Great video! Is there a rule for numbers that aren't on the table. for example my table ends at 120 degrees of freedom but the sample size is 137 for one of the samples. How does one proceed?
Linear Interpolation would be my preferred method even though there is a built in, be it incredibly small, % error because your DoF are so large. (Try you-tubing or search the web on how to do interpolation - pretty easy) - hope this helps.
hello. if there is no value you are looking for, you should take the smaller and the closest one to the degree of freedom you have. that is to say, if you have a degree of freedom 34, but it is missing in the table, you take 30 as a degree of freedom. because it is the smallest and closest one. even if you have 38 in degrees of freedom, you take a d.f. of 30
..hi! wgat if my denominator is 35 against the numerator of 4...which should i choose 30 or 40? please help me..i will be submitting my assignment (finals) this Monday...thank you
hello. do you have a video about the formula to solve degrees of freedom unavailable in the table? for example, 34 as numerator and 38 as denominator. THANK YOU!
hello. if there is no value you are looking for, you should take the smaller and the closest one to the degree of freedom you have. that is to say, if you have a degree of freedom 34, but it is missing in the table, you take 30 as a degree of freedom. because it is the smallest and closest one. even if you have 38 in degrees of freedom, you take a d.f. of 30
calculate critical and" f " statistic value considering the following information : Significance level 0.05 Numerator 11. denominator 3. Total sum of Square 160. Treatment sum of square 60. Observation number 25. treatment number 5. By solving this someone help me.
What a WASTE of time. I watched two of these videos. I want to know if the F ratio is actually far enough past the critical. How much past it does it need to be? Is it 1%? or .05? I mean is there a minimum it was has to be past the critical????
![🎤 จับฉลากร้องเพลง x P’ #XXSIVK [EP.1] (2/2) เพื่อนจับได้คำไหน..ต้องร้องคำนั้น เริ่ม! 💓🎶 #MXFRUIT](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/1bJvMJXmeS4/mqdefault.jpg)
You are Better than my Class instructor at college.
i am vietnamese , i am a student , i watch your video to learn ke , your lecture is very good , it helps me a lot , thanks
I always enjoy his tutorials ☺
11:30 is the example,skip the rest of the video
Thank you for this explanation! when would you make a video for Anova ?
YOU ARE REAL HELPING US, TOO GENIUS,we appreciate
thanks for explanation, how if my n1 samples (numerator) is 32?
how do we decide, in a given problem, which is the numerator and denominator? or, is this given in the problem?
The numerator is the one with the biggest variance, the denominator has smaller variance.
How do we know which number to put as the numerator and which as the denum, since they yield different results?
Wonderful lesson with so much simplicity
Great video! Is there a rule for numbers that aren't on the table. for example my table ends at 120 degrees of freedom but the sample size is 137 for one of the samples. How does one proceed?
Linear Interpolation would be my preferred method even though there is a built in, be it incredibly small, % error because your DoF are so large. (Try you-tubing or search the web on how to do interpolation - pretty easy) - hope this helps.
hello. if there is no value you are looking for, you should take the smaller and the closest one to the degree of freedom you have. that is to say, if you have a degree of freedom 34, but it is missing in the table, you take 30 as a degree of freedom. because it is the smallest and closest one. even if you have 38 in degrees of freedom, you take a d.f. of 30
hey everyone if you can pls help me. In the numerator are we not supposed to always substitute a bigger n value? i am really lost. Pls and thank you
excellent! I could not find critical F before
..hi! wgat if my denominator is 35 against the numerator of 4...which should i choose 30 or 40? please help me..i will be submitting my assignment (finals) this Monday...thank you
Add and divide 😅
Use interpolation
hello. do you have a video about the formula to solve degrees of freedom unavailable in the table? for example, 34 as numerator and 38 as denominator.
THANK YOU!
hello. if there is no value you are looking for, you should take the smaller and the closest one to the degree of freedom you have. that is to say, if you have a degree of freedom 34, but it is missing in the table, you take 30 as a degree of freedom. because it is the smallest and closest one. even if you have 38 in degrees of freedom, you take a d.f. of 30
denominator is not exist in df of F distribution, then what should i do sir pls?
WHEN THERE SOME NUMBER MISSING - WHAT CAN WE DO IN THAT CASE
What if i wanna do a confidence interval rather than anova
Educative , thanks
d2 not in table . what should i do?
how to find the cI i mean the F v1, v2 ,alpha/2, L and F v1,v2,alpha/2, U
very useful💕 Thanks☺️
F vbh
i don't think denominator value will be n-1 it should be n-k correct me if i am wrong
If the denominator value is above 100 how can we find the level of significance?
Not sure why anyone would give you a thumbs down. GREAT VIDEO!! Thank you.
thank you thank you thank you!
Thanks sir🤚
Great video!
you are goood!!!!!!!!!!Thank you.
How to solve if n2=12,n1=10
It depends on your alpha level but when you are using 0.05 then it is 5.54. 0.01 is 4.63.
@@jacobzornu4273 from where you are seeing ?? I think first is wrong . Correct answer for 0.05 is 2.90.
@@shahzaibansari583 df(11,9) at 5% how to find sir
@@tarashrestha1367 3.11
@@tarashrestha1367 first see V1 in f-distribution table 0.05 and V2 also . Then the combination of both will give you a value .☺️
thanks, i have question how can i get the critical value if the significance level 0.80 or 0.20??? please answer i am waiting
High key
the content of the video should be told during 5 min not 18min..
calculate critical and" f " statistic value considering the following information :
Significance level 0.05
Numerator 11.
denominator 3.
Total sum of Square 160.
Treatment sum of square 60.
Observation number 25.
treatment number 5.
By solving this someone help me.
you teach well but try to summarize it up
What a WASTE of time. I watched two of these videos. I want to know if the F ratio is actually far enough past the critical. How much past it does it need to be? Is it 1%? or .05? I mean is there a minimum it was has to be past the critical????
👍👍👍