Airlines ban emotional support animals after years of fraud and hazards

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น •

  • @sarawhitmire7967
    @sarawhitmire7967 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    This emotional support animal issue is completely out of hand!

  • @sd.lulu.multipurpose5306
    @sd.lulu.multipurpose5306 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    This is why we need stricter punishments for lawbreakers. No need for misdemeanors! Treat them like a felon that they are! Go to prison!

  • @bobby1970
    @bobby1970 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    About damn time these airlines ban all these so-called emotional animals in the cabin. No one wants to smell a big pile of poop on a 5 hour flight, or worse yet, on a 14 hour flight from LAX to SYD.

  • @ashdav9980
    @ashdav9980 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    This is a win for all citizens and those with legitimate service animals. Good.....now if this would expand to housing laws where MOST of the scammers are.

    • @Ausgar-yc1yl
      @Ausgar-yc1yl 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This has nothing to do with service animals. Emotional support animals are not service animals.

  • @theresemalmberg955
    @theresemalmberg955 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What did people do before there were emotional support animals? And how many people who claim to need them have actually gone through life-changing major trauma? By life-changing major trauma I mean war, refugee situations, losing one's home (and health) to storms, that sort of thing. EVERYONE experiences trauma of some sort at some point, that's called life. And what happens when that emotional support is taken away or is no longer there? Or are we not allowed to ask such questions?

    • @kell_checks_in
      @kell_checks_in 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Molly Crossman at Yale is asking the unfashionable questions. She's finding that ESAs actually DELAY therapeutic improvement. Not surprising, since getting people addicted to heroin would be pretty much the same thing.

  • @mathisnotforthefaintofheart
    @mathisnotforthefaintofheart ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent news!!

  • @leopardgal3337
    @leopardgal3337 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Thank God my dog is still allow he's a service dog there's a huge difference between service and emotional support mine was trained though a grouped call circle tail

    • @kell_checks_in
      @kell_checks_in 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      You couldn't just get a grabber? Why do you have to force an animal into places it doesn't belong when there are DOZENS of affordable devices that would do exactly the same things, and do them far better! Not buying it. Leave your pet home. (And, I am legally disabled and like 99.99% of people with disabilities am fed the hell up with dogs intruding everywhere they don't belong.)

  • @merryhunt9153
    @merryhunt9153 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    A peacock!? Peacocks are known for their stupidity. What are we supposed to do when it poops?

  • @progressionsessions99
    @progressionsessions99 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Emotional support dogs were what we used to call pets , you might want them with you but you don’t need them

    • @astro3
      @astro3 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Tiny Princess for goodness sakes,.
      there are people with diseases that need A DAMN DOG

    • @astro3
      @astro3 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Tiny Princess
      ok
      but
      like i didn't ask?

    • @PracticalPerry
      @PracticalPerry 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Tiny Princess Incorrect. I went to law school and work at a law office. Pets are not service animals, but a service animal is a subsumed pet. The ADA does NOT say "emotional support animals are pets not service animals" whatsoever. A service animal can be for either a physical and/or mental disability, including for emotional support. The ADA is NON exclusionary when it comes to disabilities and the need for a service animal. Please stop stating misinformation.

    • @PracticalPerry
      @PracticalPerry 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@astro3 Tiny Princess is incorrect big time. I went to law school and work at a law office. Pets are not service animals, but a service animal is a subsumed pet. The ADA does NOT say "emotional support animals are pets not service animals" whatsoever. A service animal can be for either a physical and/or mental disability, including for emotional support. The ADA is NON exclusionary when it comes to disabilities and the need for a service animal.

    • @PracticalPerry
      @PracticalPerry 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Tiny Princess I never simply said "emotional support animal", if that is all you say, this is misleading, and can be deemed as a pet. RE-Read what I said: I went to law school and work at a law office. Pets are not service animals, but a service animal is a subsumed pet. The ADA does NOT say "emotional support animals are pets not service animals" whatsoever. A service animal can be for either a physical and/or mental disability, including for emotional support. The ADA is NON exclusionary when it comes to disabilities and the need for a service animal. I had, and will be getting another, Service Animal for my PTSD, which includes emotional support.

