34:19 - T-10/Lift off, 35:32 - MAX-Q, 37:03 - Beco//Hot staging, 38:25 - It was at this moment I knew there will be no catch attempt, 41:00 - Booster landing burn, 53:28 - 🍌, 1:12:15 - Engine Raptor relight, 1:14:26//1:29:00//1:33:05 - Starship reentry, 1:37:28 - 17km, 1:39:00 - 3km, 1:39:38 - Starship landing burn/flip maneuver. 1:21:55//1:23:13//1:32:30 - Notice how the steel near to the payload door being warped slightly during peak re-entry heating. (That's in the area where tiles were removed.) Thanks.
38:25? Lmao I love how you act like you can predict the future 😂 You have no clue what they're gonna do before they announce it. You're not a rocket scientist no matter how hard you try convincing yourself. 😂😂😂
@AndToTheRepublic4WhichItStands sorry for disturbing your nipples. Even kids with little knowledge of rockets know what a “Booster Offshore Divert” means.
@@AndToTheRepublic4WhichItStandsYou act smart but youre stupid as hll, the mission control guy or whoever that is says "Booster offshore divert" in the background
@@internetcensure5849Im not sure its meant to land smoothly, i think theyre simulating landing on ground by stopping mid air just a bit above the water and then just kind of falling in ocean.
The booster didn't sealand smoothly; the explosion had been edited out. The Starship was supposed to land on the launchpad, not on sea and catch fire.😂
@@internetcensure5849 the super heavy booster was supposed to be caught back on land. Not Starship. Starship did exactly what it was supposed to. You have your vehicle names mixed up.
The booster didn't sealand smoothly; the explosion had been edited out. The Starship was supposed to land on the launchpad, not on sea and catch fire.😂
The booster didn't sealand smoothly; the explosion had been edited out. The Starship was supposed to land on the launchpad, not on sea and catch fire.😂
The booster didn't sealand smoothly; the explosion had been edited out. The Starship was supposed to land on the launchpad, not on sea and catch fire.😂
The booster didn't sealand smoothly; the explosion had been edited out. The Starship was supposed to land on the launchpad, not on sea and catch fire.😂
@@internetcensure5849it was intentional. Spacex had no plans of ship recovery. It was on a sub orbital trajectory for ditching in ocean. Not ready for ship catch. Booster was suppose to return but the tower sustained damage during take off and was aborted for ocean landing, also not recovered.
In 2021, NASA entered into a firm fixed-price contract with SpaceX valued at US$2.89 billion, spread over a number of years to develop and manufacture the Starship HLS lunar lander, as well as the execution of two operational flights: an uncrewed demonstration mission and a crewed lunar landing. Can Space X do this before China lands at the lunar south pole in either 2029 or 2030?
SpaceX havent even hit the first milestones on their development ... "long duration flight test" was scheduled for Q2 2023, they're years behind schedule, and have already spent that $3B.
The booster didn't sealand smoothly; the explosion had been edited out. The Starship was supposed to land on the launchpad, not on sea and catch fire.😂 "Can Space X do this before China lands at the lunar south pole in either 2029 or 2030?" You mean in 3029?
The booster didn't sealand smoothly; the explosion had been edited out. The Starship was supposed to land on the launchpad, not on sea and catch fire.😂
The booster didn't sealand smoothly; the explosion had been edited out. The Starship was supposed to land on the launchpad, not on sea and catch fire.😂 your comment is funny.🤣
You could hear the disappointment in the commentators' voices after the "offshore divert" callout - and it set the mood for the entire flight. What a waste.
The booster didn't sealand smoothly; the explosion had been edited out. The Starship was supposed to land on the launchpad, not on sea and catch fire.😂
Please --- lose the fan club! They make it seem like a participant sport and it's chidish and so distracting I'll watch some other source. They act like they are cheering on command, like a game show audience. I hated it.
