Is the ref an American? They did that again. The ref cheated Canadian the Women world soccer champion for the US. The Americans always want to be American First in anything.
Canada has always been behind the 8 ball with refs. Classic example of that would be the 2002 Olympic Gold Medal game. Canada was getting terrible calls against them the entire game but held it together and won.
I will Never forget that game..How the Canadian women won that day was just incredible with call after call against them 😲 I have had so much respect for Canadian womens hockey ever since that amazing performance 👍Congrats to the Canadian women once again!
Was there an angle that actually showed the puck and the player in the same shot? If the linesperson called it onside, they would need 100% video proof to overturn the call.
it was but for some reason if you dont have a conclusive video you can't use obvious logic, you have to go by the original call. It's the rules not the refs.
@@obscurereference6298 The problem is the lack of explanation of why the decision was made as it was. That is a real problem...esp in modern hockey where these kinds of reviews are done based on pretty solid fact. Hard to believe that there was not an angle that would have shown both player and puck at the blueline. It's pitiful, if that was actually the case.
No goal when the contact was when the puck was already on its way in and no possibility of a save? Then a clear offside gets waived off? Refs are nuts.
The Canadian coach is looking for an explanation, "It's rigged and the IIHF wants this match up to have as much drama and parody as possible." Side note: it actually could have been onside because this video doesn't have an angle that shows Knight's feet and the puck crossing the line in the same frame. I'm just talking shit. But I find it highly unlikely it was onside based on Knight's position. Also, that goalie interference call was so weak. Complete joke.
That was the most incompetent call I've ever seen. None of those officials should call another game. And the TSN announcers just glossed over that call "They might have had a better angle ..." The puck was outside of the zone, she was fully inside when the pass hit her. How is that not offside? I think that they wanted the drama of a US comeback. "This game had everything ...". They should have been screaming about how bad that call was, or at least demanding to understand how the linesmen saw it that way. Nothing. At the end of the day it showed how these refs and linesmen are not equipped to officiate a game at this level. I think back to Canada vs USA in an Olympic gold medal game. The linesman couldn't get out of the way and tripped the Canadian. The US player shot the puck down the ice because of that and it hit the empty net post. Then in overtime Wickenheiser gets tripped on a breakaway. It's called a penalty shot. No wait, she changes it to a two minute penalty. Under pressure that ref had no game. Meanwhile there were NHL refs and linesman - who were there for the men's hockey - cooling their heals. I love women's sports and I think that these women deserve the best on ice officials possible, and I sure didn't see this then and certainly not tonight.
There wasn't a single angle from the video above that actually showed where her feet were when the puck crossed the blue line. So it is possible they had a better angle that showed it. It "seemed" offside to me but if you replay it even at 0.25x you will find there's no definitive evidence from the angles given (mainly because the frame rate on YT is too low).
@@sports2hedz542 You would be incorrect. You don't need any special angle to clearly see that the USA player's WHOLE BODY was ALREADY across the blueline when the puck arrived. This is not a gray area. This is not marginal. This is not a close call. This is called OFFSIDE...not maybe, not almost, not close.... These officials need to be investigated.
I can understand when a referee or linesman makes an honest mistake. It's disappointing, but no one's perfect. However, that US goal was reviewed by four people, it was a metre offside. I'd like to know how the referee explained their decision to the Canadian bench. It's certainly suspicious whenever it appears a US athlete or team is, once again, handed a goal.
Lol ... not offside??🤔🤔🤔 Karma or Hockey Gods gave the W to the rightful team, but getting a call SO wrong ...when you HAVE video review is scary. Either way, the Best TEAM won.
This video here is proof enough for me that in international competitions you should not have officials that are from the same country as the athletes participating. It was a Canada US game with officials split from both countries. I knew it would be a weird one the second I saw that and I am a biased canadian fan so in glad we won but I think we should've had different officials
It is shocking that in an international best-on-best hockey tournament, there is no camera that shows the entire blue line to ascertain whether a play was offside or not.
This... isn't the final? Still a preliminary game, but you're right they'll face each other in the finals 😂 Unless Finland can pull off what they did at the 2019 worlds. If anyone here knows what im talking about, you also know what a BS call that was, in OT in 2019.