  • @Zomboo
    @Zomboo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I find many dog owners have parts of their brains missing or something...

    • @ThrowAway-f6q
      @ThrowAway-f6q 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The whole brain

  • @johnsamuels958
    @johnsamuels958 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Finally a good desicion

    • @astro3
      @astro3 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @MA Cinnseallaigh there are people who need service dogs,
      this ban is temporary anyways
      until the people who approve these service dog licenses get their shit together

    • @gloriawelch3603
      @gloriawelch3603 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@astro3 anyone needing a support dog to fly, shouldn't be flying.

    • @Ausgar-yc1yl
      @Ausgar-yc1yl 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@astro3Emotional support animal are NOT service animals, and they are banned for good. There is NO such thing as a service dog license.

  • @thanos7245
    @thanos7245 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good.

  • @RooRoove
    @RooRoove 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    ESA's are not the same as service animals...

  • @wfnwfowfnfwofno
    @wfnwfowfnfwofno 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    ESAs work? sounds like were confusing Service Animals with them.

  • @CrimsonHelldrake
    @CrimsonHelldrake 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    lol *the movie Idiocracy has become a documentary; they fuckin world is losing it's mind!*

  • @nickkrikorian5909
    @nickkrikorian5909 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Landlords scam us but making us use petscreening in apartment complexes and making us pay 25 a month for what service. Its a scam

    • @kell_checks_in
      @kell_checks_in 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Get rid of your mutt, then. Or, buy a house with an HOA that allows pets. Stop whining about your stupid hobby.

  • @PracticalPerry
    @PracticalPerry 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Under the law, "emotional support" is a service, and those with disabilities, conditions that affect a major life activity, can have a service animal for a psychiatric disability under the law. Many people who have been diagnosed with PTSD have service animals. The issue (and question-) is a service animal for PTSD could definitely be considered a service animal that provides "emotional support". So this is gonna 'cause problems. Does this guy call his dog a "PTSD Service Dog" I don't think so, but I am wondering? I went to law school. I also have PTSD and have had a service dog before for the PTSD. I need another service dog.

    • @sd.lulu.multipurpose5306
      @sd.lulu.multipurpose5306 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Wrong you fucking dumbass. Emotional support animals and service dogs ARE NOT THE SAME! Look up the Americans with Disabilities Act! It states it everywhere and even has it as a question! Before you start making incorrect comments and harassing others on another comment stream. Get your fucking facts straight.

    • @sd.lulu.multipurpose5306
      @sd.lulu.multipurpose5306 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Also, there is a such thing as psychiatric service dogs. 100% DIFFERENT FROM EMOTIONAL SUPPORT ANIMALS!

    • @lonewolf4429
      @lonewolf4429 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Just because something is a law doesn't make it right. Most "service animals" are simply pets and Grandma just doesn't want to be separated from Lulu her Chihuahua. The vast majority are abusing the law and making it more difficult for people with real disabilities to have their service animals with them. Emotional support animals should not be considered service animals..

    • @sd.lulu.multipurpose5306
      @sd.lulu.multipurpose5306 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lonewolf4429 exactly, the problem is, a law is only as strong as the ones who enforces them. Unfortunately, no law enforcement company knows or cares about it. Saying “they deal with criminal law” wtf is federal law then?! Your backyard law? My dog in the photo has been nearly attacked on numerous occasions because pets who claim their a fucking service dog gets violating around her. Luckily I can pick her up but one day I’ll be getting a 50 lbs dog and I will be able to kick and spray the pets.

    • @PracticalPerry
      @PracticalPerry 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Tiny Princess u are totally incorrect. Reread my message above. I went to law school.

