LIVE: Day 14 Antifreeze Murder Retrial | WI v. Mark Jensen
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 ต.ค. 2024
- LIVE COURT CAM - DAY 14: Former stockbroker Mark Jensen was granted a new trial after his murder conviction was overturned and Court TV cameras are inside the courtroom.
MORE HERE: www.courttv.co...
#CourtTV #AntifreezeMurderRetrial #MarkJensen
TRIAL NOTES
DAY 1 - • LIVE: Day 1 | Antifree...
DAY 2 - • LIVE: Day 2 Antifreeze...
DAY 3 - • LIVE: Day 3 Antifreeze...
DAY 4 - • LIVE: Day 4 Antifreeze...
DAY 5 - • LIVE: Day 5 Antifreeze...
DAY 6 - • LIVE: Day 6 Antifreeze...
DAY 7 - • LIVE: Day 7 Antifreeze...
DAY 8 - • LIVE: Day 8 Antifreeze...
DAY 9 - • LIVE: Day 9 Antifreeze...
DAY 10 - • LIVE: Day 10 Antifreez...
DAY 11 - th-cam.com/users/li...
DAY 12 - th-cam.com/users/li...
DAY 13 - th-cam.com/users/li...
On Feb. 21, 2008, a jury found Jensen guilty of murdering his wife, Julie Jensen. Prosecutors claimed he poisoned Julie with antifreeze in 1998 so he could continue an affair with a woman he eventually married.
Mark Jensen has always maintained his innocence. His attorneys argued Julie Jensen was depressed and killed herself after framing her husband.
Watch the FULL TRIAL - WI v. Mark Jensen (2008) - gavel-to-gavel for FREE in the Court TV Archive: www.courttv.co...
WATCH COURT TV LIVE:
www.courttv.co...
MORE TRIAL ARCHIVES:
www.courttv.co...
WHERE TO WATCH:
www.courttv.co...
The Prosecutor nailed her closing statement!! 👏 WONDERFUL CLOSING & JUSTICE FOR JULIE!!! 💕 ❤ 💗 💖 💕
Stayed awake til 4ish this morning watching live. Sleep finally claimed me. Just finished catching up. Was fitting Jambois had the last word. He’s worked so hard (& for so long) for Julie. Thank you so much Sir & your whole team. Justice for Julie!
McNeill and Jambois did a great job on this trial and the closing arguments. I hope the jury gets this right. Justice for Julie ❤
This prosecutor is amazing and has a soothing voice that helps the jury understand the facts.
How this guy got a retrial is beyond me such a waste of tax dollars! He killed his wife he was having an affair ⚖️💔 RIP Julie
Plus he even tried to kidnap and potentially kill his coworker
@@missyette I really hope the jury remembers all those slightly cryptic calls to his parents and Kelly. They're very, very damning evidence.
Not guilty.
She had affair before.
@@MoNICA-se3gc And he knew that! So what are you Saying
Brilliant team!! Was wonderful watching you fighting for Julie, just phenomenal 👏 👏
Who commits suicide in front of their family with poison?
No one :) edit: Should have qualified my answer, sorry. No one in the manner Julie did, ie via a form of camouflaged microdosing over a few days causing prolonged agony and giving her family ample time to render aid. And to be honest, time for herself to render aid, were she aware that she was dying early enough. This is based on my thesis on suicide, where even in planned suicides a dreadfully high number of survivors regretted their attemp in the seconds following it, let alone the hours and days after.
Actually, a man in my County did. He ate rat poison. People do things we just can’t understand.
Right! More Less in front of her kids! I'm happy for Justice for Julie 💔 RIP 🕊️🕊️🕊️🕊️🕊️
@@kjones7561 hopefully his pain didn't last too long, rat poisoning in suicide cases generally takes about 2-3h to cause death in humans
Kudos much respect to the Jambois team Justice for Julie
Omg! Could that defense lawyer lady laugh any weirder ALL the time!??
It's as if she's out socializing 😖
@@barrettlori9249 Yes, more like she's a high school girl at school or a party. It's weird in what should be a very serious setting. Maybe she's trying to keep everyone from being stressed, but it certainly looks out of place when it's almost constant.
