I've noticed exceptional improvments to my Starlink service over the last few months. I mounted my Dishy on my roof but not matter where I moved it I always had a couple of red spots on the Starlink virtual visibility map. Ever since I've owned it, coming up on a year soon I think.. I've always had obstructions no matter where I put my Dishy. But the last few months I went from "Obstruction" every 7 minutes to 12 minutes to 17 minutes and now I have zero obstructions and Starlink never goes down at all anymore. Compared to before when it went down for a few seconds at a time multiple times an hour. Also speeds have drasticly increased. I could expect 70-90mbs with a 60-70 ping most days. Sometimes I'd get a nice speedtest and it would break 100mbs. But now I see reliable speeds of ~200mbs with 40-50 ping. I'm super stoaked because all these improvments have happened over the last 4 months or so. So pumped to see where Starlink will go from here.
I set-up my dishy on my roof this weekend, with a similar similar level of obstruction (lower fringe of viewing field). I hope to see similar improvements you described, soon. Love your podcast, too. 👍
Wow wow! Incredibly informative as always… keep up the spirited investigative journalism and reporting. Definitely have my vote for a Peabody award! Thank you for doing this.
I think I read somewhere recently that although 1,740 satellites have been launched there is actually only ~1,615 or so that are active because some de-orbit or stop working
The early versions (v .9) is being deorbited. In the future Starlink might be able to deliver up to 10Gbit speeds, but it will require a new generation sats.
Love the bloopers! Suggestion...an adjustable wind screen for the camera mic. Kinda like a Pop screen. Might help. If it's not a camera mic,... large weighted tripod screen that doesn't block the lighting. Pretty in that dress!
Wind / rumbling: adding a 100 Hz cutoff filter doesn't remove the clipping problem, but makes your audio a lot more enjoyable with headphones. Quickly tried it with a snippet and audacity.
Audience: How windy was it? Hostess: It was soooo windy.... :) love your video...first time watcher and subscribing! Keep on filming... you have a great smile, excellent articulation, and a fun topic!
Excited for the new launch of the laser link satellites. Fighting the wind is beyond frustrating sometimes. Appreciate your willingness to go the installation to show how the pieces fit together. Windburn was a real possibility.
Just a suggestion, think you would be an interesting guest on one of NASASpaceflight tank watching streams, you could do the questions. Anyway you never know who you'll run into at Boca Chica. Enjoy
Good luck with those Utah blizzards, they are hellish to drive thru! I can not wait for version 2.0 to go online! No more pops, no need to get permission from other countries, to communicate in their country! I remember in a episode of “Earth Final Conflict”, and the Global that they showed off!
Going to need ground stations for those who are not using Starlink, which will include most if not all servers. But if the laser links/mesh links are good enough then the ground station that is closest to the server would be the only one needed. Super fast if it works that way. I can't really think of many situations where you are hitting a web site that is on another starlink terminal like you mentioned. So in theory if you are hitting from your starlink terminal to someone else's starlink terminal then fine. No ground station needed. But if you are hitting any business server on the ground that is not starlink (which is most) then you are going to hit a ground station at some point. Take for instance, your bank. You want to hit your bank's server then you are going to have to come to a ground station because I'll bet you a dollar that your bank doesn't have a starlink dishy on top of it's server clusters.
Only scenarios I see where you could stay within the Starlink network is peer to peer stuff, even then some peer to peer apps have you communicate with a server for a few things. But Google is interested in hosting ground stations, you could make a connection through the Starlink network and end right into a Google data center for all Google services. Just need Netflix on board too, they have a bunch of racks inside ISP networks for good speed.
Nice to have a Starlink update from you, now that you are in Utah it will be nice to see some new scenery as you tour around the state and show us other space news, and your climbing hobby as you explore the mountains around you
My Earth Queen Ellie, WOW.. YOU GIVE BEAUTIFUL A WHOLE NEW MEANING. AND YOUR SMART ALSO. I SEEN YOU CLIMP THOSE ROCKS AND DO THOSE PULLUPS. YOUR PERFECT!!!!!!!!!!! THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR SHARING. LAWRENCE.
I have always wondered why they don't use RF interlinks, getting those lasers aligned is a lot harder that an RF signal.. is there some rule stopping this?
