Combat range of both F-35A and F-35C is around 750 - 800 nmi (1390 - 1480km). NOT 1080km. And this is before the engine core upgrade. Also its only 12700 kgf NOT 13000 kgf dry thrust and 19500 kgf NOT 9500 kgf afterburner thrust. Additionally F-22 has the largest wing 2nd only to SU-57 with its F-119 engine producing the most thrust. So its combat range is comparable if not more than either Su-57 and J-20. According to f-16()net, it can reach 2000km+ going at Mach 1 at 50k feet. Lastly, R37M is a big and heavy missile. US equivalent is AIM-174B that will be carried by F18E/F maybe even F-15EX in the future. Then their is still Raytheon's LREW or Boeing's LRAAM.
I thought this info was wrong because I know that the F 35 engine is the strongest single engine ever made. I also know that they say it's 43, 000 lbs of thrust, which in all honesty from sources in the military say that it's 50,000lbs of thrust! Could you please explain KG and KGF? Is that just the conversion of kilograms?
@@scottmcauley5781 kg is a standard unit of mass, while kgf is a non-standard gravitational unit of force. Conversion is 1 kgf =~ 9.807 N =~ 2.205 lbf. Also when mentioning thrust in British gravitational units its lbf NOT lbs. So its 43,000 lbf or 50,000 lbf
@@scottmcauley5781 Don't know much about CAAM. But AIM-174B or air-launched SM-6/ERAAM will be a massive boon for USN if not a game changer. It's a very versatile missile as its a dual purpose long range air-to-air missile/anti-ship missile. So its like Chinese PL-17, Russian R-37 and Kinzhal combined. While also only half the price of Kinzhal. Only issue is the production numbers. They could at least improve it to 500 a year if not more.
As a US citizen born and raised First Quality and quantity need 2 B looked into.. an also need not known or talked-about or posted on any internet for future to come..
@andreww1225 I think he's saying that America has quality and quantity over all others and that we shouldn't be talking about it on the internet. I agree on the sense of speaking of our capabilities, and why our military would talk about them. Keeping secrecy is huge. Why talk about America having a 6 th generation fighter and it's capabilities, and wouldn't the military want to veil it in secrecy?
Makes ZERO sense. Have you seen China's Space Program? Where do you think they pulled a Delta IV heavy rocket out of thin air, Space Shuttle, Moon Landers and Fighter jet's that look an awful lot like Lockheed Martin aircraft, without ever purchasing one of them from the USA? Espionage. Isn't dead or James Bond and if anyone in the US Millitary cared, nobody could even post a word, without being instantly censored. Lighten up! Be less heavy, and feel the freedom of being more wiggy!
Um production capacity of US vs China? Quantity? Lockheed Patriot capacity of 600 missiles per year. Joke is the word that comes to mind. Oh and how's the 155mm shell production coming along?
@@clatoris69That came from Stalin in WW2 his 100,000 crappy tanks and 40million man army overwhelmed the Germans 3.5 million man army and superior tanks. They couldn't kill them fast enough. The Russians had thousands of troops stations back to shoot their own troops if they retreated. Same thing during the Korean War. The US had pushed the North all the way to the Chinese boarder. Then the Chinese sent 1 million troops across and we couldn't kill them fast enough. Ever watch the movie ZULU DAWN. natives with spears defeated the British Army with bolt action rifles. They just couldn't shoot them fast enough. The ZULU king sat on the hill watching the rate his men were slaughtered then he just trippled the number of men he charged into battle and overran the British positions
The TR-3, (Technology Refresh-3) in revisions, A - B - C - D, is the backbone for the Block 4 F-35 Lightning II upgrades, delivering upgraded harpoons, sensors, data processing, target acquisition and enhanced sensor capabilities, in a collaboration between Boeing, BAE systems, Northrop Grumman and Lockheed Martin. TR-3A began being deployed in January 2023, with TR-3B in 2025, concluding in final revision D, expected to be completed in 2029. January 6, 2023, 461st Flight Squadron's first flight of F-35 Technology Refresh 3 (TR-3), was at Edwards Air Force Base, California.
