If you Enjoyed this, please leave a LIKE 👍and make sure to SUBSCRIBE now👇 ► th-cam.com/users/rakcroybrosgaming More EPIC cinematic convoy and tank battles 👇 ► th-cam.com/video/bUgaOuxmUms/w-d-xo.html
490 Кing tigers produced. IS2 was created in the year 43. Released 3395. The first combat of IS -2 - April 1944, 1 combat of KT - August 1944. On the eastern front. Question: are you a moron?
The worst enemy of the king tiger was itself. Without mechanical issues it was unmatched in a one-on-one encounter. Could be destroyed but it enjoyed an advantage over every tank it faced IF it didn’t have any mechanical breakdowns.
In reality,the axis would have been hard pushed to put this many Konigstigers in the field,whereas the Ruskys had a seemingly never ending supply of armour
@@thegermanmemeperor889 Are you sure that you are not the great-grandson of another Ivan, who killed your great-grandfather and got to your great-grandmother?))) Are you sure your family doesn't have any skeletons in the cupborad?) War veterans remember well that German girls willingly slept with the liberators of Europe from Nazism for a half a kilo of sugar ... Do you know the reason of such a situation? Hans was never shot for retreat, and even when the front approached Berlin, Germans worked 8 hours a day. Every day, pray for the Americans who saved you.
@@Edario However, I repeat that this is predictable, because the König Tigers came out later IS and were just against this kind of technology and were intended, that is, what is interesting is that the Tiger fulfills its task?
@@jinglejangle3287 "This took time, and only in May 1945, the first three pre-series vehicles rolled out of the factory, to be thrown immediately into action in Germany, in the hands of an independent Guards Battalion. However, when they arrived, peace had already been signed. Rumors of a fighting en route with an isolated Abteilung of Jadgpanthers after the surrender is left unconfirmed by most sources." tanks-encyclopedia.com/ww2/soviet/soviet_is-iii.php
Stalin: how many tigers are in there? Ivan: 80, sir! Stalin: and how many shells do they have? Ivan: umm... I guess 6000, sir! Stalin: Then send 6001 IS-2s *Galaxy brain meme*
Fun facts: 1)Tiger II were never penetrated by its frontal armor even by the 122mm gun.( ecxept self propelled guns) 2) The 122mm gun was as precise as the 8,8 but the Germans has better optics 3) The first platoon of tanks to shoot has a 80% of chance of winning this battle of armored vehicles 4)The JS series was developped in response to the Tiger series
Fun facts:Tests in Kubinka: The shelling tests were carried out in the fall of 1944 in Kubinka, and during them the following results were obtained: "1. The quality of the armor of the Tigr-B tank compared to the quality of the armor of the Tigr-N, Panther and Ferdinand SU of the first releases has sharply deteriorated. In the armor of the Tigr-B tank from the first single hits cracks and spalls are formed in the armor from a group of projectile hits (3-4 shells) spalls and large breaks are formed. 2. All units of the hull and turret of the tank are characterized by the weakness of the welds. Despite careful execution, the seams during shelling behave much worse than they did in similar designs of the Tiger-N, Panther and Ferdinand SU tanks. 3. In the armor of the frontal plates of the tank with a thickness of 100 to 190 mm, when 3-4 armor-piercing or high-explosive fragmentation shells of 152, 122 and 100 mm caliber artillery systems hit them, from a distance of 500-1000 m, cracks, spalling and destruction of welded seams, entailing disruption of the transmission and the failure of the tank as an irrecoverable loss. 4. Armor-piercing shells of the BS-3 (100 mm) and A-19 (122 mm) cannons produce through penetration when hitting the edges or joints of the front plates of the Tiger-B tank hull at distances of 500-600 m. 5. Armor-piercing shells of the BS-3 (100 mm) and A-19 (122 mm) cannons produce through penetration in the front plate of the turret of the Tiger-B tank at distances of 1000-1500 m. 6. Armor-piercing 85-mm shells of the D-5 and S-53 cannons, the frontal plates of the tank's hull do not penetrate and do not cause any structural damage from a distance of 300 m. 7. The side armor plates of the tank are distinguished by a sharp unequal strength in comparison with the frontal plates and are the most vulnerable part of the armored hull and turret of the tank. 8. The side plates of the hull and turret of the tank are pierced by armor-piercing shells of an 85-mm domestic and 76-mm American cannon from a distance of 800-2000 m. 9. The side plates of the hull and turret of the tank are not penetrated by the armor-piercing shells of the 76-mm Russian cannon (ZIS-3 and F-34). 10. American 76-mm armor-piercing shells penetrate the side plates of the Tiger-B tank from a distance 1.5-2 times greater than domestic 85-mm armor-piercing shells. "
Man you dont need to penetrated the king tiger to kill the king tiger. With the massive ammount of force the Is2 can give. And the worst quality of german steel. 2 shoot and a king tiger will die even if it not a pen
@@egerkinggaming1234 I answered the person who said that the IS 2 could not penetrate the Tiger 2 armor even at close range. And what you want to tell me, I did not understand.
