The 5 Most Powerful Destroyers In The World Today

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 พ.ค. 2024
  • A destroyer, in naval parlance, refers to a swift and agile warship designed for extended periods at sea. Its primary purpose is to safeguard larger boats within a fleet, convoy, or carrier battle group by countering a diverse array of potential dangers. These boats, designed to protect the oceans, were meticulously constructed using cutting-edge technology and equipped with the most formidable weaponry. These ships represent the highest level of military engineering, characterised by their sleek designs, advanced weaponry, and state-of-the-art technology. They demonstrate the unparalleled power and resolute will of their nations.
    FAIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
    * Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
    The Buzz does not own the rights to these videos and pictures. They have, in accordance with fair use, been repurposed with the intent of educating and inspiring others. However, if any content owners would like their images removed, please contact us by email at-thebuzz938@gmail.com.
  • บันเทิง

ความคิดเห็น • 781

  • @tanagra2
    @tanagra2 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Another brilliant video thank you

  • @luoyanyang7625
    @luoyanyang7625 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +73

    Without Type 055, this list is a BS.

    • @user-wp5kx7tv1v
      @user-wp5kx7tv1v 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      055是战略舰 和这些打杂的驱逐舰没办法列入一个报表😂😂

    • @amalielynmead
      @amalielynmead 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      055是驱逐舰,被划在巡洋舰范畴,不是什么战略舰,而且根本没有这个战略舰的说法。@@user-wp5kx7tv1v

    • @junma00118
      @junma00118 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      因为055一上,美国就不是第一了,那这个视频就不正确了。

    • @ricosu192
      @ricosu192 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      他们把055放到巡洋舰。

    • @indiano.1.
      @indiano.1. 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      ​@@junma00118想多了,这个人的视频,美国永远第一,有055的视频里,他把猪母放第一的

  • @sweatybotfn9982
    @sweatybotfn9982 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    The type 055 is technically a destroyer because dispute it’s water displacement of 10 000 tons, it is created and used for destroyer “type” operations

    • @talentpt
      @talentpt 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      apparently this video puts Sejong the great class with 11000 tons displacement as destroyer. So that is not an issue

    • @sweatybotfn9982
      @sweatybotfn9982 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@talentpt exactly so it’s false

  • @webdeveloper2432
    @webdeveloper2432 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +70

    Please update the video. Didn't include Vishakapatnam class destroyer which is the most advanced destroyer from India. Kolkata class mentioned in the list is a decade old one but surprisingly it is doing much better than current ones in the world. Equipped with Brahmos, Vishakapatnam class destroyer's attack capabilities are far superior than the ones mentioned in the list. With Barak 8 defence, it is near impossible to get attacked by any missile.

    • @ChandranPrema123
      @ChandranPrema123 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Vishakapatanam is same as Kolkata but with better stealth,less crew and better radios .
      Improvements are very minor

    • @webdeveloper2432
      @webdeveloper2432 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      @@ChandranPrema123 Weapons package is what makes a warship deadly. Weapons upgrade and stealth are not minor improvements in a battlefield.

    • @nps7742
      @nps7742 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      ​@@ChandranPrema123its not same, even the look is different

    • @amuxpatch2798
      @amuxpatch2798 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@webdeveloper2432 The longer the ship and higher the hull ,easy target for anti ship missiles from land based missile systems and enemy ships with longer range missiles.

    • @TianpengXian
      @TianpengXian 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      why Indian people always so confident😂

  • @BHARATIYA_TIGER
    @BHARATIYA_TIGER 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +92

    Kolkata Class even though is Stealth destroyer with multiple role but it's a Generation behind and Vishakapatnam Class is the one on the list.

    • @frankfleming1103
      @frankfleming1103 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I don't think so ugly ship can bulid by human, tell me it is not real, I can't accept there is so ugly ship like Vishakapatanam and Kolkata exist on real world, any normal human above 3 years old can't design such ships

    • @SUCHITCHOUDHURY
      @SUCHITCHOUDHURY 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@frankfleming1103 Hmm..Glad ko know that you have 0 understanding of military vessels. THis is not a beauty pageant you simple minded jackfruit. Any one of this ships is more than sufficient to reduce a city to rubble. You can stick to your fishing boats.

    • @tarrytao7508
      @tarrytao7508 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      ​@@frankfleming1103So you judge destroyers by their beauty.. are you a fool or what.. It's not ship for your personal tour.. so for convenience, next time they will do make up of the ship before sending it to war

    • @Jordan-du6fu
      @Jordan-du6fu 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      ​@@frankfleming1103A Kolkata class came here to New Zealand not long ago and i think they look great.

    • @TheGreatMarathaArmy
      @TheGreatMarathaArmy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@frankfleming1103 You're below 3 years 😂😂😂

  • @ylstorage7085
    @ylstorage7085 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Great list to show us from which Counties people watch this Channel!

  • @user-yi3xt9jo5d
    @user-yi3xt9jo5d 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    If the Chinese 052d destroyer ranks the 3th, how about hhe 055D? It is much more advanced than 052d

    • @user-ju8xl6xk6b
      @user-ju8xl6xk6b 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      他们归巡洋舰里了

    • @user-zk9jx7ge7g
      @user-zk9jx7ge7g 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      老外做的视频,第一绝壁是美国人的

  • @horridohobbies
    @horridohobbies 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    China's Type 055 13,000-ton destroyer isn't on your list??? China currently has 8 of these ships.
    The Type 055 is widely regarded as the most powerful warship on the planet.

    • @user-ym5bl2vl7c
      @user-ym5bl2vl7c 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Said the Chinese 😂😂😂😂

    • @rjabongan1359
      @rjabongan1359 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@user-ym5bl2vl7c but the chinese navy have lesser naval war experience than US

    • @leeswecho
      @leeswecho 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The Type 055 isn't even the most powerful warship in the PLAN.

    • @horridohobbies
      @horridohobbies 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@rjabongan1359 It doesn't matter. The Chinese navy is still deadly powerful.

  • @MrCedric123abc
    @MrCedric123abc 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +105

    No credibility 055 has to be number 1.. hence why the new US destroyer is based on it .. US destroyer under development looks like a copy of the 055 😂😂😂

    • @niweshlekhak9646
      @niweshlekhak9646 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      But the Burke it the only destroyer that has done something.

