ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก
Panel: Bias Traps in AI | AI Now 2017
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 ส.ค. 2024
- Bias Traps in AI: A panel discussing how we understand bias in AI systems, highlighting the latest research insights and why issues of bias matter in concrete ways to real people.
Solon Barocas, Assistant Professor of Information Science, Cornell University
Arvind Narayanan, Assistant Professor of Computer Science, Princeton University
Cathy O’Neil, Founder, ORCAA
Deirdre Mulligan, Associate Professor, School of Information and Berkeley Center for Law & Technology, UC Berkeley
John Wilbanks, Chief Commons Officer, Sage Bionetworks
AI Now 2017 Public Symposium - July 10, 2017
Follow AI Now on Twitter: / ainowinitiative
Subscribe to our channel: / ainowinitiative
Visit our website: artificialinte...
Cathy O'Neil's Fox Co. thought experiment suggests that the only way to define success is in terms of what counted as success prior to the AI intervention. If so, then AI instruments would be useless to introduce new standards/criteria/policy objectives etc. But isn't it possible for an engineer who (in her hypothetical) is serious about reversing discrimination could actually write the software so that it has to include a certain # of female applicants, and then establish criteria which can be used to establish the promise of future "success?" I think O'Neil's book and work are great, but in a case like this I'd be surprised if engineers would necessarily be stuck with a "past is prologue" scenario.
Cheating?