So much of the observable (to us) Universe is already gone. It's strange to see the past come to life through telescopes. It's like being able to take a picture of ancient Egypt with my smartphone.
form is a cool epiphenomenon but the buddha's empirical report is: "When the mind was thus concentrated, purified, bright, unblemished, rid of defilement, pliant, malleable, steady, & attained to imperturbability... I recollected my manifold past lives, one birth, two... five, ten... fifty, a hundred, a thousand, a hundred thousand, many eons of cosmic contraction, many eons of cosmic expansion, many eons of cosmic contraction & expansion: 'There I had such a name, belonged to such a clan, had such an appearance. Such was my food, such my experience of pleasure & pain, such the end of my life. Passing away from that state, I re-arose there. There too I had such a name, belonged to such a clan, had such an appearance. Such was my food, such my experience of pleasure & pain, such the end of my life. Passing away from that state, I re-arose here.' Thus I remembered my manifold past lives in their modes & details. "This was the first knowledge I attained in the first watch of the night. Ignorance was destroyed; knowledge arose; darkness was destroyed; light arose - as happens in one who is heedful, ardent, & resolute."
@@bulamulafula3555 I believe she’s referring to the number of light years that have passed since what we are seeing now, it’s numbing to think of how much time has passed since the light left there, and now we’re seeing it😳
In realms of night where mysteries gleam, A tale of Earendel, a distant dream. Beyond celestial curtains, he's found, The farthest star, in silence profound. A twinkle born in cosmic sea, Earendel's light, a beacon to be. Through light-years vast, his shimmer's grace, A timeless traveler in boundless space. A glimpse into eternity's realm, Earendel's story, like a sacred helm. A star that whispers secrets untold, In skies where mysteries unfold. With telescopic eyes, we gaze, Upon his glow, a distant blaze. Earendel, guide to worlds unseen, In stellar ballets, his dance serene. In darkest nights, his presence known, A stellar jewel, brightly sown. Earendel, your light so pure, Forever in the heavens, you endure. As explorers of the cosmos, we aspire, To touch your radiance, to reach higher. Earendel, star of the farthest skies, Your brilliance ignites our seeking eyes.
You have to keep in mind that the observable universe and space time are not the same. In other words, just because we see that distant star doesn't mean that it's lying at the edge of time. As the universe is expanding we can only really see a tiny portion of space time. It could be that the distant stars we see are only those stars that traveled through time with us faster than light after the big bang. There could be a nearly infinite amount of universe expanding stars not observable to us at all.
@@phk2000Hubble's Law and pretty much all research since the 1920's say's otherwise. But go ahead. Whatcha got? Do you have any source for your claims?
Amazing video. I love your way of explanation. Beaing visually impaired i can easily understand what you are going to explain without seeing the pictures. I always wait for your videos, your chanul is on top of my subscriptions. Lots of best wishes and loves from Pakistan. God bless you! ❤❤
JWST keeps finding much more massive stars and galaxies in the early universe than we would have expected, potentially throwing off our basic understanding of cosmological evolution.
It just blows my mind every single time I hear things of this nature. Thanks for bringing us such informational content. Mind blowing, truly speechless.
Until JWST started, the general understanding was that the universe was 13.8 billion years old. These early stars probably indicate that our universe might be older than we think.
Crazy? Not really, but let me tell you what's really crazy. First off a disclaimer - it's impossible for you to travel at that speed, because you're not massless. But even if you could travel at the speed of light, you wouldn't sense passing of time. Therefore you'd get there in an instant. Although, during your "instant" travel, the Earth would be 28 billion years older... in other words, it would be gone a long time ago.
I've seen a calculation, a long time ago, about the movement of the earth through space and that is amazing. We don't just go around the sun, but our whole planetary system is on the move, as is the whole galaxy. All at mindblowings speeds. And we on earth notice nothing about it.
What is the maximum range that we can expect to look and find life? And where in this range is the sweet spot? Since the further we look the smaller the chance of life, and the same goes for the closer we look, the minimum range. Its like focussing an optical lens but then with time. And with the help of gravitational lensing there should be the possibility of hyper focus right? Since as a noob i can think of this, i assme this is a problem that is currently being tackled in the field of astrophysics and astro biology? I would love to see an episode about this.
The universe is unbelievably mind-boggling unimaginablely enormous that sometimes I feel like we are beyond smaller than atoms. Like sound waves. Just energy vibration.