She was truely unprofessional, yeah I get she was trying to be respectful to her client and try to make him look likeable but she completely failed at this and looked more like they were flirting the holes trial and weren't taking this seriously. It was so bad that I even seen people making jokes about mark asking her to marry him because of how inappropriate mark and her were acting threw out this trial. They forgot it was a courtroom
i skipped out all the defense stuff. couldn’t stand to listen
I bet she’ll even laugh when the guilty verdict is read…
You know, when the defense picks out certain prosecution witnesses, they have a big problem. Face it, you can buy doctors' testimony, who never even met Julie, but you will lose this case. I don't care what Arron Dillard did in another country? It doesn't mean he's lying about Mark. Mark gaslighted and emotionally abused Julie for years, and when that didn't work out the way he wanted, he killed her. I think he's guilty as sin.
JMO
Absolutely agree
@@janitaditel
Me, too!
Well said @TheFinn
It’s insulting how stupid the defense guy thinks we all are.
I loved the female prosecutors closing arguments. She did a great job putting everything together from the trial and making it all neat, tidy and easily understandable. Showed some emotion, anger/outrage & sadness, but it came across as genuine and wasn’t too much or too over the top. Very beautifully done.
Even if he didn’t push her face into the pillow, even if he isn’t the one who gave her the antifreeze (don’t get me wrong I fully believe he is the one who tricked her into drinking the antifreeze at a minimum) just the fact that he saw her condition and did absolutely nothing to help her makes him guilty in my book. I’m not 100% sure what the legal ramifications of that would be but he left her to die no matter how you look at it and then immediately began moving in his girlfriend and replacing those poor kids’ mother! And even now he is still punishing her for the affair in 1991! Absolutely disgusting! I wish she had just left him in ‘91 and not withdrawn the divorce papers and stayed with Perry. It sounds like he was genuinely in love with her and would have treated her and her son well.
He doesn’t help himself with his demeanor. It’s hard to see his humanness.
When he flashed a smile it was like a small opening.
It’s too bad he didn’t get coaching around his affect
He is so done
@Court TV are you going to open a live verdict watch video today with chat so we can wait together to see if a verdict comes today?
CourtTV gave us a less than 3 minute video on the verdict... and that's it.
now this trial is near its end... What am I going to do not being able to hear that soothing voice of Jambois!! HE WAS AMAZING!
Jambois does have a soothing voice my thoughts exactly!!
YIKES! The looks on Jenson and his lawyer sitting together is absolutely terrifying! If looks could kill, those two would have killed that prosecutor!!! 😲😵☠️
The prosecution rocked their closing
Mr Perri's (sp?) closing argument was good (ain't you sorry you fired him, Darrell Brooks?), given of course what he had to work with but McNeil's and Jambois' were superb. One thing I'd have wanted to see is character witnesses for Jensen, I guess there weren't any........
After Atty. Jambois' rebuttle I wanted to stand up and clap loudly, yell and whistle. That's why my husband doesn't take me places anymore.
I cried after it was over jambois and his team truely cared about Julie and getting justice and not about money
Jambois was the bomb
Screaming maniac? Ok. Well interesting the jury asked for evidence right away. May be the end of the road for this creeps career. Jamboi$ and his wife using up taxpayer $$$ letting hardcore criminals out of prison on skeevy deals. Dillard and Thompson are not the only rats in the prosecutions case.
He was passionate about getting justice for Julie the first time around, and after that trial, he said he would "try the damn thing again if they ever appealed." I think this case is very important to him. He heard from so many people about who Julie was, and how much she loved her boys.
It's heartbreaking that they don't remember a lot about her, and have been told that their mother committed suicide and left them.
I think the prosecution is doing an awesome job! Marky baby is going right back to his 4×6 where he came from. He shows absolutely NO emotion about "anything"!!! His whole demeanor is "Evil"!
Oh he's still thinking this is all Julie's fault!!
He’s definitely has antisocial personality disorder aka psychopath.
I hope he gets life without parole. He took Julie's life and caused those who loved her intense grief. Not one witness for Mark talked about him with any feeling, not even his sister. (Although I was surprised to hear that she's been putting $200 on his books for a lengthy amount of time.) But he really had no passionate witnesses, just highly paid experts who didn't seem very professional or credible.
You ever look up loss of consciousness for yourself while your experiencing it ? Bam. I hate her kids were raised on that lie but they had to believe it to survive.
I cant decide if I want to go to the courthouse for the verdict. I will be either VERY angry or VERY happy.
