Richard D. Wolff: Is a Peaceful Multipolar World Even Possible Without Massive Wars?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ก.ย. 2024
- Richard D. Wolff is Professor of Economics Emeritus, University of Massachusetts, Amherst where he taught economics from 1973 to 2008. He is currently a Visiting Professor in the Graduate Program in International Affairs of the New School University, New York City.
Earlier he taught economics at Yale University (1967-1969) and at the City College of the City University of New York (1969-1973). In 1994, he was a Visiting Professor of Economics at the University of Paris (France), I (Sorbonne). Wolff was also a regular lecturer at the Brecht Forum in New York City. (www.rdwolff.co...)
Richard D. Wolf is scientifical genius and more than that a blessed sage and elder spokesman.
To you and your work, Nima, I lift my hat and bow. Thanks and greetings from Germany ...
Always interested in what Rick Wolff brings to any discussion. A wonderful man!
Another clueless Marxist ...
@const71 are you a fan of capitalism ?
@@greendragonspirit1646 I am a fan of limited governement ... Which does not exist anywhere... Just look at how bad Canada has become under the Marxist Trudeau ... No wonder so many citizens want to get out of this communist anti-freedom shithole...
Groucho rules!
@@const71if you only new what a clue meant….
Please Mr. Wolff, go on more podcasts. Speak to as many people as possible because your message needs to be heard by more people in this country and the world. Thank you.
I think he does do that .
Rick's always very prominent.
Prof. Wolff, brilliant as usual. The only thing I could say: let the rich fight their own wars.
Yes, it seems true, yet they drag us along without invitations.
Happy to see Richard Wolff again.
Thank you for shaking our world mister Wolff....we need to be aware of the reality...
*Professor Wolff
The people calling others inferior are projecting.
Beautiful analysis! And thanks to Nima not interrupting Richard Wolff. Every child's dream for a grandfather
I could listen to Richard Wolf for hours.
And again Prof Wolfe educates and illuminates a complicated subject. Thank you Nima.
Súper guest!! The Best!
Professor Wolff is great teacher, he’s way of explaining situations is easy to understand , l have learned a lot from him.
Richard and Nima cooperation! The best! 🙌🙌🙌
Stunning lecture. More truth and valuable insight in one performance than TV ever provided in it's entire history. A privilege to have attended.
Prof RICHARD WOLFF AS ALWAYS ENLIGHTENING n KNOWLEDGEABLE
UNAFRAID 2 TELL-IT AS IS.
ALWAYS BRIGHT SHINING LIGHT IN A
SEAS DARKNESS OF FALSEHOOD .
🙏 NIMA 4 SHARING HIM WITH US ALL.
ALWAYS A DOUBLE 🏅🏅.
Thank you's. Excellent content 👍
Thankyou, Dr Wolff. Very enlightening and thought-provoking.
But Mearsheimer is invested and only preaching american hegemonic superiority - nothing more. Prof of talkshows.
Vrlo zanimljivo izlaganje sa fantasticnim zavrsetkom
A (false) dichotomy, stated again and again, is authoritarianism vs. democracy. ("Democracy" is what we call the oligarchy)
Thank you Dr Wolff.
Thanks R W
Thankful for yt. I used to listen to KPFK, I'd always have to turn this guy off. I just couldn't listen to him. One day I tried speeding him up a little and now, no problem. He's so fantastic. Thank you Nima.
Bravo wolf 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
The Wolff's on 🔥... 😂
Great and intelectually exciting chat!!
Thank you Mr Richard to explain so many interesting info, so big knowledge and understanding .. wait to see you again here
Superb
Just brilliant!
Professor Mersheimer's neoconservatism with respect to China has enabled him to take a critical approach to U.S. foreign policy vis-a-vis Russia and Israel without being marginalized and drummed out of mainstream academia. It's still insane.
Wow. I am so moved and impressed!
Prof Wolf is fantastic. His analysis of China is spot on.
You are so right and awesome in explaining the facts in geoeconomista and geopolitical.
I admire John Mearsheimer because he is a realist who explains his theory without any emotion. John said that China poses a threat to US hegemony. From the American point of view, that's a fact. And for that reason John said that China must be contained.