@@chaos2876 IS2,s turret movement was incredibly slow and it’s barrel had a really bad mobility and also it was really slow compared to the tiger tanks that’s why in a 1v1 situation a tiger is more likely to win
Not really. The IS-2 carries a 122mm gun that is a whole third larger than the 88mm gun the Tiger II is armed with. Although at ranges over 500m the IS-2 may not be able to frontally penetrate a Tiger II (At ranges under 500m the 122mm APHEBC can penetrate the turret front), remember that 122mm is a very large caliber for an anti tank gun of that time. Even if the shell itself doesn't penetrate, the welds on the tank are not going to react well to being hit by a 25kg chunk of metal travelling at 800m per second, especially when you consider the fact that German steel and welding quality got worse and worse as the war dragged on. There were many documented cases of Panthers and Tiger IIs straight up losing armor plates and falling apart after frontal hits from Soviet 122mm and 152mm shells which weren't supposed to penetrate at all.
In the reality many if not the most battles between IS-2 and Tiger 2 was an couple IS-2 ambushes a Tiger 2's then destroy them. 501st Heavy Panzer Battalion was depleted in such battle.
Well yes because IS-2's attacked with ambush and in close range.Actually they had pretty bad optics and gun had trash accuracy compare with long 88.Tiger II still superior in 1v1.
@@AFT_05G Tiger 2 was superior not by gun, but because of armor. IS was good against first Tigers and Panthers in face to face battles. A long range 122mm was actually good accuracy.
@@AFT_05G The Tsh-17 wasn't a bad optic by any standard, and the gun wasn't any less accurate than really any other anti tank gun. And historically Tiger IIs lost nearly every engagement they got into with IS-2s.
Alot of you are jumping at the Tiger 2 transmissions as if the thrown together soviet tanks didn't ever have issues....like weld separations or....unprotected turret rings that occasionally injured crew members....transmissions that jammed and wouldn't shift.. irregularities in steel hardness resulting in fracturing hulls.
You're right, but the IS 3 had significantly better armor compared to the IS 2, and was somewhat superior to the tigers 2. To knock out one IS 3, you need several tigers 2, while you need to shoot it in vulnerable areas, and the IS 3 cannon is able to punch the tiger 2 directly into the forehead of the tower.
IS2 122 mm gun carried only 18 rounds and had to be depressed 15° to reload. Rate of fire and target acquisition were correspondingly affected adversely.
The IS-2's were issued with 28 rounds, 8 APHE and 20 HE.In special situations they would be supplied with 56 rounds. About: "had to be depressed 15° to reload"- this is true only for the early IS-2 1943 models, also known as IS-122, but not all of them had this issue. The tanks in this video are IS-2 model 1944 which had no such issue.
@@haljordanwithm6077 так в комментах собрались потомки пожелавших нашей земли и её получивших на глубине 2х метров, вся Европа против нас воевала за исключением небольших сил сопротивления
according to reports of shelling of Tiger B tanks at the Kubinka firing range, at distances of 500, 1000,1300,1500, when fired with shells of 100,122,152 mm caliber, armor breaks, structural failure, weld seam destruction, tower armor breach were noted.
@@warfare11gaming thanks for answering! You can find the battle report easily, but it's basically like that: shermans advanced from a village on muddy fields, panzers caught them in the open from the other village, a few shermans manage to fall back. Americans were in the brink of anihillation until a company of M36 came and stopped the german counter attack and exchanged rounds with panzers in the distant villages. At least one tiger II was destroyed by m36, other three by US arty. The battle ended in stalemate. Note the 76mm shermans had a couple of hvap rounds.
