I have to question the demo. IP is a layer-3 that has to flow over _some_ layer-2; most commonly today, that'd be ethernet. So when switching to "just ethernet" it should've improved. That says to me whatever messaging layer you're adding is not optimal. Ethernet does have a mechanism for QoS (802.1p), but is not a "reliable transport" - there's no acknowledgement of transmission. While everything these days wants to be "cheap" ethernet and IP, they aren't the right tool in every case. (eg. CAN has been very popular in automotive systems, 'tho "automotive ethernet" is a growing thing.)
As far as I've understood QoS it just uses queues with different priorities. This is better than without it, but it neither ensures that a super important packet can be really send first (determinism) nor guarantees that the packet arrives within a set time limit (time sensitivity or "real time"). TSN uses several new features like fixed time slots and is even able to interupt packets with lower priority during the sending process.
So, you are using tech that has already been in play for over a decade.... Audio Networking better known by its brand names, AVP, Dante and a bunch others. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_audio_network_protocols Time synced networking. Master clock on host network controller, rest of devices slave off it for the clock and assured delivery of packets.
I have to question the demo. IP is a layer-3 that has to flow over _some_ layer-2; most commonly today, that'd be ethernet. So when switching to "just ethernet" it should've improved. That says to me whatever messaging layer you're adding is not optimal. Ethernet does have a mechanism for QoS (802.1p), but is not a "reliable transport" - there's no acknowledgement of transmission. While everything these days wants to be "cheap" ethernet and IP, they aren't the right tool in every case. (eg. CAN has been very popular in automotive systems, 'tho "automotive ethernet" is a growing thing.)
Interesting, where is this technology used? Vehicle manufacturing, valued paper printing?
So it is basically qos on the network?
As far as I've understood QoS it just uses queues with different priorities. This is better than without it, but it neither ensures that a super important packet can be really send first (determinism) nor guarantees that the packet arrives within a set time limit (time sensitivity or "real time"). TSN uses several new features like fixed time slots and is even able to interupt packets with lower priority during the sending process.
No, I think I have your answer above.
KFC
AT&T
CNN
WTF
So, you are using tech that has already been in play for over a decade.... Audio Networking better known by its brand names, AVP, Dante and a bunch others. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_audio_network_protocols
Time synced networking. Master clock on host network controller, rest of devices slave off it for the clock and assured delivery of packets.