Excellent narration on different schools of Vedanta in his inimitable style. There is a fundamental unity of "Brahman" though every school has a different interpretation. The ultimate teaching of Sri Ramakrishna that "whichever path and school we follow doesn't matter, the final goal and destination is rhe same for everyone", appeals to me. That's the ultimate truth.
True, but there is no wrong in learning and reading the philosophy of our ancient gurus or monks. Follow or to not follow is your call. But to give your reason and neglect these beautiful philosophies, sorry I can't take that.
🙏 In the understanding of Advaita, Vishishta Advaita, Dwaita Dwaita Advaita Bhakti Marga and many such schools within the Brahminical spiritual practices, that have evolved within the Ramakrishna Mission it is significantly unique that they are all in harmony with each other, with perfect amity amongst themselves. Reversal of the ladder concept introduced as an interlude showing that they're all paths to the ultimate realisation nothing being graded as the 'higher' or 'lower' path with a democratic approach in fairness to each and every follower within the fold speaks volumes of the Organisation. 🙏
जय हो। दस पथ अद्वैत वेदान्त के सिद्धान्तों को बतलाने के। धन्यवाद 🙏 सुन्दर संदेश दिया गया है कि सबका मंगल सब अनेकों प्रकार से, एक की ही अभिव्यक्ति है। जय जय। अपने साथ ही इस्कान परंपरा को बतलाने के लिए भी।
Sri Ramana Maharshi 🙏 seemed to have little vedantic tuition prior to His Enlightenment - in this lifetime at least . I find it very telling that when various people brought scriptures to Sri Ramana He once commented that advaitic scriptures best reflected His experience of Self . The direct experience of Advaita is beyond the scriptures of Advaita . Words will always be limiting . The problem i have with the other dualistic schools is ' how can you limit God ? ' . As Sri Ramana Maharshi 🙏 said ' Infinity dies not allow fir funite parts within it ' . 🙏🕉️
This is Swami Sarvapriyanandas viewpoint and Swami Medhananda of the same Ramakrishna Mission has a very different concept structure which includes Bhakti and all the paths to God as equal and not a ladder.. I recommend his talks.
But Swami Sarvapriyanda also quoted one of his own guru Swamis as saying that "the ladder can be reversed". He spoke too of Ramakrishna himself who basically always said follow whatever path is meaningful to you. I don't find anything small or rigid about Sarvapriyanda ji.
Realising God is very tough for the complicated and simple for the simple. Upanishads, brahma sutras, Bhagavad Gita being three limbs of Vedanta should be studied and understood as it is... Just like in maths we all understand that 2+2=4
Ancient Vedic sages developed six Darshanas including Vedanta. Veda Vyasa has written in detail about Samkhya and Yoga also, apart from Vedanta. Neo Vedantins have suppresed all other Darshanas, except Vedanta. There are a lot of differences within Vedanta itself. Hindus should study all six Darshanas, not just Vedanta. No Darshana is higher or lower.
I presume that in TN advitha founded by Sri Shankaracharia is being fallowed the most as we see Shankara mutt and their linked organisatons like hospitals etc
Thank you. I was wondering, do you have the link to the original video of this, where I can watch it without those pictures that have been placed over Swami speaking?
It is a fact that in the last one thousand years, Vedanta scholars have suppressed all other Darshanas by saying that Vedanta Darshana is superior to other Darshanas. This is childish, ignorant and damaging to Sanatana Hindu Dharma. Different Darshanas deal with different aspects of Sanatana Hindu Dharma and philosophy. These Darshanas are not in running races or conflicts with each other! We should study and learn from all Darshanas. 🙏🏽🕉️🙏🏽
Please tell me which school of vedanta philosophy is truth or near to the truth . I get that all are trying to reach but then there has to be one right answer there can be only 1 truth ?????? Please answer and give proper explanation
Good question. The reason that there are so many explanations on this subject means that there are several paths to truth. And you can choose any of them of your choice. I am particularly very keen learner of Advaita Vedanta, though I respect all other philosophies also.
