Nebraska Man dates to 1922. There was a rush to find ape-man species in North America which lead to wild speculation. This was also proved incorrect by more careful science. Peking-Man is now considered a sub-variant of Homo Erectus and not a separate species. Java-Man is now also considered a variation of Home Erectus. Ramapithecus was considered important for awhile, but later fossil finds demonstrated it to be less important.
@@coachhannah2403 No scientist has ever been involved in any frauds. If you think they have can you give an example. There are none in this video. This is propaganda.
Sadly when you know all these falsehoods and know the truth you tell people about them and they refuse to beleive or check things out for themselves. They would rather beleive a lie than the truth
@@frankcardano4142 this has been known for decades. This isn't new. DNA analysis has exposed all this. Then you speak of brainwashed. Your like the Twitter Twitts.
@@edwardwoods5977 Yes. These are creationist lies from decades ago. It’s amazing they’re still peddling them. Can you pick your favourite one and I’ll walk you through how these liars are tricking you?
@@frankcardano4142 they mentioned this in the video and it was absolutely found to be a fraud. Skull of a man jaw of an orangutan and the teeth were altered filled down to more closely resemble a man.
As far as I can tell the whole proto ape to human is just begging the question. They still haven't shown how constituent particles floating through the primordial soup would have spontaneously combined. Most chemical reactions require the input of energy into the system. You have to overcome the activation energy required to do the chemical reaction. Then one would need to explain how proteins would last in the primordial soup... Since, proteins have a half life of a day. I guess evolutionists need to pay more attention to biochemistry class.
And you are an expert on what? A Chimp has 98,6% the same as a human and if you look at how they behave they have a lot of "human" behaviour. And you believe in a YT channel and this man is clearly a creationist , but the whole Neanderthal genome has been put together after many years its not easy to find DNA that isnt degraded and they compared it to our DNA and we have 2-5% DNA from Neanderthals. This guy makes so many mistakes, of course scientists made much mistakes back then they didnt have DNA analysis nor other modern technology. There is more evidence for almost every year and how much hard scientific evidence do we have that God made us ..none. The evolution of species has nothing to do with how life came to be . The evolution that nature changes animals/humans (Species) to adapt them to the environment they live in there is lots of evidence for that and you are looking at some things that have not been proven or explained yet because its complicated but give scientific evidence that God made everything. If you want answers YT is not the best source but there are YT channels about human evolution or genetics you just have to find the good ones.
You do know that energy can be added into the system from gaseous pressure from the reductive atmosphere or hydrothermal vents, right? And who told you that proteins have a half-life of a day? Do you even know what half-life means?
@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440 So, you believe that 'hydrothermal vents' and 'atmospheric pressure' causes the myriad of chemical reactions responsible for keeping even the simplest single called organisms alive? I'm not using the colloquial term of energy. I'm referring to the specific typ of energy used to overcome the activation energy in chemical reactions that enzymes are responsible for. As for your last question... Yes, proteins have a half life. 🙃 It doesn't just refer to a radioactive element.
@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440 You have another problem with the hydrothermal vents theory. Heat denatured proteins. An analog to denaturing is if I put your car in a car crusher. You car will no longer have a function. It's the same with a protein. Protein folding is extremely important and very specific and it will lose its enzymatic ability if it's denatured.
Praise God for how he designed us in his own image, I pray more people may turn from the false teachings of Darwin’s evolution and to the truth found in the word of God.
@@EADB72 Weren't you listening? Your willingness to believe a lie if it suits your purpose. "There's a sucker born every minute" Why don't you prove God exists and the Bible tells the truth and that this "Theory" is correct. To be honest you could very well be that sucker that's willing to accept the lies. This discussion is 100% theoretical. You can't prove it just like I can't prove it. I don't get how you can ask for proof when all the answers are going to be based on the opinions of what people believe.