    • @911rsr
      @911rsr 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Free Tibet

    • @mickmick3364
      @mickmick3364 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      indeed

    • @kevinwang4241
      @kevinwang4241 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Western media are still not used to the fact that many of China’s weapons are already the best in the world.😂😂😂

    • @911rsr
      @911rsr 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kevinwang4241 Only Chinese would think such a way. Free Tibet and fuck Xi bro

  • @sanasshushu3905
    @sanasshushu3905 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +112

    India's Vishakapatnam Class should be in the list, ig Kolkata class in much more for defence that that of aggressive warfare

    • @lazynow1
      @lazynow1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Man it must stink on that ship.....

    • @sanasshushu3905
      @sanasshushu3905 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

      @@lazynow1 just like ur name why not stay lazy and do nothing for this world, it would be great help for all living forms 😃😃😃

    • @lazynow1
      @lazynow1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@sanasshushu3905 let us all know once India discovers soap......

    • @sanasshushu3905
      @sanasshushu3905 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      @@lazynow1 ahhhh wait u still doesn't use soap damm , how doesn't u know India had discovered it hundreds of year ago , bro u need to come out of cave

    • @lazynow1
      @lazynow1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@sanasshushu3905 hmmmmm India had discovered it hundreds of year ago......yea...but they do not use it...why is India so dirty and the people as well..??..answer that question pin head...

  • @rickgolder6818
    @rickgolder6818 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +46

    Ignore your life problems just like bee ignored Vishakapatnam class destroyers 👌

    • @user-qx9bt9tr6t
      @user-qx9bt9tr6t หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Bee!

    • @nitinagrahari1806
      @nitinagrahari1806 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Kolkata destroyer comes under vishakhapatnam class..

    • @rickgolder6818
      @rickgolder6818 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@nitinagrahari1806 no. Kolkata class is a totally different class of destroyers, Kolkata class destroyers are the successor of the delhi class destroyers, the name of the three Kolkata class destroyers are INS Kolkata, INS Chennai and INS Kochi.
      Whereas Vishakapatnam class destroyers are the latest Destroyers and the successor of Kolkata class destroyers. The three vishakapatnam class destroyers are INS Vishakapatnam, INS Mormugao and INS Imphal.
      The next gen destroyers that is the Project 18 (P-18) class destroyers will be the successor of Vishakapatnam class destroyers. It will be one of the biggest and heaviest destroyers after completing with a weight of around 12,000 tons. The first ship is supposed to be ready by 2027.

    • @rickgolder6818
      @rickgolder6818 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nitinagrahari1806 no. Kolkata class is a totally different class of destroyers, Kolkata class destroyers are the successor of the delhi class destroyers, the name of the three Kolkata class destroyers are INS Kolkata, INS Chennai and INS Kochi.
      Whereas Vishakapatnam class destroyers are the latest Destroyers and the successor of Kolkata class destroyers. The three vishakapatnam class destroyers are INS Vishakapatnam, INS Mormugao and INS Imphal.
      The next gen destroyers that is the Project 18 (P-18) class destroyers will be the successor of Vishakapatnam class destroyers. It will be one of the biggest and heaviest destroyers after completing with a weight of around 12,000 tons. The first ship is supposed to be ready by 2027.

    • @wangzhang9478
      @wangzhang9478 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      W E A K

  • @sweatybotfn9982
    @sweatybotfn9982 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    You’ve got to be kidding me, you put 052D class and didn’t put 055?

    • @fanjiaqi2840
      @fanjiaqi2840 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      放了055还有美国人什么事

    • @sweatybotfn9982
      @sweatybotfn9982 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@fanjiaqi2840 也都😛

  • @pupuwang4826
    @pupuwang4826 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    身為中國人,我強烈要求055應該跟影片中其他的驅逐艦分開,055裝備了10馬赫的高超音速導彈,影片中的其他船加起來都比不上055

    • @apocain
      @apocain 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      如果航母是把飞机场搬到海上,055其实就是把导弹发射井搬到了海上。。。

  • @productguru8323
    @productguru8323 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The radar system on Kolkata class is No doubt the most powerful one on the ocean in this world!

  • @gasparguadalupethecante6377
    @gasparguadalupethecante6377 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    great video greetings the buzz you are the best in the world

  • @catstory1986
    @catstory1986 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    where is china 055 destroyer? why put 052d here??

    • @le_monker
      @le_monker 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      If they did, America won’t be on top 1 and that is an absolute crime

  • @harikrishnanps8938
    @harikrishnanps8938 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Where type 55 destroyer

  • @Aamirmhmd99
    @Aamirmhmd99 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    Where is the type 055 Renhai class destroyers? They weigh 13000 tonnes and pack 118 vls missiles making it one of the deadliest destroyers in the world.

    • @chfa2001
      @chfa2001 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      055被列為:巡洋艦

    • @my33311
      @my33311 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@chfa2001錯, 為什麼韓國的也是超過一萬頓不算?

    • @chfa2001
      @chfa2001 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@my33311 韓國的只能叫防空驅逐艦,他的反艦飛彈還是用普通的斜角發射箱

    • @my33311
      @my33311 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@chfa2001 斜不斜角是他們的技術落後問題, 和分類是沒有關係

    • @wingwong2064
      @wingwong2064 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      主要原因055 也加在列表內美國的就不能夠是第一名了,你們明白的!

  • @Jps_8
    @Jps_8 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    This list needs to be updated, Vaishakapatnam class destroyers have been inducted with over 2000 changes from kolkata class destroyers kolkata class destroyers are old now

  • @stokeynathu8112
    @stokeynathu8112 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Among the 5 Most Powerful Destroyers ,4 in Asia

    • @kw8757
      @kw8757 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      According to this shit laughably amateurish video.

