I am so sorry Adriene Hill. I might seem a little ungrateful but your enthusiasm on the Economics crash course was so contagious. It really made me interested in Economics and made the videos so much fun. Really loved them! These are great as well!
You guys are really helping me understanding different subjects for my media-exam. Will defiantly use your videos for my other subjects as well. Thank you!
One of the biggest issues in big data is outsourcing algorithms, which gives companies plausible deniability when the program does something that could be considered unfair with the data.
The thing is, lots of big companies prefer to not deal with the security themselves, but rather hand it over to cyber security company, by using their products Because, it's easier to focus on one thing - the data, than on the security as well It's like, for example, to use Adobe Photoshop grandma and advanced image editor, to edit your images, instead of a program like Paint to edit individual pixels, because Photoshop has lots of tools to edit the pixels more efficiently, more realistically So, the company would generally prefer to hire an expert Photoshop designer, then tell an employee to use paint to edit individual pixels to create the complete image - and if we're talking about a 1920×1080 image, we're talking about more than 2 million pixels (just multiply the numbers) - a work that wo6 take ages. That's why Adobe created Photoshop
0:25 Well, depends on the algorithm maker, really Some developers are more experienced than others Some developers are more creative than others in their solution-solving ability So really, there is no "perfect" algorithm, only "what algorithm will best manage this set of data" And I'm talking as a software developer myself
I often hear conspiracy theorist types talking about how scary Big Data is and yet, it seems when Google, Netflix, TH-cam, or Facebook try to suggest things to me based off my interests, they get it wrong more than right. I'll be more scared of Big Data being all knowing and tracking my every move when it can figure out what videos I actually want to watch on TH-cam.
Inaccurate AI is theoretically more dangerous because it’s as if someone in a position of power is operating from a very warped perspective on reality. Of course, we’ve seen that human leadership is just as, if not more, susceptible to this problem.
Maybe you try to protect yourself and keep your data personal, so they haven't collected enough data about you to be more precise about their suggestions?
That's when it will be too late. You are one individual that matters much less than the whole of internet users. If big data allows prediction of most people, it's still bad, even if there are exceptions.
I would say that using an algorithm as black-box is extremely problematic ... 5:00 ... I constantly see people throwing a dozen algorithms at a problem before stepping back to think about the problem they are trying to solve first. Study MATH instead of Stats or CS and you'll be better equipped to assess what's happening between input and output.
I would say that using an equation as white-box is extremely problematic. I sometimes see people throwing a dozen equations at a problem before stepping back to think about the problem they are trying to solve first. Study STATS or CS and you'll be better equipped to assess what's happening.
You can't compute that kind of data with mathematics. I find having mathematical understanding while studying Stats and CS to be very useful. But of course, it is more complicated.
I noticed some slippery speech here. Was compass wrong about different races offending at different rates ? It wasn't clear if compass was 200% actual rates or if black defendants actually were offending at twice the rate.
*_...there's an interesting perspective on university science, that should call attention to the persistent belief than science can be advanced pointwise, instead of uniformly: it's called "functional analysis" where the researcher assigns data values to a metric field basis e.g. EMF(x,y,z,t), whereas 'reality→reality' outputs the same as the inputs, to be understood..._*
Generalizations is what is expected from big data, so just because you don't agree with what the algorithm says doesn't mean that it is wrong. The algorithm might spew politically wrong results but statistically, it is right.
*_...big-data-analysis hides-while-pretending-to-solve the basic flaw in designing-for-the-test instead of designing-for-the-spec: researchers/reviewers/readers, users, don't-get-to-know whether enough-data was included/anonymized-excluded; like those old NAVY recruitment ogive tests, a box between two men may carry a lopsided transmission-so, you're a cook..._*
*_...what why-did somebody else write that too: I did some of the pre-engineering of that system for NEL (ca '77)-and looked at the sample test questions... ('cringe')..._*
That's why curating data is an important part of statistical analysis.
Very informative! Real life examples make your videos more interesting.
I am so sorry Adriene Hill. I might seem a little ungrateful but your enthusiasm on the Economics crash course was so contagious. It really made me interested in Economics and made the videos so much fun. Really loved them! These are great as well!
You guys are really helping me understanding different subjects for my media-exam. Will defiantly use your videos for my other subjects as well. Thank you!
My wife is getting her PHD in BIg Data:3 Im so proud of her
I didn't know how much I needed to here this until right now... thank you so much. It'll definitely give my research more meat
Started statistics chapter this week, currently on correlation.
I'm not taking Statistics but I still enjoy watching their videos...Anyone else?
Ranger Ruby khanacademy is similar too
One of the biggest issues in big data is outsourcing algorithms, which gives companies plausible deniability when the program does something that could be considered unfair with the data.