Probably many reasons we don't know. It is amazing they can aim a laser from a moving satellite to another moving satellite. Maybe radio is too bulky for weight reasons, probably draws a lot more power since it's a much broader signal even with phased array. With higher power requirements due to the scattered nature of radio, bandwidth is probably lower. They can only gather so much power from the solar panels. Communicating with a specific satellite from multiple angles would require many antennas increasing weight further, lasers probably don't add much weight comparatively. Maybe there would be too much radio noise with all the satellites throwing radio waves around. They only have so many bands licenced to them, could interfere with their network and others or just not allowed at all on that scale. Yes you could use a type of CDMA or GSM protocol, but I imagine it's just too much to have 17,000 satellites broadcasting radio every which way, it's exponential in how many connections you can make.
They will unfortunately still need ground stations because internet is the infrastructure, the datas are in data centers and servers on the ground, same with consumers and companies.
very true because each ground station antenna can have only so much bandwidth and ability to handle a maximum number of connections, ground stations not only will be needed but they will still need to establish more of them as the system grows. and in certain places like islands in the middle of the oceans the ground stations will need to be larger than the ones on the coasts of the major land masses.
Great video Ellie! I've heard from several TH-camrs that StarLink is not suitable for livestreams currently, hopefully this will improve over time, and mobile capability is also exciting for Dishys on the move! ;)
A friend of mine was a beta tester for Starlink and has been pretty disappointed. He told me if the slightest bit of dust or pollen collects on the dish or if a bird or squirrel is nearby the reception evaporates rapidly. I was once psyched to sign up but I think I'll hold off for now.
Interesting. People have had heavy snow fall and not lost a connection, often not even losing speed. Rain doesn't affect it, thick clouds don't effect it. Birds and pollen are not likely to block the signal
Try putting plastic pvc, abs or Teflon sheet on top of it. It’s invisible to RF and can be used to protect the dish from accumulated debris if you angle the sheet so it slides off. Also, I don’t think pollen would make much of an impact, but I don’t have it so that’s only speculation.
Does this mean that laser technology will allow users in countries where Starlink is banned and there are no ground stations to still use Starlink and enjoy uncensored internet via the inter-satellite laser link?
No. Gen 1 doesn't have laser communication for receiving or transmitting so they can't talk to each other. Gen 1 can only talk to ground stations and user terminals
These are for all future launches, gen 2 with laser communication will be replacing gen 1. This is why we haven't had any Starlink launches for a couple months for any orbit, they needed to ramp up production of gen 2. The focused on Alaska because it's required bro operate there, and the first 2 launches there were for testing.
Great content. Was curious to see this key part of infrastructure for the current Starlink network. I wonder how long they will be needed in any number?
If you’re talking about the hardware, you pay for that when it ships. But to get on the list you have to put $100 down, which is refundable if you change your mind.
Not a requirement necessarily. As long as the satellite you're connected to can see a ground station too it works. The places it won't work without a laser interconnect is over the ocean and remote places like northern Alaska, Antarctica, and the like. So all over Washington or Utah you should be able to drive around and have connectivity, however you're geolocked into a cell coverage area determined by your service address. And a different terminal may be required to handle fast speeds 🤷
@@langeludo There have been plans already. Wether it's a different plan or requires a different dish we don't know. They've been in talks with interested airlines as well.
@@Jaker788 they would have to shoot beams at all possible (or most often frequented by planes/ships) cells for air travel/ship business. I wonder if that would result in bandwidth problems since now low capacity planes would get service while rural areas that are somewhat dense wouldn’t get as much beam overlap.
We always need ground stacions to conect to fiber internet But the ground stacions need upgrade ka band it's not enought in a world of petabytes of data
Hi Ellie, ordered in May 2021 my Starlink dish and I wait today for it, and I wrote some question to the space ex but nobody answer me. How I can rich out to Elon Musk in person to ask him about my order?
@@ellieinspace that is very good news! I appreciate the work you do on your channel. I teach CTE classes at a charter school in South Jordan. Your videos are very well done and are excellent teaching tools. Thank you for what you do, Ellie.
At this point I don’t care which type of satellite is above me…I want my dish I preordered in February so I can have decent internet now. And less wind for your next video lol.
You all know the real goal is to chip and track every human being don't you? It will start like this. Chip your pet and locate it anywhere in the world with your cell phone. We promise not to sell or share the tracked info with any one except our partners but we don't control what they do with it so you will have to speak with them. Hay that was a good idea, how about your kids? Well if you care about them too, you will also chip them. And how about this one, if you want out of jail you will need to be chipped. Well now we are going to mandate it for everyone because it's best for the country and it is constitutional because we checked with the supreme court judges we packed in the court. I am getting up in age and may not see the whole thing come to fruition but if the younger people don't start understanding that the water is about to boil then they will loose the one greatest thing they have on this earth. Their freedom. The ability to regain it will be nearly impossible.
