我返緊full time 星期一至五朝九晚六，冇工人冇長老，老公每晚放工八點後先返到屋企。BB而家放育嬰園，返工前放低BB，放工即刻食飯然後接BB。幫BB沖涼洗衫、做家務、到自己沖涼、餵奶、氹BB瞓，晚晚搞到1點先有得瞓。試過BB唔舒服連續幾晚半夜不停大喊，真係人都癲。 育嬰園一位難求，冇人湊BB點出來做嘢。政府想人生仔，又冇配套，真係個個都可以靠長老靠工人湊仔咩？
不要說香港，美國都是一樣。父母雙職工，學校三點放學，只能去after school或者報興趣班，都是巨大商機恨恨地在家長錢包挖錢。最慘是美國又不像香港那般有個巨大菲傭或外傭市場可以已便宜價格請live in nanny把家務照顧妥當。所以父母回家還要煮飯處理家務把菲傭那分工作攬上身。在美國都有很多女人不想生孩子，孩子成長階段的時候事情特別多，不是病就是學校很多活動多少都要出席，又要照顧起居飲食，又要照顧情緒發展，很多事都要請假配小孩，夫妻兩輪流請假處理小孩的事情，美國又沒有價格相宜又質量好的nanny。美國政府從來都沒有像香港般引入巨大的菲傭莫等等外傭市場，所以要請一個好nanny不容易。現在女人都覺得煩死了不像蠟燭兩頭燒。生仔有獎金都沒用，獎金都不能代替這些煩心事。
In other countries.. they "pay forward"... i.e. They pay around 40% of their salaries in tax. This is what Northern Scandinavian countries do. So that their own money circulate round and round. But HK is not like that.. it does not even tax anyway. And the same with the mainland too. Always borrowing.. esp if that state has become bankrupt... or in debts. And is unable to release that debt. Same with that Macau bridge. That was a wrong move !!! Even though they wanted it as an asset.. but it is like sacrificing this generation.. for the future... Everybody know what they want. They wanted to keep the GDP.. but what is the point of a GDP.. when you no longer have the population to go with it ? So it is just a form of gambling ? No people?
@@MKLA000 : US doesn't have this provision is because it has an open door policy. Wouldn't have the support for children and birthing.. but you can birth elsewhere and then move to the USA... Most women in the US probably choose a lower cost city to have a child.. I don't get it.. but you need to check. And compare and do a lot of homework online etc.
According to the latest government info... or the media.. there is technically "no government"... actually. Cos the NSL.. has dissolved the HK government. In a way... if those money made before in the 1980s and the 1990s.. were saved and kept.. . then this would not have happened now. A lot of people paid so much inheritance taxes, and things... and then in came people from the mainland. Not knowing the laws. Not accepting the laws.... and did not sympathetically work with the laws either. So now... an entire absolute ruined state. The government allowed the financial sector to take above that of the local government model. This is too late. And then the various second mistresses from over the borders...
So why don't they do the same as in the past ? Take your child to work as well. Especially when they are young as well. Have a nursery. Prepare your food for yourself and for baby too. This is very normal in many companies in the west. So why not the same in HK? Then either do side work or part time work.
Wow.... They must have closed the door behind them a lot.... So.. how come there aren't the commercial provision in some companies?.... On site ?... The question is .. if you don't even give people their salary .. when will you be able to .... Sustain the spending powers in HK ? Don't always rely on foreign incomes into HK.
@@roundbunny : If the entire building are small businesses and factories or workshop. If the facility provides a small place for all kids. One or two adults do that. How hard is it ? If it does not exist. Then somebody open a small company or charity to do this. How hard is it ? Many things did not exist in the past. How did it happen ? People made it happen.
@@MeiinUK hi, i am not saying that it isnt possible, i was just confused by your original comment ( You said that this is is veyr normal for companies in the west), but I personally havent seen any yet. I agree that this would be a good idea
@@roundbunny : Er.. In the UK.. it is common. i.e. Even if you are a small business, then you could find a "roundabout way", but it is still legal to a large extent.. to fit the solution etc. So... things like... "if the individual is not qualified with looking after children"... you "can have the parent on the premises as well." As in an open plan office, and the next door is rented by another company, and you can put them there, so that you can see them etc." (and work on a laptop in that children's area, say). This is how "play centre" works. They have a play area for the child. And the parents work on their laptop. Connected to any company etc. This is quite common in the UK. i.e. Companies can be around 10-50 people, for example. So... and the legal registration can exist etc. The format can exist as well etc.
d 老闆唔畀人收工，在職媽媽真係好辛苦
$25 一個鐘，真係離晒大譜，呢個價錢你覺得真係對得住啲有愛心嘅保母咩？
而且仲要经过社工approve先可以接job，门槛高
我認為要合理價錢請社區保母
為乜要湊人地果件....吾湊自己果件，
乜佢吾知母愛應該留番比自己的寶貝先岩嘅咩？
做乜將自己最珍貴嘅母愛比人哋嘅細路而吾係留比自己嘅細路？
出錢比佢湊嘅人士為乜吾湊番自己果件，去咗邊？
完全系肥上瘦下，你問下高層收緊幾多錢😂甚至個社工收緊幾錢，佢願吾願意減一半人工
媽媽真偉大!