Compass alghorititm: if (black == true) { recidivism = true} else {recidivism = false }
I had to re-open this tab and re-listen to the credits... the Chad and Stacy? HAH
John Smith LOLOL. I was afraid that I was the only one who would get it.
This video actually helped me with AP computer science principles... Thnx a lot!
The thing is, lots of big companies prefer to not deal with the security themselves, but rather hand it over to cyber security company, by using their products
Because, it's easier to focus on one thing - the data, than on the security as well
It's like, for example, to use Adobe Photoshop grandma and advanced image editor, to edit your images, instead of a program like Paint to edit individual pixels, because Photoshop has lots of tools to edit the pixels more efficiently, more realistically
So, the company would generally prefer to hire an expert Photoshop designer, then tell an employee to use paint to edit individual pixels to create the complete image - and if we're talking about a 1920×1080 image, we're talking about more than 2 million pixels (just multiply the numbers) - a work that wo6 take ages. That's why Adobe created Photoshop
Thanks for making this video!
This video deserves much much more views..
0:25 Well, depends on the algorithm maker, really
Some developers are more experienced than others
Some developers are more creative than others in their solution-solving ability
So really, there is no "perfect" algorithm, only "what algorithm will best manage this set of data"
And I'm talking as a software developer myself
I think I was being tracked but after examining the information gathered a determination was made that I’m boring AF😞
8:30 k-anon
I often hear conspiracy theorist types talking about how scary Big Data is and yet, it seems when Google, Netflix, TH-cam, or Facebook try to suggest things to me based off my interests, they get it wrong more than right. I'll be more scared of Big Data being all knowing and tracking my every move when it can figure out what videos I actually want to watch on TH-cam.
Well, it was precise in my case too. You can't trust a privacy policy these days.
I guess you're predictable.
Inaccurate AI is theoretically more dangerous because it’s as if someone in a position of power is operating from a very warped perspective on reality. Of course, we’ve seen that human leadership is just as, if not more, susceptible to this problem.
Maybe you try to protect yourself and keep your data personal, so they haven't collected enough data about you to be more precise about their suggestions?
That's when it will be too late. You are one individual that matters much less than the whole of internet users. If big data allows prediction of most people, it's still bad, even if there are exceptions.
9:00 golden state killer dna + me
Best episode in series for ML Transparency nuts. But you /should/ watch them all. DFTBAQ! ;)
My rule: Wearing a collar => husky. No collar => wolf.
Mine is fur pattern Husky, eating my corpse in Alaska, Wolf.
Wait we have algorithms that humans don't know exactly what they do?
I would say that using an algorithm as black-box is extremely problematic ... 5:00 ... I constantly see people throwing a dozen algorithms at a problem before stepping back to think about the problem they are trying to solve first.
Study MATH instead of Stats or CS and you'll be better equipped to assess what's happening between input and output.
You need to figure out what is exactly your problem to solve before you look for what algorithm you need to use.
I would say that using an equation as white-box is extremely problematic. I sometimes see people throwing a dozen equations at a problem before stepping back to think about the problem they are trying to solve first. Study STATS or CS and you'll be better equipped to assess what's happening.
You can't compute that kind of data with mathematics. I find having mathematical understanding while studying Stats and CS to be very useful. But of course, it is more complicated.
I noticed some slippery speech here. Was compass wrong about different races offending at different rates ? It wasn't clear if compass was 200% actual rates or if black defendants actually were offending at twice the rate.
Shout out to whoever paid for the studio to be named “Chad and Stacy”.
*_...there's an interesting perspective on university science, that should call attention to the persistent belief than science can be advanced pointwise, instead of uniformly: it's called "functional analysis" where the researcher assigns data values to a metric field basis e.g. EMF(x,y,z,t), whereas 'reality→reality' outputs the same as the inputs, to be understood..._*
Generalizations is what is expected from big data, so just because you don't agree with what the algorithm says doesn't mean that it is wrong. The algorithm might spew politically wrong results but statistically, it is right.
Ashley madison haha
👌
Do a video about The Assassins..
Джонн гринн
Hi
*_...big-data-analysis hides-while-pretending-to-solve the basic flaw in designing-for-the-test instead of designing-for-the-spec: researchers/reviewers/readers, users, don't-get-to-know whether enough-data was included/anonymized-excluded; like those old NAVY recruitment ogive tests, a box between two men may carry a lopsided transmission-so, you're a cook..._*
Raymond K Petry why to use copy and paste 👍
*_...what why-did somebody else write that too: I did some of the pre-engineering of that system for NEL (ca '77)-and looked at the sample test questions... ('cringe')..._*
Is there anyone who knows how to make this awesome videos?
That not big data.
A lot of us have never stopped looking at the total disregard for privacy since they created all this. You are only as silly as your leash.
I thought it was Garbage In, Gospel Out.