BeZero's carbon ratings are objectively terrible.

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 9

  • @eliasayrey5188
    @eliasayrey5188  2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    It seems that two days after this video came out BeZero downgraded the scores of some of these rotten projects. Good I guess.. But these weren't totally cherry picked examples. I actually took out a bunch more examples from the video to cut down the time. The problem is obviously systemic.

  • @eliasayrey5188
    @eliasayrey5188  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    DISCLAIMER: I am not in any way affiliated with Pachama. I stopped working for them in Sept. 2021. The opinions and data in this video do not in any way reflect their own.

  • @googlejustletemlikethingsa3370
    @googlejustletemlikethingsa3370 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    There is only one thing worse than no information, and that is bad information!

  • @louiswang498
    @louiswang498 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, may I know what are your thoughts on 1113 Valparaiso? what makes it better?

  • @kadnify
    @kadnify 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’d trust a transparent ratings system/protocol from you Elias. Chicanery be damned!

  • @003angeli
    @003angeli ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes! please do something about carbon ratings. I want to know what makes a good project good, and a bad project bad.
    Thank you's from an intern on a project developer company (I've heard that the project that they made before was good according to you! So want to hear your thought process about it)

  • @danieluslander8940
    @danieluslander8940 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent points but "full disclosure.....I may be a competitor in the near future"....that shows up in the last 15 seconds of your video? You trashed yourself for no reason. The disclosure should have appeared first, not last. Full disclosure: I have no dog in this fight.

    • @eliasayrey5188
      @eliasayrey5188  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I made this video before I had decided to co-found Renoster. We only got started in July. At the time I was considering this or starting an NGO.
      Regardless, I provide countless examples with satellite imagery. The source of the information isn't relevant. If you don't believe me about Luangwa's baseline, go look at it yourself to confirm what I've said. Go examine NIHT Tapayo on Google Earth and see its deforestation. These are public datasets.