I feel like the AI was the limiting factor here. The Indycar driven by a real driver would have made the pass. In a longer race, it would have eventually passed it anyway. One lap wasn't long enough to determine who was truly faster.
The Indycar clearly has a better arrow package as it was all over the back of the Benneton in the turns. It just didn't have a great opportunity to pass.
@@f1virtualfilms in assetto corsa's content manager you can check the mod's "author" by just simply displaying it on the garage when you're gonna select the car to drive, maybe that could help remembering where it's from
The VRC car would have give the Indycar a better chance. Actually, even with the RSS car, I'm certain that the only reason it lost, is because it couldn't get by the F1 car. The indycar may be less powerful, but it has more downforce, better tires, less drag, and is far, far superior under braking. If it had gone for the pass, it would have gotten by and held onto the position with ease.
Modern F1s are 15 seconds faster than indycar in Austin. A 1986 F1 car is approximately 14-15 seconds slower than a modern F1. So, yeah, it would be a close call on a road course. Late 90s cart were 3-4 seconds faster (Road America).
@@calibri1182 the old CART cars from the 90s and early 2000s in oval spec could reach just about 260+ mph on long straights or on the Indianapolis motor speedway, just 4 mph faster than an unrestricted v10 f1 car at 256+ mph.
What is bro yapping about? Does this mean that the most powerful engine F1 beat the most dominant? The W11 since according to your comment straight-line speed rules all else
@@FardeenRiyadh16 Most powerful engine doesn't mean best straight line performance. In general overtaking on straight is way easier than in the middle of the corner. And of course it doesn't work in extreme cases, but if you put for example F2004 in front of W11 on any current F1 track, there are maybe 2 tracks where W11 would overtake Ferrari on track.
@MagisterSzczypior you just cherry-picked a scenario perfectly suited for your point, put slicks on an F2004 and put it against the W11 for the Fastest Qualifying Time and the W11 come out on top, then in an actual race it'll slowly build a gap leaving it in the dust, the grip from the W11 is outrageous despite being a heavier car and no TCS, even giving the F2004 slicks and keeping the W11 Engine restricted to last an entire season compared to a single race. And I'm fairly confident that the downforce and grip the W11 produces will make overtaking in corners much easier than F1 cars with high downforce. Top Speed on a circuit is like the lowest of priorities, Acceleration, Braking and Cornering are much more important, what's the point of having a car on a race track that can, theoretically, do 250 MPH but has double the stopping distance from the same speed, much lower Cornering speeds and too much power that it can't accelerate properly out of a corner, carrying speed is more important for the fastest time and the best chance to overtake, the W11 will always leave corners at a higher speed which gives it a chance to overtake, unless it's somewhere like Monza, tight corners, tight roads, long straights, F2004 has the odds there.
I feel like the AI was the limiting factor here. The Indycar driven by a real driver would have made the pass. In a longer race, it would have eventually passed it anyway. One lap wasn't long enough to determine who was truly faster.
They are both the same AI diff, so what’s your point ?
@@henryhallam5270I think he’s trying to say the AI are programmed to be too cautious.
@@henryhallam5270why are there always confrontational people like you
The IndyCar is much faster, it just didn't have a good spot to overtake.
Where is the Benetton mod from?
Where can I download it?
The Indycar clearly has a better arrow package as it was all over the back of the Benneton in the turns. It just didn't have a great opportunity to pass.
There is a lack of power on the straight to be able to overtake.
@@f1virtualfilmsand there is a lack of AI ability to pass
@@xnotasweatx I agree
What’s the intro music?
It´s a theme used by the brazilian tv in the broadcasting of indy series
th-cam.com/video/T_1j_w_FzNg/w-d-xo.htmlsi=cRWSJhvOkU2-ECmz
Do you get the idea from my comment, cause I’m happy to see this ❤
It's always good to receive suggestions from subscribers and create videos that you enjoy watching. Thanks again my friend.
@@f1virtualfilms 👊
Bro where is Benetton B186 mod? But i can Pass for Jimmy Broadbent? Link Plz
I've had this car for a long time and unfortunately I don't remember where I downloaded it from. I'm sorry my friend
@@f1virtualfilms Ok Thanks 🤜🤛🙏
@@f1virtualfilms in assetto corsa's content manager you can check the mod's "author" by just simply displaying it on the garage when you're gonna select the car to drive, maybe that could help remembering where it's from
Sehr und sehr!
The VRC car would have give the Indycar a better chance. Actually, even with the RSS car, I'm certain that the only reason it lost, is because it couldn't get by the F1 car. The indycar may be less powerful, but it has more downforce, better tires, less drag, and is far, far superior under braking. If it had gone for the pass, it would have gotten by and held onto the position with ease.
Benetton hyper power
Comparing a modern indycar to an old f1, ah yes very fair matchup, no literally, the old CARTs would win by a landslide
I miss CART..those cars were nasty!
@@mabelpup8502 fr fr
Modern F1s are 15 seconds faster than indycar in Austin. A 1986 F1 car is approximately 14-15 seconds slower than a modern F1. So, yeah, it would be a close call on a road course.
Late 90s cart were 3-4 seconds faster (Road America).
@@calibri1182 the old CART cars from the 90s and early 2000s in oval spec could reach just about 260+ mph on long straights or on the Indianapolis motor speedway, just 4 mph faster than an unrestricted v10 f1 car at 256+ mph.
@@calibri1182 and true, on a road course it would be close between modern indycars and old f1 cars
It just proved that in direct battle straight line performance is more important than cornering performance
absolutely 0 wheel knowledge
What is bro yapping about? Does this mean that the most powerful engine F1 beat the most dominant? The W11 since according to your comment straight-line speed rules all else
@@FardeenRiyadh16 Most powerful engine doesn't mean best straight line performance. In general overtaking on straight is way easier than in the middle of the corner. And of course it doesn't work in extreme cases, but if you put for example F2004 in front of W11 on any current F1 track, there are maybe 2 tracks where W11 would overtake Ferrari on track.
@MagisterSzczypior you just cherry-picked a scenario perfectly suited for your point, put slicks on an F2004 and put it against the W11 for the Fastest Qualifying Time and the W11 come out on top, then in an actual race it'll slowly build a gap leaving it in the dust, the grip from the W11 is outrageous despite being a heavier car and no TCS, even giving the F2004 slicks and keeping the W11 Engine restricted to last an entire season compared to a single race.
And I'm fairly confident that the downforce and grip the W11 produces will make overtaking in corners much easier than F1 cars with high downforce. Top Speed on a circuit is like the lowest of priorities, Acceleration, Braking and Cornering are much more important, what's the point of having a car on a race track that can, theoretically, do 250 MPH but has double the stopping distance from the same speed, much lower Cornering speeds and too much power that it can't accelerate properly out of a corner, carrying speed is more important for the fastest time and the best chance to overtake, the W11 will always leave corners at a higher speed which gives it a chance to overtake, unless it's somewhere like Monza, tight corners, tight roads, long straights, F2004 has the odds there.
@@FardeenRiyadh16 Why are you mentioning Qualifying, when I clearly said about DIRECT BATTLE?
Senna beat Fw14b in Monaco. That's it.
Thank you Nigel's brain