Did you decide to go to the courthouse for the verdict? If I lived near I would have felt exactly the same as you. I would have been devastated if the verdict had gone not guilty.
Brilliant rebuttal. Wow!!!!
Omg I just realized that they used Julie's insurance money to take Kelli on that damn cruise!!!
They did?😩
yup
Seriously, jurors #3, 4, 5, and 6??
The clerk was looking at the papers 🤦🏼♀️ that should have totally been done a different way
@@GoalieMomma1414 I don't think she looked at them until after she pulled them out. She should have stirred them around more before picking them.
Are they not doing live chat while this going on or is it just
I really wished that they would of kept the chat up
Funny how Mark was awkwardly standing around at the end.
I know! He always has that creepy smile.
@@zxy78267 he's a snake
I’m trying to have patience waiting for the verdict
Lol I keep checking every hour to see if there's an update
Me too! 😅
I hope it doesn't take too long. I'm sure they don't want it to seem like they didn't go over the evidence carefully, but I think the chats and comments are almost all thinking "guilty." I hope the jury feels the same way. I've seen a very small amount of people saying that he's not guilty, which I think is strange. Did they watch the whole trial?
@@zxy78267 I highly doubt they watched the trial and if they did then that highly worries me and how they treat any females in their lives!
The irony is that he now gets to see hundreds of real penises. They can compare sizes. 😂
guilty, imo
They've had a few questions/requests so far, including DeFazio (therapist) notes.😳
People with gaslighting especially when narcissistic drive the person crazy and when they are psycho, leads to this. They can't drive them into despair so they finally act and kill the person, crazy. But then you listen to the defense and it all becomes a mystery, very tough job if there is no concrete evidence and with a case many years ago.
Poor precious Julie. Mark Jensen is a complete monster… he even looks like a ghoul. I’ll never know what any woman would see in him, let alone someone as lovely as Julie. It’s unbelievable that Kelly LaBonte was engaged when she was fooling around with Jensen and then went on to marry her fiancé anyway! She and Jensen deserved each other. That jail call between her and Jensen when she says “Let’s go to Oompa Loompa Land” is stomach-turning… and to watch that defense attorney chuckle as if she thought that was cute and clever was awful. Worst defense team ever… totally unlikable on every level.
Even though I still think there's enough to convict mark, perri's closing argument was so well crafted, succinct, and compelling. If the jury has any logical, analytical types on board, there might be a hung jury.
🔒🔑💯
And throw away the key!!!
Wonder how long the wait will be…
Took them 32 hours (4-5 days) 1st trial, and that was with "the letter."
Just read those 32 hours spread over just 3 days! Long days deliberating.😳
Hope they come back soon
Me, too, and with a guilty verdict!
And there’s Jambo coming in hot!!!! Can somebody photoshop a bandana on him please?
There were only 4 tickets in her tray! What??
People on other channels are saying that the jury is gone home for the night
Maybe the other channels didnt hear the cue from the judge saying the jury can stay quite late tonight and that the lawyers and himself are there on standby.
They went home at 5.
I bet $$$ this attorney and the killer have a jailhouse wedding. The way they act is not only disgusting but very unprofessional. Yuck.
Oh it's beyond disgusting and disrespectful on so many levels
@@missyette Oh good. I thought I was the only one who sees this.
@@deebennett7912 I thought it was weird early on.
@@zxy78267 Yes me too DJ. Today during closing arguments they weren't even trying to hide it. They are downright flirting. There is absolutely not likable or appealing about him.
1:09:11 is the guard asleep back there? Lol
Whichever way it ends, both sides did a great job IMO 👍 It was very sad listening to their son David 😢
I'm still here
5:23 is Jensen looking at the attorney’s chest area⁉️ 😮
oh I'm sure he is
There's more than a hairline crack in defence's absurd example of "reasonable doubt". Not a good start - he should give up his day job and try something simpler. No wonder the prosecutor (and half the spectators) are falling asleep during defence's speech! 2:37:27
Clearly, defence is trying to use metaphor to suggest that even a hairline crack in prosecution's argument should cause you to disbelieve it, but it is an absurd example because no-one in their right mind would hesitate to decide to not buy a house whose foundations are evidently unsound.