In what world was that onside? Also that goalie interference is iffy at best. Goalie reaches out to make contact and there’s a 0% chance she saves it anyways.
Thaty's how I saw it. She made no attempt to play the shot, instead, stuck her mit out high, (the shot was going low five hole.) into the forwards arm who would have clearly missed her if not for the effort of the goalie to make contact in oder to pull the call. Chickenshit cheat was all.
Look...we ALL know - even the USA - that is was blatantly offside. The officials do too, hence the ridiculously LONG time to decide - you know, "Hmmm....ummm....hmmm...ummm....OK, I think we made everybody think we spent lots of time on a close call." "We don't have the angle to determine that it was offside." ?!?!? Guess what? EVERYBODY else does!
Goaltender interference is when a goaltender is interfered with in such a way that had the goaltender _not_ been interfered with, a goal would’ve been scored. She was not stopping that puck.
OH Canada!!🍁🍁🍁 The Canadian Women did the women's team so proud, there families proud and All of Canada proud! Congrats to the Women's team! The US women played hard but tonight it was all Canadian Women!!!🍁🍁🍁🍁🍁🍁Oh CANADA!!!!🍁🍁🍁🍁!!!🍁
So....being a foot over the blueline before the puck crosses it is not offside now? When did they institute this new rule? Is it to boost offence? For the US?
that refereeing was absolutley disgusting, went from 4 to1 to 3 to 3, in under a minute, i call BS on that lets hope NONE of those refs are ban from calling ANY of medal games, they shouldnt even be calling pee wee hockey it was that bad,
I was definitely enjoying the game and the extremely sus refereeing really spoiled the whole mood. I hope this problem gets addressed, what a stain on an otherwise really exciting game.
Well I think with such a good game going on and the chance of gaining more fans worldwide the no goal call then the brutal no call offside did the opposite women’s hockey lost serious fans because of such amateur officiating sad
This game should never gone to overtime. The obvious offside no-call was ridiculous on the American 'goal' earlier. These refs should GO BACK TO SCHOOL
The officiating was nothing short of egregious! The USA player's WHOLE body was completely offside! This call wasn't difficult. This wasn't marginal. It was clearly offside. How can you possibly call it any other way? Sorry...I stand corrected. They did "find a way". Thank goodness the better team actually won, in spite. The women's league needs to step in and deal with these officials and, no....the puck did not enter the zone ahead of the player crossing the blueline. It's OFFSIDE! Duuuh.....
Canada power play is inefficient. It is way too conservative, They need to take some risks, to force the play. I really hate to see three players on the blue line. It is so unproductive.
Would have been interesting to know what the justification was for the second US goal. My though is that they didn't have a definitive angle....which is absolutely lame in modern day hockey. Not a good comeback...for Canada...but still a great victory.
@@joeprice8163 Agree. I'm checking media articles..and everyone is staying away from the topic, for some reason. I think it's a real problem when these things are not explained. It looks like serious lack of transparency, as to why the decision was made in that way. The angle used in the video does not give a 100% clear angle...but you gotta think there is a better angle out there.
@@joeidaho5938 There is literally supposed to be a linesperson in position to make the call. Someone said there was a video shown from behind the goalie that clearly shows it offside...it was shown once and not again. The player receiving the puck was at a virtual standstill when they received the puck, no way they were moving from on side to get that pass. The worst thing is that it destroys any interest in watching women's hockey. They have a history of this level of bull shit calls...mostly in favour of the good 'ol USA.
@@joeprice8163I feel so bad when Canada loses because hockey is everything up there. It’s the best only team sport that they have a chance to beat U.S. in. 😂
Was der Unterschied ist gegenüber den Männer Hockey ist das die Frauen viel zu wenig Dampf darauf haben im Spiel es sieht alles so wie es in Zeitlupen wäre.