Apologies, goods, & unfortunatelys are not the terms I would expect to be used as they were in today's commentary. Example: the call-out "Trajectory is Nominal." is seriously degrading "nominal" and diminishes the efforts that achieved a nominal state by the engineers who created these achievements. "Good" does not adequately describe these most outstanding achievements in the history of Rocketry. Apologies? There are no apologies in scientific advancements. Unfortunates are not science. Errors are in science. Am I nit picking? No. A certain level of professionalism is expected here. Not frivolous terms that diminish the work and professionalism of other scientists and engineers.
Catch no-go came from the tower automated health check, Booster 13 was on it's way when it got the no-go command and diverted. The Booster itself was all go, the issue was with the tower, probably the catch arms malfunctioned.
34:19 - T-10/Lift off,
35:32 - MAX-Q,
37:03 - Beco//Hot staging,
38:25 - It was at this moment I knew there will be no catch attempt,
41:00 - Booster landing burn,
53:28 - 🍌,
1:12:15 - Engine Raptor relight,
1:14:26//1:29:00//1:33:05 - Starship reentry,
1:37:28 - 17km,
1:39:00 - 3km,
1:39:38 - Starship landing burn/flip maneuver.
1:21:55//1:23:13//1:32:30 - Notice how the steel near to the payload door being warped slightly during peak re-entry heating. (That's in the area where tiles were removed.)
Thanks.
Ty
38:25? Lmao I love how you act like you can predict the future 😂
You have no clue what they're gonna do before they announce it. You're not a rocket scientist no matter how hard you try convincing yourself. 😂😂😂
@AndToTheRepublic4WhichItStands sorry for disturbing your nipples. Even kids with little knowledge of rockets know what a “Booster Offshore Divert” means.
Thanks
@@AndToTheRepublic4WhichItStandsYou act smart but youre stupid as hll, the mission control guy or whoever that is says "Booster offshore divert" in the background
It's bananas, the launch, whole flight and landing was AWESOME !👌❤👍
1:14:44 dude, that's insanely awesome. Could be one of the best fragment of video in the history of mankind
I just realized the plasma moves in sync with the music, this is just crazy to witness
It's very impressive, but best in the history of mankind?? Lol, no!
The booster didn't sealand smoothly; the explosion had been edited out.
@@internetcensure5849Im not sure its meant to land smoothly, i think theyre simulating landing on ground by stopping mid air just a bit above the water and then just kind of falling in ocean.
we know how plasma works my guy.
Knowing the hight of the ocean to make a perfect flip and landing blows my mind.
You guys truly are the shyt.
Congratulations on your awesome vehicles
The booster didn't sealand smoothly; the explosion had been edited out. The Starship was supposed to land on the launchpad, not on sea and catch fire.😂
@@internetcensure5849 the super heavy booster was supposed to be caught back on land. Not Starship. Starship did exactly what it was supposed to. You have your vehicle names mixed up.
This was a most beautiful launch !!!! 🔥
But not the landings.😂
That banana so calm and peaceful.
This was bananas 🍌
Just brilliant
Great footage, and great accompanying music ('They Dream By Day' ~ Selah)
The booster didn't sealand smoothly; the explosion had been edited out. The Starship was supposed to land on the launchpad, not on sea and catch fire.😂
Did the banana survived?
Gagging The Flying 🎉🎉🎉 Glider
1:41:34 when u run out of words 😂
Thanks 🙏🏾
44:50 - What are those objects?
Likely just ice
@TheLaunchPad
thnks for sticking to the point mate...
grt uploads.
Time to go to space people
7:00
The two people at the broadcast desk are airing from California. Wonder if they are making the move soon from California to Texas?
I am amazed at how well the top stage held up after cooking for so long!
The booster didn't sealand smoothly; the explosion had been edited out. The Starship was supposed to land on the launchpad, not on sea and catch fire.😂
Totally bananas 😂
On this re-entry it didn't hang around 68km in altitude like it did in previous flights, the re-entry was much steeper on this one.
