Seeing how congress holds control over D.C. that means they allowed for public transportation to be implemented in the capitol. Yet half the politicians think of mass improvement to the US transportation infrastructure as ridiculous and unrealistic.
In fact, member of Congress only have public transportation so they can make it easier for them to get around the city. If you think about it, just literally an underground transit network at Capitol Hill…
Comparing US cities that were built at least 300 years ago against European cities that were built 700 years ago is like comparing a Nokia and IPhone and praising IPhone for how versatile it is lol
DC metro is so much cleaner then other subway systems I’ve used (ie NY subway and the Boston T system.) DC residents do like complaining about how often the system is delayed but compared to the rest of the country it’s amazing.
@@jasonhaven7170 US politicians do not use the metro lmao. Their staff does though so maybe that has something to do with it (but given the chronic funding challenges of the DC metro system I doubt it).
why is there barely any actual stock footage of D.C. in this video. that's Flinders Street Station in Melbourne at 1:24, which is on the other side of the planet from D.C. pretty sure that's the Chicago L at 1:05 too
As a northern VA resident, it was super obvious that like 95% of the footage is outside on the DC area. There should be a disclaimer because it can be very misleading to most unfamiliar with the area.
DC is well designed... in the parts you mentioned. But for 80% of its land use, it's the same as usual. Strip malls, stroads, and 12-lane highways as far as the eye can see. Most of the city outside of a couple of bubbles are horribly designed. Good thing, though, is that is has a lot of potential. The rail network is very extensive and constantly expanding. If we did what we did in Rosslyn at every station on the network, we will have a far superior city. Luckily, no shortage of development is happening, with the biggest one at Tysons Corner. But there is still much to do, and large parts of the rail network will be severely underused until then. I reckon with proper land use around the network, the Washington Metro can grow to 1.5 - 2 million riders per day. I am speaking as a DC native.
93,000,000 riders is low when compared with Canadian city's ridership - Toronto subway was 235,000,000 last year, Montreal subway 245,000,000 and Vancouver Skytrain 116,000,000. But wait, there's more! Toronto has another 60 million passengers just on its streetcars, plus another 35,000,000 on its commuter rail, another distinct system. Toronto absolutely crushes any city except New York when it comes to public transit and that's without even considering it's massive bus and Bus Rapid Transit sytems. Furthermore, it is almost doubling its subway/lrt network in the coming decade, as is Montreal. US is far behind on public transit.
Most of the wealthy politicians from other parts of the country live out in the rich counties surrounding DC and drive/are driven into their jobs. They don't use public transit.
@@noco7243LA???😂😂 maybe in like 10-20 years but right now, hell no. Add Chicago, Philadelphia and San Francisco to that mix and maybe Seattle soon instead of LA
DC's metro is actually terrible there's some areas where the lines go for 5 to 6 miles in between stops skipping over thousands and thousands of residents forcing them to drive miles in either direction to a Park and Ride to get on to the limited rail. It's laughable that there's a recent trend speaking of DC like it has a good metro, it absolutely does not. New York, Chicago, Boston, Philadelphia, Portland, and San Francisco have more valuable and developmented metros then DC, DC metro is useless to the majority of its residences. Which explains why the majority mode of travel is still cars like: 90+%
@@truthfacts5438 The main things that's not cool is how DC wants the rest of the country to subsidies its rail way system with tax payer money. A couple changes could make DC's rail profitable without taxes.
Now go to any other US city you'll be appalled. Some have no metro, near zero bus routes, not even walking or bikeing infustrucre, and no train line connections. Just congested highways and potholes
Washington DC is terribly designed, how can this person even make such a video! DC is as American as American cities come: stereotypical wide roads, heavily reliant on cars, the metro is a damn near useless for 90% of the population. It's a joke to even consider That it is better designed than Moscow, Moscow has a much better developed heavy rail system and has way more green space and more valuable land uses than DC ever has or will...
![[UNCUT] “บอสณวัฒน์” ลากไส้!! ใครหนุนหลัง "แม่ตั๊ก ป๋าเบียร์" I คนดังนั่งเคลียร์ I 30 ก.ย. 67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QlD7mU2KKRk/mqdefault.jpg)
Seeing how congress holds control over D.C. that means they allowed for public transportation to be implemented in the capitol. Yet half the politicians think of mass improvement to the US transportation infrastructure as ridiculous and unrealistic.
Talk about it!
Because of the donations they receiver from the automobile industries😂
Improvement to infrastructure = less profita for the auto industry, insurance industry, healthcare industry....they would never do it
In fact, member of Congress only have public transportation so they can make it easier for them to get around the city.
If you think about it, just literally an underground transit network at Capitol Hill…
It’s crazy that an American city can be better designed than some European cities
All American cities should be like that 🇺🇸
Comparing US cities that were built at least 300 years ago against European cities that were built 700 years ago is like comparing a Nokia and IPhone and praising IPhone for how versatile it is lol
@@Kuricang31 you're saying american cities are the iphone in the scenario?
Boston
@@skysthelimitvideosand Canada to
DC metro is so much cleaner then other subway systems I’ve used (ie NY subway and the Boston T system.) DC residents do like complaining about how often the system is delayed but compared to the rest of the country it’s amazing.
Well, it's very clean because US politicians use it.
@@jasonhaven7170no way us politicians are going on public transport
@@jasonhaven7170 US politicians do not use the metro lmao. Their staff does though so maybe that has something to do with it (but given the chronic funding challenges of the DC metro system I doubt it).
