I think they probably need governmental agreement on how to properly store the c02 still. No point building them in masses until we can store it properly. I'm doing a research paper on this i'll update if i find anything lol
I don't see how the released CO2 stays separate from the rest of the air. Maybe the tree was a concept application till they work that out? or maybe the plastic costs too be profitable from the carbon tax credits?
Literally no one is saying we should absorb all of the co2 in the atmosphere, no one is saying co2 is pollution. The goal is to absorb the unnatural EXCESS of co2 in the atmosphere that exists as a BYPRODUCT of pollution from fossil fuels such as oil and coal. Co2 is most definitely a natural thing, but the amounts we see in our current atmosphere are abnormal. If we get back to the levels of co2, worldwide, that existed before say the industrial revolution, then life would be much better for..everything living. Co2 is good for plants, too much co2 will kill off everything due to global warming. We've already seen what co2 and global warming gone wild can do, just look at Venus. Life will actually thrive better, if we reduce the amount of co2 in our atmosphere, places that have been suffering droughts and catastrophes due to global warming will flourish again. The way to make the green parts of our planet greener than what we've seen in 100 years lies in many paths and technologies, and types of co2 sequestration will likely be a big part of it.
That..being said, I'd love to see the co2 captured by this type of remarkable material, put back into algae to make biofuel, whose co2 would be fed back into the algae to create a closed system for energy demands. Something like the co2 from this resin being fed into algae tanks like the ones on the algae powered apartment complex in Hamburg, Germany.
by using these machines, which are far more efficient at absorbing CO2, they will create a healthier environment for plant life to grow. there is not one solutionto the issue the more tools in the tool box the easier the repair goes.
Planting more trees won’t restore our carbon cycle equilibrium before 2050 technology will, it got us in the mess and now it’s gonna have to take us out. With that being said I love your enthusiasm.
Christophe Jospe hi! i am a greek student and i am searching for some informations about artificial trees.. How much it cost? In witch cities already exist? Where is the factory of them..? And as i can understand this will be the solution of our planet, why do not we use them more? If you have any link for these or ansewrs ... Thank you !!
Christophe Jospe hi! i am a greek student and i am searching for some informations about artificial trees.. How much it cost? In witch cities already exist? Where is the factory of them..? And as i can understand this will be the solution of our planet, why do not we use them more? If you have any link for these or ansewrs ... Thank you !!
people in these comment sections fail to see the benefit of making this kind of technology even if it hasn't been implemented in mass yet... I assume we're waiting on funding and finding the proper way to store the captured CO2 still? anthropogenic climate change aside, having this technology for the next century to millions of years if our species makes it is what is more important because CO2 levels fluctuate naturally and maybe it will be what we use to maintain our climate from NON-anthropogenic climate change. No need to want a completely iceless world millions of years from now, or an ice age when we can control greenhouse gases to live in the world are adapted to instead of one we are not. The technology will come if we have the time. In the meanwhile, yes, renewable energy and reforestation is important
Plant a lot of trees 🌱🍃🌿🌳. Absorbs a lot of carbon dioxide and creates oxygen🍃🌳. It's time to plant trees🌱 to save many people🌱 🌎🌱🌍🌱🌏🌱🌱🌱🌱🌱🌱🌱🌱🌿🍃🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳
When you consider the damage being done every single year, because of the more nasty weather. I would actually say, that in long term, it would be free to plant 60 million of these tree's it would even be a profit.
All this is great, but real trees are still indispensable for a variety of other, more complex reasons. We don't need to maintain as many trees as we once had in the past, but this is no reason to think we have a full replacement for regular forests/ trees.
A breakthrough in science! Hooray! We need this Physicist Engineer producing artificial trees in high concentration places! I can be his Sales person!!!
I feel sorry for the people in New Hampshire and Illinois with all the snow they are getting it's like a ice age over there they should not have to go though that all because the government can't do there job
They would sell the CO2 to companies who need the CO2. Soda companies, deep sea pumping companies, greenhouses, etc. They could also sell the "trees" to companies that need to use CO2. Instead of the company having to have CO2 transported to them they could capture the CO2 onsite.
3:51 estimation in 2009, around 10 years ago, a single tree could absorb about a ton CO2 per day, that alone already qualify for Elon's carbon capture requirement C'mon Elon, I thumb up this video, so that this video could reach you, at least try to contact Prof. Klaus Lackner
can you use salt water ? And if so ,wouldn"t it be easier too have these's trees floating on the ocean suffice like a forest .pumping it down to the ocean floor like tree roots.
