Refrigerant Types, Issues and Future

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 63

  • @EngineeringMindset
    @EngineeringMindset  7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    ⚠️ *Found this video super useful?* Buy Paul a coffee to say thanks: ☕
    PayPal: www.paypal.me/TheEngineerinMindset

    • @lihuen7904
      @lihuen7904 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Úc6jiruARUHIRUUUIHYGIHUYYYHGUIUUJ767Y7YYYYYYUTTYYR85H3YUEH4UU3TG3UWJHUUHEUHEJRUHRUHRUGI2yUt7 8fur8

  • @Oopsie223
    @Oopsie223 5 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    hey man. this is undoubtedly one of the best TH-cam mech channels if not the best. I've learned so much from you so thank you. the diagrams you have are of great quality and very helpful for comprehension during the presentation. keep it up and if you can reach your shoulder, pat yourself on the back.

  • @dantevillarreal5462
    @dantevillarreal5462 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This video is underrated, such a great explanation. Thank you!

  • @sam111880
    @sam111880 6 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Great explanation again on refrigerant ...however i would like to see a detailed process of actually creating them...like a how its made video... they only have one on making containers for them not the actual refrigerents DuPont makes/others make... I imagine its harder then just making air gas that welders uses by a huge compressor and distilling the air process.

  • @joshp.2237
    @joshp.2237 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This was hands down the best explanation of GHG and ozone and their effects I have come accross yet.

  • @bigtooka2069
    @bigtooka2069 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you man this really helped me with my thermodynamics class

  • @jameskennett8666
    @jameskennett8666 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Phenomenal videos that’re attention grabbing with amazing explanations. Thank you!

  • @tunthianlalhauzel9752
    @tunthianlalhauzel9752 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I just discovered this channel recently and dare I say its one of the best youtube channel explaining electricity and its related devices. Hope you bring out more awesome videos.

  • @joshuastyles9936
    @joshuastyles9936 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Glad that I finally know what an HFC is.

  • @74womack
    @74womack 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Nice video,can you do one on alignment with dial indicators please.

  • @RealFuzzyPickLE530
    @RealFuzzyPickLE530 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Who should be retrofitting systems? In what region? Are you talking about specific countries or what?

  • @lucianorosel8128
    @lucianorosel8128 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just found your videos, and im pleased to be learning things i was on the fence on before, thank you!

  • @mohdadnan1888
    @mohdadnan1888 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    hey Paul thanks for sharing valuable knowledge can u plz make a video on chiller installation.

  • @EngineeringMindset
    @EngineeringMindset  5 ปีที่แล้ว

    ⚠️ Learn *REFRIGERANT RETROFIT GUIDE* here: th-cam.com/video/1OqgLcU2buQ/w-d-xo.html ⚠️

  • @JamesPettinato
    @JamesPettinato 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What everyone is overlooking is, the flamible refrigeranrs are mixed with oil, the combination is like napalm if there's a fire under the compressor

  • @syedfaiyaz3762
    @syedfaiyaz3762 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Extra ordinary explanation

  • @motog6436
    @motog6436 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You spent so long talking about "the environment" that you forgot to talk about the actual performance of the refrigerants

  • @biniamgthadic2185
    @biniamgthadic2185 ปีที่แล้ว

    awesome explanation boy

  • @gabrieltremblay1750
    @gabrieltremblay1750 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great videos, but do you know if there are any issues with health? Thanks.

  • @notanewbie1718
    @notanewbie1718 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does not lightening create ozone every time it discharges?

  • @heronairconditioning5452
    @heronairconditioning5452 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What are the suspected long term effects on living organism as opposed to artificial

  • @3poli
    @3poli 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do they take into account their efficiency when calculating their footprint or just the refrigerant in itself

    • @ashbridgeprojects6916
      @ashbridgeprojects6916 ปีที่แล้ว

      No, the GWP figure is just the refrigerant release itself. This is the whole scam. These low GWP replacements, like CO2, have a poor COP and use 40-60% more energy and therefore 40-60% more carbon. The carbon footprint from the energy usage of a system is several orders of magnitude more than the footprint of the refrigerant should the charge be released into the atmosphere. Unless your power is nuclear/not fossil, we should be using the most efficient refrigerants possible. The industry is run by salesmen.

  • @peterfrancis3865
    @peterfrancis3865 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanx alot 👍

  • @lucaswhoelse9958
    @lucaswhoelse9958 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What if we mixed alcohol and water to lower the boiling rates and decrease the freezing rates so it's more suitable as a refrigerant

  • @SciDOCMBC
    @SciDOCMBC 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    UV radiation is in no way deflected by ozone, even in this case the UV photon destroys the O3 molecule, but this is by no means as bad as it is with chlorine, in the natural process, it is sufficient that newly formed ozone can rise from the lower atmosphere back into the high atmosphere and fill the gaps

  • @djs5916
    @djs5916 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    If the buildup of dense green house gases allows more infra-red energy to be reflected back to earth, why doesn't it also reflect more IR energy before it reaches the troposphere?

