[C&C3: Kane's Wrath] Strategy Highlight - Rediscovered Nod Tactics

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 24

  • @johnchao2422
    @johnchao2422 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    YESSSS I LOVE THE WAY YOU MANAGE SPECTERS

  • @ozymandias4820
    @ozymandias4820 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome video. Love to see these strategies used by a pro. Hoping for more vids showcasing specters, vertigos, and enlightened. :)

  • @Spirultima
    @Spirultima ปีที่แล้ว +4

    In almost all regards I consider the Firehawk the better heavy aircraft when compared to the Vertigo, but I'd be lying if I said I preferred it. Entertaining games as ever, lad.

    • @masterleafcnc
      @masterleafcnc  ปีที่แล้ว +4

      They fit different roles, but I guess in this video I used them much like the Firehawk. Usually players never seem them used that way.

  • @lukesimmons968
    @lukesimmons968 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    top notch specter gameplay! ggwp.

  • @amxhwvhmvawx2735
    @amxhwvhmvawx2735 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I always find it annoying that at MOK the Awakened are immediately available with their EMP without having to set up the Operations Center first.
    For the best units (Venoms, Hamerheads, Sniper team) to fend them off, higher Tech is required.
    EMP Grenadiers and Cultists are also not immediately available.

  • @Drakuba
    @Drakuba ปีที่แล้ว

    neat vid, tho i wonder why PAC is rarely, almost never, build? Isnt PAC the ultimate anti-manspam unit for example? Or anything that spams alot of weak units

  • @bigrussiankarakal
    @bigrussiankarakal 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think specters can detroy your own beacons cause i sometimes lost it after first specter shoot

  • @looinrims
    @looinrims ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you have the mathematical formula for veterancy?

  • @giovannyc.1724
    @giovannyc.1724 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is 5 and 2 still optimal or 6 and 2 would be better after some of the harvester fixes?

    • @masterleafcnc
      @masterleafcnc  ปีที่แล้ว

      6 and 2 is definitely better if youre doing a one base strategy

    • @looinrims
      @looinrims ปีที่แล้ว

      You might have too many harvs by expanding and new refs in the later parts

  • @riproaringanus
    @riproaringanus ปีที่แล้ว

    That out of time possibly comment was rather concerning!

    • @masterleafcnc
      @masterleafcnc  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I meant to say real life is consuming more of my time, I probably worded it wrong in the video.

    • @Slithy
      @Slithy ปีที่แล้ว

      😅@@masterleafcnc

    • @boundless9189
      @boundless9189 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Time beats all things

  • @jumpscaremyers6886
    @jumpscaremyers6886 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey leaf, have you ever thought about using spectre artillery to destroy an opponents tiberium fields?
    I wonder how much that would impact their resource generation, i did do some tests with it in custom games and it's definitely doable, might do well to damage the tiberium with vein detonation or tiberium vapour bomb first just to get the crystals weak enough to where one spectre artillery round can destroy them, but it can just be done by the spectres alone.
    then maybe once most of the crystals are destroyed you can focus around the centre of the field to negate tiberium regeneration, idk i just thought it would be an interesting concept to be put into action.
    why destroy your enemies ability to harvest resources when you can directly destroy the resource instead.

    • @masterleafcnc
      @masterleafcnc  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      On a resource limited map that allows for that such as Tournament Tower that tactic can do wonders. With zocom on that map its actually necessary, as you cant win through attrition. Having said that, if the map has a lot of tiberium on it then usually it doesnt do anything noticeable from my experience. Overall, it depends on the map.

  • @tritarch6687
    @tritarch6687 ปีที่แล้ว

    EA rushes games? Say it ain't so! Good replay btw.

  • @tu4764
    @tu4764 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I presume the current KW community is a high skill level, right?