ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก
Surf Without Surveillance: Tor's Karen Reilly
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ส.ค. 2024
- "People are under the impression that the Internet is sort of anonymous by default," says Karen Reilly, development director of the Tor Project. "They don't know how many digital trails they're leaving behind."
As the latest NSA scandal has alerted the public to the threat of widespread government surveillance, Reilly shows us how to restore our privacy in the digital world. Reason TV editor Nick Gillespie spoke with Riley about Tor, a set of software encryption tools that empowers people to use email and surf the web anonymously.
"There's a lot of everyday reasons why people would use Tor," Reilly says. "You don't necessarily have to be somebody who's under a particular threat to want privacy." Among the half million people who use Tor include victims of violence, people with medical conditions, people who don't trust their Internet service provider, and those who object to government surveillance on principle.
About seven minutes.
Produced by Todd Krainin. Camera by Amanda Winkler and Krainin.
Go to reason.com/reasontv/2013/06/26... for downloadable versions and subscribe to ReasonTV's TH-cam Channel to receive notifications when new material goes live.
She's got this whole hot secretary thing going on...can ya dig it?
Thank you that is helpful.
Best comment: "Restricting power isn't a matter of whether you like this administration or this one. It's about restricting power because that person that you trust with that power is not always going to be the president."
I so wish that the politicians could recongize that and stop being up in arms when a power that they've voted in is wielded by someone else.
With the usb option you can carry your "Tor only" machine wherever you go. It will be slower than a regular PC, but that's the price you pay for stealth. As an extra layer of protection, use TrueCrypt on the usb for ultra-secure anonymous browsing. Then if you ever lose the usb device you don't have to worry about it being viewed by someone that finds it. Without your password, they will never get in. Neat.
They've considered that. One compromised relay is not enough to link the source to the destination, because it only knows the previous and next hop.
I wish that were true. We also need privacy from corporations. They are just as bad as government.
I always thought it was creepy that I could type in something about some car I like and then when I go to some random, totally different website, and face ads about such a car or similar cars near my home.
Ideals are for religions and governments. I'm a pragmatist. My wishes and dreams for the future are my own and I don't presume to know what is best for everyone else. Everyone can pursue their path to enlightenment/happiness/fulfillment/meaning the way they see fit.
"empathy is the only way path out of violence" that's like saying prayer is the best medicine. Violence can't be stopped with all the empathy in the world. Violence is stopped with violence. Force met with force.
I said "privacy wouldn't be an issue" I didn't say we would have total privacy. What I do in my own home, on my computer, or what books I read, or the conversations I have to people would not be of any threat to society, so I don't care if google or yahoo reads all of my emails or looks at my browsing history. They just want to show me ads which is a very fair trade for using their service. Only a government (monopoly) could do something with your info that you don't want.
I find it hard to believe that there is no backdoor if it was first made as a military software...
From what I understand, TOR can run two types of nodes, a relay, or an exit node. It's fairly safe to run a relay, but if you run an exit node, you could get a nasty visit from the police, FBI, homeland security, or God knows who else, who will think that you are personally responsible for all TOR traffic. It's definitely not something you want to do from home. If you can afford it, have a dedicated site for it, and consult your ISP first.
For single PC users, how about running Tor inside a VM? Or better yet, run Tor in a VM appliance that exists only on a USB device. Once you unplug it, it's like you never existed. Overly complicated perhaps.
But I like your idea of having a "Tor Only" machine. I like that alot....
Philippines, Indonesia, multiple areas in Africa, multiple areas in South America. All of these lands have areas where government is practically absent. Technically, the government claims the territory but the inhabitants have never seen a police officer or other government official. Just Saiyan.
Remember that now if a user goes dark and off the radar by using tor and a vpn, you now may get included in a suspect list warranting additionally targeted oversight.
It works fine, but it's slower. Unfortunately, Tor's used for a LOT of illegal activities so some ISPs try very hard to flag Tor traffic. Noticing Tor traffic from regular internet traffic is very difficult tho, so there's a very small chance you'll be noticed. Even if you are, the encryption that Tor provides will keep the information you send secure. The major exception is that the data is obviously unencrypted at the endpoint, so using Tor for sites that give info to NSA is a dumb idea.
What a baffling statement.
Now I'm a big fan of star trek, but the show is absurdly optimistic about the better nature of politicians and the military (star fleet is essentially a military entity) when historically they have been the central cause of all the woes in the world. There are many paths to warp capability, even Gene Rodenberry saw this. The Klingons, Cardassians, and the Ferengi all achieved warp travel too. Just super saiyan 5 Brolly
Once we achieve the level of brain to brain communication (think Borg). Privacy will be considered an archaic idea.
More of those brilliant cogent arguments that appeal purely to logic and evidence. You've made it clear I don't have to respond to you anymore.