I would be interested in information in Rule Alaska? I’m in the interior so I be wondering 💭? All day long Yahoo great information ℹ️ thank you for your efforts. All day long Yahoo
Starlink will ramp up again soon the new satellite is ready as well as the new antenna dish. Throw in starship to haul hundreds of these new satellites per launch and it will be an explosion.
@@ellieinspace Congratulations on the new job! I live in Sweden, so I'm probably not the best informed person when it comes to the specifics about Utah.
When Elon first said his speed of latency that they we shooting for I figured what he had stated was much slower than what they will actually be able to provide once the system is up and running with more optimized technology👍
Depends on where user receivers are. Latency will rise for packets relayed from satellite to satellite, which they will do for remote areas lacking ground stations, such as ocean-going vessels, airplanes on over-ocean routes, science stations in Antarctica, etc. Ground stations are important for low latencies. But *any* service is better than *no* service. Just being able to obtain high bandwidth internet in remote locations is a huge plus.
@@Urgelt I think light travels 40% faster in space compared to fiber. Possibly the lowest latency for long range packets. Guess time will tell, but it could be a huge feature of Starlink.
@@mcarpenter2917 Each hop requires processing time. Processing in silicon is *way* slower than the speed of light in either a vacuum or in an optical fiber cable. For a Starlink satellite, it *also* has to realign an antenna each time it delivers a packet to the ground. If you have to add satellite-to-satellite hops, you'll get more latency. Take an ocean-going ship in the middle of the Pacific - if the nearest ground station where routing wants the packet to go is 6 satellite hops away, *there* is your extra latency. But we wouldn't compare that latency to fiber, 'cause there isn't any fiber out there in the Pacific, except in a very few places (islands) on intercontinental cable runs. And those will probably be Starlink's interconnection points for packet routing. SpaceX won't want to route all the way around the Earth from satellite to satellite; its goal will be to get rid of each packet as soon as is practicable. Why? Satellite-to-satellite hops eat up bandwidth, which SpaceX will wish to preserve for more packets. Think of a packet as a hot potato. Pick up a packet from a ground station, the goal is to get it into the terrestrial network as quickly as possible. Don't sleep on the fact that Starlink can't compete directly on price with terrestrial networks - except where those networks don't reach. It's more expensive to provide bandwidth from space. So efficient utilization of available bandwidth is important for Starlink. It's not really about how fast light travels in a near-vacuum versus how fast it travels in optical fiber. It's about hops. Fewer hops means lower latency and better utilization of the Starlink network.
@@Urgelt All very reasonable and a good description of current networks, but we really don't know what's possible. The plan is to have 40k satellites. That is a lot of satellites.
@@mcarpenter2917 The sheer number of satellites will influence *some* performance parameters. But assuming that available bandwidth hasn't been saturated (which, for Starlink, as a mesh network, is a *local* phenomenon), the number of satellites won't constrain or unconstrain latency. How far a packet must travel, and how many hops it must go through, will still be the latency drivers. Most of the time, Starlink's latency will be quite good. But the cost per hop is going to be higher for Starlink than for terrestrial networks. So serving as a rival for terrestrial backbones won't work for Starlink. The value of the network will come from operating where terrestrial networks can't go. And that is what SpaceX has said from the beginning about Starlink.
I've noticed exceptional improvments to my Starlink service over the last few months. I mounted my Dishy on my roof but not matter where I moved it I always had a couple of red spots on the Starlink virtual visibility map. Ever since I've owned it, coming up on a year soon I think.. I've always had obstructions no matter where I put my Dishy. But the last few months I went from "Obstruction" every 7 minutes to 12 minutes to 17 minutes and now I have zero obstructions and Starlink never goes down at all anymore. Compared to before when it went down for a few seconds at a time multiple times an hour.
Also speeds have drasticly increased. I could expect 70-90mbs with a 60-70 ping most days. Sometimes I'd get a nice speedtest and it would break 100mbs. But now I see reliable speeds of ~200mbs with 40-50 ping. I'm super stoaked because all these improvments have happened over the last 4 months or so. So pumped to see where Starlink will go from here.