Hi, I really need some help ! Does anyone know how they did to have this kind of plastic which can absorb carbon dioxide ? And where we can find it ? Because I’m looking for this special kind of plastic and I’m struggling. Thank you very much for your help.
It doesn't explain where they will store this. I love the idea, but we need to be sure that all of that CO2 one day just go back into the atmosphere because of a minor incident. The so-called CO2 storage has to be safe and reliable.
Would actually be pretty cool. I wonder how much money they need thought. Kickstarters rarely go above 8 million dollars. but maybe something like this cool atract more attention.
@myslmysl No I do not think it would not be more efficient, we currently produce 72 million cars A DAY! Apparently to keep up with today's level of pollution we would only need to produce TEN million of the artificial trees, and the fact that these trees take in more carbon dioxide than real trees and do not even need to grow they are much more efficient. As for an eyesore, it's not about looks it's about taking care of this only planet we have, I would gladly have one in my back yard x]
if you had a 1/8th inch think strip of this plastic and made a dome with it then on the inside put a water sprayer, would it absorb the co2 from the outside then the co2 would move through the plastic to the inside then the water sprays then the co2 goes inside then a vacuum pump sucks out the water and co2 sorts it so the co2 goes into a gas tank and the water goes back to the sprayer? or instead of a vacuum pump on the inside you could have a small plant.
I would still prefer to see the hills deforested, but IF Carbon capture like this takes off, it would be best to pair it with Algea growing for fuel, food etc. At present Algea growers are setting up near waste sites for nutrients and factories for their CO2 to feed the Algea.
@OTVF we can build them the size of a city block. sequestering millions of tons a day. When you put it on your house, where is it going to be sequestered?
Here's a thought... why don't we just plant more real trees?? Maybe, just maybe, restoring the natural habitats we have destroyed is the logical way to go...
Etienne Van Rensburg you need a entire planet full of trees to save it. And if we did we need to destroy agriculture and houses. Now people are starving and homeless.
they literally addressed that in the video. the CO2 storage sites in Utah are testing methods for undergournd storage that solidifies the the gas over the course of approximatly 2 years. the solidified CO2 is then used for either an energy source or to make fertilizer, at least that is what they are looking at right now.
I don't think having 60 million of these trees will do as much good as having too much CO2. If anything we should 'plant' these trees in CO2 populated areas (Big cities), or use the material more as a filter for things such as vehicles or large factories that release CO2. But then again, I dont have the numbers and the whole picture of this yet. Cool invention though.
Would it be possible to have one tree that could take in CO2 the most and give O2 the most, then rengineer its DNA so that we could increase its capacity by one billion times?
I would like to remind viewers that plants love CO2. They don't reach their best growth rates until CO2 reaches 1200pm. Reducing CO2 levels would be dangerous for plants. If CO2 drops below 250ppm plants stop growing. Below 150ppm plant death occurs. If your interested, a good article can be found at the following link: university.upstartfarmers.com/blog/why-and-how-to-supplement-co2-in-indoor-farms Happy reading.
Do you even science Kevin? You seriously have no idea how bad 1200ppm of Carbon would be to the environment. Nature is a delicate thing and even a small shift is enough to destroy it as we know it. We are at 410ppm and rising. Don't compare indoor farms to Earth because those indoor farms aren't as complicated as the earth's ecosystems.
This has been one of the crucial elements of the debate, is the climate robust? Or is it fragile? The alarmist argues that it is fragile and slight changes lead to catastrophic failure. The evidence for a robust system is the fact that you and I are here. Are you complaining about me referencing other people's science? In science, every claim has a reference to supporting science done by someone else.
Suika this is your second attack on my character. Generally science based discussions proceed on the quality of the argument and supporting evidence not character attacks. Would you like to continue the discussion without the character attacks? There is still much to be said about the argument you have already presented.
I'm sorry for attacking your character but man made Climate change is something that can NOT be debated because it is fact. The only people who think is a debate are politicians and celebrity figures who have been payed off by Oil companies or those who listen to them. Think of it this way, (and I mean no offense) would you sit here and debate with a person who believes that the government is run by lizard people, when you know such a proposition is utterly stupid?
I agree, but a rotting or burning tree release carbon. Then again, plants needs carbon. These contraptions produce carbon during manufacturing, transportation, installing, maintenance, and eventually a trip to the landfill.
