Thank you sir 😊 I have watched your all lectures ❤ I really appreciate it because your way of teaching superb ❤ ... Plzz sir make videos on every chapters of philosophy plzzz from Indian to Western... Thank you ... Allah bless you 🤞❤
Tq a lot sir...I understand my whole syllabus of European philosophy through your videos... It's very halpful tq so much sir...🙏🙏 I don't even read books aftr this video... Without books...I cn wrt all long question aftr wtch ur video,❤️🙏 TQ so much sir it very helpful 🙏
The degree of consciousness is different in human beings (conscious monads) as well as animals( sub conscious mondas), the kind of rational power and logical thinking humans are capable of experiencing, is not in the domain of animals. I think you haven't listened to the full lecture yet...
How can God as super conscious monad pre adjust conscious monads of mind and body given that monads are windowless and have no interaction with one another?
Leibniz proposed that creation of a monad is not known to us, that's why he proposed the theory of pre-establised harmony to justify his conception of windowlesss.
Infinite here means monads are many in numbers and monads are simple substances, you can break the composition of monads, not a monad, because monad is indivisible. But the composition of the monad is divisible...
@@PhilosophySimplified sir monads are windowless they can't interact each other so how is it possible when 2 or more monads interact with each other they make a composition ....sir how
A simple Monads is immaterial, but when a composition of monads came into being... It turn to be material. Same point is accepted by nyaya school of indian Philosophy. Moment two or more than two monads unite together... Simple imperceptible monds become perceptible. The point you need to understand is the difference between simple monads as well as Composition of monads. Composition of monads hold the contradictory qualities in comparison to simple monads. If simple monad is indivisible, invisible, the composition of monads is divisible as well as visible.
Simple vs composite. Single monads immaterial hai but composite main unite ho rahe... Transformation to hogi hi... Jaise nyaya main hai atoms immaterial (invisible) hote hai but jo sabse minute perceptible object hai it is composed of six atoms... Atoms dikhte nehi hai but composition dikhta hai, same single monad immaterial hai but jab monds unite hote hai to unka structure change ho jta hai...
@@PhilosophySimplified sir I agree with u ans but nayaya not say this na ki every thing have consciousness but he say degree of consciousness lower to higher ....to fr jb ek monad h to usme v conscious h thodi si or jb 2 mil jyenge to usme v hogi na consciousness or agr consciousness h to fr wo material kese ho skta h ...?? It's my point
Consciousness is the property of monads and not monads itself. And monads are windlowess... Leibniz used simple analogy that simple are immaterial and composition turn to be material... Like Descartes, lebniz too have many flaws in his Philosophy. Like in Charavka, consciousness is the byproduct of matter.... There is no consciousness in atoms but when a body came into being, consciousness comes automatically. Charvak views is more problematic in comparison to Leibniz.
So fundamentally disturbed this part of the theory is..mind and body's connection is not like the way it has been explained by him...many times body goes through effects from outside but min has no knowledge of it...food and TV simultaneously..you will not experience the taste that precisely.
@@PhilosophySimplified first thank u for replying ....he does not accept simple monad is material becoz he think some consciousness present in all things but in matter no conscious ness so it's reject na sir ...
No two monads are same and the difference is the degree of consciousnes... Human brain is a material stuff but it is composed of conscious Monads, like human hairs are also Material in nature but they are composed of unconscious monds. The point here is anything that exit is composite in nature. Whatever is composite is material... Monads are simple substance, so in true sense only monads are real and they exit beyond creation and destruction. But composite is liable to creation and destruction, so they are not considered as real.
Thank you sir 😊 I have watched your all lectures ❤ I really appreciate it because your way of teaching superb ❤ ... Plzz sir make videos on every chapters of philosophy plzzz from Indian to Western... Thank you ... Allah bless you 🤞❤
Thank you Sir 🙏🏻....U r proved that Western philosophy is not difficult 💞💞💞💞
Oh Sir u r Too Good..... Best Explanation.... I'm going to love philosophy..... Lots Of Love From Kashmir
Thank you.
Tq a lot sir...I understand my whole syllabus of European philosophy through your videos...
It's very halpful tq so much sir...🙏🙏 I don't even read books aftr this video... Without books...I cn wrt all long question aftr wtch ur video,❤️🙏 TQ so much sir it very helpful 🙏
Thank you for your kind and inspiring word 🙏
Beautifully explain sir...& Very energetic voice.... I'm your big fan sir....
🙏🙏
Now loving philosophy...thanks sir👍
Superb.. keep going 👍👍
Nice explanation
Thank you so much sir
how exactly did Leibniz influence Nietzsche?
Wonderful work, keep it up
Thank you
Thank you very much 😊
7:50 monads are qualitatively alike but quantitatively different
No, two monads are not the same...
How we humans are conscious monads and animals and plants are sub conscious monad??? Pls explain
The degree of consciousness is different in human beings (conscious monads) as well as animals( sub conscious mondas), the kind of rational power and logical thinking humans are capable of experiencing, is not in the domain of animals. I think you haven't listened to the full lecture yet...