This sentence can fly only if you assume quality and quantity are both qualities, that is both are values. No, Stalin did not say that. The proper sentence sounds like this: "Quality is a value and quantity is a value. Repeting the obvious 'quantity has a value of its own' sounds stupid." 100,000 infantry won't make a tank crew no matter what. But hey, it was Soviet Russia so ridiculous shit can=will happen if you force the shit to become a tanker. Shit won't drive a tank but you did a great job with your Makarov shooting it in the process.
@@chinhuattan did you think the 10 Abrams would out last 5,000 Russian tanks ? Maybe your expectation are a bit high ? Just sayin !? But at this point it doesn't matter cause Russia's about out of Tanks anyways, wont be long now ! Poor little Putler lost all his Tanks 😫😭 😂🤣😉 🇺🇸 🏴☠️
Sorry to say you’re wrong. The F-22 is cheaper and cost less to operate. The military was so set to get the F35 it stop production of the F-22. The F-35 is still having trouble. A large number are grounding
This video said the US military is going to spend the next 10 years "modernizing" the F-35 to finally match the performance capabilities of the F-22, which of course is an older plane. Crazy.
@timlane5445 F-22 cost $143m (in 2005 dollars), which is over $191m today. Lot 17 F-35 (current) is $78m a piece. F-22 costs $85k per flight hour to operate. The F-35 costs $42k per flight-hour.
@@ingzimmerman899😂😂😂 nope they only have a few and haven’t even started fully producing them. They can’t get all the parts to build them because of sanctions. Russia relied heavily on the west for new technology and plane parts.
It's the best mix of quality, quantity, support, logistics, training, and manufacturing. The F-35's will probably never fly alone. In Europe, F-35s will fly with typhoons, vigens and dassult, f-15, and f-16 aircraft flown by our allies and coordinated over link-16. Likewise, in the Middle East, American, Israeli, Saudi, and UAE aircraft are being coordinated with assets from our carrier task force. The same will be true in the Pacific with the addition of indigenous aircraft from Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, and Australia. Russia may never again be in a position to partner with anyone. Even China sees that an open partnership isn't possible. So when talking numbers nationalism is no longer relevant. Cooperative consortiums are the future!
We have both Quantity and Quality while Russia has a plane held together with self tapping screws. for 1 SU-57 there will be about 400 F-35's hunting it down..
XQ-58-A Valkyrie, is the only Q in the eQuation. Both the F-35B and C aircraft were designed to be able to carry up to 24 Small Diameter Bomb II (SDB II) [Raytheon Stormbreaker GBU-53/B] weapons. Eight (8) weapons, for internal carriage, will be approved for use under the Block 4 program. The aircraft can carry an additional 16 weapons externally on the four wing pylons, pending operational requirements, depending on the needs of the services. F-35 Lightning II Joint Program Office spokesman Michael Land, stated via email in mid-August, 2020. “Initial capability release on the F-35B is planned for 2022, and full capability on all three variants is planned for 2023.” Covid-19... delayed but back in track and Block 4.2 / 4.3 are going live already. It concludes with Technology-Refresh (TR), revision 3, stage D, in Block 4 upgrades (Block 4.1, 4.2, etc, onwards)...
Idk why you’re comparing these legendary aircraft to a Russian hoax plane 😅 they don’t even have more than 5 operational. The ones seen have screws sticking out and tape on the wings 🤦. SU-57 is 🗑️
F35 is the greatest fighter jet ever because it has "Stealth". But is is much slower than SU57 J20 J35. Yeh it got better Stealth. But is is much less maneuverable than the SU57 J20 J35. Yeh F35 got better Stealth. But is has much less climb ability than SU57 J20 J35. Yeh the F35 got better Stealth. But is does not have supersonic cruise like SU57 J20 J35. Yeh the F35 got better Stealth. But the F35 has much less combat range than SU57 J20 J35. Yeh the F35 got better Stealth. But the F35 has much shorter range air to air missiles than SU57 J20 J35. Yeh the F35 got better Stealth. The F35 is multi role fighter bomber while SU57 J20 J35 are air superiority fighter optimized for air combat. Yeh the F35 got better stealth. The F35 peer adversaries has the best EW tools in the world with ability to nullify and jam comms. But the F35 has the BEST stealth. The SU57 J20 J34 has avionic at least on par if not better than the F35. Yeh but the F35 has better stealth. But the latest avionic radar can see "stealth". WTF!