I love(sarcasm) how the TSN commentators called it offside after watching replays and then started praising the American players for their tenacity and never quit attitude, complimenting the American players after a totally ridiculous call. Say what you will about Don Cherry but he would've said it was total BS regardless of the paycheque he was getting! The Canadian TSN commentators should be ashamed! What message does this send to young girls, like my daughters, playing hockey and supporting their hockey heroes, that the game they love is corrupt! it wasn't even a judgement call, the video evidence is VERY clear! Funny how TSN stopped showing replays after the bad call!!! All you have to do is watch the USA/Finland gold medal game where it took 20 minutes to review the winning Finland goal. If you ladies want to be taken seriously stand up for integrity in the game and not just paycheques!! Just because we won in a shootout this shouldn't be swept under the rug! When did a call on the ice become a jury deliberation, where one ref holds out on a bad call until the rest of the officials fold??? That call should've been made in 30 seconds
Betting has DESTROYED sports and so few people realize this...yet. Think of rooting against your favorite team because you have a bet on the opposition based on the odds?!?!? Happens often! Sports betting has opened the door to "losers" - this is not intended as an insult. It's a FACT! Here's the premise of casinos and sports betting: NEVER keep track of your expenditures. Just celebrate the few wins. In this way, you are ignorant of just how much of your hard-earned money you've burned.
“Gotta hand it to the Americans” they sure as hell tried to 😂
Lmfao
Right? Holy hell. I know these rivalry games are intense and sometimes unpredictable but that was the weirdest game I've watched in a long time
😅😅😂😂🤣🤣🤣😂😂😅😅
Obviously the refs failed the class, “Defining Off Side 101”
Damn the ref’s really wanted the US to win that game eh.
LOL...ya right. That would explains all the Canada PP's
@@drdlin you literally got gifted the most clear offside I have ever seen and on top of that Canada got disallowed a good goal and you still ate shit
Is the ref an American? They did that again. The ref cheated Canadian the Women world soccer champion for the US. The Americans always want to be American First in anything.
@@drdlin bs
@@Fomich Oh.....CANADA!!!
Lol how did the Americans 2nd goal count?!
Canada has always been behind the 8 ball with refs. Classic example of that would be the 2002 Olympic Gold Medal game. Canada was getting terrible calls against them the entire game but held it together and won.
2002 American ref, Stacey Livingston, right up there with 1972 Josef Kompalla. garbage humans.
I will Never forget that game..How the Canadian women won that day was just incredible with call after call against them 😲 I have had so much respect for Canadian womens hockey ever since that amazing performance 👍Congrats to the Canadian women once again!
Way too go ladies!! 🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦
I just need an explanation of why that one play wasn't offside
Was there an angle that actually showed the puck and the player in the same shot? If the linesperson called it onside, they would need 100% video proof to overturn the call.
Looked 100% offside!
IIHF refs
Hey! Yooz didden see nuttin....capiche?!
@@pyRoy6 dude watch the replay it shows the American CLEARLY offside. That was a bullshit call straight up!
That goal that made it 3-2 should not have counted. Good to see that the right team won, even if it was a shootout.
How was that not offside 😂
it was but for some reason if you dont have a conclusive video you can't use obvious logic, you have to go by the original call. It's the rules not the refs.
@@obscurereference6298 It was the refs to have not called the original offside. My god, that was offside by a mile...
@@MattyCTea this is true. but nothing different than nhl refs
@@obscurereference6298 The problem is the lack of explanation of why the decision was made as it was. That is a real problem...esp in modern hockey where these kinds of reviews are done based on pretty solid fact. Hard to believe that there was not an angle that would have shown both player and puck at the blueline. It's pitiful, if that was actually the case.
@@joeidaho5938 that is 100% also the problem. for sure but i dont think they had angles we didnt see. i think that was just bad camera work
Congrats Canada!
No goal when the contact was when the puck was already on its way in and no possibility of a save? Then a clear offside gets waived off? Refs are nuts.
Nuts, or....?
Good game on both sides. That American goal that was allowed was offside 100%.
AWESOME ! But please show all the shootout goals plz
The Canadian coach is looking for an explanation, "It's rigged and the IIHF wants this match up to have as much drama and parody as possible."
Side note: it actually could have been onside because this video doesn't have an angle that shows Knight's feet and the puck crossing the line in the same frame. I'm just talking shit. But I find it highly unlikely it was onside based on Knight's position.
Also, that goalie interference call was so weak. Complete joke.
I can't figure out if your use of the word parody instead of parity was a typo or just really clever.
Woo, that off side was so obvious you could call it from space 😂
Glad they won, that offside was dirty.
That is a nhl level miss call
lmao soooo right
It was just like watching the Leafs blow a 3-1 lead going into the 3rd period with seconds left on the clock.