Qualified non-dualism does not say jivatma is part of Brahman' nature, as you say. Brahman is indivisible, acceptable by all vedanta schools. Brahman being indivisible must be maintained by all schools.
Most vaishnava scriptures reject total advaita. so do the traditional shaiva agamas. The most dominant face of advaita is sankaracharya, a shaiva so they often get linked together.
@@black_rx4549Shankaracharya isn't shaiva but Shiv bhagwan himself had taught high level of Advaita ,hence to reject advaita they have to reject shiv and accept shree krishna , because avatars like Krishna and Ram bhagwan are there for only one purpose,to increase bhakti in mind of seeker as they have various literature associated with them with various moral teachings which develops bhakti in the mind of seeker
In one of lectures he said the truth can't be said and i also believe that actual truth cannot be bound by any language cause langauge it self is maya so then why he teaches in english which in itself is very very bad language to explain our philosophy. I think his purpose is to tell very very limited truth through our limited self .
When an individual who follows advaita so strictly is asked whether he belongs to hare krishna iskcon for which he replies that he is not hare krishna but he belongs to Ramakrishna, that means he is dualist, he is finding difference . Similarly, we hv to know the difference between master and His servant (paramatma n atma). Everything can't be one n same. Brahman is one of course that doesn't mean whatever comes out of brahman is non dual.. From mud we can make different pots as well as we can build a hut.. They hv different uses and it's identity is different... Dualism is very easy to understand n realise God, why take complicated path.. Be simple n realise God.. Chant n be happy
Very intelligent observation. I guess he was only trying to demonstrate with the example. I am not the master of Advaita Concept. I am just learning. But I like your observation.
Lol as long as he's living with world he has to differentiate 😂 Meaning of world is differentiation Ramkrishna math doesn't completely follow Advaita there are many bhakti followers too As you said paths are different but goal is same to realise Brahman Let people decide for themselves don't dictate others lives and opinions like abrhamic religions
My question is which school of philosophy is the truth and why these😅 ancient philosopher create commentary so now they themselves create confusions that who is right is it advait, or vishishth advait or shudh advait or dwait or non or all . I my view vishishth and shudh seems close to truth .
Without any realisation, he already concluded VishiShiTaadvaita to be higher than tatvavAda and MAyAvAda even higher than that! Most people analyse other philosophies with a bigoted mind. So, they always end up concluding that their understanding is higher. This SvAmi is one such example. Due to the influence of English, his Sanskrit pronunciation is flawed.
Before sitting in judgement upon him you have to establish your credentials for being worthy to judge him; otherwise your words are just empty talk without any substance.
Swamiji if swami vivekananda preached advaita. Why did his chief disciple sister nivedita wrote in aggressive Hinduism lecture- 1. Buddha accepted world and denied atma 2. Shankaracharya accepted atma and denied world 3 ramakrishna and vivekananda accepted both one and many. 2. Why did swamiji said for ones own salvation and welfare of the world ? World is an illusory on Brahman in advaita. 3. Why sri ramakrishna corrected totapuri? 4. All there stages are present all vedanta schools
Service for mankind is for cleaning your chit Ramkrishna used to say ,I would have covered my village with gold and what not only if it was real When he was asked about poverty in Bengal
@parmar__12 ramakrishna saying that covering kamarpukur with gold means that one has to work for one's own salvation and it is not like magic or a free. Krishna says only through practice and dispersion one achieves everything. All these are within difference and establish differences. Shankaracharya vedanta, ultimately sadhana, is also within error or false ignorance. Bondage itself is illusion, how can the removal of bondage is real that is also illusion only. Removal also illusion.
@parmar__12 service to mankind is cleaning the chit is accepted by all religions. But it is not applicable to shankaracharya, who will finally say that jivtama itself is an illusion of Brahman.