Yeah right, even IS2 can destroy a King Tiger Frontally. When the Tigers can't withstand return fire from IS2, it's just so obvious that the germans really need to work their tanks armor angling...
Germany had a lack of tungsten, which made the armour strong. And it is because of this lack of tungsten and some other ingredients that made the steel in the Tiger 2’s armour weak, it is reported that an IS-2 high explosive shell caused the upper front plate of one Tiger 2 to collapse. Since The crews of IS-2s found that this kind of things kept happening, the standard loadout for IS-2s were: 20 high explosive shells and 8 armour piercing shells.
122 мм орудие ИСов 2 не смогло бы пробить тигров 2 в корпус, в башню могло, но как ты видишь боты стреляют не в слабые зоны, а куда попало, то есть в основном в корпус. Плюс перезарядка ИСов составляла от ±12-20+ секунд, тем временем как тигры в основном 8-10 секунд. Я не пытаюсь сказать, что тигр 2 в разы лучше ИСов, да и болел я за наши танки, но не забывай, что немцы создавали тигров 2 как танк абсолютного превосходства в бою, а ис 2 как экономически выгодный, мобильный танк с хорошим бронированием, орудием, в общем танк создавался как массовый, простой в производстве ответ тиграм 1, а сталкивался зачастую с пантерами и тиграми 2. Он вполне мог их уничтожить, однако шансы не всегда были на его стороне. Плюс ещё слаженность работы экипажа, и мы получаем, что в реальности 11 Ис 2 уничтожили 15 тигров 2
Будь у ис 2 перезарядка в 10-15 секунд и у них было бы гораздо больше шансов, хотя я просто надумываю. Ни один человек не смог бы зарядить ис 2 за 10 секунд. За 15 секунд под вопросом, но большая часть заряжающих не смогла бы.
ИС 2 гроза орудия 122мм более опасно противник! Но башня броня 100мм... Тигр 2 башня 185мм хорошая защита. ИС 2 проблем не достаточно. ИС 3 более броня 250мм чем Тигр 2.
Depends, at this period gyrostabilizers werent introduced in these tanks. Also resighting takes time and effort. Plus these heavy tanks have notorious cases detracking and transmission breakdown. Medium and light tanks would be better capable of fire and move. Heavy tanks were more like goalies, big lumbering, and not maneuverable
If you Enjoyed this, please leave a LIKE 👍and make sure to SUBSCRIBE now👇
► th-cam.com/users/rakcroybrosgaming
More EPIC cinematic convoy and tank battles 👇
► th-cam.com/video/bUgaOuxmUms/w-d-xo.html
100 ha-go's vs 15 Shermans (Mission imposible)
Would be entertaining to see, or maybe 25 m24s
More like mission turkey shoot
@@joshuaosborne9203 ha-go can pierce Sherman from back.
@@simonm.1884
And side within 100 meters(roughly 100 yards).
@@simonm.1884 yeah it can pierce the sherman from the side too, like said easthulk99
Who would win? 25 Newly Built and engineered IS-2s or A bunch of manufactured boys?
Wow you are yes one shit look at you name
@@david123davi7 nice replie
Meanwhile in Ussr: They have made only 26 tigers 2, let's make 500 Is2
490 Кing tigers produced. IS2 was created in the year 43. Released 3395. The first combat of IS -2 - April 1944, 1 combat of KT - August 1944. On the eastern front.
Question: are you a moron?
@@kedrsoundlight2508 It's called a "joke"
Kedr SoundLight wow dude. Chill my guy.
@@kedrsoundlight2508 No you apeshìt he meant there were a lot more IS2 tanks than King Tigers.
Even though historically, there was a battle where 14 Tiger II's got destroyed by 11 IS-2s. Look up Red effect's video on IS-2 Vs Tiger II.
The worst enemy of the king tiger was itself. Without mechanical issues it was unmatched in a one-on-one encounter. Could be destroyed but it enjoyed an advantage over every tank it faced IF it didn’t have any mechanical breakdowns.
A single Bob semple tank would dominate this battlefield.