Well watching what you say is always good advice. Someone will always build a better mousetrap.
Anarchy is not exactly a great way to live. Sure a lot of issues would go away that come with government. However, there would arise an equal or greater amount of problems with Anarchy.
And Tor was recently hit with its own attack by law enforcement and a bunch of pedophiles who used Tor were recently arrested
That's bullshit that commercial business is more efficient than government bureaus serving like functions. There's tremendous waste in outfits like Intel and Microsoft and General Motors, and the corner 7 11 for that matter.
Tor is great but it is not all you need if you wish to remain anonymous/ secure. You can be seen connecting to the TOR network and that can cause you to come suspicion. There are ways around this... but if your machine is compromised not even TOR and powerful encryption will help you. If the recipient of your communications is compromised you are screwed also. Activist, blogger and journalist beware.
Also some spyware will be able to detect that you're using Tor, and governments are developing spyware (Germany was recently outed for such). So personally, I wouldn't use Tor, I just use the NoScript addon/plugin and watch what I say online.
tor is good if you do not use communications and social media, and if you love dial up speed
Anyone use this program yet and say it works well with their system?
is she rocking a comb-over?
because desalinization, water treatment facilities, and water reservoirs would be impossible without the magical govt.
probably there would be some nosy people then - they wouldn't be able to do much with that knowledge though...
Its true that a small portion of humanity will use violence to get their way. I still think a philosophical and ethical understanding should be a mandatory part of all education. Empathy is the only way path out of violence. I favor the Star Trek model of humanity's future with minor changes. Do you have an ideal to strive towards? Just super saiyan 2.
uhhhhm, no. not how it works at all.
Restore the balance.
What nonsense! The NSA buys a copy of TOR and walks right in.
Tor is an government program..
True but I'm not too worried about Google or Apple sending in armed men to bust my teeth in and take me for national security questioning "off the grid" because I once asked a single offhand question to an Afghan via the internet about Islam 6 years ago.
Not to be all "The Big Evil Corporations" cause they're not all Big, and they're not all Evil. But I do have issues with the way companies (I'm looking at you facebook) handle your private information.
When you re-ask your questions in a different audio space and shoot "overs" with a person whose hair is not the same as the interview subject, you're manipulating the viewer. Just saying.
J Garrett Damn, you have good eyes. I didn't even notice.
clean drinking water would though.
Linux T.A.I.L.S + TBB = winning
Really? Tell that to my ISP :)
link is dead 404...notfound
Karen reminds me of a female Matt Welch.
privacy wouldn't be an issue if there were no government. Just sayin.
there'd be a myriad of other issues taking its place. I agree in spirit but do you know how daft that comment sounds?
damn air conditioner.....
"your anarchist free market stuff is just pie in the sky"
Brilliant argument.
"do you know what a slap suit is" yes, they are those things that big corporations can avoid by lobbying congress to change the environmental protection laws and we all consent to this flagrant corruption by continuing to pay our taxes.
"are you out of your mind" More of that brilliant debate skill.
Physicians wouldn't compete for customers in a free market? Now you're just being silly.
Response to SuperSneakySteve, your response and the fact that feel compelled to hide under " The Cowardly Cloak of Anonnimity" invalidate your infantile response to a serious subject..
*"Don't watch unless you want to open yourself up to NSA snooping. Oh, wait, it's already too late."*
Being a libertarian means never having to admit you're paranoid.
reason.com/blog/2014/07/06/if-youre-reading-reasoncom-the-nsa-is-pr#comments
Who says nerds or geeks cannot be attractive?!
You can always leave. Just sayin.
Hot.
(continued)
autonomies and areas of such a dirth of natural resources for governments to exploit that are left to the indigenous population to toil and die in because they have no place else to go. You telling someone to just leave is tantamount to telling the native americans to move to a reservation. Who gave you and your government this planet? Where do you get the gravitas to tell me to leave a place that doesn't belong to you? That you didn't earn or gain approval from the community?
delete the nsa
I think Nick Gillespie has a terrible haircut.
(continued)
"please do go live in a country where there isn't and competing factions quarrel to achieve state power"
There is so much stupidity in this statement that at each level of resolution there is an identical quantity of stupid. It's fractal stupidity.
In an anarchy, the idea is that real competition can take place. Not this illusion of competition or the idea that competition is a bad thing. The simple fact is, there are no anarchies. There are Zomias and there are collectivist
Such idiocy.
"if there were no govt privacy wouldn't be an issue"?? LOOL
So you like being spied on by Google, Facebook every major company, military contractors etc!?
And "no govt"? LOL: There is always some, even if it's just a bunch of criminal Somali pirates.
Of course there should be a monpoly on power. If you disagree, please do go live in a country where there isn't and competing factions quarrel to achieve state power.