As a person who studied SE Asian history this vid really make me laugh. The woman in the pic has nothing to do with Karen or Burmese at all. Yet her pic is in many thai book but she is totally Thai -- born in BKK under Thai parents on March 3rd, 1830 and passed away in 1983. Her name is Chaochom MRW. Sadab Laddawan (เจ้าจอมหม่อมราชวงศ์สดับ ลดาวัลย์), a wife of King Rama V. Copy her name in Thai and search for her pics. There are tons on the net with her biography. What I would say next is your choice to listen. What you do is the reason why many look down at you. History is not just words of mouth but it need historical evidences to support that story. The queen just passe away in just about 50 years so there are TONS of evidence of who she is. However since you believe and make some story WITHOUT any proof, that shows your lack of the way of modern thinking. And that's the reason why others look down at you. In case you don't have money, at least if you have knowledge and have good method of medern studying (which reflect your background from studying to how you were raised) people would respect you. But if you have nothing, well, don't balme others when they look down at you. You make them think that way yourself. It's pathetic like the old saying "Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt". Also noted here that it's IMPOSSIBLE for the king to have foreign wife at that time esp. those from Burma. Why? Simply. No matter which ethnics you are you were under Great Britain regime. They colonized you decades before the time of King Rama V coronation. To have a wife under their subject would means Siam let their influence spread into the country via that wife. It's something they would not allow since they know that the West want them under their rules the same way Burma faced. That's why I said your vid is a sample of why others would laugh at you or anybody who believe it. It reflects that you don't THINK but believe anything which go with what you tend to believe. A sign of gullibility.
As a person who studied SE Asian history this vid really make me laugh. The woman in the pic has nothing to do with Karen or Burmese at all. Yet her pic is in many thai book but she is totally Thai -- born in BKK under Thai parents on March 3rd, 1830 and passed away in 1983. Her name is Chaochom MRW. Sadab Laddawan (เจ้าจอมหม่อมราชวงศ์สดับ ลดาวัลย์), a wife of King Rama V. Copy her name in Thai and search for her pics. There are tons on the net with her biography. What I would say next is your choice to listen. What you do is the reason why many look down at you. History is not just words of mouth but it need historical evidences to support that story. The queen just passe away in just about 50 years so there are TONS of evidence of who she is. However since you believe and make some story WITHOUT any proof, that shows your lack of the way of modern thinking. And that's the reason why others look down at you. In case you don't have money, at least if you have knowledge and have good method of medern studying (which reflect your background from studying to how you were raised) people would respect you. But if you have nothing, well, don't balme others when they look down at you. You make them think that way yourself. It's pathetic like the old saying "Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt". Also noted here that it's IMPOSSIBLE for the king to have foreign wife at that time esp. those from Burma. Why? Simply. No matter which ethnics you are you were under Great Britain regime. They colonized you decades before the time of King Rama V coronation. To have a wife under their subject would means Siam let their influence spread into the country via that wife. It's something they would not allow since they know that the West want them under their rules the same way Burma faced. That's why I said your vid is a sample of why others would laugh at you or anybody who believe it. It reflects that you don't THINK but believe anything which go with what you tend to believe. A sign of gullibility.
![Ep:586 [ နီၢ်မုၢ်ယဲၤဖဲ ] Part: 1. เรื่องราวของคุณ mu yeh peh. (Karen True Story Of Naw Mu Yeh Peh)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/shIi6QQpfgI/mqdefault.jpg)
😭😭😭
👍👍👍👍
😢😢ကရင်မလေ😢
တော်တော်ချောတဲ့ကရင်မလေးဘဲနော်
သင်တို့ဂတိကဝတ်ဖျောက်ဖျက်သော်လည်းတိုင်တည်သောစကားကတိကဝတ်သည်တည်မြဲပြီးသားမို့သင်တို့ကတိမတည်ရင်ဝတ်သင့်မည်အမှန်ပြင်
As a person who studied SE Asian history this vid really make me laugh. The woman in the pic has nothing to do with Karen or Burmese at all. Yet her pic is in many thai book but she is totally Thai -- born in BKK under Thai parents on March 3rd, 1830 and passed away in 1983. Her name is Chaochom MRW. Sadab Laddawan (เจ้าจอมหม่อมราชวงศ์สดับ ลดาวัลย์), a wife of King Rama V. Copy her name in Thai and search for her pics. There are tons on the net with her biography. What I would say next is your choice to listen. What you do is the reason why many look down at you. History is not just words of mouth but it need historical evidences to support that story. The queen just passe away in just about 50 years so there are TONS of evidence of who she is. However since you believe and make some story WITHOUT any proof, that shows your lack of the way of modern thinking. And that's the reason why others look down at you. In case you don't have money, at least if you have knowledge and have good method of medern studying (which reflect your background from studying to how you were raised) people would respect you. But if you have nothing, well, don't balme others when they look down at you. You make them think that way yourself. It's pathetic like the old saying "Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt". Also noted here that it's IMPOSSIBLE for the king to have foreign wife at that time esp. those from Burma. Why? Simply. No matter which ethnics you are you were under Great Britain regime. They colonized you decades before the time of King Rama V coronation. To have a wife under their subject would means Siam let their influence spread into the country via that wife. It's something they would not allow since they know that the West want them under their rules the same way Burma faced. That's why I said your vid is a sample of why others would laugh at you or anybody who believe it. It reflects that you don't THINK but believe anything which go with what you tend to believe. A sign of gullibility.
တကယ်လားလေစာပါတယ်နော်ကညောမူနအယ်နပွာကလူမောပအယ်လိုပသပကအိုဎူအပို့လိုပသ
As a person who studied SE Asian history this vid really make me laugh. The woman in the pic has nothing to do with Karen or Burmese at all. Yet her pic is in many thai book but she is totally Thai -- born in BKK under Thai parents on March 3rd, 1830 and passed away in 1983. Her name is Chaochom MRW. Sadab Laddawan (เจ้าจอมหม่อมราชวงศ์สดับ ลดาวัลย์), a wife of King Rama V. Copy her name in Thai and search for her pics. There are tons on the net with her biography. What I would say next is your choice to listen. What you do is the reason why many look down at you. History is not just words of mouth but it need historical evidences to support that story. The queen just passe away in just about 50 years so there are TONS of evidence of who she is. However since you believe and make some story WITHOUT any proof, that shows your lack of the way of modern thinking. And that's the reason why others look down at you. In case you don't have money, at least if you have knowledge and have good method of medern studying (which reflect your background from studying to how you were raised) people would respect you. But if you have nothing, well, don't balme others when they look down at you. You make them think that way yourself. It's pathetic like the old saying "Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt". Also noted here that it's IMPOSSIBLE for the king to have foreign wife at that time esp. those from Burma. Why? Simply. No matter which ethnics you are you were under Great Britain regime. They colonized you decades before the time of King Rama V coronation. To have a wife under their subject would means Siam let their influence spread into the country via that wife. It's something they would not allow since they know that the West want them under their rules the same way Burma faced. That's why I said your vid is a sample of why others would laugh at you or anybody who believe it. It reflects that you don't THINK but believe anything which go with what you tend to believe. A sign of gullibility.