Again, too big. Too dominating of the skyline. Build the same number of housing units but in a different way. Anyway, how is this going to suffer if a fire were to break out? What happens when the vandalised lifts break down?
I do see the intention of providing more housing, but I personally disagree with this method. One way to achieve more housing is to build developments around motorways or rail lines while leaving the green around untouched. I believe this is practised in Denmark?
@IsmailSarjo Very interesting. People need housing. I fully get that point. The important thing is not to go back down the road to "slums in the sky". We have to learn lessons from the past.
Again, too big. Too dominating of the skyline. Build the same number of housing units but in a different way. Anyway, how is this going to suffer if a fire were to break out? What happens when the vandalised lifts break down?
I do see the intention of providing more housing, but I personally disagree with this method.
One way to achieve more housing is to build developments around motorways or rail lines while leaving the green around untouched.
I believe this is practised in Denmark?
@IsmailSarjo Very interesting. People need housing. I fully get that point. The important thing is not to go back down the road to "slums in the sky". We have to learn lessons from the past.