I think its just to show us how cruel & narsististic they are 'ie the bbc' what they have done to people who genuinly have disabilities having their money reduced & simply just to attack ' is nothing short of what hitler would do ' there just vile ' one of their children could end up ill ' they would get disability money for them' ie their own ' their just twisted & evil & vile 🤢 havn't got anytime for spoilt vile people of this nature 🤮
Like Reform UK Limited, the IEA. with not a single democratically elected representative, still manages to be overrepresented on political programmes. Strange. Instead of asking HER about funding, panelists should be asking Bruce and Dale to give full disclosure on the background of these organisations. Demand to know. And if the answer is 'we don't know/they wouldn't tell us', then they shouldn't be given a platform.
She always tries to give the impression that the IEA's donors are ordinary individual members of the public who could be intimidated if exposed, whereas of course we can be certain they are actually large wealthy interests which stand to gain from its policies at the expense of the rest of us.
This is by far the most important issue in UK Politics in recent years. This is the attempt to introduce U.S. style mega corruption into British politics.
Theres one crucial statement she makes which is quite telling when using the Max Moseley rebuttle "arent quite so squeaky clean EITHER" - suggesting she knows damn well the financiers of her employers are as dodgy as they come
Think tanks left or right are a form of lobbying, which circumnavigates the need for cash for questions which is illegal, what ever happened to constituents communitys being the focus of mp’s actions in parliament? The whole system is broken
Donors should not be allowed anonymity if they 'donate' a large amount and expect easier access to politicians than other people - that is antidemocratic.
Think tanks. Behind the scenes influencers. They have a lot of clout among some MP's. We should know who funds them if they've such an input into who shapes our lives.
She needs to get it into her head that she is only on the shows as a rep for the IEA. She is not there as herself. No more than a MP is there as themselves, they are there a representative of their political party.
The BBC are now firmly in the pockets of the US funded right wing brigade thanks Boris. If having think tanks on the BBC is valid why not all of them, why only a few and this one the most. Surely balance would be achieved if both right and left and centre think tanks of which there are many are given a chance. If the BBC did that as they should we might here from the IEA once every five years instead of every week. So bad is this BBC bias they are more represented than the Greens as are reform who have ZERO MPs and next to no real support (see council elections) other than polling companies who get it wrong every time.
They should be honest and upfront as to where their funding comes from before they are allowed on these programmes. They have a big influence on the way this country is run, but like Tory funding its very shady.
She looks to have responded by becoming a presenter. Kitchen too hot or just recognised as not knowing what they are talking about,and done ssoooo much harm as politicians who can’t think for themselves and screw the whole Nation.
If only big pharma had no input to clinical safety trials, or the tobacco industry had never lobbied MPs, or the sugar baron wasn't married to the health sec.
The question has to be why LBC and BBC (especially BBC) continue to put these people on say, Question Time? PS .. Fiona, where Nigel Farage lately? Out of fashion? 😂🇬🇧
Carver wouldnt be pyshing her extreme views if it wasnt the dact that she is funded. That is why we need to know who is funding her to say what they want
She represents the same people who use phrases like, "the will of the people" and words like "democracy" when it suits them but refuse to say who pays the rent for their Tufton Street address.
It's always hilarious to watch the angry smile of a Tory trying to mask indignation at being scrutinised & the creeping realisation that their 'spin' is starting to unravel. Also, the IEA recruitment process would seem dysfunctional. What were the other candidates like? Even more ridiculous grinning ninnys?
The priveledge one ' but to be fair ' shes not that bad ' its farage & patrick cristie that get on my nerves ' they are so self entitled ' & just assume everyone else is loaded 😁
She’s a danger to society
As long as she is allowed to open her oversized cakehole, she isn't.
she's a traitor to the ordinary people of the country.
She's a traitor
They are a treacherous bunch!
She doesn't answer a question but just shouts and deflects, a good tactic when the hosts don't make it a requirement.
Emily love's her London Bankers and Wall Street Pirates.
Why do the BBC keep on platforming these people from the IEA, the Taxpayers Alliance etc. ?
Exactly! Impartial, my @rse! 👍
I thought she was a newsreader on GBeebies but the C5 Jeremy Vine show described her as a commentator.
@@alfsmith4936 She does both.
@@JHatLpool She must be the busiest grifter in the country.
I think its just to show us how cruel & narsististic they are 'ie the bbc' what they have done to people who genuinly have disabilities having their money reduced & simply just to attack ' is nothing short of what hitler would do ' there just vile ' one of their children could end up ill ' they would get disability money for them' ie their own ' their just twisted & evil & vile 🤢 havn't got anytime for spoilt vile people of this nature 🤮
She's angry and entitled
Daddy, I want a pony!
And I used to take a hockey stick to school and play the violin.
Entitled personified
But not a French one.
Keep up the campaign. This is one of the most neglected corruption scandals in UK politics.
The Institute of Money Laundering.
A very, very weird woman.
This women has a spot on GB news dosnt that say it all.
She's never less than hilarious.
Carver Understands Nothing Today
Yeah but nobody cares about HER opinions, they care about the opinion of the IEA. Who she represents, so who is she representing?
Like Reform UK Limited, the IEA. with not a single democratically elected representative, still manages to be overrepresented on political programmes. Strange. Instead of asking HER about funding, panelists should be asking Bruce and Dale to give full disclosure on the background of these organisations. Demand to know. And if the answer is 'we don't know/they wouldn't tell us', then they shouldn't be given a platform.
tufton street has far too much influence and is on these type of shows far too much.
👍🎯 💯
Yet another example of political discussion programs lousy panel choices.
If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the facts aren't on your side, pound on the table and fake outrage.