  • @zeuspark4408
    @zeuspark4408 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    Now, the most powerful destroyer in Korea is not a Sejong The Great class destroyer but a recently built Jeongjo The Great class destroyer.
    Length : 170m (557.7 ft) , Displacement : 12,000 tons , Speed : 30 + knots

  • @Bishal_Goswami
    @Bishal_Goswami 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Vishakapatnam is more powerful without a doubt than the Type 52D, Type 055 is no doubt way more powerful than Indian destroyers. But not the Type 52D. And i don't know why Kolkata was considered rather than Vishakapatnam. Though same but still different.
    And type 055 is arguably a cruiser if considered the size. But if to be considered as a destroyer it should have been in the top 3. Or 2. And Burke in terms of armament is a bit in the downward side than the Eejon The great. But in terms of sensors its ahead. We should also understand that both the Japanese and Korean destroyers are Aegis destroyers.

  • @xinfuxia3809
    @xinfuxia3809 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Destroyers have taken the roles of battleships.

  • @lingth
    @lingth 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    no Type 055 from China? its newer than the 052D

    • @VINN_MW
      @VINN_MW 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      if there is a type 055 China. America will lose badly😂. and this channel admin doesn't want that

    • @le_monker
      @le_monker 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      055 is just Chinese propaganda and does not exist, don’t worry about it 😂

  • @vickyyadav5723
    @vickyyadav5723 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    A messy list this list needs to get updated nd include Vishakapatnam class Destroyer which is latest....

  • @phaddu7737
    @phaddu7737 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Arguably is good word.

  • @emd-ef4lm
    @emd-ef4lm 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    SEJONG 駆逐艦はVLSミサイルが128基w

    • @my33311
      @my33311 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Is a copycat version. Type 055 is far stronger with dual band radar.

  • @haopei1605
    @haopei1605 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    where is the type 055

  • @Teknik_Pemula
    @Teknik_Pemula 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    just in theory...never fight each other/face to face directly...😅

  • @Melikegames3100
    @Melikegames3100 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +60

    As an Indian, l don't agree that the Kolkata Class destroyer should be in your list. These destroyer are defence destroyer to protect our terrietorial waters and thus have less firepower(with only 48 VLS cells and most of them are occupied with air to air missile). Also it a generation lower than the other destroyer mentioned in your video.

    • @rohangangan8327
      @rohangangan8327 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      It was surprising. Its successor is already in the navy the Vishakapatnam Class destroyers (P15 Bravo Class)

    • @Triggatra4258
      @Triggatra4258 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      *surface to air missiles

    • @TheGreatMarathaArmy
      @TheGreatMarathaArmy 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

      1) As a Dumb@$$ you should know Indian destroyer is the only Warship in the list which has stealth design.
      2) Its a multirole destroyer not Air defence destroyer.
      3) It is designed to perform Long range multirole missions including escort role to Indian Aircraft carrier battle group. It has 15000km range which is highest among warships on list.
      4) Less "VLS" doesn't mean less Firepower......For example:- Brahmos missile has twice as heavy as Tomahawk yet 4 times faster and has 32 times kinetic energy.
      BARAK 8 system has 100km to 150km range and has Anti ballistic missile defence capability.
      5) There's empty space available onboard for another 32 VLS but not used.

    • @sigmarule6477
      @sigmarule6477 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      You are a bot from racist south korea

    • @lazynow1
      @lazynow1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      please comment again when you learn what soap is.....

  • @baba-vh7hb
    @baba-vh7hb 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    where is 055

  • @mdshihab8219
    @mdshihab8219 หลายเดือนก่อน

    He sneaked in an indian destroyer like we wouldn’t notice

  • @anuragrai6330
    @anuragrai6330 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Type 055 crying in corner with vishakapatnam and maya class.

    • @le_monker
      @le_monker 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Don’t put the 055 with those garbage, thanks

  • @cf5365
    @cf5365 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The video would not be "politically correct" if it included a Chinese 055 destroyer.

  • @kuniakinakatsu7107
    @kuniakinakatsu7107 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Japan plans to start building Aegis warships starting this year. According to the revealed specifications, she has a total length of 190 meters and a displacement of 12,000 tons. Two ships are planned to be built.

  • @leehale5828
    @leehale5828 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    A powerful group of destroyers, however, naval traditions, crews, training and experience will always make the difference in battle. Being dedicated and willing to die for your country is not enough. Sometimes you just die. For further information please consult the Japanese, Italians, Germans and Russians.

    • @soumyajitsingha9614
      @soumyajitsingha9614 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Naval tradition wow you must have not heard about India's carrier ops in 1971 war and Indian Navy's fighting experience

    • @tringuyen7519
      @tringuyen7519 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Naval tradition means nothing compared to technology. US has SEWIP block 3 on its destroyers which can repel hypersonic & ballistic missiles!

  • @bharatbayash1146
    @bharatbayash1146 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    this channel pro US only support and highlights US weapons only😂😂

    • @peach5403
      @peach5403 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😂😂😂😂

    • @le_monker
      @le_monker 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No, that is the most absurd thing I’ve ever heard of. America still has the best naval destroyer, the 055 is just propagation of the CCP and does not exist. This channel is fair and unbiased 😂

  • @richessery8475
    @richessery8475 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    This list isn't even close.

  • @louischoi2883
    @louischoi2883 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    POV: Type 055 is classified as cruiser, so it’s not on the list.

    • @user-ff5gj5qs6g
      @user-ff5gj5qs6g 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      WTF What we define here is a destroyer

    • @halfmanhuang2029
      @halfmanhuang2029 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hey, in your logic, nearly all destroyers in this list can be seen as cruiser.

    • @MrCastodian
      @MrCastodian 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      That’s just dumb, Type 055 is a destroyer, just because USA say it’s a cruiser does not make it a cruiser, just as large ships in both USA, Japan and South Korea are called destroyers, but They call Type 055 a cruiser, a big lol

  • @sanujitroy6830
    @sanujitroy6830 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    bharat on destroyer testing

  • @OMKARKULKARNIorkul1991
    @OMKARKULKARNIorkul1991 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Include and do research around Vishakhapattanam class its formidable destroyer equipped with state of the art sensors and lethal offensive abd defensive weapons.

  • @santiagobotero6278
    @santiagobotero6278 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Type 055 number 1

    • @Triggatra4258
      @Triggatra4258 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ain't you from Mexico or something? Why would you go for China? They will take all your $ and land and then make it seem like they did YOU a favor amigo. Get it together.