Furthermore, the notion that "if you hesitate then you have doubt" is ridiculous by itself Sensible people, unlike fools, always hesitate and reflect before making an important decision. Therefore any court advocating hesitation as proof of doubt itself clearly does not understand elementary logic and commonsense and therefore is not to be relied upon, no matter how august it may be.
An article in Duke University School of Law journal "Judicature", Vol 103, No 2 states:
"In 1987, a subcommittee of the Committee on the Operation of the Jury System of the United States Judicial Conference proposed a model jury charge that included these words: “Proof beyond a reasonable doubt is proof that leaves you firmly convinced".”
Although that attempted definition is circular (Eg you are convinced of something only if you do not doubt it) and it is illogical, because many people are convinced of things for which there is no evidence whatsoever just because they want them to be true (eg Jesus loves you, and if you are meek, you will inherit the Earth after you are dead), it is still a lot better than the older, even more absurd idea that hesitation implies doubt.
So what definition would be better? The phrase "reasonable doubt" itself is its own best definition, for the following reasons:
1. reasoning is a process of making deductions (inferences) from facts (axioms, evidence) and prior deductions.
2. doubt is uncertainty about whether a thing (deduction or fact) is really true
So a deduction is "reasonable" if it can be deduced (reasoned) from the evidence.
And if there is any reason to doubt the truth of a thing, then that thing should not be taken into consideration.
In this case, defence started off with a provenly unreasonable definition of "reasonable doubt" so there is reason to doubt anything he has to say about anything.
I don’t think so! One of the most highly credentialed appellate and trial lawyers in the state. The defense closing will be used in law school. Top notch! He silenced the bully non-factual screaming creepy prosecutor who himself appears obsessed. Perri doesn’t scream about P*ni# - in fact doesn’t scream at all. He’s analytical. Best closing defense argument I have ever heard.
@@galaxygrl1047 However, it's going to take a lot to overcome the fact that Mark was having an affair, gave her three Ambien in such a short time, and had those phone conversations with his parents about coming up with $1000 for an inmate's girlfriend for something he couldn't discuss over the phone.
@@Silly.Old.Sisyphus if you are trying to insult, you missed. What/who is jack lemmonn and what are you saying. reminiscent of Jamboi$ questions.
@@Silly.Old.Sisyphus bizarre. again your attempt at insult has failed. Are you a DJ Mr. Brown? You certainly have zero understanding of the law.
So did everyone leave
From what l&c channel says yes
WOW Defense closing statement was really good too! I learned a couple new facts which raises doubt. I'm an indecisive person anyway 🙃 I'd hate to be in that jury!
If she was all about the kids why did she have an affair? Was she yearning for love and affection from her husband? Mark and Julie appeared to be such a cute couple. Some of her actions did seem intentional. Speaking to odd ppl about her suspicions in regard to her husband trying to kill her and stating in a letter if something happened to her that her husband would be the first suspect…..who says that? Wouldn’t you just say , if something happens to me then my husband did it! Why offer that he would be 1st suspect as if there are more suspects.
Huh?
Or your husband is deceiving you. And now he is even trying to off you. You wonder if you're sane because he's been harassing you for years, and you don't know what's true or false any longer. So, you think out loud and see how your friends react to your outrageous thoughts. Just in case you are right.
And, it turns out, you are.
As a side note, her affair was a one-weekend thing. Mark and her decided to remain together and work through it, even had another child. He, on the other hand, kept sending her pictures “from her former lover” and got married to his mistress.
So yeah. 🤷🏻
@@SmallKerfuffle yeah….makes you wonder what’s so outrageous about simply divorcing your wife. He odiously wanted another life with someone else and Julie sounds capable of taking care of herself and her children.
Who the hell was she supposed to talk to about her suspicion of her husband going to kill her?? Her husband?? Get off it, clearly you've never been in an abusive relationship and pray you never have to experience it but hope you educate yourself on it
@@missyette Your profane language is uncalled for. She could’ve spoke to her close neighbors and close friends more so than a teacher at school. Don’t talk to me disrespectfully
I was wondering what is this guy wearing in his ears ?
It's the "Weinstein"- light... pretendig to have some handicap, in order to get sympathy. If his hearing is really thar bad, he would have been wearing orinary hearing aids, not the Weistein version.
@@ziggywalsh5562 thank you. I agree with you if his hearing is that bad why not regular hearing aids.