If there was a Bob Semple present there wouldn't be a battlefield, both sides would instantly vacate the area to New Zealand's finest
i just looked up the bob semple tank and lol’d soooo hard
Nathan Ramos best tank ever
A single australian emu would obliterate an entire army of bob semple tanks
Meanwhile, after the battle, the remaining Tiger II’s broke down...
Classic
*BREAKDOWN BREAKDOWN*
Hans ze transmission broke again
The KV and IS series had a lot of reliability problems too, even more than the German ones in some cases. It was normal for ww2 heavies.
In reality,the axis would have been hard pushed to put this many Konigstigers in the field,whereas the Ruskys had a seemingly never ending
supply of armour
Truly a clash of Titans.
BACK IN THE SOVIET UNION
Ivan:we have lost in the battle what should we do
Stalin:hmm let's build another hundred tanks
Hum Let's build 100 more tanks
Yes and Ivan gets shot for retreating
@@thegermanmemeperor889 Are you sure that you are not the great-grandson of another Ivan, who killed your great-grandfather and got to your great-grandmother?))) Are you sure your family doesn't have any skeletons in the cupborad?) War veterans remember well that German girls willingly slept with the liberators of Europe from Nazism for a half a kilo of sugar ...
Do you know the reason of such a situation? Hans was never shot for retreat, and even when the front approached Berlin, Germans worked 8 hours a day. Every day, pray for the Americans who saved you.
@@АлександрКацман well my great grandfather died in late 44 early 45 and my grandfather was born in 42-43 so no i think not
@@thegermanmemeperor889 ahahahahaha
3:24 I will cover you comrade! 😁
Lol
To throw in a broken lines ad makes this even more entertaining
Germans : wow we won
Russians : *SEND IN ANOTHER BATTALION*
I love how you mixed the sponsorship in with the video, you also kept it short and to the point. Thank you :)
Glad you liked it!
3:24 IS-2 using IS-2 as shield
Karl Körner, King Tiger-Commander destroyed one time 11 IS 2 tanks. ( And 28 T-34 tanks) It happend in April 1945.
Fake
Are you referring to King Tiger 314 during the battle of Berlin?
3:25 good cover
da it's call Another Tank mask comrade
Also one problem with the Tiger II's was the price. I think around 439 Tiger II's were built vs >3,400 of the Soviet IS-2's.
2:50. Guy gets blown right out of the tank. 😂
Typical Men of War logic
King tiger Vs JS 2?
What would you guys pick? Me:King Tiger
I will pick Osokin tank
Bob Semple
The Königs tiger, obviously.
KT
T-34-85 (remember the Ogledow)
Something unambiguous and predictable ... I would have watched a duel koenig tigers vs is-3
Not enough historical data,
Let's do Tiger vs Transmission
@@Edario However, I repeat that this is predictable, because the König Tigers came out later IS and were just against this kind of technology and were intended, that is, what is interesting is that the Tiger fulfills its task?
No, the IS-3 never took part in a ww2 battle. This video makes more sense.
@@werrkowalski2985 if it ever happened, I'd like to read these sources.
@@jinglejangle3287 "This took time, and only in May 1945, the first three pre-series vehicles rolled out of the factory, to be thrown immediately into action in Germany, in the hands of an independent Guards Battalion. However, when they arrived, peace had already been signed. Rumors of a fighting en route with an isolated Abteilung of Jadgpanthers after the surrender is left unconfirmed by most sources."
tanks-encyclopedia.com/ww2/soviet/soviet_is-iii.php
Here's some suggestions:
1. Maus vs Leopard 2
2. Nashorn vs Pershing
Thanks for your suggestions
@@warfare11gaming no problem comrade
This whole video is Tiger engine earrape.
Stalin: how many tigers are in there?
Ivan: 80, sir!
Stalin: and how many shells do they have?
Ivan: umm... I guess 6000, sir!