@@PhilosophySimplified i am not a philosophy student but i am interested in this so thats why .btw thanks for explaining.
How can God as super conscious monad pre adjust conscious monads of mind and body given that monads are windowless and have no interaction with one another?
What is the purpose of accepting god's existence if he is not defying human logic.. he can do anything.
Leibniz proposed that creation of a monad is not known to us, that's why he proposed the theory of pre-establised harmony to justify his conception of windowlesss.
Sir my question is if monads are infinite n another side u said that we can't break monads.... Sir how,it's a little confusing please clear it...
Infinite here means monads are many in numbers and monads are simple substances, you can break the composition of monads, not a monad, because monad is indivisible. But the composition of the monad is divisible...
@@PhilosophySimplified sir monads are windowless they can't interact each other so how is it possible when 2 or more monads interact with each other they make a composition ....sir how
That was explained in pre-established harmony
@@PhilosophySimplified okay sir thanks 😊 on that time I'm watching ur video that's primary and secondary qualities according to Locke 😇
Thanks 😊👍
Send vedeo about severtinus Boetious
very hard to understand the language - doesn't sound english even... why is this listed here.
This lecture is in native indian language-Hindi
@@PhilosophySimplified thanks..I thought I had a setting wrong
I am inspired by the Lebanese concept
Kindly create a video of Indian philosophy
Check playlist... already start uploading
Indian Philosophy: th-cam.com/play/PLQsM5zgHuDPfbOirhwtn9kDsQULelpAiR.html
@@PhilosophySimplified Wow Thank you so much sir
Sir plz upload mimansa, Vedanta philosophy
Soon
It means ye bilkul av ki science ki bt kr rhe h na ...Jo hm av mante h ki matter is made up of atoms .
Mondas are spiritual substance, so they are different from material atoms. But yes at quantum level... science jaise b hai...
Sir he does not accept matter but u say two or more monad come together and make matter ....pls explain
A simple Monads is immaterial, but when a composition of monads came into being... It turn to be material. Same point is accepted by nyaya school of indian Philosophy. Moment two or more than two monads unite together... Simple imperceptible monds become perceptible. The point you need to understand is the difference between simple monads as well as Composition of monads. Composition of monads hold the contradictory qualities in comparison to simple monads. If simple monad is indivisible, invisible, the composition of monads is divisible as well as visible.
@@PhilosophySimplified ek akela immaterial h but do mil k material kese ho skte h jbki Leibniz said ki every thing have some consciousness .???
Simple vs composite. Single monads immaterial hai but composite main unite ho rahe... Transformation to hogi hi... Jaise nyaya main hai atoms immaterial (invisible) hote hai but jo sabse minute perceptible object hai it is composed of six atoms... Atoms dikhte nehi hai but composition dikhta hai, same single monad immaterial hai but jab monds unite hote hai to unka structure change ho jta hai...
@@PhilosophySimplified sir I agree with u ans but nayaya not say this na ki every thing have consciousness but he say degree of consciousness lower to higher ....to fr jb ek monad h to usme v conscious h thodi si or jb 2 mil jyenge to usme v hogi na consciousness or agr consciousness h to fr wo material kese ho skta h ...?? It's my point
Consciousness is the property of monads and not monads itself. And monads are windlowess... Leibniz used simple analogy that simple are immaterial and composition turn to be material... Like Descartes, lebniz too have many flaws in his Philosophy. Like in Charavka, consciousness is the byproduct of matter.... There is no consciousness in atoms but when a body came into being, consciousness comes automatically. Charvak views is more problematic in comparison to Leibniz.
Good explanations
Amazing ❤️ sir plz Hegel philosophy pe video bnaiye 🙏
Sure.
Fantastic
So fundamentally disturbed this part of the theory is..mind and body's connection is not like the way it has been explained by him...many times body goes through effects from outside but min has no knowledge of it...food and TV simultaneously..you will not experience the taste that precisely.
Subscriber from Jammu 🤍
Koi education subject ka esa agar teacher ho
It means ki theory bolti h Jo av science bolta b wo matter is made up of atom and he say monad is made up of atom ..and monad is matter indirectly
Simple Monad is not material, but composition of monad is material in nature.
@@PhilosophySimplified first thank u for replying ....he does not accept simple monad is material becoz he think some consciousness present in all things but in matter no conscious ness so it's reject na sir ...
No two monads are same and the difference is the degree of consciousnes... Human brain is a material stuff but it is composed of conscious Monads, like human hairs are also Material in nature but they are composed of unconscious monds. The point here is anything that exit is composite in nature. Whatever is composite is material... Monads are simple substance, so in true sense only monads are real and they exit beyond creation and destruction. But composite is liable to creation and destruction, so they are not considered as real.
@@PhilosophySimplified he say all monads are qualitatively alike ,only quantitative difference .ky kya h fr???