It makes sense becuase most people using are going to work in the federal goverment and therefore have a higher standard of integrity and cleanliness
@@skysthelimitvideosmy father works for a congressman and though the congressman has now moved when he lived near metro he took it
why is there barely any actual stock footage of D.C. in this video. that's Flinders Street Station in Melbourne at 1:24, which is on the other side of the planet from D.C.
pretty sure that's the Chicago L at 1:05 too
As a northern VA resident, it was super obvious that like 95% of the footage is outside on the DC area. There should be a disclaimer because it can be very misleading to most unfamiliar with the area.
What's the point of having Moscow city on the thumbnail if you haven't even mentioned it?
same question lol
Moscow metro is much better than dcs btw
Click bait. It worked on me.
Click bait. Everyone loves to channel their anger by insulting Putin and Russia in general
Yeah. Useless clickbait.
So many misused footages, like why showing Chicago L when talking about DC Metro, or London when talking about Columbus?
cool video but why so much footage of transit systems and countries you aren't talking about...? it's quite distracting
DC Metro actually has 98 stations, not 91.
Only the USA would say how many parking facilities in the same sentence as station numbers and route miles.
NAH FR THO
DC is well designed... in the parts you mentioned. But for 80% of its land use, it's the same as usual. Strip malls, stroads, and 12-lane highways as far as the eye can see. Most of the city outside of a couple of bubbles are horribly designed. Good thing, though, is that is has a lot of potential. The rail network is very extensive and constantly expanding. If we did what we did in Rosslyn at every station on the network, we will have a far superior city. Luckily, no shortage of development is happening, with the biggest one at Tysons Corner. But there is still much to do, and large parts of the rail network will be severely underused until then. I reckon with proper land use around the network, the Washington Metro can grow to 1.5 - 2 million riders per day. I am speaking as a DC native.
And it might also be the most well designed city in the world to ever dominate grid layout
Great video! I found it very informative!! Thanks Versed!
Washington DC might be the most well designed city in the us
Man, you're being very very generous extending the DC area to Spotaylvania and Front Royal lmao
Kansas City adopted free public transportation years ago
So awesome!
93,000,000 riders is low when compared with Canadian city's ridership - Toronto subway was 235,000,000 last year, Montreal subway 245,000,000 and Vancouver Skytrain 116,000,000. But wait, there's more! Toronto has another 60 million passengers just on its streetcars, plus another 35,000,000 on its commuter rail, another distinct system. Toronto absolutely crushes any city except New York when it comes to public transit and that's without even considering it's massive bus and Bus Rapid Transit sytems. Furthermore, it is almost doubling its subway/lrt network in the coming decade, as is Montreal. US is far behind on public transit.
All the government bureaucrats are there. So yeah, they're gonna have best public transit and best healthcare.
Eh, not really. Most of these implementations lay on the city's council and Mayor to go about, including policies.
Most of the wealthy politicians from other parts of the country live out in the rich counties surrounding DC and drive/are driven into their jobs. They don't use public transit.
So DC has a well designed transit system but the rest of the US doesn't.
NYC, Boston, LA, come on.
@@noco7243LA???😂😂 maybe in like 10-20 years but right now, hell no. Add Chicago, Philadelphia and San Francisco to that mix and maybe Seattle soon instead of LA
DC's metro is actually terrible there's some areas where the lines go for 5 to 6 miles in between stops skipping over thousands and thousands of residents forcing them to drive miles in either direction to a Park and Ride to get on to the limited rail. It's laughable that there's a recent trend speaking of DC like it has a good metro, it absolutely does not. New York, Chicago, Boston, Philadelphia, Portland, and San Francisco have more valuable and developmented metros then DC, DC metro is useless to the majority of its residences. Which explains why the majority mode of travel is still cars like: 90+%
@@truthfacts5438 The main things that's not cool is how DC wants the rest of the country to subsidies its rail way system with tax payer money. A couple changes could make DC's rail profitable without taxes.
@@truthfacts5438 Most people who live in DC do not use a car to commute. New York City is the only other city in the US which is like that.
come to DC and ask the people if they think the city is well designed lol. getting around the city is such a pain in the ass sometimes
Now go to any other US city you'll be appalled. Some have no metro, near zero bus routes, not even walking or bikeing infustrucre, and no train line connections. Just congested highways and potholes
Is the voice AI?
So... they got a functioning public transport system.
,,insanely well designed'' 😂
This Video is hilarious because everyone in the DC metro area agree that DC is one of the shittiest designed cities on all levels.
have you seen a map of DC? its like they purposefully laid out the city to contuse people
DC have the worst traffic across the country
first edit: i am fourth
Nope, fourth actually. Better luck next time.
its been 4 months you still here@@guydreamr
@@GuramritSinghKohli And you are still fourth, rather than first.
Washington DC is terribly designed, how can this person even make such a video! DC is as American as American cities come: stereotypical wide roads, heavily reliant on cars, the metro is a damn near useless for 90% of the population. It's a joke to even consider That it is better designed than Moscow, Moscow has a much better developed heavy rail system and has way more green space and more valuable land uses than DC ever has or will...
Have you ever been to DC?
Wide roads lol
@@I46718 , hey, they've seen a few pictures of the Downtown area, so they're an expert.
i like the info but none of these shots are from DC.
Bike paths are better
No
yes goofy@@noco7243
car centrism go crazy. take your dirty, inefficient, slow transit to an underdeveloped Caribbean island.@@noco7243
its so easy to get to the metro form my house i take a 5 min walk and i am there
lets go moco