Stalin: Then send 6001 IS-2s
*Galaxy brain meme*
Fun facts: 1)Tiger II were never penetrated by its frontal armor even by the 122mm gun.( ecxept self propelled guns)
2) The 122mm gun was as precise as the 8,8 but the Germans has better optics
3) The first platoon of tanks to shoot has a 80% of chance of winning this battle of armored vehicles
4)The JS series was developped in response to the Tiger series
still is was no match against the beautiful tigers
Fun facts:Tests in Kubinka:
The shelling tests were carried out in the fall of 1944 in Kubinka, and during them the following results were obtained:
"1. The quality of the armor of the Tigr-B tank compared to the quality of the armor of the Tigr-N, Panther and Ferdinand SU of the first releases has sharply deteriorated. In the armor of the Tigr-B tank from the first single hits cracks and spalls are formed in the armor from a group of projectile hits (3-4 shells) spalls and large breaks are formed.
2. All units of the hull and turret of the tank are characterized by the weakness of the welds. Despite careful execution, the seams during shelling behave much worse than they did in similar designs of the Tiger-N, Panther and Ferdinand SU tanks.
3. In the armor of the frontal plates of the tank with a thickness of 100 to 190 mm, when 3-4 armor-piercing or high-explosive fragmentation shells of 152, 122 and 100 mm caliber artillery systems hit them, from a distance of 500-1000 m, cracks, spalling and destruction of welded seams, entailing disruption of the transmission and the failure of the tank as an irrecoverable loss.
4. Armor-piercing shells of the BS-3 (100 mm) and A-19 (122 mm) cannons produce through penetration when hitting the edges or joints of the front plates of the Tiger-B tank hull at distances of 500-600 m.
5. Armor-piercing shells of the BS-3 (100 mm) and A-19 (122 mm) cannons produce through penetration in the front plate of the turret of the Tiger-B tank at distances of 1000-1500 m.
6. Armor-piercing 85-mm shells of the D-5 and S-53 cannons, the frontal plates of the tank's hull do not penetrate and do not cause any structural damage from a distance of 300 m.
7. The side armor plates of the tank are distinguished by a sharp unequal strength in comparison with the frontal plates and are the most vulnerable part of the armored hull and turret of the tank.
8. The side plates of the hull and turret of the tank are pierced by armor-piercing shells of an 85-mm domestic and 76-mm American cannon from a distance of 800-2000 m.
9. The side plates of the hull and turret of the tank are not penetrated by the armor-piercing shells of the 76-mm Russian cannon (ZIS-3 and F-34).
10. American 76-mm armor-piercing shells penetrate the side plates of the Tiger-B tank from a distance 1.5-2 times greater than domestic 85-mm armor-piercing shells. "
Man you dont need to penetrated the king tiger to kill the king tiger. With the massive ammount of force the Is2 can give. And the worst quality of german steel. 2 shoot and a king tiger will die even if it not a pen
@@egerkinggaming1234 I answered the person who said that the IS 2 could not penetrate the Tiger 2 armor even at close range. And what you want to tell me, I did not understand.
@@алинаберезина-й4п eh i am not talking to you but to the guy
I just want everyone to know that the IS-2 irl was not capable of actually destroying a Tiger II to this degree from the front
Thats wholly incorrect, and its show by historical engagements. Tiger IIs, for a multitude of reasons, did not do well fighting IS-2s.
@@chaos2876 IS2,s turret movement was incredibly slow and it’s barrel had a really bad mobility and also it was really slow compared to the tiger tanks that’s why in a 1v1 situation a tiger is more likely to win
Not really. The IS-2 carries a 122mm gun that is a whole third larger than the 88mm gun the Tiger II is armed with. Although at ranges over 500m the IS-2 may not be able to frontally penetrate a Tiger II (At ranges under 500m the 122mm APHEBC can penetrate the turret front), remember that 122mm is a very large caliber for an anti tank gun of that time. Even if the shell itself doesn't penetrate, the welds on the tank are not going to react well to being hit by a 25kg chunk of metal travelling at 800m per second, especially when you consider the fact that German steel and welding quality got worse and worse as the war dragged on. There were many documented cases of Panthers and Tiger IIs straight up losing armor plates and falling apart after frontal hits from Soviet 122mm and 152mm shells which weren't supposed to penetrate at all.
@@chaos2876 irl is2 could not pen tiger 2 at all, the true armor pen that is2 had is around 165 mm
@@justahumanbeing59 According to whom and or what? The numbers are very well documented by this point.
killed by an IS-2 sounds less painfully than being overrun by t-34's
This is the best battle i've ever seen before, TIGER-2 Vs IS-2...