If you want to lose a war buy American weapons systems. The best overrated, overpriced and very problematic systems there is on the market. Its backed by the USA's performance on the battlefield. It tied in the Korean war and lost in Vietnam and Afghanistan.
@@hanzmedina7 Its all on public record. IF American weapons systems are so good why isn't there no correlation in winning conflicts the USA has been involved in? If you, like this site believe the opposite then you might as well believe in Santa Clause and the Easter bunny exist also and instead of commenting here go to children's sites and play there and leave these sites to the adults.
@@hanzmedina7 Did you know the USA spent 20 years in Afghanistan and lost to mere peasants armed with 50 year old Kalashnikovs and IED's? It is the world's most humiliating defeat in the history of warfare.
@@spartanconscience2693 The humiliation of Afghanistan will be nothing compared to the NATO/US/Proxy Ukraine debacle. The entire world is watching as every US military superiority myth is getting exposed and demolished in real time. Only the heavily censored brainwashed American and EU sheeples don't know.
Did you know The US lost on average 1 man every 3.5 days and at one point went 18 months without a a single loss?. Did you know the US lost more men in traing accidents world wide than were killed in Afganistan?. Did you know the US did not engage in total warefare against any government but instead built schools , roads and hospitals?. Did you know not One US base was ever over run by the Taliban? Did you know the Taliban hid out and resupplied in Pakistan where our soldiers were not allowed to fight them?. Did you know that the US military armed trained and supplied the Afgan Army and then left as planned. Did you know the US millitary was not defeated in any way? I had friends that were there. They fought way too nice. Rules of engagement were such that a Taliban could be dressed as a civillian wave and smile at you as you walked by. Then as you went by he shot you in the back. That's gorilla war. Gorilla war can not be defeated without just rounding up and killing everyone that moves. Same thing in Vietnam US had so much fire power we weren't defeated. If you look at no of deaths per side it was overwhelmingly one sided. US troops would give out candy bars and try and befriend the villagers. The Vietcong would see a village that had been friendly and helpful to the Americans and come in and kill every one. The US left Vietnam because it became politically unpopular at home not because we were defeated on the battle field . Even during the famous TET offensive which turned political opinion against the war the US forces still drove the Vietcong out and defeated them millitaraly. If we hadcwaged the war the same way we fought WW2 it could have been over quickly. If we had sent the US Navy into Hi foung harbor and landed 50,000 marines in Hanoi it would have been over. Instead we Allowed Russian ships full of supplies to unload and be shipped into the jungle. Think what would have happened if all those supplies and missiles never got there in the first place. @spartanconscence2693
The F-100 Super Sabre? The catfish that was made during the Vietnam war? The F-100 that has a max speed (926.6mph) that is 400mph slower than the F35 (1200mph)? 1200 definitely sounds slower than 926. Mhmm.
HAHAHAHA !@LOSERS NEVER WILL IT HAPPEN SU-57 IS A PIECE OF SHIT COMPARED TO F-35Q OR OLDER THIS IS STEALTH PLANE SU-IS NOT & TERRIBLE IN BATTLES RADAR IS NO GOOD AT DISTANCE DEFENSIVE OF SU-57 IS NOT COMPATIBLE W/F-35Q WHEN USA SAYS IT IS JUNK ITS BECAUSE THEY TESTED THAT SU-57 THE NEW F-15EX/F-18TAX, F-22 BLOC 4 IS THE BEST JET PLANES EVER MADE IT AS QUALITY THAT NO OTHERS JET PLANES AS IN THE AIR THAT IS WHY USA AS CLOSE TO 2200 F-35 JET IN THE AIR SU-57 ONLY 8 LEFT AS UKRAINE KILLED 6 OF THEM IN UKRAINE W/MANPADS LOL @!
The trouble for a half dozen SU57s is they aren’t actually 5th gen but just a tad lower observable up against over a thousand actual 5th gen. This not even counting the F22 which just added new long range capability which the SU57 can’t compete with. Fun to dream though
650mi is a long way to fly just to get shot down. ooooor 650mi is a long way to try and limp home(1300mi round trip)......without getting shot down. lol
Combat range of both F-35A and F-35C is around 750 - 800 nmi (1390 - 1480km). NOT 1080km. And this is before the engine core upgrade. Also its only 12700 kgf NOT 13000 kgf dry thrust and 19500 kgf NOT 9500 kgf afterburner thrust. Additionally F-22 has the largest wing 2nd only to SU-57 with its F-119 engine producing the most thrust. So its combat range is comparable if not more than either Su-57 and J-20. According to f-16()net, it can reach 2000km+ going at Mach 1 at 50k feet. Lastly, R37M is a big and heavy missile. US equivalent is AIM-174B that will be carried by F18E/F maybe even F-15EX in the future. Then their is still Raytheon's LREW or Boeing's LRAAM.