@@regardsk3815 why are you twisting ramkrishna's word He said I would have cover whole town into gold if it was real but it isn't And he also said in hsi other discourse that highest teaching that he could give to his disciples from scriptures is that brahm Satya jagat mithya Krishna says keep your mind always directed toward me , surrender to me and I will take care of yourself means no karma kand or yagya else is needed to attain salvation if there is surrender And that's the thing, Shankaracharya or any other advait guru said that liberation is not to attain because when inquired it's known Atman was never bound or illusionned It is forever there as witness,and is known when we have self realisation
@@regardsk3815 Shankara never said that karma is not needed ,if according to him Karma or gyana or bhakti wasn't needed then why would he ho town to town spreading his teaching? Shankara himself said that service and self inquiry is needed till we realise our 'self' When self is known it is known that it was never under any illusion but till then self inquiry is needed
What do you mean by step higher…do not give biased opinion….saiva siddha to oldest of all…sankara 900 ad, ramanuja 1000ad madwar ( dwaita) 1100 ad Thirugnana sambandar 700 ad …god is another, separate from soul also with the soul … Sankara advaita not based on experience but created to destroy Buddhism. Before Buddha…Vedic scholars perform yag as and you pay for the yoga an and get everything from the lord…does not matter what kind of individual you are. Buddha said you are responsible for your action and yag as are baseless. Then adi sankara came up with a theory that only Brahman and everything else is imagination( because of the first assumption… can’t permit second one)…
Lol Advaita didn't get introduced by Shankara he learnt it from his guru who had his own guru it's like many centuries old last guru I remember was gaudapada And Advaita comes with experience ashtavakra experienced it janka did shuka maharaj did In modern times ramkrishna did Ramana maharishi did nisargadata maharaj ji did It's a realised philosophy And Buddha is right you can't attain Brahman with yagya ,even Krishna said it
In shankara, vedant achieved its pinnacle, and from ramanuj, started the trend of lower and biased interpretation of vedant with lower levels of understanding due to a certain devotional bias
@@darkknightryderShankara commentary itself degraded...He contradicted and distorted meanings of Scriptures. That's why every later philosopher criticized his philosophy as pseudo Buddhist philosophy. Even modern scholars say the same.
@@parmar__12 Lol delulu. You think he hasn't used grammar to derive meanings? 😂 What do you mean "as they are"? Have you not read the Shankara statement in Gita 18.66 that even a thousand statements of scriptures can't turn crow white? He said this....but he is very inconsistent in his interpretations. Also, Upaniṣads doesn't have 3 level of reality concept. This concept is anti-vedic. It's borrowed from Mahayana. The way Shankara and his followers used it... it's insulting to vedas. Apart from some 5 statements, all other verses of shruti are cancelled. 98% of Shrutis is cancelled.
Practical vrdanta IV Swami vivekananda says New discoveries vol 4 page 481 A jiva can never attain absolutely to Brahman until the whole of maya disappears. While there is still a jiva left in maya, there can be no soul absolutely free. In advaita vedanta, who is jivatma ? Jivatma itself is Brahman in empirical form due to unreal ignorance. Vedanta Sutra 1.2.8 God is also due to false ignorance 1.2.20 If we don't accept individual soul and Brahman are different, then we have to accept both are the same and defect of being jivatma is on Brahman only. Brahman being nitya sudddha buddha will be foregone. Teaching of tat tvam asi will be for Brahman. Or teaching will be eternally there. Result in differnce How can you say madhava vedanta is lower than advaita. Sarvapriyananda has not ready one single scripture of Madhvacharya work.
@parmar__12 thus lower and higher realization what you are taught establish only difference and non difference. Observe carefully. There is no jivatma separate in shankaracharya advaita. Brahman itself fakely appears as jivatama to itself and tries to negate it as the highest realization. This is nothing but establishing a difference only.
