Martin Heidegger, Plato's Doctrine of Truth | Allegory & History of Metaphysics | Core Concepts

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ค. 2024
  • Get the Heidegger book Pathmarks - amzn.to/2AH5z0p
    Support my work here - / sadler
    Philosophy tutorials - reasonio.wordpress.com/tutori...
    Take classes with me - reasonio.teachable.com/
    This Core Concept video focuses on Martin Heidegger's essay "Plato's Doctrine of Truth" (found in the book, Pathmarks), which discusses the Allegory of the Cave in Republic book 7. Heidegger views Plato's shift in the understanding of the essence of truth - from unhiddenness to correctness - as setting western thought on the path of metaphysics and humanism.
    He also briefly discusses how Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, Rene Descartes, and Friedrich Nietzsche figure into this history of western metaphysics, further developing additional conceptions of truth that remain within the trajectory originally established by Plato.
    If you'd like to support my work producing videos like this, become a Patreon supporter! Here's the link to find out more - including the rewards I offer backers: / sadler
    You can also make a direct contribution to help fund my ongoing educational projects, by clicking here: www.paypal.me/ReasonIO
    If you're interested in philosophy tutorial sessions with me - especially on Heidegger's thought and works - click here: reasonio.wordpress.com/tutori...
    You can find the copy of the text I am using for this sequence on Heidegger's essay "Plato's Doctrine of Truth" in Martin Heidegger Pathmarks, available here - amzn.to/2AH5z0p
    My videos are used by students, lifelong learners, other professors, and professionals to learn more about topics, texts, and thinkers in philosophy, religious studies, literature, social-political theory, critical thinking, and communications. These include college and university classes, British A-levels preparation, and Indian civil service (IAS) examination preparation
    #Plato #philosophy #Heidegger

ความคิดเห็น • 15

  • @MrMarktrumble
    @MrMarktrumble 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Very good. Worth repeating and learning. Thank you.

  • @Self-Duality
    @Self-Duality 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very intriguing thinking 😊💭

  • @rashidmohdamin8324
    @rashidmohdamin8324 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent !!

  • @iamcaesar6741
    @iamcaesar6741 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can you make a short video on a more detailed idea of what "being" means; the way I understand it now after watching many philosophy videos. In general, is that "being" is the activity of the thing that defines its essence. And the word or name of that specific essence that is assigned to it; is a sense of an idea a "distorted interpretation" which is an "idea of an idea." Is this close to what you are saying?

    • @GregoryBSadler
      @GregoryBSadler  6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      "Being" is a term that gets multiple meanings. Here's my more or less standard response to requests I make videos about X - th-cam.com/video/vkXKtxleGA8/w-d-xo.html - if you're interested in commissioning a video or videos, I do that sort of work from time to time

  • @Nalhek
    @Nalhek 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So how does heidegger think that alethea is preferable to humanistic metaphysics? What are we missing out on that the presocratics had?

    • @GregoryBSadler
      @GregoryBSadler  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You're asking a big question here.
      I'll give a short answer - aletheia is involved, for Heidegger, in all metaphysics, so the question contrasting [truth as] alethea against humanistic metaphysics isn't quite putting matters right. To start working an answer out for yourself, you want to read the entire essay.

  • @DrewShotwell
    @DrewShotwell 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would you say that Heidegger is asserting that humanistic metaphysics is an anthropomorphic system by which human beings become erroneous in their conception of truth? And, if this isn't too much of a stretch, could this be a basis of thinking by which an environmentalist 'metaphysics' is founded: having a sharper sense of the non-centrality of human beings in Being?

    • @GregoryBSadler
      @GregoryBSadler  6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Change "anthopomophic" to "anthopocentric", and the answer is yes

  • @motemints
    @motemints 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    headache :(, I'm stupid

    • @GregoryBSadler
      @GregoryBSadler  6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Probably not. These works are complex, so not getting them all at once doesn't mean you're stupid

    • @henryberrylowry9512
      @henryberrylowry9512 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Never getting them at all wouldn't make you stupid!