Allah will replace them with a better one, for Allah is the most loving and fair. Good luck brother
The Muslim claim that Muhammad is found in the Song of Solomon 5:16 is utter nonsense. The Song of Solomon is a sensual love song between Solomon and his bride-read the book. In ch. 5 vv. 10-16 the bride is describing Solomon’s appearance and concludes, “he is altogether desirable (makh-mawdim). This is my beloved…” (v. 16; ESV). Who is the demonstrative pronoun “this” speaking of? Solomon!
The Hebrew word מַחְמָד is pronounced makh-mawd' , the plural form is pronounced makh-mawdim , not Muhammad. The word means “lovely,” “pleasant” or “desirable.” It is a common noun (ie. not a name) that is found in many passages in the OT-do a word search (Strongs number H4261). The word occurs 12 times in the OT... I wonder why he doesn't mention the other 11??? 🤔
For instance, Ezekiel’s wife is called makh-mawd' (Ezekiel 24:16; cf. 24:18), so if makh-mawd' means Muhammad, does that mean that Muhammad was Ezekiels wife? We all know Muhammad was a perverted guy, but does any Muslim think that he lived in the 7th century BC???
This has got to be one of the stupidest arguments I’ve ever heard-a word kinda sounds like Muhammad (if you don’t know Hebrew) so we can rip the word out of its context, neglect how it’s used in other place in the Bible, and claim that it’s a reference to Muhammad. Wow! Well by that logic, we must conclude that since the Hebrew word for "mouse" is akbar, we should translate the Arabic sentence "Allahu Akbar" as "Allah is a mouse"! The Islamic god is a mouse!
Dedat must have thought Muslims are the stupidest people on the planet and they won’t fact check anything he says.
Islam is built on lies-this is just one of them. Do you want to look at other verses where Muslims falsely claim to find Muhammad?
Muhammad was a false prophet who lied about being in the Bible.
Is Muhammad predicted in Songs of Solomon 5:16?
חִכֹּו֙ מַֽמְתַקִּ֔ים וְכֻלֹּ֖ו מַחֲמַדִּ֑ים זֶ֤ה דֹודִי֙ וְזֶ֣ה רֵעִ֔י בְּנֹ֖ות יְרוּשָׁלִָֽם׃
ḥikwō maməṯaqqîm wəḵullwō maḥămadîm zeh ḏwōḏî wəzeh rē‘î bənwōṯ yərûšālāim:
“His mouth is most sweet; he is altogether lovely. This is my beloved, and this is my friend, O daughters of Jerusalem.”
The first mistake by Deedat is that he pronounced מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים as ‘muhamaddim’. But he is wrong, it is ‘ma-kha-madim’. So there is no pronunciation of Muhammad.
The other mistake made by Deedat is that he said that ‘מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים' is a name. Again he is very wrong because מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים is a masculine plural noun, so it is not a name (like יְהוִֹה, Yhvh). And because it is not a name it is impossible that it refers to Muhammad.
Also the claim that the plural 'im' (or 'eem') in ma-kha-madim in the Hebrew language was ‘added for respect’ is in this case false. Biblical poetry is typically built on pairs of metaphors, for example "they were swifter than eagles, they were stronger than lions". In Song of Songs 5:16 it's "His mouth is most sweet, ממתקים, he is altogether lovely, מחמדים. So מחמדים, ma-kha-madim is equivalent to ממתקים, mamtaqim. So the addition ‘-im’ is just a superlative of ‘desire', so it means 'most desire'. Exactly in line with the other words in vers 16: ‘mamtaqim’ = most sweet and other places ‘partamim' = most noble.
Forms of the same Hebrew word are also used elsewhere in the Old Testament, yet Islamic ‘scholars' do not claim that those passages refer to Muhammad. Rightly so, since those verses cannot be forced to fit the notion that Muhammad is under consideration. For example, Isaiah 64:11 mourns the destruction of Jerusalem: “Our holy and beautiful temple, where our fathers praised You, is burned up with fire; and all our pleasant things are laid waste.” “Pleasant things” is a form of the same word in Song of Solomon 5:16. Would the Islamic ‘scholars' contend that Muhammad was “laid waste” in Jerusalem?
Additional occurrences of the same word are seen in 1 Kings 20:6; 2 Chronicles 36:19; Lamentations 1:10,11; Ezekiel 24:16,21,25; Hosea 9:9,16; Joel 3:5. Is in this cases also Muhammad mentioned? If yes, why? If not, why not?