@@regardsk3815 there's no jivatama true and not true Realisation is step by step Through bhakti we establish a relation with divine as jivatama and atman But with bhakti when gyana is attained it's known that there's no difference between that jivatama and Brahman Ramkrishna is the best example of that
@@parmar__12 When you mix water with milk. You cannot deny the existing of water in milk. Salt when mixed with water. Water and salt inseparable but cannot be distinct. Sri Ramakrishna says- I don't want to become sugar but to taste the sugar. Sri Ramakrishna says page 98---- What is knowledge? God alone is the doer and none else- Thou art the driver and I am the carriage. JIvatma is the power of Brahman Jivatam is the body of Brahman Jivatam is the splendor of Brahman. Jivatam and Brahman are inseparable so it is non-dual. They cannot be in essence exactly same- Sri Ramakrishna does not day they are exactly same.
Adi Shankara never ever discriminated between hara and hari whereas madva and ramanuja downgraded hara as much as possible. Shivaya Vishnu Roopaaya Shiva Roopaya Vishnave Shivascha Hrudayam Vishnu Vishnooscha Hrudayam Mayah Shivaha Yataa Shivamayoo Vishnu Eevam Vishnu Mayah Shivaha Yataantaram Napasyaami Tataamee Swasthiraayishi
All this spirituality is pure hocus pocus. There is no explanation for the question why the world is a mess. The level of evil in this world is unimaginable. And if we approach any spiritual guru the path they suggest will take hundreds of lifetimes. What's the use. I have a problem in this life. The answer can be got after a hundred lifetime which I won't even know of.
Excellent narration on different schools of Vedanta in his inimitable style. There is a fundamental unity of "Brahman" though every school has a different interpretation. The ultimate teaching of Sri Ramakrishna that "whichever path and school we follow doesn't matter, the final goal and destination is rhe same for everyone", appeals to me. That's the ultimate truth.
When there is love of God,then you will take up every means to meet him,then that is no philosophical question,but a very practical one. 😊
True, but there is no wrong in learning and reading the philosophy of our ancient gurus or monks. Follow or to not follow is your call. But to give your reason and neglect these beautiful philosophies, sorry I can't take that.
॥जय श्रीरामकृष्ण||
🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
Namaskar Swami Sarvapriyanandaji Maharaj 🙏🏻
🙏 In the understanding of Advaita, Vishishta Advaita, Dwaita Dwaita Advaita Bhakti Marga and many such schools
within the Brahminical spiritual practices, that have evolved within the Ramakrishna Mission it is significantly unique that they are all in harmony with each other, with perfect amity amongst themselves. Reversal of the ladder concept introduced as an interlude showing that they're all paths to the ultimate realisation nothing being graded as the 'higher' or 'lower' path with a democratic approach in fairness to each and every follower within the fold speaks volumes of the Organisation.
🙏
जय हो।
दस पथ अद्वैत वेदान्त के सिद्धान्तों को बतलाने के।
धन्यवाद 🙏 सुन्दर संदेश दिया गया है कि
सबका मंगल
सब अनेकों प्रकार से, एक की ही अभिव्यक्ति है।
जय जय।
अपने साथ ही इस्कान परंपरा को बतलाने के लिए भी।
Sri Ramana Maharshi 🙏 seemed to have little vedantic tuition prior to His Enlightenment - in this lifetime at least . I find it very telling that when various people brought scriptures to Sri Ramana He once commented that advaitic scriptures best reflected His experience of Self . The direct experience of Advaita is beyond the scriptures of Advaita . Words will always be limiting .
The problem i have with the other dualistic schools is ' how can you limit God ? ' . As Sri Ramana Maharshi 🙏 said ' Infinity dies not allow fir funite parts within it ' . 🙏🕉️
Pranaam Mj for enlightening on Advaita Vedanta 🙏🏻🙏🏻
Advaita and Sri Ramakrishna's views on it are clearly elucidated. Very good.