So after trapping the co2, what it will be used for? Is it safe to just hold the co2 in large quantities without doing nothing? can we just send the unused co2 to space?
Where do you store all this CO2, trees do a better job for free, thanks to global warming trees will absorb and store more CO2 faster then ever. All we need to do is pass a Tree law, every citizen must own 2 trees on their property, problem solved
So this does not convert co2 into oxygen or anything, just captures it? Which then has to be stored somewhere? How much co2 does the plastic manufacturing create?
2:04 they just let the normal atmosphere of co2 back into the airtight chamber? would that not just let the levels go back up as normal? and also they want to absorb the co2 and just let it back out into the air by wetting the material what is the point of that??
What will this do to our water cause if water triggers it to release then where will it go or if it's being put on the water we need away to turn it into a solid
10 years later, and where has this technology gone????
They never come out. Good Things will never...
No funding, it's also cheaper to just plant trees
I think they probably need governmental agreement on how to properly store the c02 still. No point building them in masses until we can store it properly. I'm doing a research paper on this i'll update if i find anything lol
No money to be made
@@dpizzy99 the technology is actually being utilized and there are dates set for megaton carbon capture plants to be completed in a few years
OK - Eight years later and I still haven't seen a single one of these trees anywhere. What happened?
costs too much, not practical, likely nobody wants to pay for them...This is just libtards coming up with stupid ideas to spend tax payers' money...
This video is for idiots... plant more trees and CO2 is easily removed.
Right up there with mining the moon and colonizing Mars.
Ryan - Yeah, much more intelligent to spend tax payers' money on the wall and the Space Force, huh? Dumbass Trumptard.
I don't see how the released CO2 stays separate from the rest of the air.
Maybe the tree was a concept application till they work that out?
or maybe the plastic costs too be profitable from the carbon tax credits?
Literally no one is saying we should absorb all of the co2 in the atmosphere, no one is saying co2 is pollution. The goal is to absorb the unnatural EXCESS of co2 in the atmosphere that exists as a BYPRODUCT of pollution from fossil fuels such as oil and coal. Co2 is most definitely a natural thing, but the amounts we see in our current atmosphere are abnormal. If we get back to the levels of co2, worldwide, that existed before say the industrial revolution, then life would be much better for..everything living. Co2 is good for plants, too much co2 will kill off everything due to global warming. We've already seen what co2 and global warming gone wild can do, just look at Venus. Life will actually thrive better, if we reduce the amount of co2 in our atmosphere, places that have been suffering droughts and catastrophes due to global warming will flourish again. The way to make the green parts of our planet greener than what we've seen in 100 years lies in many paths and technologies, and types of co2 sequestration will likely be a big part of it.
That..being said, I'd love to see the co2 captured by this type of remarkable material, put back into algae to make biofuel, whose co2 would be fed back into the algae to create a closed system for energy demands. Something like the co2 from this resin being fed into algae tanks like the ones on the algae powered apartment complex in Hamburg, Germany.
If we would capture all, it would be unlivably cold. No thermostatic gases in atmosphere.
Paradoks Paradoks -16 degrees colder.
Better than I imagined. :)
in this video the say to revert back to pre-industrial age levels not capture all of it.
Ever thought of planting more trees and cutting them less.
And covering them underground ? :D They will never think of that. You can use algae aswell. But no they have other agendas.
by using these machines, which are far more efficient at absorbing CO2, they will create a healthier environment for plant life to grow. there is not one solutionto the issue the more tools in the tool box the easier the repair goes.
Planting more trees won’t restore our carbon cycle equilibrium before 2050 technology will, it got us in the mess and now it’s gonna have to take us out. With that being said I love your enthusiasm.
Literally the first sentence in the video.... also trees can't be reused
five years later, any word on this?
This work is being continued and demonstrated at the Center for Negative Carbon Emissions at Arizona State University - engineering.asu.edu/cnce/
Christophe Jospe hi! i am a greek student and i am searching for some informations about artificial trees.. How much it cost? In witch cities already exist? Where is the factory of them..?
And as i can understand this will be the solution of our planet, why do not we use them more?
If you have any link for these or ansewrs ...
Thank you !!
Christophe Jospe hi! i am a greek student and i am searching for some informations about artificial trees.. How much it cost? In witch cities already exist? Where is the factory of them..?