I'm always interested when economist's speek because it's the economy that truly matters. Nothing can work without money or resources
My POV Prof Richard, the major economic problem today, which means political problem, is Social Democracy vs Liberal Democracy. Which as you know means Group rights vs Individual rights. No brainer... if you had to choose between saving 3000 Global Billionaires OR 8.1 Billion souls, which would you SAVE if you had to pick one group or the other?
A GDP based on immaterial things and money printing bubbles are not worth sheit, neither in the US or PRC, please dont overestimate such or use as a measure of basically anything.
Richard goo for the president of the USA
And make this world the peace ✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️
Richard, tell the haters to f**k off, keep on telling the truth.
The good doctor is spot on! Thank you for having him on again.
The US was not after WW2 under existential threat from Russia. However, it may have been under existential threat by labour power generally.
I think there were two main counters here: military, and cultural. The various "liberations" of the 60s was of the latter. Feminism destroyed labour more effectively than anything else. I mean how is a miner going to strike in the absence of a family behind him?
Any world, multipolar or not, without wars is necessarily a peaceful world. Is that the correct answer?
Give me an “authoritarian” gov’t that works for its people any time over any of the so-called democratic gov’ts of the Clown West who only work for the donors.
One point here Add subtitle
Dr. Wolff is brilliant but what’s with the over enunciation? I sometimes wonder if he is speaking specifically lat me.
It's his years of teaching. Reminds me of my years as a student.
Do you think you could fall asleep in one of his lessons? If your teacher keeps you awake, and then stakes you to the subject matter from every angle, then the material shared will stick, and you will be a wiser student. This is what makes a brilliant teacher.
lt's the USA(NY)rhetoric style.😂😂😂
How was China different from Soviet Union, which made China succeed and Soviet Union collapse ?
Immaturity and childishness keeps coming to the top. There is still a world that is mature and won't buy into the nonsense. The end of an empire awaits.
Its not childish. Its deviouness. Its intentional smearing.
Monsieur Wolff, vous parlez la parole de Dieu; le Seigneur vous a donne un don particulier, 2 Timothy 2:15.
La competition aujourd'hui est fictive: pour la gouvernance du monde entier! Mais nous ne sommes pas proprietaires de la terre!! Elle be nous apartient pas; nous y sommes des locataires, Dieu etant Le seul proprietaire kegitime.
Ok , mais nous devons essayer de vivre ensemble sur cette terre meme si elle ne nous appartient pas ,et le mieux possible , si possible...;)
Mershaumer v wolff schedule it
❤
Prof. Richard Wolff's name in lowercase again? Really?
Ah, the GDP popped up as a “measure” of something…
Might be worth, one day, to have the respected quests to clarify on that, too. In here, if the GDP would be a real indicator of a potential in winning a war -??? - needs a particular clarification.
GDP = C + I + G + NX
How would it directly (!) reflect a military might? (…while it does not even directly reflect prosperity, food quality, life style(s), etc.)
2. B t w, I did not know that war in Afghanistan was a Rus-Am war. Ah, and Rus lost because of GDP. In that case, Vietnam war was also, perhaps, between Rus and Am. Then the Rus won with even lesser GDP ratio (?)….
In Ukr, pathetic Rus is facing the block representing many all the leading countries with combined GDP x100 more than the Rus. The West is poised to win, I guess, could not be the opposite, right?
Or (maybe), something wrong with the GDP “indicator” or the way we apply it?
Vote Stein 2024!!
Wolfe woke to the bone...
Hello! First comment!
Nima, are you in another places, where are normal hosts, not corrupted animals ?
Nima, can we comment in another place ? Because yt garbage deletes everything .. 🐕
Of course, a peaceful multipolar world is possible. All we have to do is get off our high horse, cut out our stupid hegemony nonsense, and stop to admire the work on fostering ccoperation being done by Russia and China. We have the power because we are the problem. How is this not obvious ?
How many shows do you per day, Nina? Are you an AI entelechy that does not eat or sleep?
It's surprising how well organized people accomplish a lot.
*Nima
3:23 - I do feel like Prof. Mearsheimer tends to use "Realism" as a way to give some amount of (undue) validity to his claims. It's the academic version of "Trust me, bro!"