我返緊full time 星期一至五朝九晚六，冇工人冇長老，老公每晚放工八點後先返到屋企。BB而家放育嬰園，返工前放低BB，放工即刻食飯然後接BB。幫BB沖涼洗衫、做家務、到自己沖涼、餵奶、氹BB瞓，晚晚搞到1點先有得瞓。試過BB唔舒服連續幾晚半夜不停大喊，真係人都癲。
育嬰園一位難求，冇人湊BB點出來做嘢。政府想人生仔，又冇配套，真係個個都可以靠長老靠工人湊仔咩？
你真係好慘
@@tong514有d俾佢更加慘
你好勁﹗
@@luckyhappy65 咁樣捱咗幾個月，工人姐姐到咗，終於有人幫手。B放育嬰院成日病，請病假時靠工人姐姐睇，自己返工無可能經常請假。
💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻
最後一間公司個老闆好好👍🏻👍🏻
點解爸爸一直隱身？從源頭解決問題，不應將育兒責任及風險全數轉移到媽媽身上。
非常認同
咁爸爸去咗邊，點解要媽咪犧牲夢想去成就小朋友成長？
憑你這樣問，我相信你一定係/會係個好老公/爸爸👍🏻
08
08
通常爸爸人工高d, 唯有犧牲媽媽份工
爸爸怎會理呢 全都是女人做
難怪咁多人唔想生小朋友🤔又要做勞動力，又想社會有足夠人口增長，配套做得唔好，好難兩者平衡
學新加坡，生完有獎金
不要說香港，美國都是一樣。父母雙職工，學校三點放學，只能去after school或者報興趣班，都是巨大商機恨恨地在家長錢包挖錢。最慘是美國又不像香港那般有個巨大菲傭或外傭市場可以已便宜價格請live in nanny把家務照顧妥當。所以父母回家還要煮飯處理家務把菲傭那分工作攬上身。在美國都有很多女人不想生孩子，孩子成長階段的時候事情特別多，不是病就是學校很多活動多少都要出席，又要照顧起居飲食，又要照顧情緒發展，很多事都要請假配小孩，夫妻兩輪流請假處理小孩的事情，美國又沒有價格相宜又質量好的nanny。美國政府從來都沒有像香港般引入巨大的菲傭莫等等外傭市場，所以要請一個好nanny不容易。現在女人都覺得煩死了不像蠟燭兩頭燒。生仔有獎金都沒用，獎金都不能代替這些煩心事。
In other countries.. they "pay forward"... i.e. They pay around 40% of their salaries in tax. This is what Northern Scandinavian countries do. So that their own money circulate round and round. But HK is not like that.. it does not even tax anyway. And the same with the mainland too. Always borrowing.. esp if that state has become bankrupt... or in debts. And is unable to release that debt. Same with that Macau bridge. That was a wrong move !!! Even though they wanted it as an asset.. but it is like sacrificing this generation.. for the future... Everybody know what they want. They wanted to keep the GDP.. but what is the point of a GDP.. when you no longer have the population to go with it ? So it is just a form of gambling ? No people?
@@MKLA000 : US doesn't have this provision is because it has an open door policy. Wouldn't have the support for children and birthing.. but you can birth elsewhere and then move to the USA... Most women in the US probably choose a lower cost city to have a child.. I don't get it.. but you need to check. And compare and do a lot of homework online etc.
本身已經係奴隸、仲學乜人生仔😂
$25, 最低時薪都不如
好乖
好多媽媽想自食其力，政府可以增加託管服務，又可以带動就業機會，香港女人是好本事獨立的
According to the latest government info... or the media.. there is technically "no government"... actually. Cos the NSL.. has dissolved the HK government. In a way... if those money made before in the 1980s and the 1990s.. were saved and kept.. . then this would not have happened now. A lot of people paid so much inheritance taxes, and things... and then in came people from the mainland. Not knowing the laws. Not accepting the laws.... and did not sympathetically work with the laws either. So now... an entire absolute ruined state. The government allowed the financial sector to take above that of the local government model. This is too late. And then the various second mistresses from over the borders...