I set-up my dishy on my roof this weekend, with a similar similar level of obstruction (lower fringe of viewing field). I hope to see similar improvements you described, soon. Love your podcast, too. 👍
Amazing Ellie! Nice video and great work! And the outtakes make it so much better!
Oh my ear buds.... that wind noise is brutal...good video!
More bloopers please 😂, love the on the road video's, adventure 🙂.
Wow wow! Incredibly informative as always… keep up the spirited investigative journalism and reporting. Definitely have my vote for a Peabody award! Thank you for doing this.
What a kind comment, thank you for the support!
Welcome to Utah! Great to have more space people.
Great info, I enjoy the ground station coverage. Bringing the evolution of Starlink into a better understanding. Thanks for that :)
@1:43 I love that they have Lock Out Tag Out procedures.
I think I read somewhere recently that although 1,740 satellites have been launched there is actually only ~1,615 or so that are active because some de-orbit or stop working
Sounds like they need an OTA right away! ;)
The early versions (v .9) is being deorbited. In the future Starlink might be able to deliver up to 10Gbit speeds, but it will require a new generation sats.
SpaceX should have you as their PR person, great job yet again and thanks for the detailed information!
Love the bloopers! Suggestion...an adjustable wind screen for the camera mic. Kinda like a Pop screen. Might help. If it's not a camera mic,... large weighted tripod screen that doesn't block the lighting. Pretty in that dress!
Huge news, you moved to Utah! WOW! Of course, excellent reporting on the latest StarLink news!
Like your outtakes.
Wind / rumbling: adding a 100 Hz cutoff filter doesn't remove the clipping problem, but makes your audio a lot more enjoyable with headphones. Quickly tried it with a snippet and audacity.
Audience: How windy was it?
Hostess: It was soooo windy....
:) love your video...first time watcher and subscribing!
Keep on filming... you have a great smile, excellent articulation, and a fun topic!
Great video, love this stuff:-)
Excited for the new launch of the laser link satellites. Fighting the wind is beyond frustrating sometimes. Appreciate your willingness to go the installation to show how the pieces fit together. Windburn was a real possibility.
Qqq
The wind played heck with your audio.
Just a suggestion, think you would be an interesting guest on one of NASASpaceflight tank watching streams, you could do the questions. Anyway you never know who you'll run into at Boca Chica.
Enjoy
...and why the hell would she want to go do that for way less pay?
Wind noise at 5:04 distorted sound and your key hanging down was distracting. Replaying it 10 more times really helped.
Super Creepy
Your creepy dude
Charlie Puth alert. Charlie Puth has entered the chat and is now creepin round.
Welcome to Utah. Sorry i missed you. Yup, its bleak out west of SLC.
Good luck with those Utah blizzards, they are hellish to drive thru!
I can not wait for version 2.0 to go online! No more pops, no need to get permission from other countries, to communicate in their country!
I remember in a episode of “Earth Final Conflict”, and the Global that they showed off!
Wow. That was a lot of information in just 4 minutes.
I'm much more interested in them actually shipping my kit. Waiting list timeline has slipped twice now.
Going to need ground stations for those who are not using Starlink, which will include most if not all servers. But if the laser links/mesh links are good enough then the ground station that is closest to the server would be the only one needed. Super fast if it works that way.
I can't really think of many situations where you are hitting a web site that is on another starlink terminal like you mentioned. So in theory if you are hitting from your starlink terminal to someone else's starlink terminal then fine. No ground station needed. But if you are hitting any business server on the ground that is not starlink (which is most) then you are going to hit a ground station at some point.
Take for instance, your bank. You want to hit your bank's server then you are going to have to come to a ground station because I'll bet you a dollar that your bank doesn't have a starlink dishy on top of it's server clusters.
Only scenarios I see where you could stay within the Starlink network is peer to peer stuff, even then some peer to peer apps have you communicate with a server for a few things.
But Google is interested in hosting ground stations, you could make a connection through the Starlink network and end right into a Google data center for all Google services. Just need Netflix on board too, they have a bunch of racks inside ISP networks for good speed.
Nice to have a Starlink update from you, now that you are in Utah it will be nice to see some new scenery as you tour around the state and show us other space news, and your climbing hobby as you explore the mountains around you
I’ve already hiked a few amazing areas! Utah is beautiful!!!
Fellow Utah'n here and welcome to Utah!