I thought this info was wrong because I know that the F 35 engine is the strongest single engine ever made. I also know that they say it's 43, 000 lbs of thrust, which in all honesty from sources in the military say that it's 50,000lbs of thrust! Could you please explain KG and KGF? Is that just the conversion of kilograms?
Have you seen the ERAAM and CAAM missiles, and if so, thoughts?
@@scottmcauley5781 kg is a standard unit of mass, while kgf is a non-standard gravitational unit of force. Conversion is 1 kgf =~ 9.807 N =~ 2.205 lbf. Also when mentioning thrust in British gravitational units its lbf NOT lbs. So its 43,000 lbf or 50,000 lbf
@@scottmcauley5781 Don't know much about CAAM. But AIM-174B or air-launched SM-6/ERAAM will be a massive boon for USN if not a game changer. It's a very versatile missile as its a dual purpose long range air-to-air missile/anti-ship missile. So its like Chinese PL-17, Russian R-37 and Kinzhal combined. While also only half the price of Kinzhal. Only issue is the production numbers. They could at least improve it to 500 a year if not more.
@@johnsilver9338 is it just me or should civilians not be able to know this for national security reasons
They've been talking about that new motor forever ?
It's about time to stop messing around and get it done !
🇺🇸
Adaptive cycle is hard.
Patience @alphabet, patience.
The tag is misleading, there is little to no information about the Q variant
I’ve never witnessed such awesome editing as this one.
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏HOLY HOLY HOLY LORD GOD ALMIGHTY WHO WAS WHO IS AND WHO IS TO COME
There were more errors and mistakes than my last algebra exam :/
Go Air Force!
So... what about the F-35Q? This video did not address that far as I can tell. Maybe I should watch it again, but probably will not.
As a US citizen born and raised First Quality and quantity need 2 B looked into.. an also need not known or talked-about or posted on any internet for future to come..
You make no sense
@andreww1225 I think he's saying that America has quality and quantity over all others and that we shouldn't be talking about it on the internet. I agree on the sense of speaking of our capabilities, and why our military would talk about them. Keeping secrecy is huge. Why talk about America having a 6 th generation fighter and it's capabilities, and wouldn't the military want to veil it in secrecy?
Makes ZERO sense. Have you seen China's Space Program? Where do you think they pulled a Delta IV heavy rocket out of thin air, Space Shuttle, Moon Landers and Fighter jet's that look an awful lot like Lockheed Martin aircraft, without ever purchasing one of them from the USA?
Espionage. Isn't dead or James Bond and if anyone in the US Millitary cared, nobody could even post a word, without being instantly censored.
Lighten up! Be less heavy, and feel the freedom of being more wiggy!
Thought we were building Trans warp drones!
Quantity wins every time!
It depends on the level of quality vs the level of quantity. But generally speaking, I agree.
quality takes on quantity if you have both then winner
Um production capacity of US vs China? Quantity? Lockheed Patriot capacity of 600 missiles per year. Joke is the word that comes to mind. Oh and how's the 155mm shell production coming along?
@@GenghisX999 yeah we are completely screwed with the Obama regime . I meant Biden harris whoever is destroying the USA.
@@clatoris69That came from Stalin in WW2 his 100,000 crappy tanks and 40million man army overwhelmed the Germans 3.5 million man army and superior tanks. They couldn't kill them fast enough. The Russians had thousands of troops stations back to shoot their own troops if they retreated. Same thing during the Korean War. The US had pushed the North all the way to the Chinese boarder. Then the Chinese sent 1 million troops across and we couldn't kill them fast enough. Ever watch the movie ZULU DAWN. natives with spears defeated the British Army with bolt action rifles. They just couldn't shoot them fast enough. The ZULU king sat on the hill watching the rate his men were slaughtered then he just trippled the number of men he charged into battle and overran the British positions
Su57 is 4th generation it has little stealth and isn’t in production
If all of you would order it, it would enter production. Holly Jesus, starting the serial production line for the client's money is such a poor move.
your voice is some kind of high frequency weapon
Now 19 countries with Greece !