    • @shanshan2077
      @shanshan2077 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Perhaps this channel calls it a cruiser, similar to how America classifies it

    • @bermanmo6237
      @bermanmo6237 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@shanshan2077 Due to its tonnage, more than the US Ticonderoga class cruisers, it is technically a cruiser.

  • @user-hw4gw9fh2t
    @user-hw4gw9fh2t 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    居然有印度驱逐舰上榜,没搞错吧

    • @landflame
      @landflame 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      一个月前美印关系可能比较好吧,照顾一下印度万国造的面子

    • @le_monker
      @le_monker 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      啥?驱逐舰?我还以为是一次性潜艇

    • @LuckyAntenna-yr7fb
      @LuckyAntenna-yr7fb หลายเดือนก่อน

      I heard something about where the missiles are filled up with water are coming from your country right ?

  • @haguroIJN-myokoclass-No.4-1929
    @haguroIJN-myokoclass-No.4-1929 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    「あたご」じゃなくてより新しい「まや」にしてほしかった

  • @wentao614
    @wentao614 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Chinese 055?!

    • @easahuang2057
      @easahuang2057 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      055被他们归为巡洋舰。。。

    • @Chickenworm9394
      @Chickenworm9394 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      被三哥吃掉了

  • @KaustubhBadgujarK2
    @KaustubhBadgujarK2 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    I don't no why people hate Indians ?
    If you hate India then comment below why you hate india, let's have fair discussion.
    Come with facts not conspiracy.
    👍

    • @ParaSF-im8kn
      @ParaSF-im8kn 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      its usually the Chinese, P@kis and Brits. Ignore.

    • @IvyKuong-xe6cw
      @IvyKuong-xe6cw 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Just a question how do u k of people hate Indians I can't see any comment against Indians so I am bit doubtful but you can prove me.

    • @pelandolickasshole8715
      @pelandolickasshole8715 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@IvyKuong-xe6cw you have less notice that

    • @amarjeetmutum809
      @amarjeetmutum809 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      No hate just jealousy

    • @Chickenworm9394
      @Chickenworm9394 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wr don't hate Indians. We take pity on Indian arrogance😂

  • @mohan02
    @mohan02 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    China should be no.1 as, I heard, their missiles are filled with water (cutting edge technology I guess) instead of fuel.

    • @russelfang7434
      @russelfang7434 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Basically these rumors were first made up by 4chan and then spread by the treasured Indians. They are addicted to these Internet crap.

    • @user-tr1jh6wy5h
      @user-tr1jh6wy5h 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      真的有人信😅

    • @user-qx9bt9tr6t
      @user-qx9bt9tr6t หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@russelfang7434 Indians on 4chan? You smoking pot?

  • @reighbh13
    @reighbh13 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    where does the Royal Navy type 45 fit on the list?

    • @olivergrundy5205
      @olivergrundy5205 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Should be in 5th with Indian destroyer off the list

    • @Aryan-xv5or
      @Aryan-xv5or 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      No where 😂

    • @pdss2528
      @pdss2528 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@olivergrundy5205lol, the type45 is primarily an air defence destroyer and it lacks the offensive capabilities.
      The indian destroyers carry 16 brahmos anti ship missiles which are the fastest supersonic anti ship missile in the world. And it also carries 32 indo-isreali barak-8 sams so it perfectly fits on the list

    • @TheGreatMarathaArmy
      @TheGreatMarathaArmy 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Type 45 destroyers are designed for Air defence role, while Kolkata/ vishakhapattanam class destroyers are Multirole destroyers which can perform Air defence, Anti ship, Land attack, Anti submarine warfare roles.

    • @ParaSF-im8kn
      @ParaSF-im8kn 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      at no.10, but unless upgraded in the near future, it could possibly be out of the top 10.

  • @BrenSoleo
    @BrenSoleo 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Battleships! Make one with battleships

    • @sinnopal1
      @sinnopal1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      you are living in a world of pre-WW2 era....

  • @fclovemimi
    @fclovemimi 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    为什么拿052C的照片说成052D?

  • @shajil9962
    @shajil9962 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ins Imphal is a class apart and the latest

  • @jamesvr_7398
    @jamesvr_7398 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    A little disappointing that the Royal Navys Type 45 isnt on here as i personally think theyre unmatched in radar and sensor capability, only lacking in numbers

    • @t.4999
      @t.4999 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You use the radar to track what? It’s an air defence ship primarily lacking any offensive capabilities.

    • @jamesvr_7398
      @jamesvr_7398 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @t.4999 Any offensive capabilities? The 4.5 inch, MOD 1 main gun, as well as their ability to carry Harpoons AND tomahawk cruise missiles? Ah yes, sounds like a lack in offensive capabilities...
      As for the radar, it also tracks ships and ground targets, so whilst you're right in saying it is an air defence Destroyer (AAW) It can, and probably would, be used for S2S combat

    • @t.4999
      @t.4999 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jamesvr_7398 scroll down the comment section and others have typed out clearly how “STRONG” the ship is based on its feature. I’m not going to repeat their points again…

    • @t.4999
      @t.4999 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jamesvr_7398 lol you clearly have no idea how naval warfare works. Even a Corvette has same gun.. so what? Grow up. There are hypersonic cruise missiles of 500kms+ range that can break a ship in half with just its memetic power and air defence missiles of 150kms+ rage… and you are talking of subsonic tomahawk and other short range missiles of the 80s-90s… seriously? It’s not 19-20th century to where British empire sailed supreme. Times have changed. Read the other comments below

    • @jamesvr_7398
      @jamesvr_7398 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @t.4999 Well, I suppose you're right, I've only been serving for 6 years.
      I've only been on all 6 destroyers, both our carriers, 2 frigates, 2 US Arleigh Burkes, and 4 OPVs, but sure, my experience means nothing, even though I've witnessed exercises go sideways. But hey, naval warfare at its finest, right?
      As for your corvette remark, I am yet to see a corvette, with a 4.5in main gun.
      As for the Royal Navy, from my experience, we are one of the most technologically advanced Navies on the planet. We just serverly lack numbers...
      Also. I stated that the tomahawk were used as an added offensive capability, and I'm well aware of what they are capable of...
      I would strongly suggest you remain hidden behind your keyboard before you land yourself in an argument you can't finish.
      Goodday

  • @user-uu3bg7hf1l
    @user-uu3bg7hf1l 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Where did the Maya class go?
    And I am Japanese, so I am probably a bit biased, but I believe that even the Atago class, not the Maya class, is superior to the kolkata class.
    The Atago class has been recently upgraded to the same Aegis System Baseline 9 as the Maya class and is now equipped with an/spq-9b, and can also carry SM-6, although it is not currently scheduled to do so.
    The Kolkata class, on the other hand, can carry only 32 cells worth of missiles, the remaining 16 cells being for anti-ship missiles, and the range of the Barak-8 missiles is not flattering to begin with, and the Kolkata class is not a dedicated defense ship like the Aegis in terms of armament to begin with.
    I think the comparison itself is wrong.