What is the giant column of smoke coming from the ground near starships fin at 39:15? Wildfire? Smoke shaped cloud? Cooling tower made cloud?
The plume from launch. It’s mostly water vapour
It’s the trail from the launch itself which is pretty awesome
Fry Starship bananas
มาหาคูบากรจะบอกให้สร้างยานอวกาศให้บินออกนอกโลกแล้วค่อยใช้จรวดเดินทางระหว่างดวงดาวมาทีวัดป่าถ้ำหมากมางเจริญพร(ปะโมทิโต)นามะคูบากร
Every time they say “higher angle of attack” do they mean “lower”?
1:37:45 ...nose tipping down, yeah going straight into the ocean and most definitely not into space
THE Banana is SoLd out at 6.2 million😅
at 1:12:22 what is it? pieces of ice ? or space debris? who take off the engine? at T00-37-52
More than likely ice
@@Owencr905 I've seen on previous SpaceX launches. According to the caster, it's solid oxygen.
1:12:27 Banana Separation - Norminal
Was the banana baked afterwards?
Why not have Superheavy abort catchland on a Super Net?
I'll never get over the bellyflop and flip maneuver. Its just crazy that it works.
great... bravoo
The booster didn't sealand smoothly; the explosion had been edited out. The Starship was supposed to land on the launchpad, not on sea and catch fire.😂
Old version tiles: SEE! WE ARE ENOUGH!
Not for rapid reusability
I watched it like a month ago on wednesday 34:09
glory : 한글로 써 봅니다. 바나나 라는 말이 뭔가요? 아까 우주선 중앙에 바나나 하나가 있었던것 같던데...
Fireball was the BEST part!
What happens when they land in the ocean? And does it pollute the ocean at all?
Why is there a long wait stuck at the pad at the beginning, just curious. Get that thing in the air immed
your car also has a wait period when you step on the gas, its the same things here just a much higher scale
When are they going to be crewed?
As far as I know, 2027
when they will find suicidals
Banana(for scale)
23:58 Starsjip Enterprise Edition
A oreo ads 💀
Why not try to land it on Hawaii
Is the banana ok?
Anyone seen any videos from WB-54 of starship 6?
Look how fast that thing is in space they lit the engine for 2 sec and it picked up 50mph
Jerry, u were supposed to tighten those nuts down! The whole damn world just saw it floating in space
44:50
Did the Starship itself break in half after going horizontal on the Indian Ocean?
The booster didn't sealand smoothly; the explosion had been edited out. The Starship was supposed to land on the launchpad, not on sea and catch fire.😂
@@internetcensure5849 he asked about starship. Not the booster.
@@internetcensure5849it was intentional. Spacex had no plans of ship recovery. It was on a sub orbital trajectory for ditching in ocean. Not ready for ship catch. Booster was suppose to return but the tower sustained damage during take off and was aborted for ocean landing, also not recovered.
I hope that Trump allows Elon to have more influence over NASA and also give them more funding.
Безлимит 2025.г 🇷🇺
09:40 Girls: "take your average size banana" 🤪
two $lut$
W
🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
the flight controller didnt even say go starship :(
Why not simply wait out till burnout of fuel and land it somewhere where things can be salvaged atleast for a museum.
In 2021, NASA entered into a firm fixed-price contract with SpaceX valued at US$2.89 billion, spread over a number of years to develop and manufacture the Starship HLS lunar lander, as well as the execution of two operational flights: an uncrewed demonstration mission and a crewed lunar landing. Can Space X do this before China lands at the lunar south pole in either 2029 or 2030?
Probably
SpaceX havent even hit the first milestones on their development ... "long duration flight test" was scheduled for Q2 2023, they're years behind schedule, and have already spent that $3B.