One problem not addresses is how astronomers decide what the Webb should focus on. You can't have it stay locked onto Earendel all the time with a whole vast universe of other things to observe.
they decide buy submition , you have to submit what you want to look at and for how long and what you are trying to see , its then decided by a comity if your proposal has merit or not
I wasn't the brightest star at school!!!!!!! But love these videos and I do think the universe is infinite. I cannot really imagine 14 billion light years away from us, and 1 light year is 5.6trillion. I struggle to comprehend that distance.
When the JWST starts really looking back into the early Universe it will see so many galaxies so close together along with globular clusters and on and on. The old Universe (all the mass in a small, maybe earth sized) became, for a short time, a Galaxy Creating Machine! The first thing that this machine did was split in half; each pushes hard against the other creating a black hole at the center where the most pressure is then away creating one huge spiral galaxy with black hole in the center, between both Sides (of the old Universe, it was an inside job >smiles< soon to be new universe) pushing full blast against each other (We should all know because We all had to choose sides back then and probably push with all our mental might! We all (all the Beings in this/old Universe) knew what was happening; We were all there; We are all eternal; where else would We all have been at this moment, with our Awareness & Consciousness, We had no form and there are no aliens, we know all the beings anywhere intimately.) creating that first large spiral galaxy with one very large black hole in the center)! The tremendous stress blew both Sides into countless Pieces, each Piece pushing on those near it creating many, many more spiral galaxies (elliptical galaxies got created mostly when the galaxies were close together there were many collisions and that usually left two elliptical galaxies going on their merry way; and one larger black hole or two black holes orbiting each other going their own way) and other matter. Elliptical galaxies got created in another way where three progenitors act on each other such that the galaxy is created with all the gas being stripped out by the creation) The Progenitors (the old Universe in pieces) that created all this are Quasars now. Most Quasars pushed each other to the perimeter of our new Universe. From there they they form a basket like pattern all around the new Universe. They are responsible for our gravity and moving electromagnetic vibrations and much more. Some Quasars stalled and remained in the physical Universe. The JWST will allow Us to understand what happened back then. We all can see, as well, that We were always a part of whatever this Universe was/is involved in… “out of the One many, out of the many One”
Quick question: So the image shows galaxies AND stars? That must be a big star if the rest of the image are individual galaxies. Lensing magnifies to a single star that much? I must have missed something.
JSWT is the moat powerful telescope nowadays so many contributions to our astronony and giving amazing and beautiful pictures about observable universe ❤
Why don't you do a segment on SETI's "A Sign in Space" project? Nobody is talking about it, probably because they failed to inform the press, so few people actually know about it.
It's almost impossible to do that with current technology, even with JWST telescope. JWST and other advanced earth base telescopes can only determine the chemical composition of the atmosphere of planets outside the solar system by using "Transit Method" and/or "Radial Velocity Method" / "Doppler spectroscopy".
@@MuhammadKHuda so sending out probes into the cosmic neighborhood is the only solution to know if we do have neighbours. Considering the vastness of space that's going to be very inefficient
@@thehex9959 But why? We sure know they exist, and there is a lot of proofs (like bodies from outside of solar system), the only interesting thing is possibility to research another star closely.
Just wondering where they got the name Earendel. At first I thought it was after the son of Idril and Tuor in the Lord of the Rings but it's spelled different. It would be nice to have this information.
I have a question. How can light photons travel billions of years without dying? Do they just keep going, or do they never die out? I'm just trying to understand. Are light rays immortal therefore they just keep traveling and traveling?
They are just a particle. If you break a glass, its fragments dont disappear to nowhere, same deal with photons. They keep going until something absorbs them.
Am I wrong in thinking that the first generational stars should be be burnt out or supernova'd by now? I guess so if we were closer to it but since it's so far away from us we are technically looking at it from the past?
Who knows what they are now. You are looking at data from 13 billion years ago. Whatever/wherever it is in it's space expanded location of 28 billion light years, we will never know unless we can fold space and wormhole/ftl travel there. When we get where we "think" it might be, maybe we'll warp right into a star and instantaneously vaporize because we will have absolutely no idea where we are headed.
Earendil is a Tolkien character from his Book the Silmarilion. I wonder if the person who named the Star was a fan. He does spell it slightly different with a 'el' instead of 'il'.
8:50 "These stars have very few other elements, which we call metals in astronomy" -- Uhhh. What? Only about 1/4 of the periodic table (elements) are metals. There are also gases, minerals (carbon etc), rare earths and so on. What an odd mistake.
Ehrendel should not be made of any elements higher in atomic number than iron. Most likely it should be 80% hydrogen and 18% helium and maybe some traces of lithium, beryllium, boron, carbon, and oxygen. That should be it..