3:06
Boommmmm Tiger II get ammorack by 122mm Shell guided by Stalin.
Muhammad Riski Yossaphat that’s not ammorack thats ammo-rekt lmao
I guided him.
3:28
@@jinglejangle3287 That was a setup.
@@josephstalin9712 ahahahaha
In the reality many if not the most battles between IS-2 and Tiger 2 was an couple IS-2 ambushes a Tiger 2's then destroy them.
501st Heavy Panzer Battalion was depleted in such battle.
Well yes because IS-2's attacked with ambush and in close range.Actually they had pretty bad optics and gun had trash accuracy compare with long 88.Tiger II still superior in 1v1.
@@AFT_05G Tiger 2 was superior not by gun, but because of armor. IS was good against first Tigers and Panthers in face to face battles. A long range 122mm was actually good accuracy.
@@AFT_05G The Tsh-17 wasn't a bad optic by any standard, and the gun wasn't any less accurate than really any other anti tank gun. And historically Tiger IIs lost nearly every engagement they got into with IS-2s.
The variant of King Tiger you used has a 185mm turret front.
Still possible to penetrate by the is-2 if shoot there.
Gabriel Perianu Yes but only in very close ranges.
Gabriel Perianu if at an extremely close range, and at a elevation advantage.
Minutes 0:09 LOL The Man Watch Sponsored In TV 🤣🤣🤣
There can't be two first.
yep
Alot of you are jumping at the Tiger 2 transmissions as if the thrown together soviet tanks didn't ever have issues....like weld separations or....unprotected turret rings that occasionally injured crew members....transmissions that jammed and wouldn't shift.. irregularities in steel hardness resulting in fracturing hulls.
The giant of the east vs the giant of the west is what this videos true name is
The struggle in assault mode lol
3:23 - Ivan, cover me!
Ivan: Ok
Can you recreate the scene in the movie t-34 with all the Panthers
T34 85
Isaiah Moore the Fury but russian version
@@Neofito74298 but without scene where hundreds SS run on tank machinegun without anti-tank weapon.
Finally a new vid!! 👍
Great vid very immersive battle👍👍👍
Good video as always
Thank you for video
Been waiting for this
Warfare, hows that sea battle coming along? 😂
Great video .... keep up the good work
King tiger : winner
Also king tiger : TRANSMISSION BROKE !!!
Most insane battle ever, IS-2 did not won due to lighter armor, but can penetrate the front of a tiger 2, but what if It was IS-3?
Is-3’s carried the exact same gun as the Is-2’s historically. This isn’t World of Tanks, they didn’t have the fictitious BL-9 gun mounted.
You're right, but the IS 3 had significantly better armor compared to the IS 2, and was somewhat superior to the tigers 2. To knock out one IS 3, you need several tigers 2, while you need to shoot it in vulnerable areas, and the IS 3 cannon is able to punch the tiger 2 directly into the forehead of the tower.
Sherman's last stand,
1 Sherman Vs Type 97 Chi-ha Army Please.
1:18 The IS-2 didn’t have a hull MG, the only crew member in the hull was the driver
25 kingtigers VS 25 IS-3
İt would be stalemate or IS-3 would win in very close range.
*IS-3s rumbling in the distance*
I love your vids
IS2 122 mm gun carried only 18 rounds and had to be depressed 15° to reload. Rate of fire and target acquisition were correspondingly affected adversely.
The IS-2's were issued with 28 rounds, 8 APHE and 20 HE.In special situations they would be supplied with 56 rounds. About: "had to be depressed 15° to reload"- this is true only for the early IS-2 1943 models, also known as IS-122, but not all of them had this issue. The tanks in this video are IS-2 model 1944 which had no such issue.
thats is-122
cmon man
u can tell the difference on their frontal armour
is 2 was angled and is 122 isnt
88мм против 122мм, не смешите мои сандали, ис выдержит попадания а вот тигра прошьёт навылет
Это объяснять бессмысленно, ибо в комментариях много ценителей рейха.
@@haljordanwithm6077 так в комментах собрались потомки пожелавших нашей земли и её получивших на глубине 2х метров, вся Европа против нас воевала за исключением небольших сил сопротивления
@@Fe_Republik так а я о чем говорю?