    • @ParaSF-im8kn
      @ParaSF-im8kn 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      all you are talking about is Air defence.
      Talk about the Radar - The MFSTAR is an AESA radar with a range of around 500 kms. AN/SPY 1 D(V) is a 400 kms PESA radar introduced in 1998.
      Anti ship/land capabilities - BrahMos can hit targets over 400 kms with speeds of Mach 3. Where does the Type 90 Anti ship missile stand in Comparision? 200 kms range and Mach 0.8?
      Anti sub warfare - Kolkata is equipped with Heavy torpedo tubes with torpedos have ranges of 40 kms. This is supplemented by ASW rockets for short range targets. Light Torpedo tubes on Atago can match that?
      Even in aviation capabilities, 2 Helicopters vs 1?

    • @user-uu3bg7hf1l
      @user-uu3bg7hf1l 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@ParaSF-im8kn
      Indeed, it's no surprise that the Atago class loses in anti-ship capability, because     Japan has long left anti-ship capability to aircraft, such as the f-2 and p-1.
      However, in terms of anti-ship capability, the helicopters carried by the Kolkata class are older than the Seahawk, and the U.S. only uses some of them anymore, and they are old aircraft that have been retired by Japan and Canada.
      Also, you said the Kolkata class has a radar range of 500km, but I checked and it only says 450km.
      I looked it up in English properly.
      Oh, and how many targets can the Kolkata class radar track at the same time?
      I haven't been able to find any.
      The range of the Kolkata-class missiles is not comparable to that of the sm-2 and sm-6, so their range advantage is not that significant.
      Well, if these factors are taken into account, the Kolkata class is probably more useful than Atago class.
      However, the Atago class wins hands down when it comes to anti-aircraft capability.
      The Atago class wins in ballistic missile defense capability, just because the Kolkata class is not equipped with it.
      Ah, but now that I think about it, the Atago-type SM-6 can also be used as an anti-ship missile, so it may have superior anti-ship capabilities.

    • @ParaSF-im8kn
      @ParaSF-im8kn 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@user-uu3bg7hf1l Helicopters are not part of the ship. They are part of the Naval Aviation and can be changed as per requirement on a ship.
      From 2023, the Indian Navy has started acquiring MH-60R, the upgraded version of what the Japanese Navy uses, SH-60K.
      In the coming days, they will be be flying from the frontline warships of the Indian Navy.
      Kolkata Class's radar range is shown as "over 450 kms". I have been on the INS Kolkata and the sailors have told me its "around 500 kms".
      Even for Atago's radar , its shown as 370 kms, but for this comment, i have calculated as 400 kms.
      Hundreds of targets are tracked. and AESA technology is much more superior than PESA. Its a generation ahead.
      I have agreed, Atago wins in Anti air as well as Ballistic missile defence.
      But Kolkata is much better in Anti-ship, Land attack, Anti sub warfare, radar and aviation facilities. Even the design of Kolkata is stealthier and more modern 2010s design. Atago is directly based of the older 1990s Arleigh Burke Class design.
      Also Kolkata Class has much more advanced network centric capabilities. Look up "Cooperative engagement capabilities" .

    • @user-uu3bg7hf1l
      @user-uu3bg7hf1l 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@ParaSF-im8kn
      Ah, so the Kolkata class wins.
      Well, I could agree that the Aegis system is the most powerful in the world, but the spy-1 is a passive radar, so it is inferior to the Kolkata class radar.
      Also, I didn't know that the SH-60R is operated by the Indian Army.
      By the way, the Maritime Self-Defense Force is procuring the SH-60l, a development of the SH-60k, starting in 2023.
      Well, we are all friends against China, so let's work hard for each other!

    • @IvyKuong-xe6cw
      @IvyKuong-xe6cw 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@user-uu3bg7hf1l Fr China is aggressive against all the south east Asian countries including mine, Malaysia.

  • @HenriHattar
    @HenriHattar 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    The Australian HOBART class is just a BIT better than the Aeirleigh Burke and just a small bit behind the UK version, which is the best in the world.

    • @t.4999
      @t.4999 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      lol uk version is the best? Pulling sentences from the back end? It’s meant for only air defence and you selling that garbage as being better that ships that can multirole? 😂
      Aussi ships are sitting ducks. What’s the news with that Canberra Class Amphibious Assault Ship (LHD)? Is it fit to float leat alone fight? Get over yourself. World doesn’t revolve around white nations 😂

    • @tringuyen7519
      @tringuyen7519 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Unless Australia’s Hobart class comes with SEWIP block 3, Arleigh Burke is the king of destroyers. SEWIP 3 can repel hypersonic & ballistic missiles.

    • @HenriHattar
      @HenriHattar 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I take it you are a manufacturer??????@@tringuyen7519

    • @nps7742
      @nps7742 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yah thats why they send it to Yemen....

    • @lazynow1
      @lazynow1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Australian HOBART is useless......as they will only build a few.....your comment is stupid...

  • @tiaoyi-bx5yi
    @tiaoyi-bx5yi 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    India pieced together a ship with parts from various countries.

    • @bornfree735
      @bornfree735 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And you reverse engineered your entire country 😂

  • @rudyalfonsus686
    @rudyalfonsus686 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    when American DDGX finish, they will say chinese type 055 copied from DDGX. just like when they say wechat pay copied apple pay

  • @megaharlequin3990
    @megaharlequin3990 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The photograph at 4:38 should be a Luyang II (Type052C) vessel, PLANS Haikou (DDG-171), according to her huge radar protection cover

  • @enzhus
    @enzhus 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    失踪大王当然是最好的,你刚想打它却发现它失踪了 😮

  • @AtlascopcoChong
    @AtlascopcoChong 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    055 is THE most superior destroyer/cruiser at sea, period.