I think I know the answer to why JWT is seeing fully developed galaxies near that star. It`s because,,if you had another JWT at the point where that star is and focussed it further you would only see another quadrillion galaxies beyond that.We are not allowed the capacity to think in terms of forever. But it`s out there.
Almost certainly gone supernova by now. Depending on the source (and the internet sources vary wildly), the lifespan of these Type B stars range from a few million to a billion years or so.
Thank you for a relevant question. Earendel is definitely a dead star now, after 13 billion years has passed. The maximum life span is approx. 10 billion years for a mid-sized star like our sun. Bigger stars than our sun have shorter lifespan, because they burn up their helium and hydrogen faster. The right amount of these 2 gas types keeps the star "alive" and active. Earendel is a blue B-type star with a mass between 50 and 100 times bigger than the Sun.
We are focused on where we are from. Are there satellites looking at where we are going? Because if multiverse has any likely hood can we find them? I would also think the James Webb equipment would be essential for future space travel. Mapping the Universe stars and planets and other obstacles. That could destroy the vessels we send. How Voyager 2 has survived is Astronomical. Yep, pun intended.
Not a big deal, as no such travel is possible and there is no point of doing so other then take a look. Either way, we will receive data a millenia or two later in best case, when it wont really matter.
Man said if the big bang is true, then this gives a presentation thinking it's true. Did it ever occur if, if I said , there's a creator he could have put every star and galaxy ect, in their place. So if a creator is true, and the creator put everything there, then you can never tell the age. You can only know how far away it is ,not when it was put there
Earendel confuses cosmologists, they are confused on many scales, all confusing the beginning, physicists fail to explain the large BH, distance of the stars, even what happened at the big bang demands rethinking and the physicists fail miserably.
LMFAO! Science ALWAYS has room for being wrong when the evidence is presented. But the "big bang" expanding universe "theory" has FAR more evidence then any other "theory" out there. We CLEARLY see the universe is expanding and that it's LITERALLY billions and billions of years old, soooo, yeah. Whatever YOU'RE thinking is probably very childish and wrong.
Yet we are also the only things in the universe that can ask the question of why it’s all here -that we know of. That makes us quite important, but brings a responsibility with it; ensuring there will be more of us around to continue asking that question and seeking the answers. Because we are so small and fragile, we need to be coming up with ways /-constantly/-to improve life for all of us, so that we can dedicate time to not going extinct in a chaotic universe we’re only now getting our first glimpses of.
It is true that we are small but, there is more beyond this life. God created all of this, and gave His only begotten son's blood on the cross, so you can see eternal life. It's real, I've seen it, and all who call upon His name in truth will be saved... That's a promise, and that's a whole lotta souls... Believe it... 🙏
Hayz... its amazing that others people busy studying space ... here in the Philippines we stock in politics ... local elections "nag kakapatayan na " hahaha
He speaks. of this star in the present tense when in fact it no longer exists most likely and it's remains may be on their second or third reincarnation and part of other stars or planets ages ago.
@@ljramirez I'm pretty sure that it's probably off by 2-10 billion years. Similar to carbon dating. A miniscule amount of red light shift movement cannot be accurate for objects that are so distant and light that has been travelling for 13 billion years without many points for it to be distorted by dust, galaxies, etc. Just my thoughts.
@@andrepark3147 carbon dating is chemical-based, and subject to changes in the decay rates etc...however c14 is still accurate to just decades over 50,000 years. so by your example this would only be off by tens of millions of years for this distance, not billions by a long way.
Thanks, I enjoyed the video. However, I'd rather have a real person narrating. Most American-made science videos have a young hyped-up voice. Thankfully, this one doesn't have a speedy overly-excited voice. Keep up the good work.
Thank you 😊 But this is a real person narrating it. Jeffrey has been working with us even before the beginning of this series that has now completed 72 episodes.
Wow, in the paperback book I published in 2021 on page 48 I wrote quote "James Webb Space Telescope will discover old, fully grown galaxies as far as the telescope can see, further than 13.8 billion light-years away." I then I went on to explain how I solved it. I even said the large old galaxies would become the mother of all paradoxes, much more puzzling than the event horizon information paradox. I solved the paradox produced by large, old, smooth and fully formed galaxies further than 12.7 billion light years away before NASA launched the JWST. No need to solve it because I already did before NASA discovered they were wrong. I know why. And I also know why the JWST will not find any population III stars. I said Earendel would not be a population III star. It's most likely a dwarf galaxy, not a single star. They won't be able to confirm the big bang model because they won't find any population III stars. I've been called a fringe scientist for claiming the JWST would not be able to find the first population III stars or young galaxies in the early universe. Yet, I was right?