And as i can understand this will be the solution of our planet, why do not we use them more?
If you have any link for these or ansewrs ...
Thank you !!
@Tommy Games 3 months later, how is he a psycopath
Haha years gone
wondering if this could be used while terraforming Mars (removing excess CO2 released during the warming-up stage)
It could be used for venus too
I thought mars needed more CO2 to actually get an armosphere?
What is the cost per artificial tree.
How about putting these in cities where they collect most co2 and plant more trees outside the city.
That would be too much logic and in this world cannot bear logic.
Yes, because everybody knows trees are toxic in cities and cannot absorb their huge co2 levels.
Still waiting for these
Pretty good stuff!! However, the world should still look for energy efficient machines.
people in these comment sections fail to see the benefit of making this kind of technology even if it hasn't been implemented in mass yet... I assume we're waiting on funding and finding the proper way to store the captured CO2 still? anthropogenic climate change aside, having this technology for the next century to millions of years if our species makes it is what is more important because CO2 levels fluctuate naturally and maybe it will be what we use to maintain our climate from NON-anthropogenic climate change. No need to want a completely iceless world millions of years from now, or an ice age when we can control greenhouse gases to live in the world are adapted to instead of one we are not. The technology will come if we have the time. In the meanwhile, yes, renewable energy and reforestation is important
When it will be available ?....
Plant a lot of trees 🌱🍃🌿🌳. Absorbs a lot of carbon dioxide and creates oxygen🍃🌳. It's time to plant trees🌱 to save many people🌱 🌎🌱🌍🌱🌏🌱🌱🌱🌱🌱🌱🌱🌱🌿🍃🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳
Watching this in 2022...
When you consider the damage being done every single year, because of the more nasty weather.
I would actually say, that in long term, it would be free to plant 60 million of these tree's it would even be a profit.
Cool! Sounds like the problem has nearly been solved. Good job!
Amazing invention so thankful to inventors God bless
Really, where is this inventions that this invented 5 years ago. Are you one of these gullibles that believes all this?
All this is great, but real trees are still indispensable for a variety of other, more complex reasons. We don't need to maintain as many trees as we once had in the past, but this is no reason to think we have a full replacement for regular forests/ trees.
Remarkable invention. Hope This will save our planet.
What! This is amazing! Why haven't I heard of this before!?
Pfft too expensive,just build a high building and plant Co2 sucking plant into it. More plant could be planted
amazing but still haven't seen even ONE in 2020.
@@isukumidoria2850 and you never will, this is pure fantasy.
A breakthrough in science! Hooray! We need this Physicist Engineer producing artificial trees in high concentration places! I can be his Sales person!!!
These guys need a kickstarter
these could be everywhere on the side of highways, with solar lights!
I feel sorry for the people in New Hampshire and Illinois with all the snow they are getting it's like a ice age over there they should not have to go though that all because the government can't do there job
Can it be sold commercially?
3:50, water supply, it needs a water supply, good luck , Plant more trees
9 years on. What are we waiting for?
They would sell the CO2 to companies who need the CO2. Soda companies, deep sea pumping companies, greenhouses, etc. They could also sell the "trees" to companies that need to use CO2. Instead of the company having to have CO2 transported to them they could capture the CO2 onsite.
Yeah, you're stupid...sell it to soda companies lol...
3:51 estimation in 2009, around 10 years ago, a single tree could absorb about a ton CO2 per day, that alone already qualify for Elon's carbon capture requirement
C'mon Elon, I thumb up this video, so that this video could reach you, at least try to contact Prof. Klaus Lackner
This is great It looks promising
Co2 increases plant growth
@@johnperic6860 Yes it has thanks for confirming John more co2 please
More carbon, more plants. More plants consume more carbon?
So potentially 60,000,000 artificial trees worth of plastic added to the already mounting plastic waste we have to deal with!
So if this works, we're not gonna have any trees in the world except in place like botanic gardens?
can you use salt water ? And if so ,wouldn"t it be easier too have these's trees floating on the ocean suffice like a forest .pumping it down to the ocean floor like tree roots.
where is the so-called technology it's been 11 years since this video came out
The "inventors" spend the money donated by idiots.
Hi, I really need some help ! Does anyone know how they did to have this kind of plastic which can absorb carbon dioxide ? And where we can find it ? Because I’m looking for this special kind of plastic and I’m struggling. Thank you very much for your help.
Plastic solutions? No thank you!