  • @RS-cd9cf
    @RS-cd9cf 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    So what’s his plan when his service / support dog dies and he becomes an emotional wreck because he now has now support ?
    I suggest get therapy and stop parading around stores and airports with your pets , this is encouraging bad behavior! What did the soldiers do when they got back from ww1 through to Vietnam? Pucker up buttercup

    • @RS-cd9cf
      @RS-cd9cf 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@liftedgifted6010is your mindset of a 4?year old ? 🙏🏻😿

    • @TheSarahJane33
      @TheSarahJane33 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They had crippling PTSD and killed themselves.

    • @kell_checks_in
      @kell_checks_in 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@TheSarahJane33 Bullshit. Any loser who wants to bully other people brings up "suicide." Look up Molly Crossman's studies at Yale (so far, the only legit research into whether or not ESAs are BS.) ESAs delay therapeutic outcomes. In other words, they make people WORSE. No surprising, since the whole joke is based on indulging selfish bullying and narcissism.

  • @sarcasticcat4982
    @sarcasticcat4982 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A dog trained for a specific task for a handicapped person IS NOT AN ESA!!! IT IS A FULL SERVICE DOG. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE. YOU CAN NOT BAN A SD.

    • @kell_checks_in
      @kell_checks_in 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Hell, yeah, you can. If the "service dog" is violent, is crapping everywhere, is trying to interact with strangers or is behaving erratically, hell yeah you can ban it. Here's an experiment: ask any of the fakers with their "home trained" SDs what it means to have an animal at "focus." They have no idea what the word even means. They don't even know what "heel" is. "Home trained" means NO TRAINING AT ALL. We're twenty years overdue for hard, strictly- enforced certification standards and annual retesting & microchipping of SDs. Their numbers should drop and keep dropping to nil as the tasks they perform are replaced by tech solutions that DON'T violate other people's needs and rights. Enough of this crap.

  • @songhenry1084
    @songhenry1084 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    It’s wrong to ban all emotions support pets

    • @msmakos1
      @msmakos1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Unfortunately, those who abused the system are the reason they are banned. We can’t have nice things when it’s ruined. Don’t ruin service dogs though. You’ll fight 31 years and millions of handlers before you destroy our chance.

    • @msmakos1
      @msmakos1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Zachary Sheffield there is no such thing as certifications for emotional support animals or service dogs. It’s the doctors letter that is required for the animal. Even then, January 2021, Air Carrier Access Act actually changed the term of emotional support animal to pet because people abused the system just to bring their pet without paying the fees.

    • @msmakos1
      @msmakos1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Zachary Sheffield excuse me! Do you have a legitimate service dog or a fake “certified” Service dog? Because your speaking to a legitimate task trained none illegally certified service dog. She’s not certified Because it’s illegal and a a major scam. Under the Americans with Disabilities Act there is no such thing as a certification, documentation or registration. ADA is the federal law. If you certified your pet as a service dog your committing a felony crime.

    • @msmakos1
      @msmakos1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Zachary Sheffield also, certifications and registrations don’t hold gold EVER in American court! Good luck arguing with a judge who knows the federal law down to the t.

    • @tj.espygil4544
      @tj.espygil4544 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Emotional support pets are not allowed in most businesses. Service animals are always allowed.

  • @gotfoodstamps
    @gotfoodstamps 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This ban is BS, esa animals may not be $$$$trained to perform a service but they provide people with a real medical condition to be mentally stable and get through life, punish the people who’s pet is aggressive and bit somebody, not all esa pet owners. I hope this law gets reversed.

    • @93ImagineBreaker
      @93ImagineBreaker 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      so basically they're a pet

    • @kell_checks_in
      @kell_checks_in 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      By definition, anyone with an ESA is NOT mentally stable. That degree of bullying selfishness alone is evidence of ongoing sociopathology. Anyone who "needs" a fur-covered bag of feces to "get through life" is not "stable" and NOT "getting through life." If anything, they're regressing. Real therapy cures people of weird, unhealthy, SELFISH obsessions, it doesn't create and indulge them.