  • @rajatjangir674
    @rajatjangir674 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This video is not fair.😂😂 I'm an Indian happy to see my country in this list but hey where is Zumwalt class destroyer miss. 😂😂😂

    • @rohitb5834
      @rohitb5834 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Zumwalt class is a 16000 tons cruiser, and cannot be ranked along with 7500-12000 tons Destroyer.

  • @shahab1947
    @shahab1947 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where is HoutIran Yamantil 777 class
    HHH mark ???
    😅😅😅

  • @rakeshkrishnan1099
    @rakeshkrishnan1099 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You need to replace kolkata with vishakapatnam class

  • @teddygary6702
    @teddygary6702 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    055???

  • @LEEAUTOMOTIVE
    @LEEAUTOMOTIVE 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    055 and the others😅

  • @gordonmckenzie926
    @gordonmckenzie926 3 วันที่ผ่านมา

    No British Daring class?

  • @kyzoaryant9905
    @kyzoaryant9905 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This destroyer will be destroyed if they meet frigate armed with zircon 😂😂

  • @user-dg7jk7gm3q
    @user-dg7jk7gm3q 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    055 = made in china

  • @niweshlekhak9646
    @niweshlekhak9646 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Except Burke none of the other destroyers are battle tested.

    • @reighbh13
      @reighbh13 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      crew capability isnt listed on the wiki page 😂

    • @juniorleslie4804
      @juniorleslie4804 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      The Arleigh Burke is battle tested against who?, Sadam Hussein, and the Tabilan Militia Navy. Are you serious, if they are the most powerful countries the USN fought against, I wouldn't call that battle tested.
      None of these destroyers are tested in any naval battles, such as the Battle of Midway, the Coral Sea, and the Leyte Gulf, or the Jutlands. Those are just a few of the great Naval battles, until these vessels face such challenges; I personally would hold off, on any claims that they are battle tested .

    • @niweshlekhak9646
      @niweshlekhak9646 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@juniorleslie4804 among the listed destroyers I mean, which other destroyer in that list has shot down anything.
      Well and yes, Iraq was the 5th strongest army in the world before US invaded.

    • @juniorleslie4804
      @juniorleslie4804 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@niweshlekhak9646 The strongest or the 5th largest. Naval destroyers have land attack capability, but do they fight armies, or other navies.
      Threats to destroyers are other surface combatants, aircraft with anti-ship missiles, cruise and ballistic missiles, and submarines. Did either Iraq or Afghanistan possess any such military capabilities?.

    • @niweshlekhak9646
      @niweshlekhak9646 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@juniorleslie4804 Yeah Iraq did have a Navy.

  • @zahidhasan918
    @zahidhasan918 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    😂😂😂😂 just funny list. You need to learn more about military ship.
    1.type055
    2.great class
    3.maya class
    4.horizon class
    5.uss arber

  • @WoYaoDieManBUFF
    @WoYaoDieManBUFF 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    ??????????????Where is type 055??????????????This video is a joke🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @augustomaramonte9619
    @augustomaramonte9619 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not including a royal navy a France o r Italian destroyer on the list are making me questioning
    but anyone can have their opinion

    • @sinnopal1
      @sinnopal1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      italians? italian military? i am laughing...they could not even beat machete carrying ethiopians...

    • @augustomaramonte9619
      @augustomaramonte9619 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@sinnopal1 not the navy but the ship baby
      The same thing that France have
      Questioning the Royal Navy ship too?

  • @tristanwche
    @tristanwche 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They are just overestimated and expensive targets on the sea… time changed.

    • @sinnopal1
      @sinnopal1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      these are aegis destroyers...billion dollar ships. wake up, you are still in ww2

  • @user-ij2vj2fm5f
    @user-ij2vj2fm5f 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    055? 045?

  • @mahamajones2994
    @mahamajones2994 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks for the video but I do not agree with ur list at all

  • @bobsmith3983
    @bobsmith3983 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Brahmos missile in not the fastest cruise missile in the world as the Zircon is the fastest.

    • @user-qx9bt9tr6t
      @user-qx9bt9tr6t หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well, unless you don't know how numbers work, your facts aren't true.

  • @MaxKrumholz
    @MaxKrumholz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Saar 6

    • @bermanmo6237
      @bermanmo6237 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Due to its tonnage, Saar 6 is classified as a corvette, just like MEKO K130 corvette which it is based on.. I do agree it is well armed just like the ships presented on this podcast.

  • @fabricemartin5561
    @fabricemartin5561 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where si the chinese type 055 destroyer ? He had the yj-21 ballistic anti ship missile 1500-2000kms range mach 6-10, the yj-18 anti ship missile 540kms range mach 3 final hit, the hq-26 anti ballistic misdile, the hq-9b and hq-16fe anti cruise missiles, drones and a airplane, hq-26 anti ballistic and satellites missilles, cj-10 cruise missile surface to land, yu-8 missile anti submarine, to helo z-8, cwis 1130 and hhq-10 short range defense, 4 giant aesa radar s and c band, 50% more power electricity than burque and ticonderoga, 4 aesa radar band x for targeting and other stuff for the 8 first ship they build. Those type 055 are better than all of your short list actualy

  • @Kimbo1972
    @Kimbo1972 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I'd suggest taking a look at the Royal Australian Navy's Hobart class Destroyer, which although based on a Spanish design, has US Aegis Command and Control system - and put that in front of the Indian vessels - matter of fact I'd put the Japanese vessels in front of the Indian one too - no offence to our Indian friends intended