    • @EngineeringMindset
      @EngineeringMindset  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Good question, I think to some extent it will reduce the amount entering, but it's a constant stream of energy from the sun so for every 1 unit of energy that is deterred, a vastly higher quantity will get through. As it passes through, hits the planet and it reflected back into space the chance of colliding with a greenhouse gas particle doubles, each part that is reflected back to earth will then have to try again and some of that also won't make it. So overall, we still get that build up which outweighs the offset.

    • @robertrocheville7769
      @robertrocheville7769 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's really about the heat that objects release through infra red.
      All objects release infra red. A lot off that occurs are night. If we have greenhouse gases that infra red gets reflected back.
      Also keep in mind that the sun shines more than just infra red and that gets absorbed as heat.

    • @djs5916
      @djs5916 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@EngineeringMindset I'm not sure if this is an adequate explanation - if the gg's in the troposphere are capable of reflecting IR radiation (possibly others too), then why is the assumption that it works more one-way than the other? i.e. if it's really a bit like a double-sided mirror with holes in it, then the IR penetration or reflection will surely be similar and the gg's are really only making the holes in the mirror smaller, which should allow allow more IR reflection from both sides of the troposphere!

  • @josemcq1
    @josemcq1 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do the refrigerant 136 exist?
    My teacher told me to investigate its properties but I do not find it anywhere

    • @samuelwoolwineiv7886
      @samuelwoolwineiv7886 ปีที่แล้ว

      No, two carbon atoms can’t be single-bonded to each other as well as six fluorine atoms AND two hydrogen atoms.

  • @Meleeman011
    @Meleeman011 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm trying to build a cooling suit for van lifers so they can save on cooling costs to cool their bodies, and I was looking to use a liquid that could evaporate quickly at a low pressure and at body temperature, which would be cooled via a peltier device and condenser coil.

  • @drodriguez394
    @drodriguez394 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would you be able to explain how refrigerant is heavier than air.. but also climbs to the ozone? Seems like a contradiction to me.

    • @CT-vm4gf
      @CT-vm4gf 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      In a calm stagnant environment, refrigerants will settle or sink because they are heavier than air. But air or the atmosphere as we know is windy, therefore the refrigerants get mixed and lifted into jet streams which carry the refrigerants up into the ozone layer.

  • @agusmaulanarefrigeranhidro7167
    @agusmaulanarefrigeranhidro7167 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The future refrigerant to change refrigerant sintetic is hydrocarbon refrigerant. Hydrocarbon refrigerant familiar with environmental so can decrease consumsion of power electrical

  • @st.m.3979
    @st.m.3979 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i dont understand why this video has so few views

  • @sam111880
    @sam111880 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If everything is going to HC does this imply oil companies and natural gas companies can manufacture it simply by there byproducts of refining the fossil fuels... because it seems its all HC going to... Again when it started with CFC it had no HC in it ...so that seems to me it be a completely different manufacturing process then oil refinery byproducts...And need a completely different manufacturing process... curious because i know how recycling process goes it pretty easy but creating it to begin with is difficult for me to understand

  • @bsanchez3563
    @bsanchez3563 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Somewhere i remember seeing the last letter in refrigerant types standing for Alternative aka a meaning akternative at the end of ie r134a. meaning Alternative

    • @samuelwoolwineiv7886
      @samuelwoolwineiv7886 ปีที่แล้ว

      The “a” in R-134a means it’s an isomer of R-134, they have the same chemical formula, but a different arrangement of the atoms.

  • @SHAIKdaikinhafeez
    @SHAIKdaikinhafeez 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Super

  • @sandhung1162
    @sandhung1162 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I always think the greenhouse gas effect, the warm gas is manufactured directly in earth. Now I understand that the heat comes from the Sun, reserved at earth

  • @aaroncrucillo7922
    @aaroncrucillo7922 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    sir pasa brought me here

  • @JohnLothe
    @JohnLothe 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can anyone explain how these gases affect the environment exactly? Where are the studies and evidence to support the claims that these gases are doing what they are claiming they are doing?

    • @prettycureforever7102
      @prettycureforever7102 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      They cause the ozon hole in the North poles and that is the reason why we have a huge whole in the earth plus its in our text books we study . since chlorine is heavier than air it breaks down the carbon molecules in the stratosphere .since technician have been letting this out thinking bleach desolve in water it didn't it went straight up in he air destroying 100,000 molecules

  • @tonytor5346
    @tonytor5346 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why not use liquid Nitrogen?

    • @samuelwoolwineiv7886
      @samuelwoolwineiv7886 ปีที่แล้ว

      It requires extremely high pressure, new systems would have to be designed specifically for it.

  • @khaiyacharadae-agri-news2701
    @khaiyacharadae-agri-news2701 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    ‌শিক্ষণীয়

  • @Jesus-bs5fl
    @Jesus-bs5fl 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I thought this was a video on refrigerant types. It turned into a global warming video around 6m in lol.

    • @drjny
      @drjny 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The reason that refrigerants are changing is to lower their ozone depletion potential and global warming potential.

    • @motog6436
      @motog6436 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, he didn't mention _anything_ about their performance