Pranams and aum namo narayanaya Swamiji Maharaj ji
Thanks
This is Swami Sarvapriyanandas viewpoint and Swami Medhananda of the same Ramakrishna Mission has a very different concept structure which includes Bhakti and all the paths to God as equal and not a ladder.. I recommend his talks.
I love your viewpoint. "All the paths to God as equal and not a ladder". And I tend to agree with that viewpoint. Thanks for sharing.
All truths are true from different points of view.
So true.@@anupamdebnath1884
But Swami Sarvapriyanda also quoted one of his own guru Swamis as saying that "the ladder can be reversed". He spoke too of Ramakrishna himself who basically always said follow whatever path is meaningful to you. I don't find anything small or rigid about Sarvapriyanda ji.
Thank you Swamiji for explaining the basic difference among Dualism,Non-Dualism & Qualified Non-Dualism
You will be attracted to the path that is natural to your temperment and that can take you to the highest.
Arjuna was really sorry.
As always a great blessing to hear
Pranam Swami
Hari sarvotama❤
Hari Om Tat Sat.
Ice block : Dwait
Water liquid: Vishista advait.
Water Vapour : Advait.
H2O: His Highness Occupancy.
🙏🌹Jai Shree Ramakrishna 🌹🙏
Realising God is very tough for the complicated and simple for the simple. Upanishads, brahma sutras, Bhagavad Gita being three limbs of Vedanta should be studied and understood as it is... Just like in maths we all understand that 2+2=4
Ancient Vedic sages developed six Darshanas including Vedanta. Veda Vyasa has written in detail about Samkhya and Yoga also, apart from Vedanta. Neo Vedantins have suppresed all other Darshanas, except Vedanta. There are a lot of differences within Vedanta itself. Hindus should study all six Darshanas, not just Vedanta. No Darshana is higher or lower.
Great insights. Happy to learn more through people like you. Thank you for your comments.
and who teaches this currently ?
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
I presume that in TN advitha founded by Sri Shankaracharia is being fallowed the most as we see Shankara mutt and their linked organisatons like hospitals etc
I think of all the three the Vishistadwitha philosophy of Sri Ramanujachariya is the least fallowed in our country
0:59 - The text in the video: "Brahma", not "Bramha". Please fix it. Humbly.
Thanks for the feedback.
Thank you. I was wondering, do you have the link to the original video of this, where I can watch it without those pictures that have been placed over Swami speaking?
I don't have the link readily.
You should be able to get the original video. www.youtube.com/@VedantaNY
I don't have the link readily.
You should be able to get the original video. www.youtube.com/@VedantaNY
@@Indiacareercentre Thank you.
It appears that all the various forms of Vedanta rise and set in one Consciousness. That is all.
It is a fact that in the last one thousand years, Vedanta scholars have suppressed all other Darshanas by saying that Vedanta Darshana is superior to other Darshanas. This is childish, ignorant and damaging to Sanatana Hindu Dharma. Different Darshanas deal with different aspects of Sanatana Hindu Dharma and philosophy. These Darshanas are not in running races or conflicts with each other! We should study and learn from all Darshanas.
🙏🏽🕉️🙏🏽
Thank you for your comments.
🙏🙏🙏🙏
Please tell me which school of vedanta philosophy is truth or near to the truth . I get that all are trying to reach but then there has to be one right answer there can be only 1 truth ?????? Please answer and give proper explanation
Good question. The reason that there are so many explanations on this subject means that there are several paths to truth. And you can choose any of them of your choice. I am particularly very keen learner of Advaita Vedanta, though I respect all other philosophies also.
3:10 4:15
🙏🙏🙏🛐💐
🙏🏼
The 10 orders of Advaita... what's the difference between them? What does it mean that you're Puri?
Qualified non-dualism does not say jivatma is part of Brahman' nature, as you say.
