Please let me know if my understanding is correct. @5:58 black moves (11-17) and from there the game is lost for black. I believe (22-27) for was a reasonable option. White could still perform its combination and get the king on square (4), however, black would have an opportunity to advance a piece to square (38) and challenge for a king.
black stills wins. after white moving to king at 4, black will play 10 - 14. white then has to take the piece at square 22 with his king after which black plays 17 - 22. white has to capture with his king to square 20, and still loses
@@koromamedia8146 Yes. White goes to king: but, i believe its because of two reasons. 1st, the sacrifice of a piece by forcing the majority capture. 2nd, because white has more pieces on the right side of the board after the exchanges. I see a 4 to 2 advantage for white.
Please let me know if my understanding is correct. Moves #5 and #6. (5-10, 31-26). I am having difficulty applying the line diagram here. (31) is a strategic position for (5) which means "I should have a piece on 31!" Based on the exchanges that took place afterward, this move was designed to weaken blacks right side and allow black to crate the fork lock on the left side.
the move was 5 - 10, you do the calculation based on the current position of the the piece, that is 10, and not 5. so in this case, 10 forms a triangle with 3 and 13. 3 and 13 forms a triangle with 7. 7 forms a triangle with 24 and 22. 22 forms triangle with 16 and 26. so based on the line diagram, 26 is a strategic position for 10 . you can also check this position using the square diagram to confirm the position. thanks@@abelin5568
Please let me know if my understanding is correct. (34-29, 20-25, 40-34) Whites 2nd move in game 1 based on the square diagram, this piece moves to the center of the square and towards the vertice at 29. Also, based on the line diagram, since 29 is a strategic position for 25, (40-34) supports square 29.
the move 40 - 34 of white did not move to the center of the square, based on the square diagram, but took a strategic position of the square of the vertice of the square at 40, after black paying 15 - 20
Please let me know if my understanding is correct. hello again. today I have a question, specifically for the first game and the first two moves (34-29, 20-25) Based on the square diagram, if white moves 29-24, this exchange will land the piece on 35 to 24. Would this play satisfy the principles and theory of the square diagram. Based on what i've learned from you, the squares surrounding 29 are (23, 24, 33, 34) and landing on 24, the white piece now controls (24 and 34)
you are right, but it will be too early to move to square 24. before you advance to your opponent's territory, make sure your position is solid. based on the square diagram, it will not be wrong to move to 24. but it changes the system of the game. it gives the game a different outlook
@@koromamedia8146 AHHH> I see. The way it was played lead to a fork lock system. I'm not sure what system my idea refers too. But i do understand the principle here. thank you.
![N`cho Joel Atse [ 5 ] - vs - Jean Marc Ndjofang [ 3 ]](/img/n.gif)
Please let me know if my understanding is correct.
@5:58 black moves (11-17) and from there the game is lost for black. I believe (22-27) for was a reasonable option. White could still perform its combination and get the king on square (4), however, black would have an opportunity to advance a piece to square (38) and challenge for a king.
black stills wins. after white moving to king at 4, black will play 10 - 14. white then has to take the piece at square 22 with his king after which black plays 17 - 22. white has to capture with his king to square 20, and still loses
@@koromamedia8146 Great. i will set it up and look at it.
ok
@4:15, (34-30-25x45) Would this be considered "sacrificing a piece for position?" The piece on (15) is the only defender of (4) and (5)
34 - 30 gives white opportunity to move to king
@@koromamedia8146 Yes. White goes to king: but, i believe its because of two reasons. 1st, the sacrifice of a piece by forcing the majority capture. 2nd, because white has more pieces on the right side of the board after the exchanges. I see a 4 to 2 advantage for white.
i would've to see these two against each other these last two years, with Roel a his prime. i am still wondering who is the best nowadays.
I also believe that.
G is the best. But it's not easy to beat R.B . G studied his game and knows how to beat him more than any player.
I agree
Please let me know if my understanding is correct.
Moves #5 and #6. (5-10, 31-26). I am having difficulty applying the line diagram here. (31) is a strategic position for (5) which means "I should have a piece on 31!" Based on the exchanges that took place afterward, this move was designed to weaken blacks right side and allow black to crate the fork lock on the left side.
at what time of the video?
@@koromamedia8146 at .07 sec black moves 5-10
the move was 5 - 10, you do the calculation based on the current position of the the piece, that is 10, and not 5. so in this case, 10 forms a triangle with 3 and 13. 3 and 13 forms a triangle with 7. 7 forms a triangle with 24 and 22. 22 forms triangle with 16 and 26. so based on the line diagram, 26 is a strategic position for 10 . you can also check this position using the square diagram to confirm the position. thanks@@abelin5568
Please let me know if my understanding is correct.
(34-29, 20-25, 40-34) Whites 2nd move in game 1 based on the square diagram, this piece moves to the center of the square and towards the vertice at 29. Also, based on the line diagram, since 29 is a strategic position for 25, (40-34) supports square 29.
the move 40 - 34 of white did not move to the center of the square, based on the square diagram, but took a strategic position of the square of the vertice of the square at 40, after black paying 15 - 20
the second part is correct
@@koromamedia8146 thank you.
Greetings@@abelin5568
Please let me know if my understanding is correct.
hello again. today I have a question, specifically for the first game and the first two moves (34-29, 20-25)
Based on the square diagram, if white moves 29-24, this exchange will land the piece on 35 to 24. Would this play satisfy the principles and theory of the square diagram. Based on what i've learned from you, the squares surrounding 29 are (23, 24, 33, 34) and landing on 24, the white piece now controls (24 and 34)
you are right, but it will be too early to move to square 24. before you advance to your opponent's territory, make sure your position is solid. based on the square diagram, it will not be wrong to move to 24. but it changes the system of the game. it gives the game a different outlook
and it all depends on how you will handle it
@@koromamedia8146 thank you.
@@koromamedia8146 AHHH> I see. The way it was played lead to a fork lock system. I'm not sure what system my idea refers too. But i do understand the principle here. thank you.
It’s my honour@@abelin5568
Pffffffffff Bomstra 3 and Giorgev 9 😮
Startled?
@@koromamedia8146 no not anymore because now I'm informed that almost all of those games were when Bomstra was still a baby
you are right
Moi je pense que georgiev est le plus grand maître de dame jamais
I agree with you, but Alexey Chizhov is also one of the best draughts players
❤ trop fort