@@Pennhnd1 I'm sorry, while watching the first part, I see the teacher uses tradition as part of his curriculum. I use only the inspired Word to get my conclusions. Using only the Epistle, the date of Authorship must be before the Crucifixion because there is no reference to the Crucifixion, Resurrection or any of it's ramifications. Scripturally, the only reason there is no mention of the Resurrection is that it hadn't happened yet. Once the Resurrection happens it becomes the only thing worth talking about. God would not inspire a missive about a believers life in Jesus without stressing their need to rely totally and only in the Resurrected Christ.
@@Pennhnd1 Did you see my response to your reply. I often don't get a response to my replies. So I wonder, did they not see it? Did they not understand it? Did they see the undeniable logic and vow to herald the pre Crucifixion authorship of James ever after?
You know a CHILD OF GOD BY YOUR LIFE AND WORKS THAT PRODUCE THE FRUITS OF THE HOLY SPIRIT ❤
Amen ❤ this was a good teaching I forsure took down psalm 141:3 I needed that thank you Jesus ❗️📖✨
Thank you MY GOD AND SAVIOR❤ I PRAISE YOU AND I LOVE YOU SO MUCH WITH ALL MY HEART MIND SOUL AND MY WHOLE BEING❤❤❤
Five Crowns Crown Of Life Crown Of Incorruptible Crown Of Righteousness Crown Of Glory Is Shepherd Of Flock Crown Of Rejoicing
Wonderful teaching, thank you so much.
Thank you brother. I'm listening and learning and preaching. God bless you and the lords church you're entrusted with. Amen
Thank u for ur teachings it helps me to grow
Amen 🙏🏽
🙏❤️❤️❤️🙏
The New Testament Epistle of James was written before tghe Crucifixion.
no. Watch Part 1 . . . This is the earliest book/letter written, but it was written after the persecution of Herod Agrippa (AD 44).
@@Pennhnd1 I'm sorry, while watching the first part, I see the teacher uses tradition as part of his curriculum. I use only the inspired Word to get my conclusions. Using only the Epistle, the date of Authorship must be before the Crucifixion because there is no reference to the Crucifixion, Resurrection or any of it's ramifications. Scripturally, the only reason there is no mention of the Resurrection is that it hadn't happened yet. Once the Resurrection happens it becomes the only thing worth talking about. God would not inspire a missive about a believers life in Jesus without stressing their need to rely totally and only in the Resurrected Christ.
@@Pennhnd1 Did you see my response to your reply. I often don't get a response to my replies. So I wonder, did they not see it? Did they not understand it? Did they see the undeniable logic and vow to herald the pre Crucifixion authorship of James ever after?