    • @TheGreatMarathaArmy
      @TheGreatMarathaArmy 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      No offence......let's compare😊
      #Hobart class V/S #Kolkata class
      #Design
      Kolkata:- stealth
      Hobart:- non-stealth
      #Role
      Kolkata:- Multirole
      Hobart:- Air defence (primary)
      #SPEED
      Kolkata 30 knots
      Hobart 28 knots
      #Range
      Kolkata 11000 km
      Hobart 9300 km
      #Radar/ Range.
      Kolkata:- MF STAR (AESA) 450km
      Hobart:- AN/SPY1 (PESA) 370km
      #ARMAMENTS
      Kolkata 48 VLS sells
      Hobart 48 VLS sells
      #ANTI-SHIP MISSILE
      *Kolkata*:-16 units × #BRAHMOS
      speed Mach 3 / 2301mph
      Range 500km to 800km
      *Hobart*:- 8 units × #Harpoon
      Speed mach 0.71/ 537mph
      Range 220km
      #AIR-DEFENCE MISSILE
      Kolkata:- 32 units × BARAK 8 (ABM- capable)
      150km range
      Hobart:- RIM 162 ESSM
      Range 50km
      RIM 66/ SM2
      Range 150km
      #TORPEDO
      Kolkata:- Varunastra/ 533 mm
      Range 40km
      Hobart:- Eurotorp MU90/ 323 mm
      Range 23km
      #CIWS
      Kolkata:- 4 units × AK630M
      Hobart:- 1 unit × phalanx
      #HELICOPTER
      Kolkata 2 units
      Hobart 1 unit.
      #PRICE
      Kolkata $780 million/unit
      Hobart $3 Billion/ unit.

    • @TheGreatMarathaArmy
      @TheGreatMarathaArmy 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      New Vishakhapattanam class destroyers are upgraded variant of Kolkata class, It's more powerful than it's predecessor armed with weapons like Brahmos ER, Barak 8 LR/ER, MF STAR AESA RADAR, has powerful network centric sensors and electronic warfare capability better than Aegis combat system.

    • @ParaSF-im8kn
      @ParaSF-im8kn 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      others have already said it. Kolkata Class with its 450 kms+ AESA radar, 400 kms+ BrahMos Anti ship/land missile with speeds 3 times of sound, and other advanced network centric capabilities, is at a completely different level.

    • @marcd5196
      @marcd5196 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      I'd suggest, next time partner with India for your ships, rather than Spain or Uk. Unless u want overpriced, less capable 30 year old technologies.
      The Spanish clone you use uses the American AEGIS system which was initially introduced in the 1990s. Even US is upgrading the radar and other systems in the Arleigh Burke Block 3 version. And you bought that for 3 Bil$ for a ship that was commissioned in 2017.

    • @BHARATIYA_TIGER
      @BHARATIYA_TIGER 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      ​@@TheGreatMarathaArmyDon't worry brother I don't think he knows about destroyers that much anyway

  • @jjsmith4829
    @jjsmith4829 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    please get a better narrator

  • @tgsgardenmaintenance4627
    @tgsgardenmaintenance4627 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Type 55 ???

  • @jagosingh85
    @jagosingh85 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where’s the all powerful Moskva?

  • @user-et1sr6nr3t
    @user-et1sr6nr3t 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Stupid ranking. Where is Project 22350 with the world's deadliest hypersonic zircon? Project 22350 is the best, no doubt.

    • @user-qx9bt9tr6t
      @user-qx9bt9tr6t หลายเดือนก่อน

      Has it even completed yet?

  • @johnsilver9338
    @johnsilver9338 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    In my opinion, in terms of VLS and capabilities
    Cruiser Ranking
    1. SK's Sehjong Batch II : 128 VLS : battle tested Aegis system, BMD SPY-1, BMD/ASAT SM-3
    2. Chinese Type 055 : 112 VLS : dual band Type 346B radar, terminal supersonic YJ-18, anti-ship ballistic YJ-21
    3. US Tico : 122 VLS : battle tested Aegis system, BMD SPY-1, BMD/ASAT SM-3, multi-purpose SM-6, quad-packed ESSM, Tomahawk Block Va MST
    4. SK's Sehjong Batch I : 128 VLS : battle tested Aegis system, BMD SPY-1
    Destroyer Ranking
    1. US Burke Flight III : 96 VLS : battle tested Aegis system, dual band 37 array BMD SPY-6, BMD/ASAT SM-3, multi-purpose SM-6, quad-packed ESSM, Tomahawk Block Va MST, stealthy LRASM
    2. US Burke Flight IIA : 96 VLS : battle tested Aegis system, dual band 24 array BMD SPY-6, BMD/ASAT SM-3, multi-purpose SM-6, quad-packed ESM, Tomahawk Block Va MST, stealthy LRASM
    3. Japanese Maya : 96 VLS : battle tested Aegis system, BMD SPY-1, BMD/ASAT SM-3, multi-purpose SM-6, quad-packed ESSM, Tomahawk Block Va MST
    4. US Burke Flight I/II : 90 VLS : battle tested Aegis system, BMD SPY-1, BMD/ASAT SM-3, multi-purpose SM-6, quad-packed ESSM, Tomahawk Block Va MST, stealthy LRASM
    5. Japanese Atago : 96 VLS : battle tested Aegis system, BMD SPY-1, BMD/ASAT SM-3, Tomahawk Block Va MST
    6. Japanese Kongo : 90 VLS : battle tested Aegis system, BMD SPY-1, BMD/ASAT SM-3, Tomahawk Block Va MST
    7. US Zumwalt Retrofit : 80 VLS : multi-purpose SM-6, quad-packed ESSM, Tomahawk Block Va MST, 4 - 12 extra hypersonic CPS
    8. UK Type 45 Retrofit : 72 VLS : dual array SAMPSON, S1850M/SMART-L, 8 extra NSM
    Frigate Ranking
    1. Russian Admiral Gorshkov Batch II : 64 VLS : terminal supersonic 3M54T Kalibr, ramjet Oniks, scamjet Zircon
    2. Spanish Álvaro de Bazán : 48 VLS : battle tested Aegis system, BMD SPY-1, quad-packed ESSM, 8 extra NSM
    3. Chinese Type 052D : 64 VLS : dual band Type 346A radar, terminal supersonic YJ-18
    4. US Constellation : 32 VLS : battle tested Aegis system, 9 array BMD SPY-6, quad-packed ESSM, 16 extra NSM
    5. Russian Admiral Gorshkov Batch I : 48 VLS : terminal supersonic 3M54T Kalibr, ramjet Oniks, scamjet Zircon
    6. Australian Hobart : 48 VLS : battle tested Aegis system, BMD SPY-1, quad-packed ESSM
    7. UK Type 45 : 48 VLS : dual array SAMPSON, S1850M/SMART-L
    8. Indian Visakhapatnam : 48 VLS : ramjet BrahMos
    9. Indian Kolkata : 48 VLS : ramjet BrahMos

    • @bkjworld
      @bkjworld 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Kolkata class and Visakhapatnam class is not frighets

    • @johnsilver9338
      @johnsilver9338 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@bkjworld They have less VLS and tonnage than other destroyers so i consider them as frigates. Same for Chinese Type 052D.

