Could make a longer video on this topic going into details of the case?! Acc to the backlash on Twitter that's not the whole story. I get that within 1 minute you can't cover all the details that's why I'm requesting a longer video on this topic!!!
This Charan seva is still performed in havelis all over Gujarat Why do we need these brothel like havelis? We have direct relationship with our god. We don't need any pervert guru. I follow pushtimarg with my heart, I've seen this Charan seva in moti haveli, Junagadh in 2018. Since then, I pray and do seva for prabhu from my home, and I don't allow my sister to go to haveli. Because we don't know what these pervert sadhus would do
Please stop spreading misinformation about Karsandas Mulji. Karsandas Mulji was highly influenced by British Protestant Christianity. His work "Niti Vachan" or Moral training (1859) is full of his ideas of what reform to him meant i.e Christian Protestant ethics, virtues and self-discipline. So, his critique of the Pushtimarg was coming from a Christian perspective rather than from the view point a Hindu reformist saddened by the state of affairs in his religion. Also, the film has removed the character of John Wilson, a scottish christian missionary who was projected by the court as a indologist and a scholar of pushtimarg. During the trial, he made several objectionable remarks on Lord Krishna. Also, the judgement vilifies Krishna specifically and all Krishna Bhakti sampradyas in general by accusing them of being driven by lust and encouraging debauchery. Not to mention that the whole case was based on hearsay incidents narrated by witnesses like Lakshmidas Khimji and Mathuradas Lowjee. In short none of the witnesses actually saw the so called "charanseva". Hence, there were no "criminal charges" pressed against the maharaj, which is claimed in the movie.
@@editx._27-w4r bro please stop supporting mulji..he was a british and christian agent..he was against pushtimarg..this movie is a propoganda against pushtimarg.
Wrong first if all this was banned in 1862 after this case and second thing this is not related to hinduism and gujarat only 2% of gujarati followed this thing during 1800s and this was banned by court in 1862 u are lier and spreading misinformation if i iam wrong prove me
फिल्म "हम दो हमारे बारह" का क्या हुआ ?
Could make a longer video on this topic going into details of the case?! Acc to the backlash on Twitter that's not the whole story. I get that within 1 minute you can't cover all the details that's why I'm requesting a longer video on this topic!!!
jadunathji nahi yadunathji and beta pehle real me dekho ki real me case kya tha fir video banao
This Charan seva is still performed in havelis all over Gujarat
Why do we need these brothel like havelis? We have direct relationship with our god. We don't need any pervert guru. I follow pushtimarg with my heart, I've seen this Charan seva in moti haveli, Junagadh in 2018. Since then, I pray and do seva for prabhu from my home, and I don't allow my sister to go to haveli. Because we don't know what these pervert sadhus would do
Please stop spreading misinformation about Karsandas Mulji. Karsandas Mulji was highly influenced by British Protestant Christianity. His work "Niti Vachan" or Moral training (1859) is full of his ideas of what reform to him meant i.e Christian Protestant ethics, virtues and self-discipline. So, his critique of the Pushtimarg was coming from a Christian perspective rather than from the view point a Hindu reformist saddened by the state of affairs in his religion. Also, the film has removed the character of John Wilson, a scottish christian missionary who was projected by the court as a indologist and a scholar of pushtimarg. During the trial, he made several objectionable remarks on Lord Krishna. Also, the judgement vilifies Krishna specifically and all Krishna Bhakti sampradyas in general by accusing them of being driven by lust and encouraging debauchery. Not to mention that the whole case was based on hearsay incidents narrated by witnesses like Lakshmidas Khimji and Mathuradas Lowjee. In short none of the witnesses actually saw the so called "charanseva". Hence, there were no "criminal charges" pressed against the maharaj, which is claimed in the movie.
@@pks2648 I'm actually supporting Karsandas Mulji. Brother read the comment properly
@@editx._27-w4r bro please stop supporting mulji..he was a british and christian agent..he was against pushtimarg..this movie is a propoganda against pushtimarg.
Wrong first if all this was banned in 1862 after this case and second thing this is not related to hinduism and gujarat only 2% of gujarati followed this thing during 1800s and this was banned by court in 1862 u are lier and spreading misinformation if i iam wrong prove me
This was followed by pustimarg sect of vaishnavism sect of hinduism which is less than 2% of gujarat population