Why do you end your triumphant diatribe with a question? Nowadays If you want to be taken seriously state your theories with unwavering certainty and wait for someone to confirm, build upon, or disprove one or more of them outright. In the meantime you are praised as a great intellectual, even by those who set you up for ridicule. That being said, you could have asked me back in the late 90s and I would have given you the all of the answers that you could have then easily plagiarized during vacation, instead of putting actual thought into a whole book. At any rate, NASA will again break budgets of decades and billions attempting to prove a theory that was flawed from it's inception, and get no closer to the ultimate answer. At least we have figured it out.
They dont focus on star, they focus on image of star, its different. Basically, this star due to way its light passes is perceived much bigger then entire galaxies that far. Think of it as gigant lence ((but there is no lence and this is all happening due to optical and gravitational effects on light) and this thing is right on focus of that lence. It bother me to no end that everyone thinks that light have no mass and is not affected by anything.
![[Gegagedigedagedago] NEW Help Gegagedigedagedago Nugget escape from Nikocado Avocado Challenge](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/hJWnwRC2Fz8/mqdefault.jpg)
So much of the observable (to us) Universe is already gone. It's strange to see the past come to life through telescopes. It's like being able to take a picture of ancient Egypt with my smartphone.
form is a cool epiphenomenon but the buddha's empirical report is:
"When the mind was thus concentrated, purified, bright, unblemished, rid of defilement, pliant, malleable, steady, & attained to imperturbability... I recollected my manifold past lives, one birth, two... five, ten... fifty, a hundred, a thousand, a hundred thousand, many eons of cosmic contraction, many eons of cosmic expansion, many eons of cosmic contraction & expansion: 'There I had such a name, belonged to such a clan, had such an appearance. Such was my food, such my experience of pleasure & pain, such the end of my life. Passing away from that state, I re-arose there. There too I had such a name, belonged to such a clan, had such an appearance. Such was my food, such my experience of pleasure & pain, such the end of my life. Passing away from that state, I re-arose here.' Thus I remembered my manifold past lives in their modes & details.
"This was the first knowledge I attained in the first watch of the night. Ignorance was destroyed; knowledge arose; darkness was destroyed; light arose - as happens in one who is heedful, ardent, & resolute."
That is what it basically is. Only this Egypt doesn't stay in the same place, so if you went for a visit it won't be where you thought it is.
gone ? wdym ?
@@bulamulafula3555 I believe she’s referring to the number of light years that have passed since what we are seeing now, it’s numbing to think of how much time has passed since the light left there, and now we’re seeing it😳
@@bulamulafula3555space is expanding ..farther the stuff faster it is going away from us
In realms of night where mysteries gleam,
A tale of Earendel, a distant dream.
Beyond celestial curtains, he's found,
The farthest star, in silence profound.
A twinkle born in cosmic sea,
Earendel's light, a beacon to be.
Through light-years vast, his shimmer's grace,
A timeless traveler in boundless space.
A glimpse into eternity's realm,
Earendel's story, like a sacred helm.
A star that whispers secrets untold,
In skies where mysteries unfold.
With telescopic eyes, we gaze,
Upon his glow, a distant blaze.
Earendel, guide to worlds unseen,
In stellar ballets, his dance serene.
In darkest nights, his presence known,
A stellar jewel, brightly sown.
Earendel, your light so pure,
Forever in the heavens, you endure.
As explorers of the cosmos, we aspire,
To touch your radiance, to reach higher.
Earendel, star of the farthest skies,
Your brilliance ignites our seeking eyes.
👏👏👏👏👏👏👌
How beautiful! Thank you 🙏
Nice ChatGPT my guy
Awesome!
So beautifully penned!! 👍
You have to keep in mind that the observable universe and space time are not the same. In other words, just because we see that distant star doesn't mean that it's lying at the edge of time. As the universe is expanding we can only really see a tiny portion of space time. It could be that the distant stars we see are only those stars that traveled through time with us faster than light after the big bang. There could be a nearly infinite amount of universe expanding stars not observable to us at all.
The universe is not expanding. It's infinite. That which is infinite cannot get any bigger.
@@phk2000Hubble's Law and pretty much all research since the 1920's say's otherwise. But go ahead. Whatcha got? Do you have any source for your claims?
@@Shadow_B4nned
@@Shadow_B4nned
@@Shadow_B4nned
What a time to be alive!
So cool that the IAU, which officially names stars, happen to be Tolkien fans.
The universe is so magnificent!!
Amazing video. I love your way of explanation. Beaing visually impaired i can easily understand what you are going to explain without seeing the pictures. I always wait for your videos, your chanul is on top of my subscriptions.