Quality
The TR-3, (Technology Refresh-3) in revisions, A - B - C - D, is the backbone for the Block 4 F-35 Lightning II upgrades, delivering upgraded harpoons, sensors, data processing, target acquisition and enhanced sensor capabilities, in a collaboration between Boeing, BAE systems, Northrop Grumman and Lockheed Martin. TR-3A began being deployed in January 2023, with TR-3B in 2025, concluding in final revision D, expected to be completed in 2029. January 6, 2023, 461st Flight Squadron's first flight of F-35 Technology Refresh 3 (TR-3), was at Edwards Air Force Base, California.
"Quantity has a quality all its own."
Stalin nearly lost the war if it wasn't for the Land Lease supplying his troops with guns and planes.
WTF.... I thought the title of this video was supposed to talk about the F35s against China instead of Russia????
Quantity has a quality of its own.
This sentence can fly only if you assume quality and quantity are both qualities, that is both are values. No, Stalin did not say that.
The proper sentence sounds like this:
"Quality is a value and quantity is a value. Repeting the obvious 'quantity has a value of its own' sounds stupid."
100,000 infantry won't make a tank crew no matter what.
But hey, it was Soviet Russia so ridiculous shit can=will happen if you force the shit to become a tanker. Shit won't drive a tank but you did a great job with your Makarov shooting it in the process.
I’m loving this but i don’t think this info should be on TH-cam
Why? Think China is going to steal it? lol
Good news, good to see the US making this incredible machine ❤❤❤
Up stip over tilt turn
It's stuff like this that keeps Putin up at night.
They speak of their F35D just like they spoke of their Abrams. What happened to their Abrams in Ukraine?
Do your research and you’ll find out, those Abrams were extremely stripped down. (Google is your friend it can save you from saying dumb things)
@@michaeldietz2648 my research tells me abrams is bullshit.
@@michaeldietz2648 pathetic excuse for a failure.
@@chinhuattan did you think the 10 Abrams would out last 5,000 Russian tanks ? Maybe your expectation are a bit high ?
Just sayin !?
But at this point it doesn't matter cause Russia's about out of Tanks anyways, wont be long now !
Poor little Putler lost all his Tanks 😫😭
😂🤣😉
🇺🇸 🏴☠️
@@user-hc5of8xk3r Then what is the logic sending only 10 tanks? From what I saw/read it was one on one. Another pathetic excuse for a failure.
The F35 has a LARGER Radar Cross-Section than the F22 (if the F22 RAM coating is in tact).
Tell me they did NOT just play an edited version of the "Rendezook" clip from the BF2042 trailer lol.....rhetorical question....they did! Haha
Please use imperial and metric, thank you
Why are you mentioning where to F-35's are based in?
Sorry to say you’re wrong. The F-22 is cheaper and cost less to operate. The military was so set to get the F35 it stop production of the F-22. The F-35 is still having trouble. A large number are grounding
This video said the US military is going to spend the next 10 years "modernizing" the F-35 to finally match the performance capabilities of the F-22, which of course is an older plane. Crazy.
@timlane5445 F-22 cost $143m (in 2005 dollars), which is over $191m today. Lot 17 F-35 (current) is $78m a piece. F-22 costs $85k per flight hour to operate. The F-35 costs $42k per flight-hour.
Is he really say that the su-57 has more low observability then F-22 because that's obviously false the f22 has more stealth than any other fighter
Try hydro electric idea for trust
They have to 'modernize' F-35's to be equal with an OLDER fighter, the F-22? What's wrong with this picture?
How many SU57 are there in service? 😂
74
2
@@ingzimmerman899😂😂😂 nope they only have a few and haven’t even started fully producing them. They can’t get all the parts to build them because of sanctions. Russia relied heavily on the west for new technology and plane parts.
@@ingzimmerman899
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
They have 74 on order. There are only about 15 total with ten of those being prototypes.
They have less than 20, and about 4 of them are test planes and not combat ready.
F-35 doesn't hold a candle to an F-22.
In many areas of performance the F35 is superior.
SMH, buy stealth and put underwing hard points on it defeating your stealth. Stupid Stupid Stupid.
