Ravel Piano Trio (Rubinstein, Heifetz, Piatigorsky 1950)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 12

  • @supermasterpip
    @supermasterpip 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    what a wonderful "Bursting at the seams "performance of this great piece.Huge muscular playing,that has lifted me up.

  • @zoranab1711
    @zoranab1711 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I have no music talent whatsoever, but this piece makes me fall apart and literally brings me to my knees EVERY TIME - for the last 30 years

  • @mysterium364
    @mysterium364 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Damn. Brings a tear. I would give a lot to hear this live.

  • @princeandrey
    @princeandrey 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Incredibly sweet and romantic interpretation & the 2nd movement kind of wild--with a fiery finish!! And the piece is a rare gem!

  • @davidrehak3539
    @davidrehak3539 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Maurice Ravel:a-moll Zongoratrió
    1. Moderato 00:00
    2. Pantoum (Abbastanza vivace) 08:31
    3. Passacaille (Passacaglia: Molto largo) 12:37
    4. Finálé:Animato 19:02
    Jascha Heifetz-hegedű
    Grigorij Pjatyigorszkij-gordonka
    Arthur Rubinstein-zongora

    • @davidrehak3539
      @davidrehak3539 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Köszönöm az értékelést

  • @rosgill6
    @rosgill6 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    the first two movements of this trio are heartbreaking. in the best way

    • @princeandrey
      @princeandrey 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes. I just used the same word & then scrolled down to see this!

  • @SotaroYamauchi-go7qy
    @SotaroYamauchi-go7qy หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    14:06

  • @extrasalt4595
    @extrasalt4595 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This trio was always interesting one, because I thought that they were challenged to overcome the differences in their musical temperaments. While this composition is not Ravel's finest - in my opinion - it merits attention. Hoomeyow!!

    • @princeandrey
      @princeandrey 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Maybe not his finest, but plenty beautiful!

    • @theorivas1
      @theorivas1 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I disagree with comment and I don’t know what good it does say this. The piece illicits a profound human experience. I don’t imagine what technical flaw you perceive, but I doubt that it reduces the experience.