Thank you!!! I love it here
All I heard was, “Frickin’ Laser Beams! Pew! Pew!”
What is a Gateway Station? What is it for? What does it do
My Earth Queen Ellie, WOW..
YOU GIVE BEAUTIFUL A WHOLE NEW MEANING. AND YOUR SMART ALSO. I SEEN YOU CLIMP THOSE ROCKS AND DO THOSE PULLUPS. YOUR PERFECT!!!!!!!!!!! THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR SHARING. LAWRENCE.
Thanks for the update.....
Awesome news thanks
Thanks for the information
You moved to ground station to get better Starlink connectivity? Wow! Way to follow through on your priorities.
Welcome to Salt Lake! Excited to follow you doing the news for Fox 13 soon.
intelligent lady, love your reporting. Keep it up
Any possibility that would work with only about a 30° in Northern Michigan. We're about 20 miles from a ground station too.
Will you ask starlink my question I live in northern Canada British Columbia in between 2 mountains will it work here
I had a proper look today and I found the first one back in 2008, so I don't need the link now thanks.
On the waiting list to get StarLink at our property. Can't wait.
L-28 was the last for the 1st shell. this is the start of the 2nd shell not the 3rd.
On waiting list since March in far northcentral Texas. Don't have any options other than hotspot phone with very poor service. Hurry up Starlink.
I have always wondered why they don't use RF interlinks, getting those lasers aligned is a lot harder that an RF signal.. is there some rule stopping this?
Probably many reasons we don't know. It is amazing they can aim a laser from a moving satellite to another moving satellite.
Maybe radio is too bulky for weight reasons, probably draws a lot more power since it's a much broader signal even with phased array.
With higher power requirements due to the scattered nature of radio, bandwidth is probably lower. They can only gather so much power from the solar panels.
Communicating with a specific satellite from multiple angles would require many antennas increasing weight further, lasers probably don't add much weight comparatively.
Maybe there would be too much radio noise with all the satellites throwing radio waves around. They only have so many bands licenced to them, could interfere with their network and others or just not allowed at all on that scale. Yes you could use a type of CDMA or GSM protocol, but I imagine it's just too much to have 17,000 satellites broadcasting radio every which way, it's exponential in how many connections you can make.
They will unfortunately still need ground stations because internet is the infrastructure, the datas are in data centers and servers on the ground, same with consumers and companies.
very true because each ground station antenna can have only so much bandwidth and ability to handle a maximum number of connections, ground stations not only will be needed but they will still need to establish more of them as the system grows. and in certain places like islands in the middle of the oceans the ground stations will need to be larger than the ones on the coasts of the major land masses.
More importantly when will Star Link IPO????
Thank you very much Ellie, very interesting presentation.
YES, finaly it is available here in Fance ! :)
HAHAHAHA! Where you jealous when America had it first?
@@jakekisiel7399 hahahhahaha no
Great video Ellie! I've heard from several TH-camrs that StarLink is not suitable for livestreams currently, hopefully this will improve over time, and mobile capability is also exciting for Dishys on the move! ;)
A friend of mine was a beta tester for Starlink and has been pretty disappointed. He told me if the slightest bit of dust or pollen collects on the dish or if a bird or squirrel is nearby the reception evaporates rapidly. I was once psyched to sign up but I think I'll hold off for now.
Interesting. People have had heavy snow fall and not lost a connection, often not even losing speed. Rain doesn't affect it, thick clouds don't effect it.
Birds and pollen are not likely to block the signal
Try putting plastic pvc, abs or Teflon sheet on top of it. It’s invisible to RF and can be used to protect the dish from accumulated debris if you angle the sheet so it slides off. Also, I don’t think pollen would make much of an impact, but I don’t have it so that’s only speculation.
Does this mean that laser technology will allow users in countries where Starlink is banned and there are no ground stations to still use Starlink and enjoy uncensored internet via the inter-satellite laser link?
That is crazy to me to launch that many satellites in low Earth orbit...isn't 25 years the avg life span or has Starlink surpassed that?
Lifespan is close to 5 years depending on amount of propellant and height (drag).
Your content is great and you are fun to watch.
Thank you William!!! I try very hard!
@@ellieinspace I am definitely a fan
Does the Generation 2 satellites communicate with Generation 1?
No. Gen 1 doesn't have laser communication for receiving or transmitting so they can't talk to each other. Gen 1 can only talk to ground stations and user terminals
Not trying to be ‘that person’ but the new laser linked are intended to be over Alaska. This is only a couple months old information.