Lots of best wishes and loves from Pakistan.
God bless you! ❤❤
The more we learn the more we don’t know
Agree its like newborns learn about human body in own mothers's labour room before even learn to cry😅
Refreshing presentation, science for the sake of learning about universal origins, learning about our own evolution in the process
JWST keeps finding much more massive stars and galaxies in the early universe than we would have expected, potentially throwing off our basic understanding of cosmological evolution.
It just blows my mind every single time I hear things of this nature. Thanks for bringing us such informational content. Mind blowing, truly speechless.
Until JWST started, the general understanding was that the universe was 13.8 billion years old. These early stars probably indicate that our universe might be older than we think.
Astounding that a single star can be observed among all the galaxies. Trillions upon countless trillions. And that we can infer so much.
Imagine going 186 thousand miles, every second, for 28 billion years. Crazy!!
Crazy? Not really, but let me tell you what's really crazy. First off a disclaimer - it's impossible for you to travel at that speed, because you're not massless.
But even if you could travel at the speed of light, you wouldn't sense passing of time. Therefore you'd get there in an instant. Although, during your "instant" travel, the Earth would be 28 billion years older... in other words, it would be gone a long time ago.
I've seen a calculation, a long time ago, about the movement of the earth through space and that is amazing. We don't just go around the sun, but our whole planetary system is on the move, as is the whole galaxy. All at mindblowings speeds. And we on earth notice nothing about it.
@@damyr I was really just thinking about the distance. I'm aware of relativity.
not 28 billion years , 13 billion , the 28 comes from how far it would be now due to the expantion of the universe
@@stevensmith797 Maybe it's infinitely bigger.
As an Earendelian I can confirm that you are reading this message after 11 billion years of my writing provided it is going with speed of light.
Fantasy and speculation combined makes for a great video
5:14 AHAHAHAHAHA 😀 THE WAY HE SAID IT IN A SERIOUS MANNER ! 😀😀😁😁😂😂🤣🤣
Being early is a honour, Always interested in the Universe.
My concept of life just changed 😮
Interesting video, THX S.O.U. 🌌
What is the maximum range that we can expect to look and find life?
And where in this range is the sweet spot?
Since the further we look the smaller the chance of life, and the same goes for the closer we look, the minimum range. Its like focussing an optical lens but then with time.
And with the help of gravitational lensing there should be the possibility of hyper focus right?
Since as a noob i can think of this, i assme this is a problem that is currently being tackled in the field of astrophysics and astro biology?
I would love to see an episode about this.
When I die and my consciousness is freed, I'll go around discovering everything and maybe share it to an open mind.
I have been trying hard to find out the name of the ambient song 0:02 playing in the background without luck 😢😢 please help 🙏🙏
The universe is unbelievably mind-boggling unimaginablely enormous that sometimes I feel like we are beyond smaller than atoms. Like sound waves. Just energy vibration.
It is a veryintersting subject thanks.
This is too good, Rishabh...keep it up!
Well done, description of stars and their make up is fascinating.
One problem not addresses is how astronomers decide what the Webb should focus on.
You can't have it stay locked onto Earendel all the time with a whole vast universe of other things to observe.
They have their time scheduled.
they decide buy submition , you have to submit what you want to look at and for how long and what you are trying to see , its then decided by a comity if your proposal has merit or not
It barely spends seconds. Most of that time is just analyzing received data.
I wasn't the brightest star at school!!!!!!! But love these videos and I do think the universe is infinite. I cannot really imagine 14 billion light years away from us, and 1 light year is 5.6trillion. I struggle to comprehend that distance.
The more we think we know, the more the Universe laughs at us!!! But, thats what we are, Seekers, of Knowledge, and God help us, Wisdom!!!!