So in Songs of Solomon no Muhammad.
Also the context, the Song of Solomon is about a beautiful young girl (Shulammite maiden) who is in love with a young shepherd boy. One day Solomon spots her and has her eventual brought to his residence where he tries to entice her to become another of his wives. The young shepherd follows and finds her and assures her of his love. She resist all the enticements, charms, riches, and luxurious life of a wife to the King. Finally she escapes and returns to her true love the humble shepherd boy. So it has nothing to do with Muhammad.
You call this nonsense proof?
Jesus was not a Christian or a Muslim because back then there where non… after the death of (Jesus peace be upon him) God had to bring the last prophet.. which Jesus speaks about… John 14:16
16 And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever;
John 14:17
17 Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you.
And nobody received prophet Muhammad
John 16:7
7 Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you.
John 15:26
26 But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me
And when prophet Muhammad came he speak nothing but God words and Jesus he never speaks about himself… please read your bible and the Quran make your research 🧐
John 16:13
13 Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come.
I think you should know the bible, and come to the Islamic preacher and discuss your knowledge, so that you are more knowledgeable, I think you don't know the contents of your book.
Deedat also made the wrong conclusion about the gender in John 16. It is correct that every noun in the Koine Greek has a gender. But the gender of nouns, not pronouns but nouns, in which they refer can differ indeed. Like in John 1:4: "In him (M) was life (F), and that life (F) was the light (M) of all mankind." So a female noun wich refers to a neuter noun. So in the same way as in John 4:24 "God (M) is Spirit (N)..." is in John 14 the Paracletos (M) is Spirit (N).
And yes, the Paracletos is a person but not a human. Not a human because it is a Spirit (John 14:17), the Holy Spirit (John 14:26), which the world cannot see (John 14:17) and is in people (John 14:17). So Deedat 'argument' fails. And so no prophet in John 14-16, let alone Muhammad.
'' His palate is sheer sweetness and everything
about him is altogether desirable. This is my
dear one, and this is my boy companion, O
daughters of Jerusalem. '' ... SOLOMON 5:16.
NWT.
This is about a Shulammite girl expressing her
love and her loyalty toward her lover. All the
chapters are expressions of a black girl in love.
Nothing more. Muhammad is not in the Bible.
seeing they see not , hearing they hear not . Neither do they understand :)
😭🤦♂️ wich translate u use
U speak hebrew? U speak arabic ? No ? Pschht 🤫
It's not altogether desirable it's altogether lovely 😂 , what can of bible you use ???
Is Muhammad predicted in Songs of Solomon 5:16?
חִכֹּו֙ מַֽמְתַקִּ֔ים וְכֻלֹּ֖ו מַחֲמַדִּ֑ים זֶ֤ה דֹודִי֙ וְזֶ֣ה רֵעִ֔י בְּנֹ֖ות יְרוּשָׁלִָֽם׃
ḥikwō maməṯaqqîm wəḵullwō maḥămadîm zeh ḏwōḏî wəzeh rē‘î bənwōṯ yərûšālāim:
“His mouth is most sweet; he is altogether lovely. This is my beloved, and this is my friend, O daughters of Jerusalem.”
The first mistake by Deedat is that he pronounced מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים as ‘muhamaddim’. But he is wrong, it is ‘ma-kha-madim’. So there is no pronunciation of Muhammad.
The other mistake made by Deedat is that he said that ‘מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים' is a name. Again he is very wrong because מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים is a masculine plural noun, so it is not a name (like יְהוִֹה, Yhvh). And because it is not a name it is impossible that it refers to Muhammad.
Also the claim that the plural 'im' (or 'eem') in ma-kha-madim in the Hebrew language was ‘added for respect’ is in this case false. Biblical poetry is typically built on pairs of metaphors, for example "they were swifter than eagles, they were stronger than lions". In Song of Songs 5:16 it's "His mouth is most sweet, ממתקים, he is altogether lovely, מחמדים. So מחמדים, ma-kha-madim is equivalent to ממתקים, mamtaqim. So the addition ‘-im’ is just a superlative of ‘desire', so it means 'most desire'. Exactly in line with the other words in vers 16: ‘mamtaqim’ = most sweet and other places ‘partamim' = most noble.