問題在於香港壓力大，工時長，所以應該要政府考慮設立最高工時，人人都可以早收工照顧家庭
講咗N年啦、要做一早做咗
以前做在職媽媽，小朋友未訓醒，我6點幾已經要起身返工，返到屋企都6、7點，基本上每日只係見到2個鐘，小朋友已經要訓。
香港政府学学新加坡多建设点廉租房，让年轻的父母负担小点，就有时间照顾孩子了。实在不行就大湾区么，生活成本比香港低很多，居住条件好不少。
如果當初無媽媽幫手照顧仔女，
我根本不會生仔
女人好叻！
講得輕鬆不用憂柴憂米！！！
我送左個仔返幼稚園先至返工，好彩間公司近
好媽媽！👍
而且當有錢請工人湊小朋友，但根本請工人一啲都唔保障香港僱主，唔明點解保障個非香港人都唔立下法保障香港僱主！
Aiden好乖！😂😂😂
好cute 笑得好開心
真係好可愛呀。。😍😍
有托兒但又未必放心呢…..
其實我真心覺得在職媽媽係辛苦過全職媽媽好多
在職家長心真係超掛小朋友……無奈生活無辦法長期陪伴小朋友……
全職媽媽辛苦好多🥲
何必要比較邊個辛苦, 十月懷胎, 做媽媽這個角色根本就是不容易
@@cindyheartful 但片中的full time mum好開心啊
@@reginachat4927 你應5系媽媽角式吧😂
要人生仔，又無支援？！點生！
有工人，你講經咩
有工人同婆婆，其實佢唔算太全職😂可以part time
@@aboutlove_5880 完全係幸福，仲做埋KOL, 仲掃咩苦啊
幸福到爆
唔算全職阿媽啦!都唔喺一腳踢...阿太來啊!
有人幫， 當然舒服好多😪
$25一個鐘太貴
應該$5蚊或唔洗比人工
就差唔多
🤗🤗
So why don't they do the same as in the past ? Take your child to work as well. Especially when they are young as well. Have a nursery. Prepare your food for yourself and for baby too. This is very normal in many companies in the west. So why not the same in HK? Then either do side work or part time work.
Wow.... They must have closed the door behind them a lot.... So.. how come there aren't the commercial provision in some companies?.... On site ?... The question is .. if you don't even give people their salary .. when will you be able to .... Sustain the spending powers in HK ? Don't always rely on foreign incomes into HK.
not sure where you live, there is no such thing as 'taking your child to work' in Canada.....
@@roundbunny : If the entire building are small businesses and factories or workshop. If the facility provides a small place for all kids. One or two adults do that. How hard is it ? If it does not exist. Then somebody open a small company or charity to do this. How hard is it ? Many things did not exist in the past. How did it happen ? People made it happen.
@@MeiinUK hi, i am not saying that it isnt possible, i was just confused by your original comment ( You said that this is is veyr normal for companies in the west), but I personally havent seen any yet. I agree that this would be a good idea
@@roundbunny : Er.. In the UK.. it is common. i.e. Even if you are a small business, then you could find a "roundabout way", but it is still legal to a large extent.. to fit the solution etc. So... things like... "if the individual is not qualified with looking after children"... you "can have the parent on the premises as well." As in an open plan office, and the next door is rented by another company, and you can put them there, so that you can see them etc." (and work on a laptop in that children's area, say). This is how "play centre" works. They have a play area for the child. And the parents work on their laptop. Connected to any company etc.
This is quite common in the UK. i.e. Companies can be around 10-50 people, for example. So... and the legal registration can exist etc. The format can exist as well etc.
政府支援不足，女人點生仔？！
女人點出返黎做嘢？！
有很多女性朋友对我讲，我系为咗唔想做工而结婚，等老公养
大陸女人吧
@@Sam-sv2tf 我在美国的本地女性讲的，全球都一样
男既同你調轉好唔好，凸！大把仔願意
照顾小孩，当然轻松过上班，想坐就坐，想行就行
你在說反話嗎
@@wong-douetdorothy9131 我照顾过自己两个小孩，所以我知道，比上班容易得多，上班要趕时间,又要睇老板臉色.
@@anthonyjohnson2172 只能說你的寶寶都是天使寶寶呢
我倒是认为不能一概而论，就好比个人的工作体验会被上司和同事影响。当全职妈妈的体验，很大程度上也会被家人的态度所影响。还有像楼上说的，小孩是否好带也是很重要的因素，所以真的很难说工作和带娃到底哪个好，因为都是各有各的情况。
@@surixu6466 上班要看人家臉，除非你是经理。