When the JWST starts really looking back into the early Universe it will see so many galaxies so close together along with globular clusters and on and on. The old Universe (all the mass in a small, maybe earth sized) became, for a short time, a Galaxy Creating Machine! The first thing that this machine did was split in half; each pushes hard against the other creating a black hole at the center where the most pressure is then away creating one huge spiral galaxy with black hole in the center, between both Sides (of the old Universe, it was an inside job >smiles< soon to be new universe) pushing full blast against each other (We should all know because We all had to choose sides back then and probably push with all our mental might! We all (all the Beings in this/old Universe) knew what was happening; We were all there; We are all eternal; where else would We all have been at this moment, with our Awareness & Consciousness, We had no form and there are no aliens, we know all the beings anywhere intimately.) creating that first large spiral galaxy with one very large black hole in the center)! The tremendous stress blew both Sides into countless Pieces, each Piece pushing on those near it creating many, many more spiral galaxies (elliptical galaxies got created mostly when the galaxies were close together there were many collisions and that usually left two elliptical galaxies going on their merry way; and one larger black hole or two black holes orbiting each other going their own way) and other matter. Elliptical galaxies got created in another way where three progenitors act on each other such that the galaxy is created with all the gas being stripped out by the creation) The Progenitors (the old Universe in pieces) that created all this are Quasars now. Most Quasars pushed each other to the perimeter of our new Universe. From there they they form a basket like pattern all around the new Universe. They are responsible for our gravity and moving electromagnetic vibrations and much more. Some Quasars stalled and remained in the physical Universe. The JWST will allow Us to understand what happened back then. We all can see, as well, that We were always a part of whatever this Universe was/is involved in… “out of the One many, out of the many One”
fascinating
What a load of tripe
This is so fascinating!! 😮 Looking far back at our origin.❤
Indeed 🌌 ✨
If , we have an origin , right ?
.
Am I right in saying if objects ever touched they are in a quantum entanglement then the speed of light does not apply ?.......
Quick question: So the image shows galaxies AND stars? That must be a big star if the rest of the image are individual galaxies. Lensing magnifies to a single star that much? I must have missed something.
JSWT is the moat powerful telescope nowadays so many contributions to our astronony and giving amazing and beautiful pictures about observable universe ❤
I did not know that gravitational lensing can be 4,000 X. That is amazing along with all the rest that Hubble and Webb have found.
Fudge factor they really call it
Why don't you do a segment on SETI's "A Sign in Space" project? Nobody is talking about it, probably because they failed to inform the press, so few people actually know about it.
Fascinating.Thanks
Perhaps we should continue doing deep field exposures, There could be better Gravitational Lenses that could answer even more questions?
awesome, thank you
Could it look at proxima centauri system? What kind of details can we get if it focuses there ?
It's almost impossible to do that with current technology, even with JWST telescope. JWST and other advanced earth base telescopes can only determine the chemical composition of the atmosphere of planets outside the solar system by using "Transit Method" and/or "Radial Velocity Method" / "Doppler spectroscopy".
@@MuhammadKHuda so sending out probes into the cosmic neighborhood is the only solution to know if we do have neighbours. Considering the vastness of space that's going to be very inefficient
@@thehex9959 But why? We sure know they exist, and there is a lot of proofs (like bodies from outside of solar system), the only interesting thing is possibility to research another star closely.
does the JWST telescope has a limit ? and what is that limit ?? 😢😢😊 😊 is that limit the Hubble telescope finds ?
Where’s the linked video?
Just wondering where they got the name Earendel. At first I thought it was after the son of Idril and Tuor in the Lord of the Rings but it's spelled different. It would be nice to have this information.
you are correct it was named earendel for this reason
I have a question. How can light photons travel billions of years without dying? Do they just keep going, or do they never die out? I'm just trying to understand. Are light rays immortal therefore they just keep traveling and traveling?
photons lose energy through interaction with other particles , if there is only a few interactions they just keep on going and going
@@stevensmith797🎉4😮ĺgiro.d.lobadia.2023.result
They are just a particle. If you break a glass, its fragments dont disappear to nowhere, same deal with photons. They keep going until something absorbs them.
W😍W ...so absorbing ... ✨💫
I love how I can reckon these sorts of things due to 1980s video games. Still hurts my brain, though. I wonder if this star is in Elite: Dangerous?
5:15 Elite Dangerous gamers remember it like "KGB FOAM"
Am I wrong in thinking that the first generational stars should be be burnt out or supernova'd by now? I guess so if we were closer to it but since it's so far away from us we are technically looking at it from the past?
Who knows what they are now. You are looking at data from 13 billion years ago. Whatever/wherever it is in it's space expanded location of 28 billion light years, we will never know unless we can fold space and wormhole/ftl travel there. When we get where we "think" it might be, maybe we'll warp right into a star and instantaneously vaporize because we will have absolutely no idea where we are headed.
I can understand their time difference now! The Universe is 13.8 Billion Years old, Although due to expansion.
Kindly explain parity of 13 billion years with 24 billing light years distance.
13 billion years old.
28 billion years distance.
It must be a galaxy. We can't see single stars that far away.
Earendil is a Tolkien character from his Book the Silmarilion. I wonder if the person who named the Star was a fan. He does spell it slightly different with a 'el' instead of 'il'.
Please make your videos in Hindi also 🙏🏼🥺. Thank you
Really: Oh, Be a Fine Girl and Kiss Me" - Isn't that what that coach did to that girl on some team that just won something. Good Video though.