These are for all future launches, gen 2 with laser communication will be replacing gen 1. This is why we haven't had any Starlink launches for a couple months for any orbit, they needed to ramp up production of gen 2.
The focused on Alaska because it's required bro operate there, and the first 2 launches there were for testing.
Great content. Was curious to see this key part of infrastructure for the current Starlink network. I wonder how long they will be needed in any number?
When does starlink charge for the system when it ships or on the first month's bill ?
If you’re talking about the hardware, you pay for that when it ships. But to get on the list you have to put $100 down, which is refundable if you change your mind.
@@Resist4 thank you
I hope the Starlink software engineers test theirs software.
Ellie gonna be hitting up the Boca Chica!!! Exciting :D
I am near Panaca NV and I cant even get service...
Will laser link allow to travel with Starklink, thus using it in different locations ?
Not a requirement necessarily. As long as the satellite you're connected to can see a ground station too it works. The places it won't work without a laser interconnect is over the ocean and remote places like northern Alaska, Antarctica, and the like.
So all over Washington or Utah you should be able to drive around and have connectivity, however you're geolocked into a cell coverage area determined by your service address. And a different terminal may be required to handle fast speeds 🤷
@@Jaker788 that is the problem “geolocked” will Starlink provide a subscription without that limitation?
@@langeludo There have been plans already. Wether it's a different plan or requires a different dish we don't know. They've been in talks with interested airlines as well.
@@Jaker788 they would have to shoot beams at all possible (or most often frequented by planes/ships) cells for air travel/ship business. I wonder if that would result in bandwidth problems since now low capacity planes would get service while rural areas that are somewhat dense wouldn’t get as much beam overlap.
We always need ground stacions to conect to fiber internet But the ground stacions need upgrade ka band it's not enought in a world of petabytes of data
were in GA. wheres my link?
Hi Ellie, ordered in May 2021 my Starlink dish and I wait today for it, and I wrote some question to the space ex but nobody answer me. How I can rich out to Elon Musk in person to ask him about my order?
LOL
I have starling it is awesome
Washington must be waaaay worse than anyone thought to force you to Utah😬
The answer is on the news. Crazies are still lose in Washington state.
.Starlink, Skynet, what could go wrong.
Welcome to Utah. Waiting patiently for Starlink in South Central Utah.
Thank's for share. SpaceX is a good idea. Is this only one?
You moved to Utah? Welcome!
I did just a week ago!!!
@@ellieinspace that is very good news! I appreciate the work you do on your channel. I teach CTE classes at a charter school in South Jordan. Your videos are very well done and are excellent teaching tools. Thank you for what you do, Ellie.
I hope you get an interview with Elon when you are in Boca Chica.
Hell yeah!
You are mesmerizing. A 💎 gemstone. Hope your doing well🥰💓🤗
At this point I don’t care which type of satellite is above me…I want my dish I preordered in February so I can have decent internet now. And less wind for your next video lol.
sad you moved ... now we aren't in the same state ... keep up on the good content
You'll dig Utah, lots of good climbing and hiking. Stay away from those freaky Mormon's though!
You all know the real goal is to chip and track every human being don't you? It will start like this. Chip your pet and locate it anywhere in the world with your cell phone. We promise not to sell or share the tracked info with any one except our partners but we don't control what they do with it so you will have to speak with them. Hay that was a good idea, how about your kids? Well if you care about them too, you will also chip them. And how about this one, if you want out of jail you will need to be chipped. Well now we are going to mandate it for everyone because it's best for the country and it is constitutional because we checked with the supreme court judges we packed in the court.
I am getting up in age and may not see the whole thing come to fruition but if the younger people don't start understanding that the water is about to boil then they will loose the one greatest thing they have on this earth. Their freedom. The ability to regain it will be nearly impossible.
❤️
Why is there no link to part 1. Are you a spadist?
I would be interested in information in Rule Alaska? I’m in the interior so I be wondering 💭? All day long Yahoo great information ℹ️ thank you for your efforts. All day long Yahoo
Starlink will ramp up again soon the new satellite is ready as well as the new antenna dish. Throw in starship to haul hundreds of these new satellites per launch and it will be an explosion.
This is sooooooo Kool Ellie.
I want one for my CYBRTRK.
Dear Santa Elon:
if using dead cat wind - fluff out w hair brush - it helps
Always good ifo.