According to a story in ww2, three IS were driving in a city, when the three tanks saw a Tiger II, the crew left directly, without thinking anything
Lol
Eugene Von Bismarck source
Daniel Doyle the king tiger crew left in this case not the 3 IS
Meanwhile :Tiger II (Tier 8)
in WoTB IS-2 (Tier 7)
In war Thunder, they are on the same combat rating
122 can't pen tiger 2 in long rang
Put they could definetly spall the armor
@@m1a1abramstank49 and crush the frontal armor becuse of its muzzle velocity
according to reports of shelling of Tiger B tanks at the Kubinka firing range, at distances of 500, 1000,1300,1500, when fired with shells of 100,122,152 mm caliber, armor breaks, structural failure, weld seam destruction, tower armor breach were noted.
@Ulf Knudsen what are you talking about? I was just replying to the guy about a thing he forgot
122mm HE would make a tiger 2 crew have a bad day
Perfect
That IS-2 War Thunder skin
What if 24 Kv 2 vs 1 maus tank
Estava esperando pelo vídeo
Deutchse güalitet never betrays me
*Deutsche Qualität
Yeah thanks
I never seen that kind of German tank before. It looks like a Tiger II
There were more than 3 500 IS-2 in WWII. There were around 600 Tigers II.
Result - IS-2 victory OMEGALUL Clap
Only 493 Tiger IIs were produced.
25/25 IS-2 destroyed but soon other 250 IS-2 came to kill 10 Tigers II survived.
Are u sure? Haha i dont think so
Double the IS2s but equip the King Tiger with the 10.5 cm KwK L/68 which was purposed but never implemented
What about the battle of Puffendorf? M36 tank destroyers, 75 and 76mm Shermans vs Panthers and some Tiger II
Sounds interesting
@@warfare11gaming thanks for answering! You can find the battle report easily, but it's basically like that: shermans advanced from a village on muddy fields, panzers caught them in the open from the other village, a few shermans manage to fall back. Americans were in the brink of anihillation until a company of M36 came and stopped the german counter attack and exchanged rounds with panzers in the distant villages. At least one tiger II was destroyed by m36, other three by US arty. The battle ended in stalemate. Note the 76mm shermans had a couple of hvap rounds.
Cool, thanks for the info. I'll write it down to my list
@@warfare11gaming your older videos of the Combat Mission game and Men of War siege of Bastogne give a good basis for it.
We miss you so much
Amazing work as always and love the tank specs at the beginning! The IS was a beast! My fav WW2 russian tank
KÖNIGSTIGERS IS MY FAVORITE TEAM .
Yeah right, even IS2 can destroy a King Tiger Frontally. When the Tigers can't withstand return fire from IS2, it's just so obvious that the germans really need to work their tanks armor angling...
Through the turret that is. IS-2 from 1944 onwards have the ufp sloped but the huge lower plate and turret is still weak.
Well IS-2 could only pen Tiger II’s front turret at ranges like 200-300 meters while Tiger II could destroy them from 2 kilometers.
@@AFT_05G do you know Ogledow?
@@AFT_05G They couldn't destroy them from 2 kilometers no.
Tiger 88 mm 1 km Is 2 122 mm 3 km
Every single one of the tank and none of them fire a machine gun
Vois from red orchestra 2
There is no evidence, that the frontal armor of a King Tiger was penetrated in WW-2-combat. So this little game is nonsense
Doesn't need to penertrated, The steel is very britle, the fragment alone will most likely kill the crew.
Well source?Still they couldn't penetrate frontal hull which has an effective armor of 250 mm.
Germany had a lack of tungsten, which made the armour strong. And it is because of this lack of tungsten and some other ingredients that made the steel in the Tiger 2’s armour weak, it is reported that an IS-2 high explosive shell caused the upper front plate of one Tiger 2 to collapse. Since The crews of IS-2s found that this kind of things kept happening, the standard loadout for IS-2s were: 20 high explosive shells and 8 armour piercing shells.
If possible the elements of the explosion and the explosion could be optimized to make it look more realistic
I'm sure that if 1v1 IS-2 would probably win against the tiger 2.