How do you know a far star is close to big bang ppint and not just far away on the same parallel with us
Red shift may be caused by something other then expansion.I hope to live to see this.
The light of Earendel, other most beloved star.
Jeffrey Smith sounds like Maxwell Powers (known Japanese/English VA) as I listened to this video.
Father Lamâitre would be so proud of JWST
8:50 "These stars have very few other elements, which we call metals in astronomy" -- Uhhh. What? Only about 1/4 of the periodic table (elements) are metals. There are also gases, minerals (carbon etc), rare earths and so on. What an odd mistake.
WHAT A WONDERFULL WORLD
Ehrendel should not be made of any elements higher in atomic number than iron. Most likely it should be 80% hydrogen and 18% helium and maybe some traces of lithium, beryllium, boron, carbon, and oxygen. That should be it..
Why don’t we send a light message back to whoever might be on the other side to see it?
Just one word WOW 🤩
A curious observation;
Those 3 aligned stars along the sunrise arc, are like the alignment of Orions Belt.
I think I know the answer to why JWT is seeing fully developed galaxies near that star. It`s because,,if you had another JWT at the point where that star is and focussed it further you would only see another quadrillion galaxies beyond that.We are not allowed the capacity to think in terms of forever. But it`s out there.
If it’s a bang, how can older stars be closer than newer stars? Sounds like intelligent design.
So something like addidas,and thats why most of this goes over my head but interesting
Can anyone name the background intro music?
Thought maybe they found one even older! Still so awesome! I wonder if Earendel is still there or gone now? 😢
Almost certainly gone supernova by now. Depending on the source (and the internet sources vary wildly), the lifespan of these Type B stars range from a few million to a billion years or so.
Thank you for a relevant question. Earendel is definitely a dead star now, after 13 billion years has passed. The maximum life span is approx. 10 billion years for a mid-sized star like our sun. Bigger stars than our sun have shorter lifespan, because they burn up their helium and hydrogen faster. The right amount of these 2 gas types keeps the star "alive" and active. Earendel is a blue B-type star with a mass between 50 and 100 times bigger than the Sun.
I think , it's a single star. The far bigger density in the early universe must have been favorable to form enormous stars.
We are focused on where we are from. Are there satellites looking at where we are going? Because if multiverse has any likely hood can we find them? I would also think the James Webb equipment would be essential for future space travel. Mapping the Universe stars and planets and other obstacles. That could destroy the vessels we send. How Voyager 2 has survived is Astronomical. Yep, pun intended.
Not a big deal, as no such travel is possible and there is no point of doing so other then take a look. Either way, we will receive data a millenia or two later in best case, when it wont really matter.
Man said if the big bang is true, then this gives a presentation thinking it's true. Did it ever occur if, if I said , there's a creator he could have put every star and galaxy ect, in their place. So if a creator is true, and the creator put everything there, then you can never tell the age. You can only know how far away it is ,not when it was put there
At that distance entire galaxies with billions of star are that small ,but a star is questionable.
It is increased in size thousands of times by gravitational lenses. C`mon, watch the video.
i can see galaxies from my specs
Earendel confuses cosmologists, they are confused on many scales, all confusing the beginning, physicists fail to explain the large BH, distance of the stars, even what happened at the big bang demands rethinking and the physicists fail miserably.
Agreed, scientist speak of the Big Bang as it is the law.
The Big Bang is just a theory........nothing more.
LMFAO! Science ALWAYS has room for being wrong when the evidence is presented.
But the "big bang" expanding universe "theory" has FAR more evidence then any other "theory" out there. We CLEARLY see the universe is expanding and that it's LITERALLY billions and billions of years old, soooo, yeah.
Whatever YOU'RE thinking is probably very childish and wrong.
😅😅😅😅well information good show 😅😅
we are so small, our life doesnt matter. we come from nothing and we go to nothing
Yet we are also the only things in the universe that can ask the question of why it’s all here -that we know of. That makes us quite important, but brings a responsibility with it; ensuring there will be more of us around to continue asking that question and seeking the answers. Because we are so small and fragile, we need to be coming up with ways /-constantly/-to improve life for all of us, so that we can dedicate time to not going extinct in a chaotic universe we’re only now getting our first glimpses of.
It is true that we are small but, there is more beyond this life. God created all of this, and gave His only begotten son's blood on the cross, so you can see eternal life. It's real, I've seen it, and all who call upon His name in truth will be saved... That's a promise, and that's a whole lotta souls... Believe it... 🙏
@@Quickened1LMFAO!