It's the best mix of quality, quantity, support, logistics, training, and manufacturing. The F-35's will probably never fly alone. In Europe, F-35s will fly with typhoons, vigens and dassult, f-15, and f-16 aircraft flown by our allies and coordinated over link-16. Likewise, in the Middle East, American, Israeli, Saudi, and UAE aircraft are being coordinated with assets from our carrier task force. The same will be true in the Pacific with the addition of indigenous aircraft from Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, and Australia. Russia may never again be in a position to partner with anyone. Even China sees that an open partnership isn't possible. So when talking numbers nationalism is no longer relevant. Cooperative consortiums are the future!
We have both Quantity and Quality while Russia has a plane held together with self tapping screws. for 1 SU-57 there will be about 400 F-35's hunting it down..
F-35Q? What happened to versions D through P?
XQ-58-A Valkyrie, is the only Q in the eQuation. Both the F-35B and C aircraft were designed to be able to carry up to 24 Small Diameter Bomb II (SDB II) [Raytheon Stormbreaker GBU-53/B] weapons. Eight (8) weapons, for internal carriage, will be approved for use under the Block 4 program.
The aircraft can carry an additional 16 weapons externally on the four wing pylons, pending operational requirements, depending on the needs of the services.
F-35 Lightning II Joint Program Office spokesman Michael Land, stated via email in mid-August, 2020.
“Initial capability release on the F-35B is planned for 2022, and full capability on all three variants is planned for 2023.” Covid-19... delayed but back in track and Block 4.2 / 4.3 are going live already. It concludes with Technology-Refresh (TR), revision 3, stage D, in Block 4 upgrades (Block 4.1, 4.2, etc, onwards)...
Both,
It will be a failure unless the carriers have spares unlike nowadays when the have none on board and no repair facilities within range !
Usually, Russian fighters jet have longer range, faster and more features than US fighter jets. also, it is low cost maintenance.
But low accuracy
No they’re not.
Your information is incorrect
SU 57 is gen 4.5
The SU-57 is still a very minor threat since the -57 is being produced in VERY small numbers.
Sure isn't very fast. Infact it seems to be a very slow bird
What does the Su57 and this had to do with China and Taiwan?
Idk why you’re comparing these legendary aircraft to a Russian hoax plane 😅 they don’t even have more than 5 operational. The ones seen have screws sticking out and tape on the wings 🤦. SU-57 is 🗑️
WJLA
F35 is the greatest fighter jet ever because it has "Stealth". But is is much slower than SU57 J20 J35. Yeh it got better Stealth. But is is much less maneuverable than the SU57 J20 J35. Yeh F35
got better Stealth. But is has much less climb ability than SU57 J20 J35. Yeh the F35 got better Stealth. But is does not have supersonic cruise like SU57 J20 J35. Yeh the F35 got better Stealth. But the F35 has much less combat range than SU57 J20 J35. Yeh the F35 got better Stealth. But the F35 has much shorter range air to air missiles than SU57 J20 J35. Yeh the F35 got better Stealth. The F35 is multi role fighter bomber while SU57 J20 J35 are air superiority fighter optimized for air combat. Yeh the F35 got better stealth. The F35 peer adversaries has the best EW tools in the world with ability to nullify and jam comms. But the F35 has the BEST stealth. The SU57 J20 J34 has avionic at least on par if not better than the F35. Yeh but the F35 has better stealth. But the latest avionic radar can see "stealth". WTF!
JAJA good joke like adding a Q letter solve the 800 + problems and creates quality and quantity. Pueril cartoonish fantasy.
If you want to lose a war buy American weapons systems. The best overrated, overpriced and very problematic systems there is on the market. Its backed by the USA's performance on the battlefield. It tied in the Korean war and lost in Vietnam and Afghanistan.
🤡
@@hanzmedina7 Its all on public record. IF American weapons systems are so good why isn't there no correlation in winning conflicts the USA has been involved in?
If you, like this site believe the opposite then you might as well believe in Santa Clause and the Easter bunny exist also and instead of commenting here go to children's sites and play there and leave these sites to the adults.
@@hanzmedina7 Did you know the USA spent 20 years in Afghanistan and lost to mere peasants armed with 50 year old Kalashnikovs and IED's?
It is the world's most humiliating defeat in the history of warfare.