Ref says "Sorry US, I tried".
That was the most incompetent call I've ever seen. None of those officials should call another game. And the TSN announcers just glossed over that call "They might have had a better angle ..." The puck was outside of the zone, she was fully inside when the pass hit her. How is that not offside? I think that they wanted the drama of a US comeback. "This game had everything ...". They should have been screaming about how bad that call was, or at least demanding to understand how the linesmen saw it that way. Nothing.
At the end of the day it showed how these refs and linesmen are not equipped to officiate a game at this level. I think back to Canada vs USA in an Olympic gold medal game. The linesman couldn't get out of the way and tripped the Canadian. The US player shot the puck down the ice because of that and it hit the empty net post. Then in overtime Wickenheiser gets tripped on a breakaway. It's called a penalty shot. No wait, she changes it to a two minute penalty. Under pressure that ref had no game. Meanwhile there were NHL refs and linesman - who were there for the men's hockey - cooling their heals. I love women's sports and I think that these women deserve the best on ice officials possible, and I sure didn't see this then and certainly not tonight.
There wasn't a single angle from the video above that actually showed where her feet were when the puck crossed the blue line. So it is possible they had a better angle that showed it. It "seemed" offside to me but if you replay it even at 0.25x you will find there's no definitive evidence from the angles given (mainly because the frame rate on YT is too low).
@@sports2hedz542 are you american?
@@sports2hedz542 the C
The Canadian player threw her hand in the air because she knew it was offside!
@@sports2hedz542 You would be incorrect. You don't need any special angle to clearly see that the USA player's WHOLE BODY was ALREADY across the blueline when the puck arrived. This is not a gray area. This is not marginal. This is not a close call. This is called OFFSIDE...not maybe, not almost, not close.... These officials need to be investigated.
👏👏👏👏👏👏👌
When it comes to hochey on the ice, the Canadians are really very good, both on the men's and women's teams.
I can understand when a referee or linesman makes an honest mistake. It's disappointing, but no one's perfect.
However, that US goal was reviewed by four people, it was a metre offside. I'd like to know how the referee explained their decision to the Canadian bench. It's certainly suspicious whenever it appears a US athlete or team is, once again, handed a goal.
Lol ... not offside??🤔🤔🤔
Karma or Hockey Gods gave the W to the rightful team, but getting a call SO wrong ...when you HAVE video review is scary. Either way, the Best TEAM won.
And not to mention they've got those big ass computer monitors and not the stupid little iPads the NHL uses
The one goal looked redic offside!! Glad Canada still won in the end!
Where to watch this game in full ?
Bro the offside 😢
great passion on the ice in this one
This video here is proof enough for me that in international competitions you should not have officials that are from the same country as the athletes participating. It was a Canada US game with officials split from both countries. I knew it would be a weird one the second I saw that and I am a biased canadian fan so in glad we won but I think we should've had different officials
What a great team. Hip hip hurrah 🎉🎉🎉
What a war! Let's go Canada 🔥
It is shocking that in an international best-on-best hockey tournament, there is no camera that shows the entire blue line to ascertain whether a play was offside or not.
It really is shocking. That downgrades the quality of the game significantly.
Go Canada Go. Nice victory.
Never thought it would be Canada and USA in the final. Lol
This... isn't the final? Still a preliminary game, but you're right they'll face each other in the finals 😂 Unless Finland can pull off what they did at the 2019 worlds. If anyone here knows what im talking about, you also know what a BS call that was, in OT in 2019.
@@vicckyyy2001 sorry, my mistake
When I tuned in near the end of the 3rd period I assumed it was the final cuz of all the hype. Thanks
@@billboggs6641 all good
In what world was that onside? Also that goalie interference is iffy at best. Goalie reaches out to make contact and there’s a 0% chance she saves it anyways.
Thaty's how I saw it. She made no attempt to play the shot, instead, stuck her mit out high, (the shot was going low five hole.) into the forwards arm who would have clearly missed her if not for the effort of the goalie to make contact in oder to pull the call.
Chickenshit cheat was all.
Look...we ALL know - even the USA - that is was blatantly offside. The officials do too, hence the ridiculously LONG time to decide - you know, "Hmmm....ummm....hmmm...ummm....OK, I think we made everybody think we spent lots of time on a close call." "We don't have the angle to determine that it was offside." ?!?!? Guess what? EVERYBODY else does!