Fossil fuels? Really I thought we were ran out 40 years ago ?
I can't wait until we can make this the size of a city block. Sequestering until we return to pre industrial revolution levels.
It will be ready tomorrow.
Here it comes now we are going to pay for air to breath
Attaching it with exhaust of auto viechle public transportation, and truck and train can help enormously
And who is going to drive these trees around?
It doesn't explain where they will store this. I love the idea, but we need to be sure that all of that CO2 one day just go back into the atmosphere because of a minor incident. The so-called CO2 storage has to be safe and reliable.
We don’t need to be designing these trees, India already had amazing plants which create the most oxygen in the world
@Champ Alexy I guess it's banyan tree
11 years later year 2021. What's the update on this?
Peter Griffen: *_WHY ARE WE NOT FUNDING THIS?!_*
You and your fellow idiots are free to fund this. Who is stopping you?
how much would cost to make one?
we need to fund this
Would actually be pretty cool. I wonder how much money they need thought.
Kickstarters rarely go above 8 million dollars. but maybe something like this cool atract more attention.
What happened in that project? We need that today.
@myslmysl No I do not think it would not be more efficient, we currently produce 72 million cars A DAY! Apparently to keep up with today's level of pollution we would only need to produce TEN million of the artificial trees, and the fact that these trees take in more carbon dioxide than real trees and do not even need to grow they are much more efficient. As for an eyesore, it's not about looks it's about taking care of this only planet we have, I would gladly have one in my back yard x]
I don’t understand, why aren’t these things all over the world already? I mean, what the h. This should be already everywhere!!
In 2019... Where is thisssss???????
if you had a 1/8th inch think strip of this plastic and made a dome with it then on the inside put a water sprayer, would it absorb the co2 from the outside then the co2 would move through the plastic to the inside then the water sprays then the co2 goes inside then a vacuum pump sucks out the water and co2 sorts it so the co2 goes into a gas tank and the water goes back to the sprayer? or instead of a vacuum pump on the inside you could have a small plant.
I hate damage control, rather preventative action.
It's means...no more plants...
Only plastic 🌲
11 years later, why isn't this stuff in my 3d printer
I'm watching this after 8 years
I am watching it after 10 years
I have a revolutionary idea that can solve all the problems presented in this video. Plants actual trees!
Does that pollute the water? Could you drink it after it has been dipped in the cup?
what's update for this?
10 years later...
I would still prefer to see the hills deforested, but IF Carbon capture like this takes off, it would be best to pair it with Algea growing for fuel, food etc. At present Algea growers are setting up near waste sites for nutrients and factories for their CO2 to feed the Algea.
It'll just help in absorbing CO2. It maybe necessary, but it can never replace a natural tree
pipal tree emit O2 24 hours a day
@bariguy87 No I don't think they did, I'll just wait for a follow up report to see what they make out of all this.
But you guys are missing an important piece to the puzzle. You need to realese humidity to the air if not it will not help that much!!
where is it?
Those trees should be put on top of city buildings, not in the middle of pristine land with next to no pollution.
Green Plastic Trees.
Radiohead warned me.
11 years and counting. Capture/release. Net: zero effect.
Humans are interesting instead of changing our ways we create some thing so we don't have to damn we are stubborn.
How does this hold up with thermodynamics?
Like where does the entropy go?
@OTVF we can build them the size of a city block. sequestering millions of tons a day. When you put it on your house, where is it going to be sequestered?
How about a tree that takes out nitrogen or argon
Here's a thought... why don't we just plant more real trees?? Maybe, just maybe, restoring the natural habitats we have destroyed is the logical way to go...
Etienne Van Rensburg you need a entire planet full of trees to save it. And if we did we need to destroy agriculture and houses. Now people are starving and homeless.
Oh no. But Al Gore has different things in mind :)
If rain comes, then it releases CO2 again
How many tree does it take to equal to one carbon capture system...
@PedrocasMS ? This isn't related to the subject. Doesn't the water have to be carbonized before the water is placed in the bottle?
So where will it STORE the GASEOUS CO2? You STILL have not SOLIDIFIED the carbon from the carbon dioxide.
That is a separate design problem. FOR A DIFFERENT GROUP OF ENGINEERS.
they literally addressed that in the video. the CO2 storage sites in Utah are testing methods for undergournd storage that solidifies the the gas over the course of approximatly 2 years. the solidified CO2 is then used for either an energy source or to make fertilizer, at least that is what they are looking at right now.