😥
I LOVE YOU JAMBOIS !!!!!!! ❤🧡💚💙💛💜🖤🤎❤
laura coster is a crappy best friend
the defense closing statement/attorny was really dry... oof. sorry mr antifreeze.
Hi april
Hi
Prosecution had a better case for divorce court, not a murder trial. Dude should have never been convicted to begin with. Who knows what this jury will do though.
Verdict?
Not yet I don't think
Hi aunt sissy
If people do not know that I AM is in control, then they will be remote controlled by evil.
Huh?
nobody can seriously tell me that they believe aaron dillard? the man is the definition of reasonable doubt.
I didn’t care for this trial bc it was so old, retrial, but now that Mark has served time in prison and discussed so many details with other prisoners he’s basically given out several get out of jail free cards and it makes him look guilty. I will say this…..if Julie didn’t want to leave her husband bc she didn’t want to lose her kids…..then why did she have an affair? Wouldn’t that be means for her husband to end the marriage and they depart and he put her out?? I’m just saying…………I understand Julie called police to tell them her husband was trying to kill her and I’m sure they thought she was a crazy lady and I bet they didn’t respond bc there was no crime committed and I promise you they didn’t come to her house to talk to her or take a report. I don’t think Julie deserves to be dead but just bc she’s deceased doesn’t make her so innocent. A lot of actions in this situation look revengeful and vindictive.
Her "affair" lasted one weekend 1991 (David was a baby, Douglas not born yet) then she immediately ended it. Mark never forgave her, spent years after gaslighting her, tormenting her. When she sought out divorce lawyer that's when he threatened to take the kids by falsely claiming to authorities that she was was unstable.
@@sandtats was she working? Why did she seek out an affair or weekend rendezvous-vous with someone she called a jerk. He persisted for some time by calling her and sending holiday cards to her house as if he intentionally wanted to make waves between her and Mark . Wonder if she thought she could find another man to take care of her and her child?
Julie felt alone and abandoned by Mark. After birth of David, 1991, Mark became jealous of the time she was spending caring for the baby (an infant!), which he felt was excessive. He had little or nothing to do with the baby's care or care of the home. Julie handled all of that: child care, the cleaning and cooking, shopping, doing the family finances, etc. She was feeling lonely and got swept up in a co-worker's adoration of her and almost instantly regretted it. (Julie had been working as a stockbroker in 1990. It was a co-worker at the firm with whom she had the weekend affair in 1991.) She also attended nursing school after high school, excelling, an A student, but quit after her 3rd year. Very bright woman, and more than capable of taking care of herself if need be. She just didn't want to work when the kids were little.
When David was in 3rd grade and Douglas in 1/2 day pre-school, Julie worked as classroom assistant to David's teacher one day a week. Mark had little respect for stay at home moms and pressured her to get a job, put Douglas in fulltime pre-school. She didn't want to but relented, putting Douglas in fulltime pre-school, applying for a secretarial job at a local school. She got the job.
Day before she died, sick and bedridden, barely able to speak, principal called the home to give her the good news. Mark answered, telling him she couldn't come to the phone as she was sleeping, followed with "and she's going to be sleeping for a long, long time," then laughed. Principal testified to that.
@@sandtats wow! It sounds like the jury from the original trial made the right decision. He ran his mouth in prison anyway which told his guilt.
@@sandtats It's funny how women are continuously persecuted for making a one time mistake and men have lengthly affairs constantly and no one bats an eye.
He didn’t kill her
Yes he freaking did!
When women commit suicide, it's usually done with pills.
@@rnbham39 Thank-you
he did
Defense is pathetic.
Perri close was top notch! Bye bye Jambou$ get your pressure checked you scream like a lunatic with big red face
they did the best they could for someone who is very clearly guilty.
will the verdict be today/tonight? im in UK its 12.45am right now i need bed lol
I believe they went home, so in the morning most likely
Nobody knows when it will be. Jurors can deliberate as long as they want to. It could be hours or days.
@@xfreespirit1979x I hope it's not a long time.
The Prosecutor of such a slimeball and they lie all the time to put another notch in there conviction belt, some don't care...
English?
Lie??? What about the "Facts/Evidence"? They made that up too?🤔🤭
You should have watched his first trial. And you really should have watched this one too!
He is a slimeball! Great description of this screaming maniac!