(M4E4) [Microeconomics] Finding Income and Substitution Effects: Slutsky Decomposition Method

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 12

  • @rishitachakraborty1535
    @rishitachakraborty1535 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You are awesome..... Amazing teaching style..... And your understanding of the subject is phenomenal...

  • @Flowowais
    @Flowowais 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    SURELY YOUR LECTURES ARE ADDICTIVE.

  • @chuyuechen6704
    @chuyuechen6704 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    so helpful! Super clear!!!

  • @chengmoulei8926
    @chengmoulei8926 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much, I’m struggling with why ev=cv when there is no income effect and why at this time walrasian demand equal Hicks Ian demand. And your video( this and another) gave me clear explanation!

  • @madelainebellini7447
    @madelainebellini7447 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Your videos are great!!

  • @حسنکرمی-ق8ه
    @حسنکرمی-ق8ه ปีที่แล้ว

    perfect teacher
    thank you
    🙏

  • @Economicstrack38
    @Economicstrack38 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great explanation

  • @piruz774
    @piruz774 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi! Thank you for this video, it was very useful and well-made. I still have one question on my mind: in the graph you drew there are three different indifference curves and every point belongs to a different one. I've seen other videos/books and sometimes the two points (that we can call A and B, the close ones) lie on the same indifference curve. When does that happen? Why sometimes we draw 2 indifference curves and other times we draw 3 of them? I'm struggling a lot. Thank you in advance, have a nice day 😀

  • @forthrightgambitia1032
    @forthrightgambitia1032 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why are you using x_m as the intermediate variable? Wouldn't x_h make more sense as you are moving along the Hicksian demand curve?

  • @madhushiwasanadevendra6691
    @madhushiwasanadevendra6691 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great!

  • @batu4041
    @batu4041 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    hocam adamsın

  • @12batchforever20
    @12batchforever20 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Batman😂