@@spartanconscience2693 The humiliation of Afghanistan will be nothing compared to the NATO/US/Proxy Ukraine debacle. The entire world is watching as every US military superiority myth is getting exposed and demolished in real time. Only the heavily censored brainwashed American and EU sheeples don't know.
Did you know The US lost on average 1 man every 3.5 days and at one point went 18 months without a a single loss?. Did you know the US lost more men in traing accidents world wide than were killed in Afganistan?. Did you know the US did not engage in total warefare against any government but instead built schools , roads and hospitals?. Did you know not One US base was ever over run by the Taliban? Did you know the Taliban hid out and resupplied in Pakistan where our soldiers were not allowed to fight them?. Did you know that the US military armed trained and supplied the Afgan Army and then left as planned. Did you know the US millitary was not defeated in any way? I had friends that were there. They fought way too nice. Rules of engagement were such that a Taliban could be dressed as a civillian wave and smile at you as you walked by. Then as you went by he shot you in the back. That's gorilla war. Gorilla war can not be defeated without just rounding up and killing everyone that moves. Same thing in Vietnam US had so much fire power we weren't defeated. If you look at no of deaths per side it was overwhelmingly one sided. US troops would give out candy bars and try and befriend the villagers. The Vietcong would see a village that had been friendly and helpful to the Americans and come in and kill every one. The US left Vietnam because it became politically unpopular at home not because we were defeated on the battle field . Even during the famous TET offensive which turned political opinion against the war the US forces still drove the Vietcong out and defeated them millitaraly. If we hadcwaged the war the same way we fought WW2 it could have been over quickly. If we had sent the US Navy into Hi foung harbor and landed 50,000 marines in Hanoi it would have been over. Instead we Allowed Russian ships full of supplies to unload and be shipped into the jungle. Think what would have happened if all those supplies and missiles never got there in the first place. @spartanconscence2693
You actually believe that Russian nonsense after all that's happened.
At least half the stuff you say is true and that's pretty good for TH-cam.
F 35 is slow, slow and comparable to the F100 Lead Sled.
The F-100 Super Sabre? The catfish that was made during the Vietnam war? The F-100 that has a max speed (926.6mph) that is 400mph slower than the F35 (1200mph)? 1200 definitely sounds slower than 926. Mhmm.
@@Chief12314 we called it the lead sled because its heavy takeoff and maneuvers. It sure took a hitting and kept on clicking.
@@Smithsj82 ok yeah I get that, but its so much slower compared to the F35? so how are you comparing the two
well how much of this info is true cause yo people lie to much use the kie as an intimidation tactics well time wll tell
The F35 would get absolutely MAULED in a dogfight against n SU57!
It wouldn't even be close!
SU 57 would never see it and it hasn't been proven in real time. so nonsense.
🤡🤡🤡
HAHAHAHA !@LOSERS NEVER WILL IT HAPPEN SU-57 IS A PIECE OF SHIT COMPARED TO F-35Q OR OLDER THIS IS STEALTH PLANE SU-IS NOT & TERRIBLE IN BATTLES RADAR IS NO GOOD AT DISTANCE DEFENSIVE OF SU-57 IS NOT COMPATIBLE W/F-35Q WHEN USA SAYS IT IS JUNK ITS BECAUSE THEY TESTED THAT SU-57 THE NEW F-15EX/F-18TAX, F-22
BLOC 4 IS THE BEST JET PLANES EVER MADE IT AS QUALITY THAT NO OTHERS JET PLANES AS IN THE AIR THAT IS WHY USA AS CLOSE TO 2200 F-35 JET IN THE AIR SU-57 ONLY 8 LEFT AS UKRAINE KILLED 6 OF THEM IN UKRAINE W/MANPADS LOL @!
Would not be a dogfight 35 with down before he saw it
The trouble for a half dozen SU57s is they aren’t actually 5th gen but just a tad lower observable up against over a thousand actual 5th gen. This not even counting the F22 which just added new long range capability which the SU57 can’t compete with.
Fun to dream though
650mi is a long way to fly just to get shot down. ooooor 650mi is a long way to try and limp home(1300mi round trip)......without getting shot down. lol
Shouldn't this be classified as top secret. Exposing this to scare opponents is pure propaganda.
Deterrence.
So basically Su57 is making F35 variants to invest. cool @@AlphaDefense