None of what you said is true, silly idiot zealot!
Lying is a weak form of sales for your ridiculous belief...
I knew it was Earendel!
we need a telescope which can see dinosaurs on a planet 10 billion light year far from us
Hayz... its amazing that others people busy studying space ... here in the Philippines we stock in politics ... local elections "nag kakapatayan na " hahaha
When did acidemia change the length of time estimate of the big bang. Big bang theory estimated time 12 billion years ago wrong.
Question. How does one distinguish a single star and a star cluster? Might this be a star cluster?
It’s explained in detail in the vid
Time only exists to the knowing.
Realy I like it
He speaks. of this star in the present tense when in fact it no longer exists most likely and it's remains may be on their second or third reincarnation and part of other stars or planets ages ago.
I don't know why, but it makes me sad that Earendel is long gone....
Does anyone else see the severed ear at 2:54? I bet that's all he hears when he dies
28 Billion light years. I’m trying to wrap my limited brain capacity around that. That would days several years to get to by car.
Respect to all astronomers and scientists, but how do they calculate light's distance? How is 13 billion years calculated?
... by redshift, like the biggest subject of the video said.
@@ljramirez I'm pretty sure that it's probably off by 2-10 billion years. Similar to carbon dating. A miniscule amount of red light shift movement cannot be accurate for objects that are so distant and light that has been travelling for 13 billion years without many points for it to be distorted by dust, galaxies, etc. Just my thoughts.
@@andrepark3147 carbon dating is chemical-based, and subject to changes in the decay rates etc...however c14 is still accurate to just decades over 50,000 years. so by your example this would only be off by tens of millions of years for this distance, not billions by a long way.
@@njones420 Thank you for your insight. I love science, but I am always skeptical of dating objects and distance measurement.
@@andrepark3147 I didn't offer a good answer though :) sorry about that.
I just didn't like the assumption its out by 80% because you "reckon".
Richard Feynman ❤
What you mean “chapter 1”
Thanks, I enjoyed the video. However, I'd rather have a real person narrating. Most American-made science videos have a young hyped-up voice. Thankfully, this one doesn't have a speedy overly-excited voice. Keep up the good work.
Thank you 😊 But this is a real person narrating it. Jeffrey has been working with us even before the beginning of this series that has now completed 72 episodes.
@@TheSecretsoftheUniverse Thanks for your response. I feel a bit foolish for suspecting, earlier, that the narration voice was a robot.
I love the voice please don’t change it.
Makes me want to go back to school and become a physicist
Wow, in the paperback book I published in 2021 on page 48 I wrote quote "James Webb Space Telescope will discover old, fully grown galaxies as far as the telescope can see, further than 13.8 billion light-years away." I then I went on to explain how I solved it. I even said the large old galaxies would become the mother of all paradoxes, much more puzzling than the event horizon information paradox. I solved the paradox produced by large, old, smooth and fully formed galaxies further than 12.7 billion light years away before NASA launched the JWST. No need to solve it because I already did before NASA discovered they were wrong.
I know why. And I also know why the JWST will not find any population III stars. I said Earendel would not be a population III star. It's most likely a dwarf galaxy, not a single star. They won't be able to confirm the big bang model because they won't find any population III stars. I've been called a fringe scientist for claiming the JWST would not be able to find the first population III stars or young galaxies in the early universe. Yet, I was right?
Where can I get your book?
Book name ? Thank you very much
Why do you end your triumphant diatribe with a question? Nowadays If you want to be taken seriously state your theories with unwavering certainty and wait for someone to confirm, build upon, or disprove one or more of them outright. In the meantime you are praised as a great intellectual, even by those who set you up for ridicule. That being said, you could have asked me back in the late 90s and I would have given you the all of the answers that you could have then easily plagiarized during vacation, instead of putting actual thought into a whole book. At any rate, NASA will again break budgets of decades and billions attempting to prove a theory that was flawed from it's inception, and get no closer to the ultimate answer. At least we have figured it out.
@@kingboagart899 You're so right.
Isn't the the diameter of the universe 92 billion light years across. Not 13 billion.
This Star is long gone …
So, this star already existed 13 billion years before the supposed big bang?
Really?
REALLY?!?
How the heck do they aim and focus Webb?
One star so far away with all the stuff in between???
They dont focus on star, they focus on image of star, its different. Basically, this star due to way its light passes is perceived much bigger then entire galaxies that far. Think of it as gigant lence ((but there is no lence and this is all happening due to optical and gravitational effects on light) and this thing is right on focus of that lence. It bother me to no end that everyone thinks that light have no mass and is not affected by anything.