М-да. Свойства 122-мм орудия неплохо преуменьшены
122 мм орудие ИСов 2 не смогло бы пробить тигров 2 в корпус, в башню могло, но как ты видишь боты стреляют не в слабые зоны, а куда попало, то есть в основном в корпус. Плюс перезарядка ИСов составляла от ±12-20+ секунд, тем временем как тигры в основном 8-10 секунд. Я не пытаюсь сказать, что тигр 2 в разы лучше ИСов, да и болел я за наши танки, но не забывай, что немцы создавали тигров 2 как танк абсолютного превосходства в бою, а ис 2 как экономически выгодный, мобильный танк с хорошим бронированием, орудием, в общем танк создавался как массовый, простой в производстве ответ тиграм 1, а сталкивался зачастую с пантерами и тиграми 2. Он вполне мог их уничтожить, однако шансы не всегда были на его стороне. Плюс ещё слаженность работы экипажа, и мы получаем, что в реальности 11 Ис 2 уничтожили 15 тигров 2
Оговорился чуть-чуть, забыл сказать про то, что ис советский. В прошлом комментарии получилось, будто ис немецкий
Ooarai Girls Academy vs. any possible combination of tanks.
The tank armor was made of pure stalinium
Awesome.
Coolest tank battle ever
Königstieger is Plural btw :)
Bruh facing 25 IS-2's is like hell or like "David vs Goliath" scenario lol
Edit: Nevermind...
the IS-2 has a much slower reloading time, even if they manage to deal with some tiger II's, there are other ones with a much faster reloading time
Будь у ис 2 перезарядка в 10-15 секунд и у них было бы гораздо больше шансов, хотя я просто надумываю. Ни один человек не смог бы зарядить ис 2 за 10 секунд. За 15 секунд под вопросом, но большая часть заряжающих не смогла бы.
Mi amigo tus simulaciones son oro puro.
O la piedra filosofal.
Kênh này thiên vị quá mức
tiger 2 is tier 8, and is 2 is only tier 7, no wonder tiger 2 won >:)
Dude This Is not world of Tanks
@@lorenzuploads4543 hence the >:)
In Warthunder Tiger 2 have higher BR too 6.7 and IS-2 5.7
@@illuminati9427 this is IS2 44 ,6.3 br.
Yet, sherman jumbo won against tiger 1, and jumbo is a tier 6, while tiger 1 is tier 7 :)
ИС 2 гроза орудия 122мм более опасно противник! Но башня броня 100мм... Тигр 2 башня 185мм хорошая защита. ИС 2 проблем не достаточно. ИС 3 более броня 250мм чем Тигр 2.
Please make 20 shermans vs 30 bm13 katyusha
I have a question, how did you get the blueprints in the video? Haha IS2 destroyed!
I made them by myself.
Could you explain to me how it works and then I'll try it out for myself.
That's advanced process, can't explain it just like that.
ok, but try to explain to me, yes you can!
You best!
Nie im Leben, die Russischen 122mm Kanonen waren viel zu schlecht.
Die hätten nie eine Tiger II Panzerung frontal durchschlagen !
122mm vs 88mm, i don't known 🤷♂️
In real life tanks would fire and move, fire and move, isnt it ?
Depends, at this period gyrostabilizers werent introduced in these tanks. Also resighting takes time and effort. Plus these heavy tanks have notorious cases detracking and transmission breakdown. Medium and light tanks would be better capable of fire and move. Heavy tanks were more like goalies, big lumbering, and not maneuverable
*This video was sponsered by World of Tanks Blitz: Game by Biased Russians*
@_Radium Blitz It just has to stop
@@ykdaviiNO KEEP MOVING RUSSIAN BIAS
Still better than Normal WoT
But War Thunder is better
That game is also on PC tho
Imaging the noises in real life
IS-2 had better penetration than that. Tiger II historically couldn’t handle sustained fire from such large shells. Just saying.
The Tank Commander pretty sure tiger had better pen than is2, just saying.
Tiger 2H had much better penetration hah the Tiger E had better penetration
Половина тигров до боя сломались а вторую половину бросили экипажи
Battle of Seelow Heights
Request : Battle Of tripoli (British VS german) Or Battle Of Midway
Do one American sniper vs 100 NVA (North Vietnamese Army)
In real life Tiger II have a bad quality front armor and got easily penetrated by IS-2’s HE