Brahman is indivisible, acceptable by all vedanta schools. Brahman being indivisible must be maintained by all schools.
Raspusha does not touch the body with many of his writings. So, good.
Did any one know anything about sant eknath ji from maharashtra
How did Advaita became associated with identifying Shiva as Brahma swaroopam vs Vishishadvaita became associated with Vishnu as Brahma Swaroopam?
Most vaishnava scriptures reject total advaita. so do the traditional shaiva agamas. The most dominant face of advaita is sankaracharya, a shaiva so they often get linked together.
@@black_rx4549Shankaracharya isn't shaiva but
Shiv bhagwan himself had taught high level of Advaita ,hence to reject advaita they have to reject shiv and accept shree krishna , because avatars like Krishna and Ram bhagwan are there for only one purpose,to increase bhakti in mind of seeker as they have various literature associated with them with various moral teachings which develops bhakti in the mind of seeker
@@parmar__12 no. Shiva's avatara in kali yuga is only listed as Lakulisa (founder of pasupata).
@@black_rx4549 totapuri the disciple of adi Shankaracharya said he's living Shankara himself
In one of lectures he said the truth can't be said and i also believe that actual truth cannot be bound by any language cause langauge it self is maya so then why he teaches in english which in itself is very very bad language to explain our philosophy.
I think his purpose is to tell very very limited truth through our limited self .
Then don't follow his teachings. Please follow what you feel is the right method to learn about the subject.
You are allowed to meditate in the Cold. If you have understanding of animal breath
When an individual who follows advaita so strictly is asked whether he belongs to hare krishna iskcon for which he replies that he is not hare krishna but he belongs to Ramakrishna, that means he is dualist, he is finding difference . Similarly, we hv to know the difference between master and His servant (paramatma n atma). Everything can't be one n same. Brahman is one of course that doesn't mean whatever comes out of brahman is non dual.. From mud we can make different pots as well as we can build a hut.. They hv different uses and it's identity is different... Dualism is very easy to understand n realise God, why take complicated path.. Be simple n realise God.. Chant n be happy
Very intelligent observation. I guess he was only trying to demonstrate with the example. I am not the master of Advaita Concept. I am just learning.
But I like your observation.
Lol as long as he's living with world he has to differentiate 😂
Meaning of world is differentiation
Ramkrishna math doesn't completely follow Advaita there are many bhakti followers too
As you said paths are different but goal is same to realise Brahman
Let people decide for themselves don't dictate others lives and opinions like abrhamic religions
Yes true.
My question is which school of philosophy is the truth and why these😅 ancient philosopher create commentary so now they themselves create confusions that who is right is it advait, or vishishth advait or shudh advait or dwait or non or all .
I my view vishishth and shudh seems close to truth .
Ok, if you feel that way, then purse your path in those philosophies.
Without any realisation, he already concluded VishiShiTaadvaita to be higher than tatvavAda and MAyAvAda even higher than that!
Most people analyse other philosophies with a bigoted mind. So, they always end up concluding that their understanding is higher. This SvAmi is one such example.
Due to the influence of English, his Sanskrit pronunciation is flawed.
Before sitting in judgement upon him you have to establish your credentials for being worthy to judge him; otherwise your words are just empty talk without any substance.
@@lgopalakrishnan3181 lol stop appealing to authority. Sarvapriyananda is no authority anyway
@@notthatnotthat5859 You are not the authority to decide who is not the authority. 😄
@@notthatnotthat5859lmao u need burnol?
Swamiji if swami vivekananda preached advaita.
Why did his chief disciple sister nivedita wrote in aggressive Hinduism lecture-
1. Buddha accepted world and denied atma
2. Shankaracharya accepted atma and denied world
3 ramakrishna and vivekananda accepted both one and many.
2. Why did swamiji said for ones own salvation and welfare of the world ?
World is an illusory on Brahman in advaita.