Typical Fiona Bruce defending populist rhetoric
isn't her husband a Tory MP?
I want to know who is behind the MPs we elected as I didn't vote for the likes of the IEA
She always tries to give the impression that the IEA's donors are ordinary individual members of the public who could be intimidated if exposed, whereas of course we can be certain they are actually large wealthy interests which stand to gain from its policies at the expense of the rest of us.
She represents Britains MAGA group!
This is by far the most important issue in UK Politics in recent years. This is the attempt to introduce U.S. style mega corruption into British politics.
Vladimir Putin could be funding her today and nobody would know .....! due transparency please.
"Methinks thou doth protest too much"
The truth is the truth Emily
Boris Johnston is alive and well and living inside an Emily Carter.
What an evil person
Theres one crucial statement she makes which is quite telling when using the Max Moseley rebuttle "arent quite so squeaky clean EITHER" - suggesting she knows damn well the financiers of her employers are as dodgy as they come
Added to that, it's hardly Max Mosley's fault his father was a fascist.
These people are dangerous,and have too much influence,this one in particular is a snippy one. ELECTION NOW PLEASE!
Think tanks left or right are a form of lobbying, which circumnavigates the need for cash for questions which is illegal, what ever happened to constituents communitys being the focus of mp’s actions in parliament? The whole system is broken
A slip of a girl with hardly any life experience apart from mummy and daddy
Donors should not be allowed anonymity if they 'donate' a large amount and expect easier access to politicians than other people - that is antidemocratic.
Corporatists don't like democracy .
The IEA buy media time
Why do these people get on MSM
Who do you think funds their little lobbying groups?
Think tanks. Behind the scenes influencers. They have a lot of clout among some MP's. We should know who funds them if they've such an input into who shapes our lives.
People who crave anonymity invariably have something to hide…
Slippery as a barrel full of eels.
IEA Not very clear thinkers are they !
She needs to get it into her head that she is only on the shows as a rep for the IEA. She is not there as herself. No more than a MP is there as themselves, they are there a representative of their political party.
The BBC are now firmly in the pockets of the US funded right wing brigade thanks Boris.
If having think tanks on the BBC is valid why not all of them, why only a few and this one the most. Surely balance would be achieved if both right and left and centre think tanks of which there are many are given a chance. If the BBC did that as they should we might here from the IEA once every five years instead of every week.
So bad is this BBC bias they are more represented than the Greens as are reform who have ZERO MPs and next to no real support (see council elections) other than polling companies who get it wrong every time.
They should be honest and upfront as to where their funding comes from before they are allowed on these programmes. They have a big influence on the way this country is run, but like Tory funding its very shady.
That 'son of an actual fascist' line always stuck with me as moronic and desperate...
All you have to say is Liz truss and Kwasi
Influenced by Mark Littlewood of the IEA,who Truss tried to put in the H of L in her resignation honours list,but it was blocked.
@@user-im8us6sg5d I'd forgotten that
why is she on TV telling US that we're lazy, thick and don't know our arse from our elbow....WHY??
Should be transparent if they have influence and any ear. Period
Emily tries but misunderstands.
She's often inclined to borrow somebody's dreams 'til tomorrow.
She looks to have responded by becoming a presenter. Kitchen too hot or just recognised as not knowing what they are talking about,and done ssoooo much harm as politicians who can’t think for themselves and screw the whole Nation.
If only big pharma had no input to clinical safety trials, or the tobacco industry had never lobbied MPs, or the sugar baron wasn't married to the health sec.
"they're not so squeaky clean either"? She's admitting her donors are not, then?
The question has to be why LBC and BBC (especially BBC) continue to put these people on say, Question Time? PS .. Fiona, where Nigel Farage lately? Out of fashion? 😂🇬🇧
I agree ,but to add one more thing ,faeces farage should be out of the country .
@@chrisstones1249He's considering a job offer with Trump in the USA. A true patriot wouldn't have to think twice to refuse.
@@user-im8us6sg5d👍👍👍👍👍👍
Who funds the IEA ?
Enemies of the species .
Big oil , big pharma, banks , arms manufacturers and tobacco corporations .a real axis of evil
I want to thank the BBC for giving them enough time to demonstrate how vile they are. Job done. Next.
She reminds me of Bridget Jones. A woman still struggling to make sense of her career.
I hate this woman
She works hard for her money.
😂😂😂😂
She'll scweam and scweam and scweam until she's sick.
Vile person
Poisonous ferret
Don’t trust her! Her eyes are too close together. And that hair colour??? Yeoh! Run Away!
Vile individual
WHAT A NIGHTMARE SHE IS
Carver wouldnt be pyshing her extreme views if it wasnt the dact that she is funded. That is why we need to know who is funding her to say what they want
That false smile is nauseating.
M u n t e r 😮
She represents the same people who use phrases like, "the will of the people" and words like "democracy" when it suits them but refuse to say who pays the rent for their Tufton Street address.
She gets really heated whenever this topic is brought up.
It's always hilarious to watch the angry smile of a Tory trying to mask indignation at being scrutinised & the creeping realisation that their 'spin' is starting to unravel. Also, the IEA recruitment process would seem dysfunctional. What were the other candidates like? Even more ridiculous grinning ninnys?
Another Tory liar.
The priveledge one ' but to be fair ' shes not that bad ' its farage & patrick cristie that get on my nerves ' they are so self entitled ' & just assume everyone else is loaded 😁
Patrick is her fiancée. They're like a pound shop Lice and Oaksnot.
Rotten to the core & should not be allowed air time!
She are Jew who supported by Israeli companies
How come this comment is allowed when most of mine get censored?