I don't think having 60 million of these trees will do as much good as having too much CO2. If anything we should 'plant' these trees in CO2 populated areas (Big cities), or use the material more as a filter for things such as vehicles or large factories that release CO2.
But then again, I dont have the numbers and the whole picture of this yet. Cool invention though.
Would it be possible to have one tree that could take in CO2 the most and give O2 the most, then rengineer its DNA so that we could increase its capacity by one billion times?
yeah I am working on it.
@@Trampolinwildlifehow is it going right now
While one should plant more trees, I see these artificial trees as being useful in cities where there's no more space to plant more trees.
Sometimes there is space to plant trees in city's. nyc has trees.
Also why did you say no one should plant more trees?
Also if a city has no space to even plant trees then where will artificial trees go?
Holy shi-this was 14 years ago? Any progress?
each tree costs $100,000.... so 60 million trees is VERY expensive.
I would like to remind viewers that plants love CO2. They don't reach their best growth rates until CO2 reaches 1200pm. Reducing CO2 levels would be dangerous for plants. If CO2 drops below 250ppm plants stop growing. Below 150ppm plant death occurs.
If your interested, a good article can be found at the following link:
university.upstartfarmers.com/blog/why-and-how-to-supplement-co2-in-indoor-farms
Happy reading.
Do you even science Kevin? You seriously have no idea how bad 1200ppm of Carbon would be to the environment. Nature is a delicate thing and even a small shift is enough to destroy it as we know it. We are at 410ppm and rising.
Don't compare indoor farms to Earth because those indoor farms aren't as complicated as the earth's ecosystems.
This has been one of the crucial elements of the debate, is the climate robust? Or is it fragile? The alarmist argues that it is fragile and slight changes lead to catastrophic failure.
The evidence for a robust system is the fact that you and I are here.
Are you complaining about me referencing other people's science? In science, every claim has a reference to supporting science done by someone else.
Well, sorry to dissapoint you but someone like you would reject reality regardless of how many scientific papers I show you. You are a lost cause.
Suika this is your second attack on my character. Generally science based discussions proceed on the quality of the argument and supporting evidence not character attacks.
Would you like to continue the discussion without the character attacks? There is still much to be said about the argument you have already presented.
I'm sorry for attacking your character but man made Climate change is something that can NOT be debated because it is fact.
The only people who think is a debate are politicians and celebrity figures who have been payed off by Oil companies or those who listen to them.
Think of it this way, (and I mean no offense) would you sit here and debate with a person who believes that the government is run by lizard people, when you know such a proposition is utterly stupid?
Can the captured CO2 be used to make concrete?
I have better technology: a device that traps more CO2 as it ages, does not require any power supply, manufacturing costs or maintenance. It's a Tree.
I agree, but a rotting or burning tree release carbon. Then again, plants needs carbon. These contraptions produce carbon during manufacturing, transportation, installing, maintenance, and eventually a trip to the landfill.
So after trapping the co2, what it will be used for? Is it safe to just hold the co2 in large quantities without doing nothing? can we just send the unused co2 to space?
you can store it in a wollastonite deposit so that it becomes calcium silicate or other deposits which react with co2 this way
XplaneZ Hey
Why is this not being used now , when we are actually having problem with Co2 increase in our current time
Maybe because lowering carbon can hurt plants and food production?
Better not get this plastic wet!
Algea is a far better alternative
Just plant a normal tree and walk away.
Where do you store all this CO2, trees do a better job for free, thanks to global warming trees will absorb and store more CO2 faster then ever. All we need to do is pass a Tree law, every citizen must own 2 trees on their property, problem solved
What happened to this project? When can it be produced on scale? Who is managing this program?
So this does not convert co2 into oxygen or anything, just captures it? Which then has to be stored somewhere? How much co2 does the plastic manufacturing create?
Ack we need more CO2 not less these artificial trees will kill natural ones!
the most expensive tree ever, just plant actual trees and reforest our degraded landscapes. we need a living habitat not a desert with false trees
2:04 they just let the normal atmosphere of co2 back into the airtight chamber? would that not just let the levels go back up as normal? and also they want to absorb the co2 and just let it back out into the air by wetting the material what is the point of that??
What will this do to our water cause if water triggers it to release then where will it go or if it's being put on the water we need away to turn it into a solid
It's cheaper to plant trees. Boom, project failed.