3. Why sri ramakrishna corrected totapuri?
4. All there stages are present all vedanta schools
Service for mankind is for cleaning your chit
Ramkrishna used to say ,I would have covered my village with gold and what not only if it was real
When he was asked about poverty in Bengal
@parmar__12 ramakrishna saying that covering kamarpukur with gold means that one has to work for one's own salvation and it is not like magic or a free.
Krishna says only through practice and dispersion one achieves everything.
All these are within difference and establish differences.
Shankaracharya vedanta, ultimately sadhana, is also within error or false ignorance. Bondage itself is illusion, how can the removal of bondage is real that is also illusion only.
Removal also illusion.
@parmar__12 service to mankind is cleaning the chit is accepted by all religions.
But it is not applicable to shankaracharya, who will finally say that jivtama itself is an illusion of Brahman.
@@regardsk3815 why are you twisting ramkrishna's word
He said I would have cover whole town into gold if it was real but it isn't
And he also said in hsi other discourse that highest teaching that he could give to his disciples from scriptures is that brahm Satya jagat mithya
Krishna says keep your mind always directed toward me , surrender to me and I will take care of yourself means no karma kand or yagya else is needed to attain salvation if there is surrender
And that's the thing, Shankaracharya or any other advait guru said that liberation is not to attain because when inquired it's known Atman was never bound or illusionned
It is forever there as witness,and is known when we have self realisation
@@regardsk3815
Shankara never said that karma is not needed ,if according to him Karma or gyana or bhakti wasn't needed then why would he ho town to town spreading his teaching?
Shankara himself said that service and self inquiry is needed till we realise our 'self'
When self is known it is known that it was never under any illusion but till then self inquiry is needed
I watched _The Animal_, and I didn’t like the Christian Vijay. He kills his brother Andrew. :(
Just don't be bias
What do you mean by step higher…do not give biased opinion….saiva siddha to oldest of all…sankara 900 ad, ramanuja 1000ad madwar ( dwaita) 1100 ad
Thirugnana sambandar 700 ad …god is another, separate from soul also with the soul …
Sankara advaita not based on experience but created to destroy Buddhism.
Before Buddha…Vedic scholars perform yag as and you pay for the yoga an and get everything from the lord…does not matter what kind of individual you are.
Buddha said you are responsible for your action and yag as are baseless. Then adi sankara came up with a theory that only Brahman and everything else is imagination( because of the first assumption… can’t permit second one)…
Shut up fool, you are totally brainwashed upanishads amd vedas were way before buddha And
You Neither Understand Buddha nor Shankara.
Lol Advaita didn't get introduced by Shankara he learnt it from his guru who had his own guru it's like many centuries old last guru I remember was gaudapada
And Advaita comes with experience ashtavakra experienced it janka did shuka maharaj did
In modern times ramkrishna did Ramana maharishi did nisargadata maharaj ji did
It's a realised philosophy
And Buddha is right you can't attain Brahman with yagya ,even Krishna said it
@@parmar__12 citation please…. From their own words…saying they personally experienced this way.
@@MM-dh3wr citation of what
@@parmar__12 their own words about their attainment of realization or this path led me to realize Brahman.
In shankara, vedant achieved its pinnacle, and from ramanuj, started the trend of lower and biased interpretation of vedant with lower levels of understanding due to a certain devotional bias
That's an interesting perspective. I am still learning, so respect the different perspectives.
@@Indiacareercentre I haven't said that I disrespect other perspectives, what I am telling is factual.
@@darkknightryderShankara commentary itself degraded...He contradicted and distorted meanings of Scriptures. That's why every later philosopher criticized his philosophy as pseudo Buddhist philosophy. Even modern scholars say the same.