Forms of the same Hebrew word are also used elsewhere in the Old Testament, yet Islamic ‘scholars' do not claim that those passages refer to Muhammad. Rightly so, since those verses cannot be forced to fit the notion that Muhammad is under consideration. For example, Isaiah 64:11 mourns the destruction of Jerusalem: “Our holy and beautiful temple, where our fathers praised You, is burned up with fire; and all our pleasant things are laid waste.” “Pleasant things” is a form of the same word in Song of Solomon 5:16. Would the Islamic ‘scholars' contend that Muhammad was “laid waste” in Jerusalem?
Additional occurrences of the same word are seen in 1 Kings 20:6; 2 Chronicles 36:19; Lamentations 1:10,11; Ezekiel 24:16,21,25; Hosea 9:9,16; Joel 3:5. Is in this cases also Muhammad mentioned? If yes, why? If not, why not?
So in Songs of Solomon no Muhammad.
Also the context, the Song of Solomon is about a beautiful young girl (Shulammite maiden) who is in love with a young shepherd boy. One day Solomon spots her and has her eventual brought to his residence where he tries to entice her to become another of his wives. The young shepherd follows and finds her and assures her of his love. She resist all the enticements, charms, riches, and luxurious life of a wife to the King. Finally she escapes and returns to her true love the humble shepherd boy. So it has nothing to do with Muhammad.
People have to read context man🤦🏿♂️. This happens every time. Take one line and boom it’s talking about Muhammad. I’ve already done my own deep research into this, it’s not referring to Muhammad at all. But some will always deny.
its not a holy ghost tooo....jesus pbuh says if he doesnt go he shall not come...why does jesus have to go for the spirit to come?...holy spirits existed way back before jesus coming down to earth???...then how it can be holy spirit that can come only if jesus leaves the earth...its clear in hebrew "Muhammad'im" as if like mr.muhammad in english...how does Mr.muhammad traslate to alltogether lovely???...i think there was no research in what you did???...i hve no right to translate you name from Mr.sumalah in english as "sweet guy in hebrew...its a name...NAME....
@@sheriffibrahim3349 Holy Spirit already there? So what? In John 14-16 Jesus Christ was SPEAKING TO HIS DISCIPLES who had NOT received the Holy Spirit YET.
And also after Jesus Christ's ascension the Holy Spirit was NOT on earth anymore, because Jesus Christ has gone away so the Holy Spirit also with Him.
So your saying 'the Holy Spirit was already there' will not help you.
But Jesus Christ said to His disciples: “But the Helper, the Holy Spirit whom the Father will send in My name, He will teach you all things, and remind you of all that I said to you." John 14:26. It is clear that Paracletos is the Holy Spirit. Muhammad was not the Holy Spirit, so the Paracletos is NOT Muhammad.
If you read John 14-16 then it will become clear that the Paracletos does NOT fit Muhammad at all. First of all in John 14-16 Jesus Christ was speaking to His disciples. And Muhammad was NOT with the disciples. Muhammad was NOT in the disciples after Jesus Christ's ascension. Muhammad was NOT sent in Jesus name. Muhammad was NOT the Holy Spirit. Muhammad did NOT teach the disciples. Muhammad did NOT remember the disciples everything what Jesus Christ has said to them. Muhammad is NOT sent by Jesus Christ. Muhammad did NOT testify about Jesus Christ to the disciples. Muhammad did NOT guide the disciples in all truth. Muhammad did NOT disclose it to the disciples. Muhammad did NOT glorify Jesus Christ. Muhammad did NOT become his 'revelation' from Jesus Christ. So the Paracletos is definitely NOT Muhammad.
@@sheriffibrahim3349 The first mistake by Deedat is that he pronounced מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים as ‘muhamaddim’. But he is wrong, it is ‘ma-kha-madim’. So there is no pronunciation of Muhammad.
The other mistake made by Deedat is that he said that ‘מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים' is a name. Again he is very wrong because מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים is a masculine plural noun, so it is not a name (like יְהוִֹה, Yhvh). And because it is not a name it is impossible that it refers to Muhammad.
@@reneandjohn no Christian scholars and Jews can deny it...Even though in Hindus scriptures....watch debates from scholars first not only reaction...Is Isaiah 29:12 talking about holy spirit too?
Watch Zakir Naik videos about Christianity
man just go watch these guys, CP,,Apostate prophet,David Wood and others
Stop wasting your time u will run mad
You can read and examine the Bible for many years and only scratch the surface. There is one God and one Truth.