Goaltender interference is when a goaltender is interfered with in such a way that had the goaltender _not_ been interfered with, a goal would’ve been scored. She was not stopping that puck.
And as for the offside… despite all the terrible, awful calls I’ve seen made in the NHL, this was amongst the worst of all time.
Great game ladies! 🇨🇦
Wow, the refs really playing hard for the States, eh? That was BLATANTLY offside. That would be waved off in any NHL game.
Very nice video ☺👍
Yay i love the canadians❤🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦
OH Canada!!🍁🍁🍁 The Canadian Women did the women's team so proud, there families proud and All of Canada proud! Congrats to the Women's team! The US women played hard but tonight it was all Canadian Women!!!🍁🍁🍁🍁🍁🍁Oh CANADA!!!!🍁🍁🍁🍁!!!🍁
Класс! Девчонки в порядке 👍👍
do you have to have the score in the title line????
So....being a foot over the blueline before the puck crosses it is not offside now? When did they institute this new rule? Is it to boost offence? For the US?
That was a crap offside call there is now way they actually said there wasn’t conclusive evidence💀
That second USA goal was one of the most offside plays that I have ever seen, yet they call it a good goal somehow?
they had to make the gane more exciting to watch for viewership
How did the American not know she was way off side on that second goal. Terrible call on the ice.
There's a lot of shitty commentary from a couple women on NHL coverage but this play by play is fantastic.
Color also
Yo um how was that onside?
Well that’s why you need refs that know how the game works…
Those refs were LOST.
How the hell was that not offside?
Should never had went to overtime
WHY DIDN'T THEY SHOW THE ANGLE THAT THE REFS MADE THEIR DECISION FROM???
Wooooo Hoooo
that refereeing was absolutley disgusting, went from 4 to1 to 3 to 3, in under a minute, i call BS on that lets hope NONE of those refs are ban from calling ANY of medal games, they shouldnt even be calling pee wee hockey it was that bad,
these goals are nhl calibre.
Worst call I have ever seen. Offside by a mile.
Is it just me or John Wroblewski looks like Steven Stamkos ???
Way to go girls!!!! ❤
women not girls this is not the U-18 iihf xD
I was definitely enjoying the game and the extremely sus refereeing really spoiled the whole mood. I hope this problem gets addressed, what a stain on an otherwise really exciting game.
Well I think with such a good game going on and the chance of gaining more fans worldwide the no goal call then the brutal no call offside did the opposite women’s hockey lost serious fans because of such amateur officiating sad
The most offside, offside I've ever seen...
Well USA, you have 2 years before the Winter Olympics to figure out how to outsmart Canada
They finally did, last night, when it mattered the most!
I like the sportsmanship when the offside call was not made. Canada just moved on and kept playing. Was a bullshit call though.
This game should never gone to overtime. The obvious offside no-call was ridiculous on the American 'goal' earlier. These refs should GO BACK TO SCHOOL
Frauen Hockey super Geil.
Die Kommentorin ist Geil die hat ein richtiger Dampf drauf das wäre etwas für mich.
Bedard and Canada won, can Canadas women team do it?
Refs deserve one year suspension.
Glad to see even the refs in women's hockey are horrible LOL. You have to admire the consistency.
Home ICE. Not home soil. Ice not soil.
🥰🤝✌🙏
lololololololololololol.. canadian women rock.....
lord thundrin jesus bey she was wayyyyyy offside bey
way offside and the ref let the Americans have the goal??? What kind of system are they running???So bias...
fire the refs textbook offside good god
The officiating was nothing short of egregious! The USA player's WHOLE body was completely offside! This call wasn't difficult. This wasn't marginal. It was clearly offside. How can you possibly call it any other way? Sorry...I stand corrected. They did "find a way". Thank goodness the better team actually won, in spite. The women's league needs to step in and deal with these officials and, no....the puck did not enter the zone ahead of the player crossing the blueline. It's OFFSIDE! Duuuh.....
Ок, Канада!
Хорошо, Россия 👊🏼 🇨🇦
world cup coming winter
if your going to have "professionals" refs maybe GET professionals who ACTULY know what an offside is....shit that was sad AF..
