I think that Shaykh Hamza has unusually conflated a series of points that by themselves are not related. However, Hamza main point is that it is better to write, express, or state an opinion rather than act on it. He does his best in a spaghetti like logic to justify non physical action against the establishment of idolatry. The example used that triggers this point is when a idol of ganesh belonging to an Indian store owner is destroyed by two Gulf Arab Muslim women. First, why was the Hindu owner disrespecting the very culture of the country. Second, the Gulf women live there. Thirdly, if the owner was actually ritualizing the statute then there is a very good argument to be had that the statute destruction is not outlandish. It would be different if the store was here in the US or another secular country. If anything maybe it would have been better to alert the authorities rather than take matters into their own hands.
First man on the planet earth is Aadam a s, ya shiv is a musalman prophet, his progeny till qayamath inspite of religion musalman, siv parvati ya ardhanareeswar adams rib hawwa were a ekadeiva devotion ibrahim a0k, stoped puthla devotism galath , prophet Muhammad eaw reformed ekadeiva devotion...
shiv is a musalman prophet > Astagfirullah. You make a claim WITHOUT evidence regarding the Deen of Islam. What can one say to the $hamele$$ Liar$ except pray that they are humble enough to put Allah subhanu wa ta'ala above the material world & social pressures in sha Allah.
MashaAllah 🌻🌻🌻🌻
Allahumma salli 'ala sayyidina muhammad 🤲🥰
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ this message should be for all Muslims not for only Indian Muslims
Well spoken.
This massages is only muslim❤❤❤
I think that Shaykh Hamza has unusually conflated a series of points that by themselves are not related. However, Hamza main point is that it is better to write, express, or state an opinion rather than act on it. He does his best in a spaghetti like logic to justify non physical action against the establishment of idolatry. The example used that triggers this point is when a idol of ganesh belonging to an Indian store owner is destroyed by two Gulf Arab Muslim women. First, why was the Hindu owner disrespecting the very culture of the country. Second, the Gulf women live there. Thirdly, if the owner was actually ritualizing the statute then there is a very good argument to be had that the statute destruction is not outlandish. It would be different if the store was here in the US or another secular country. If anything maybe it would have been better to alert the authorities rather than take matters into their own hands.
❤
First man on the planet earth is Aadam a s, ya shiv is a musalman prophet, his progeny till qayamath inspite of religion musalman, siv parvati ya ardhanareeswar adams rib hawwa were a ekadeiva devotion ibrahim a0k, stoped puthla devotism galath , prophet Muhammad eaw reformed ekadeiva devotion...
shiv is a musalman prophet
> Astagfirullah. You make a claim WITHOUT evidence regarding the Deen of Islam.
What can one say to the $hamele$$ Liar$ except pray that they are humble enough to put Allah subhanu wa ta'ala above the material world & social pressures in sha Allah.
Nice to live in a different reality…..