For the completely clueless, detB is the final result you're looking for. So, in simple english, whatever operations you apply to detA, you need to apply the opposite operations to your result. Some people are taught to do the opposite operations at the very end...it depends on the instructor and book used for the class. In those cases you write the opposite operations on the side of your paper. In this case, he's just placing them to the left of the actual matrix he's working with at every instance he applies an operation.
I'm not sure if your proof for det(A) = det(A') is correct as you're only considering upper triangular matrices, versus considering general matrices. Don't you have to show it must hold for any matrices?
![[Linear Algebra] Eigenvectors and Eigenvalues](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ihscX_B1BoA/mqdefault.jpg)
![[Linear Algebra] Eigenvectors and Eigenvalues](/img/tr.png)
My professor provided me with a 15 minute minute video discussing the theorems with no examples. This helped immensely, thank you.
Thanks mate, you saved my mid term at the eleventh hour!
This was a huge help to study for my exam, thank you.
This was kind of confusing because you did not explain why you were doing each step when you switched and multiplied rows.
Facts
yup
Fantastic, thank you so so much. It really helped me understanding.
first there minutes was extremely helpful! thank you!
Awesome vid, right down to the core properties
For the completely clueless, detB is the final result you're looking for. So, in simple english, whatever operations you apply to detA, you need to apply the opposite operations to your result. Some people are taught to do the opposite operations at the very end...it depends on the instructor and book used for the class. In those cases you write the opposite operations on the side of your paper. In this case, he's just placing them to the left of the actual matrix he's working with at every instance he applies an operation.
Thank you so much 💙💎
how did you get the -18 and the 12 3:52
Same question
6:00 why wouldn't it work if we add R2 + R3 and put it in R3 directly ??
can you explain why you changed the -1 in the Botton row to 1?
He just forgot to. However, determinant is still the same as it wouldn't be part of the main diagonal anyway.
@@xhelixshotx true but confused me so much
Why did u change -1 to 1 at 5:55? If it’s -1, the det would be 18. But we know that -18!is actually the correct answer. Can you explain this, please?
Thankyou so much
I'm not sure if your proof for det(A) = det(A') is correct as you're only considering upper triangular matrices, versus considering general matrices. Don't you have to show it must hold for any matrices?
He didn't attempt to "prove" anything. This video is explanations and examples. Not proofs.
Triangular form was helpful thanks )
How about column changes?
Would you please be able to show the proof in 9.31 for the second property please if possible.
Thanks, it was nice a simple
Great video ! You accidentally switched -1 to one though so the det B is 18 not -18
He did forget to negate it, however it does not affect the determinant as its an upper triangular matrix. So det is -18.
7:22 No, I don't think I will.
what about other properties???
NYC better