Your INTELLIGENCE, diction, oratory skills on-camera caught my attention; subbed. Besides, I've always been a sucker for women in SCIENCE. #NotEnough
You Are SOO Pretty Thanks for the video 😜
I can hardly wait to dump Verizon and Xfinity for Starlink. Better, faster, cheaper, better support......no loosing race car teams to support.
Oooooh….SKYNET. This is how it all starts. We just need them to team up with Boston Dynamics. 😏
Don't need Boston Dynamics, Tesla is building their own robots.
Sky Net
You'r just tallent keep going don't look back wow
the starlinks are for the cctv, smile you are on cameras.
i dont waste time in WAITING.
like👍
You mispronounced Panaca. Don't worry, you'll get used to the Mormon Pioneer way of pronouncing things.
Please enlighten me how to! I tried to look it up.
You may be too young to remember Binaca, but if you do, Panaca sounds a LOT like Binaca.
I use to pronounce it the same way. I believe its pronounced: Pa•naaaa•ca
Have you become a Mormon, or is there another reason for moving to Utah?
I came here for a new job!
@@ellieinspace Congratulations on the new job!
I live in Sweden, so I'm probably not the best informed person when it comes to the specifics about Utah.
Next investment: a super quality dead cat!
When Elon first said his speed of latency that they we shooting for I figured what he had stated was much slower than what they will actually be able to provide once the system is up and running with more optimized technology👍
Depends on where user receivers are. Latency will rise for packets relayed from satellite to satellite, which they will do for remote areas lacking ground stations, such as ocean-going vessels, airplanes on over-ocean routes, science stations in Antarctica, etc.
Ground stations are important for low latencies. But *any* service is better than *no* service. Just being able to obtain high bandwidth internet in remote locations is a huge plus.
@@Urgelt I think light travels 40% faster in space compared to fiber. Possibly the lowest latency for long range packets. Guess time will tell, but it could be a huge feature of Starlink.
@@mcarpenter2917 Each hop requires processing time. Processing in silicon is *way* slower than the speed of light in either a vacuum or in an optical fiber cable. For a Starlink satellite, it *also* has to realign an antenna each time it delivers a packet to the ground.
If you have to add satellite-to-satellite hops, you'll get more latency. Take an ocean-going ship in the middle of the Pacific - if the nearest ground station where routing wants the packet to go is 6 satellite hops away, *there* is your extra latency.
But we wouldn't compare that latency to fiber, 'cause there isn't any fiber out there in the Pacific, except in a very few places (islands) on intercontinental cable runs. And those will probably be Starlink's interconnection points for packet routing. SpaceX won't want to route all the way around the Earth from satellite to satellite; its goal will be to get rid of each packet as soon as is practicable. Why? Satellite-to-satellite hops eat up bandwidth, which SpaceX will wish to preserve for more packets. Think of a packet as a hot potato. Pick up a packet from a ground station, the goal is to get it into the terrestrial network as quickly as possible.
Don't sleep on the fact that Starlink can't compete directly on price with terrestrial networks - except where those networks don't reach. It's more expensive to provide bandwidth from space. So efficient utilization of available bandwidth is important for Starlink.
It's not really about how fast light travels in a near-vacuum versus how fast it travels in optical fiber. It's about hops. Fewer hops means lower latency and better utilization of the Starlink network.
@@Urgelt All very reasonable and a good description of current networks, but we really don't know what's possible. The plan is to have 40k satellites. That is a lot of satellites.
@@mcarpenter2917 The sheer number of satellites will influence *some* performance parameters.
But assuming that available bandwidth hasn't been saturated (which, for Starlink, as a mesh network, is a *local* phenomenon), the number of satellites won't constrain or unconstrain latency. How far a packet must travel, and how many hops it must go through, will still be the latency drivers.
Most of the time, Starlink's latency will be quite good. But the cost per hop is going to be higher for Starlink than for terrestrial networks. So serving as a rival for terrestrial backbones won't work for Starlink. The value of the network will come from operating where terrestrial networks can't go.
And that is what SpaceX has said from the beginning about Starlink.
Ah. so He won't need "Black-face" for South Africa then... Nice...
Ellie you are so beautiful.
Wear a hair band in the wind.
Get a light blue one with a black pattern to match your eyes. It will pop.
It will be lit.
It'll be fire.
It'll be sick.
Eso es lento de cojones