🇨🇦👌🏻💪🏼🇨🇦👍🏻💪🏼🇨🇦👌🏻👍🏻
Canada power play is inefficient. It is way too conservative, They need to take some risks, to force the play. I really hate to see three players on the blue line. It is so unproductive.
Ref on American payroll
Would have been interesting to know what the justification was for the second US goal. My though is that they didn't have a definitive angle....which is absolutely lame in modern day hockey. Not a good comeback...for Canada...but still a great victory.
How did the lines person miss it in the first place? something that far offside shouldn't need a review.
@@joeprice8163 Agree. I'm checking media articles..and everyone is staying away from the topic, for some reason. I think it's a real problem when these things are not explained. It looks like serious lack of transparency, as to why the decision was made in that way. The angle used in the video does not give a 100% clear angle...but you gotta think there is a better angle out there.
@@joeidaho5938 There is literally supposed to be a linesperson in position to make the call. Someone said there was a video shown from behind the goalie that clearly shows it offside...it was shown once and not again. The player receiving the puck was at a virtual standstill when they received the puck, no way they were moving from on side to get that pass. The worst thing is that it destroys any interest in watching women's hockey. They have a history of this level of bull shit calls...mostly in favour of the good 'ol USA.
@@joeprice8163I feel so bad when Canada loses because hockey is everything up there. It’s the best only team sport that they have a chance to beat U.S. in. 😂
@@michaelconnor5378 don't feel bad. What makes us, us is that we can be gracious in defeat and humble in victory. Congrats team USA!
Is this a joke ? If they're going to allow offside goals to count like that what's the point...It's too bad !
Was der Unterschied ist gegenüber den Männer Hockey ist das die Frauen viel zu wenig Dampf darauf haben im Spiel es sieht alles so wie es in Zeitlupen wäre.
Bro I didn’t even know they were playing 💀💀💀 if ur gonna endorse women’s sports maybe advertise it better
2nd goal by US. was WAY OFF SIDE ...WTF
They should just let the women wear half shields
The "not offside" call on the USA second goal in the very worst reviewed non-call I have ever seen --in any sport.
.
I love(sarcasm) how the TSN commentators called it offside after watching replays and then started praising the American players for their tenacity and never quit attitude, complimenting the American players after a totally ridiculous call. Say what you will about Don Cherry but he would've said it was total BS regardless of the paycheque he was getting! The Canadian TSN commentators should be ashamed! What message does this send to young girls, like my daughters, playing hockey and supporting their hockey heroes, that the game they love is corrupt! it wasn't even a judgement call, the video evidence is VERY clear! Funny how TSN stopped showing replays after the bad call!!! All you have to do is watch the USA/Finland gold medal game where it took 20 minutes to review the winning Finland goal. If you ladies want to be taken seriously stand up for integrity in the game and not just paycheques!! Just because we won in a shootout this shouldn't be swept under the rug! When did a call on the ice become a jury deliberation, where one ref holds out on a bad call until the rest of the officials fold??? That call should've been made in 30 seconds
lol
What a joke. She was clearly offside on that late goal. Pathetic. The game should have been done at 3 to 1 Canada. Smarten up guys.
...you gals....
Nothing new of couse Canada takes the W.
Offside!!
Sorry USA, nobody comes close to Canada in hockey.
NO SHOOTOUTS IN GOLD METAL OR CHAMPIONSHIP GAMES FFS !
what horrible reffing calls
How do we keep losing to this little country?
75000 women hockey players both USA and Canada! We the finnish Finland onl
Finland only 2500 women players! 70000 boys playing hockey in Finland!
@@RaineriHakkarainen70000? i thought it was 90000
Spielerisch garnicht schlecht die Frauen muss ich sagen.
Boy the refs must have been betting on the US. Too bad this is Canada’s game. EH.
Betting has DESTROYED sports and so few people realize this...yet. Think of rooting against your favorite team because you have a bet on the opposition based on the odds?!?!? Happens often! Sports betting has opened the door to "losers" - this is not intended as an insult. It's a FACT! Here's the premise of casinos and sports betting: NEVER keep track of your expenditures. Just celebrate the few wins. In this way, you are ignorant of just how much of your hard-earned money you've burned.
Wow apparently the refs are just as bad as in the NHL
why are they wearing cages ??? guys dont ,