The booster didn't sealand smoothly; the explosion had been edited out. The Starship was supposed to land on the launchpad, not on sea and catch fire.😂
"Can Space X do this before China lands at the lunar south pole in either 2029 or 2030?" You mean in 3029?
Unreal how the booster just sat in the ocean at an unnatural angle and just stayed
the big balls it had on was on the water side
yeah the balls must have some load remaining, truly unreal, cheers to the spacex team, big balls!
The booster didn't sealand smoothly; the explosion had been edited out. The Starship was supposed to land on the launchpad, not on sea and catch fire.😂
Jobs? put in for a number of times with not even an interview. Skill level composites,welding, fabrication, electronics
because you are colored.
Next time put a barbie
and trigger some feminists?
Oye 0:04
Uhh, Uhh, Uhm Uhm, you know!!
Трансляция Через Союз Спутник 2025.г 🌎 🛰 🇷🇺
Poor lonely banana. 🥹
Disconnect wtf😂😂😂
G code
The other one is so odd.."she's un aware and not totally knew,then change the topic..replace pls..
super ecology.
Elon Musk's rockets are a true marvel of engineering, pushing the boundaries of space exploration and revolutionizing the future of travel
*spacex’s rockets
The booster didn't sealand smoothly; the explosion had been edited out. The Starship was supposed to land on the launchpad, not on sea and catch fire.😂
your comment is funny.🤣
@@internetcensure5849 the starship wasn’t trying to land at the tower.
You could hear the disappointment in the commentators' voices after the "offshore divert" callout - and it set the mood for the entire flight. What a waste.
The booster didn't sealand smoothly; the explosion had been edited out. The Starship was supposed to land on the launchpad, not on sea and catch fire.😂
76,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide do fly a banana into space! good job america!
Pretty dissapointing test. I thought they wanted to land on the moon again how does a Banana help with that?
0G indicator
Bananas are a great source of potassium, banana trees aren't on the moon. Thus, we bring banana
astronaut on the ISS was lacking potassium.. so they made an delivery
Pretty disappointing mentality
Please --- lose the fan club! They make it seem like a participant sport and it's chidish and so distracting I'll watch some other source. They act like they are cheering on command, like a game show audience. I hated it.
Misleading, inaccurate thumbnail. Sorry to have to dislike that.
Apologies, goods, & unfortunatelys are not the terms I would expect to be used as they were in today's commentary.
Example: the call-out "Trajectory is Nominal." is seriously degrading "nominal" and diminishes the efforts that achieved a nominal state by the engineers who created these achievements.
"Good" does not adequately describe these most outstanding achievements in the history of Rocketry.
Apologies? There are no apologies in scientific advancements.
Unfortunates are not science. Errors are in science.
Am I nit picking? No. A certain level of professionalism is expected here. Not frivolous terms that diminish the work and professionalism of other scientists and engineers.
Das war der letzte Scheiss und sowas von langweilig 🤮🤮🤮
Jag gillar inte dig
German ultimate shitty comment
Booster 13 is a FAILURE! because it didn't go for a catch
Catch no-go came from the tower automated health check, Booster 13 was on it's way when it got the no-go command and diverted. The Booster itself was all go, the issue was with the tower, probably the catch arms malfunctioned.
@@andrasszasz4373 or lack of fuel due to high wind in higher athmosphere and calculation or as you said arm malfunctions
@@andrasszasz4373 really? I thought the booster had health problems so tower 1 is a FAILURE!
@@Locuste it didn't seam like there was a lot of wind and the boostback burn wouldn't need a lot more fuel to reach the launch site
@@andrasszasz4373 the tower's "antana" on the roof bent during launch. that was likely a waypoint for the booster. that's going to take time to fix
Propadák jako vždy...ale byly na Měsíci. Pohádka pro naivní...
Average human is 2 meters?? That is 6 foot 5.
U$ male median height 5 ft 11
Foto klipbaet 🤦🏻