    • @bkjworld
      @bkjworld 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@johnsilver9338 but displacement?

    • @johnsilver9338
      @johnsilver9338 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@bkjworld Yes, tonnage or displacement, same thing.

    • @bkjworld
      @bkjworld 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@johnsilver9338 and Armament?

  • @mengkan-kh5gf
    @mengkan-kh5gf 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    中国的新型燃气轮机,多频段有源相控阵雷达技术已全面超越美国,有了这两种技术,用不了多久新型055驱逐舰,配合中压直流技术装备电磁炮,脉冲炮。威力将进一步提升。

  • @ChaddicusMaximuss
    @ChaddicusMaximuss 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where is horizon class?

  • @abhilashaavula9321
    @abhilashaavula9321 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Typical of cutting edge technologies like South Korean goods? 😂😂😂
    More like a copy or licensed manufacturer of American defence systems

  • @summerroll7832
    @summerroll7832 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Have you guys been living under a rock? The Type 055 not on the list??? Much much better research required. This video has no creditability :(

  • @Tanish_06725
    @Tanish_06725 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    All south korean girls do not forget to like my comment. Please this is not for LGBT so korean boys don't like my comment. My love only for korean girls❤❤❤

  • @knottytoob
    @knottytoob 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There are no CCP bots in the comments section. Well done. Ha ha

  • @markc6140
    @markc6140 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Rubbish update. Many better destroyers with more firepower are missing . Arleigh Burke class too outdated.

    • @le_monker
      @le_monker 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It’s a top tier because it’s American

  • @thomaslau1214
    @thomaslau1214 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Biased BS.

  • @VK6AB-
    @VK6AB- 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    LOL this channel has no idea.

  • @kevinclarkson7036
    @kevinclarkson7036 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Its not a FUCKING BOAT!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @MrCastodian
    @MrCastodian 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Burke class:Equally exceptional lol, it’s not even close to exceptional in anti surface warfare, majority of them have no anti ship missiles, all other have way way better anti surface missiles then Burke.
    And in what world are Type 52D better then Type 055? Lol
    Same with Kolkata…Better then Viskhapatnam? Lol
    And no, Brahmos is not the fastest, far from lol.
    Atago better then Maya…
    Seriously, a joke this page.

  • @nuwandzanayake9875
    @nuwandzanayake9875 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    😂😂😂

  • @theinfralink6598
    @theinfralink6598 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is this a joke?

  • @djsk750official8
    @djsk750official8 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Ins imphal😂😂😂lauhhing in corner

  • @Tecnigod
    @Tecnigod 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When I saw the clicbait image I knew this video was a joke. Lol. Yeah, let’s all forget the european destroyers, horizon class, type 45, etc etc. Let’s also forget the russians wich are also europeans (the most populated and important part of Russia is all inside Europe that goes all the way until the Ural Mountains). I was sure it was a joke when I saw indian and chinese destroyers. Either copycats or doing reverse engineering. The japanese and later the koreans were so much better in doing that. Even if buying the patents from the west.

    • @rohitb5834
      @rohitb5834 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      cry harder lol

    • @marcd5196
      @marcd5196 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      era of west is over. Give it a few more years and ALL Top 10 Destroyers in the world would be Asian, and one American.

    • @Tecnigod
      @Tecnigod 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @rohitb5834 We must understand that videos need/crave views, therefore it’s smartass logic to put some third world crap to please countries with big population (views potential) so all we can do is laugh and ignore such videos. By the way, even some german frigates like the Sachsen class should be considered destroyers due to size, armament and role. And I’m living out the more recent Baden-Wurttemberg class, wich are giant frigates with 7200 tons displacement. The bigest around the world. Even the spanish produce aegis frigates that due to size, armament and role can be considered destroyers. But hey, let’s all pretend that we “eat noodles” everyday, If that makes the planet happier and prouder. ✌😌

    • @rohitb5834
      @rohitb5834 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Tecnigod German warships are jokes lol, so is the German Navy. And the Spanish navy...lets not get started. Neither of them make it to the Top 10 Navies and no match for Superpowers like China or even To be Superpower like India.
      Have a good day.

  • @champaberiasub4809
    @champaberiasub4809 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    No no no, kolkata class destroyer is 3rd , chinise destroyer is 5th . 😢😢😢😢you are rong.

    • @wentao614
      @wentao614 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yo, get education first then comment, you can’t even spell correctly…

    • @user-uh6wb3hm6u
      @user-uh6wb3hm6u 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      加尔各答都不应出现在上面,英国都比印度的强

    • @t.4999
      @t.4999 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@user-uh6wb3hm6uNanking in Japanese hands was better 😉
      Chinese had a party when Japanese paid NANKING a visit

    • @DARKMATTER-LEAGUE
      @DARKMATTER-LEAGUE 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      ​@@user-uh6wb3hm6uWho said ? Ins Imphal is more powerful than every brits destroyer.

    • @user-uh6wb3hm6u
      @user-uh6wb3hm6u 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DARKMATTER-LEAGUE are u kidding me ?

  • @Chickenworm9394
    @Chickenworm9394 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Its an Indian channel, of course there's an indian destroyer😂

    • @user-Tariqahm
      @user-Tariqahm 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      😂😂

    • @Semiconductor-0.3
      @Semiconductor-0.3 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Cry harder😂

    • @Chickenworm9394
      @Chickenworm9394 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Semiconductor-0.3 we are laughing at you Hindians🤣

    • @rohitb5834
      @rohitb5834 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Chickenworm9394Bat soups laughing dont count. Just wear a mask while laughing .

    • @le_monker
      @le_monker 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Would I get banned for these 2 emojis? 🇵🇰 and🦎