@@notthatnotthat5859shankara interpreted scriptures as they are others use grammar to get their mean
@@parmar__12 Lol delulu. You think he hasn't used grammar to derive meanings? 😂 What do you mean "as they are"? Have you not read the Shankara statement in Gita 18.66 that even a thousand statements of scriptures can't turn crow white? He said this....but he is very inconsistent in his interpretations. Also, Upaniṣads doesn't have 3 level of reality concept. This concept is anti-vedic. It's borrowed from Mahayana. The way Shankara and his followers used it... it's insulting to vedas. Apart from some 5 statements, all other verses of shruti are cancelled. 98% of Shrutis is cancelled.
swami turiananda - find god!
Hate Krishna you must be joking.All accepted Sri Krishna. Read their Gita.
Old video
Practical vrdanta IV
Swami vivekananda says
New discoveries vol 4 page 481
A jiva can never attain absolutely to Brahman until the whole of maya disappears. While there is still a jiva left in maya, there can be no soul absolutely free.
In advaita vedanta, who is jivatma ?
Jivatma itself is Brahman in empirical form due to unreal ignorance. Vedanta Sutra 1.2.8
God is also due to false ignorance
1.2.20
If we don't accept individual soul and Brahman are different, then we have to accept both are the same and defect of being jivatma is on Brahman only.
Brahman being nitya sudddha buddha will be foregone.
Teaching of tat tvam asi will be for Brahman.
Or teaching will be eternally there. Result in differnce
How can you say madhava vedanta is lower than advaita.
Sarvapriyananda has not ready one single scripture of Madhvacharya work.
Respect your point of view.
Dualism is the easiest way hence it's lower tho the realisation is smae
@parmar__12 thus lower and higher realization what you are taught establish only difference and non difference.
Observe carefully.
There is no jivatma separate in shankaracharya advaita.
Brahman itself fakely appears as jivatama to itself and tries to negate it as the highest realization.
This is nothing but establishing a difference only.
@@regardsk3815 there's no jivatama true and not true
Realisation is step by step
Through bhakti we establish a relation with divine as jivatama and atman
But with bhakti when gyana is attained it's known that there's no difference between that jivatama and Brahman
Ramkrishna is the best example of that
@@parmar__12 When you mix water with milk. You cannot deny the existing of water in milk.
Salt when mixed with water. Water and salt inseparable but cannot be distinct.
Sri Ramakrishna says- I don't want to become sugar but to taste the sugar.
Sri Ramakrishna says page 98---- What is knowledge?
God alone is the doer and none else- Thou art the driver and I am the carriage.
JIvatma is the power of Brahman
Jivatam is the body of Brahman
Jivatam is the splendor of Brahman.
Jivatam and Brahman are inseparable so it is non-dual. They cannot be in essence exactly same- Sri Ramakrishna does not day they are exactly same.
Sankara.Ramanuja.Madhva.all accepted Govinda
Sankara accepted Everyone,he wasn't narrow minded
Adi Shankara never ever discriminated between hara and hari whereas madva and ramanuja downgraded hara as much as possible. Shivaya Vishnu Roopaaya Shiva Roopaya Vishnave Shivascha Hrudayam Vishnu Vishnooscha Hrudayam Mayah Shivaha Yataa Shivamayoo Vishnu Eevam Vishnu Mayah Shivaha Yataantaram Napasyaami Tataamee Swasthiraayishi
@@nageshndikshit4487 where how downgrade
All this spirituality is pure hocus pocus. There is no explanation for the question why the world is a mess. The level of evil in this world is unimaginable. And if we approach any spiritual guru the path they suggest will take hundreds of lifetimes. What's the use. I have a problem in this life. The answer can be got after a hundred lifetime which I won't even know of.
th-cam.com/video/QMsxDuX_FuA/w-d-xo.htmlsi=LG2v9s7osETN94l1
Hello Pb Sudhir, I can understand your point of view. Watch the above video, you might get some answers.
@@Indiacareercentre
No solution. Typical spiritual guru jargon. Maybe there's no explanation for all this mess.
@@pbsudhir Ok I respect your views.
🙏🏻