Say what? That there are always a small number of fakers liars and scumbags trying to sell something everywhere, Greg Locke, Jim Baker, Jimmy Swaggart, Kirk Cameron, Ray Comfort, Kent Hovind, Oral Roberts, Peter Popoff, Kenneth Copeland etc etc etc. Every single one of these at the very least has been caught bending the truth more than a little for their own benefit. Yet, this list which if completed would be quite extensive and still be a very very very small percentage of "Christians" ... Were I a Christian though? These are the last group of people that I would want to be associated with. You do remember what Christ said about casting stones, yes?
Matthew 6:33-34 33 But seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness, and all these things shall be added to you. 34 Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about its own things. Sufficient for the day is its own trouble Word for today. 1st Timothy Chapter 6:7-12 7 For we brought nothing into this world, and it is certain we can carry nothing out. 8 And having food and raiment let us be therewith content. 9 But they that will be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and hurtful lusts, which drown men in destruction and perdition. 10 For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows. 11 But thou, O man of God, flee these things; and follow after righteousness, godliness, faith, love, patience, meekness. 12 Fight the good fight of faith, lay hold on eternal life, whereunto thou art also called, and hast professed a good profession before many witnesses... Amen. Isaiah 54-17 God's word for his people who believe .. [17] No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and their righteousness is of me, saith the LORD... JESUS Amen .🙂
If everyone was out preaching and no one was growing food the religious would starve. If it's cold tomorrow and you never bought a warm coat you could freeze tomorrow also. Wearing Sandals in the snow is not a good idea either so better to buy winter boots in advance than trying to find them after ground is covered with snow.
@@hydrolito as I'm sure you're aware, the theme of the text is God knows all things and excactly what you need and when. It is He who provides, not works of man. Buying boots or planting corn is a faith based act. You just hope you're right. Nothing but mankind worry about tomorrows food or next week's weather forecast.
No it isn’t. It’s a catalogue of long ago debunked arguments. It’s laughable that creationists still peddle Piltdown man and Nebraska man as evolutionary frauds.
@@SteveJones-ts4pb One fraud Exposed by scientists. Nebraska man was a sensationalised newspaper story until scientists revealed it was simply a pigs tooth. Lucy is NOT a fraud. The only fraud here is this cretin in the video.
@@frankcardano4142 People have been lied to about nearly EVERYTHING, you seem to be what I call "indoctrinated". Also easily upset about people waking up to their reality. Why so?
@@SteveJones-ts4pb Piltdown Man was a hoax carried out by Charles Dawson, the land owner. 3 palaeontologists re-examined the fossil because it wasn’t consistent with other fossils being found in South Africa. The larger braincase was the last thing to evolve. If evolution is true then Piltdown Man had to be a fraud. It was re-examined and bingo. It had an orangutans jawbone and chimps teeth. Confirming human evolution.
It's called science, it changes with better more relevant evidence. What we know today could be changed tomorrow. That's how science works, we know that we do not know everything.
its not science but clear deception & the willingness to believe a lie despite the truth! science cant interpret data its the scientist that do so, hence the bias of the individual is the most important factor!
@@PortmanRd hey thank you and can you answer me a few very simple questions. Since your an atheist I have no doubt you'll be able to answer them as most tend to be very educated. Can you give me the mechanism and one example of how an organism gains new never before seen Information? Next, can you give me an example of how soft tissue can last 65 to 500 million years? Name the mechanism as we know polymerization or cross linking won't last that long. So there is 2 simple questions I would love for you to answer. Don't bother saying sickle cell anemia that's not new its a loss of function. I have asked a lot of so called atheists these questions and they seem to stop talking lol. So let's see if your honest or a lying moron that knows nothing about science.
This was really cool. You should do one on how carbon dating is inaccurate. I always thought It was fascinating how the trees from From Mt S Helen’s if carbon dated would show they are thousands upon thousands of years old and not a couple 100 like they are. Am I correct?
Perhaps you are thinking of this: “In June, 1992 a large sample was collected from the surface of one of the last lava flows, probably from the year 1986. Samples were sent to a radioisotope laboratory in 1996 to be dated using the potassium-argon method. This method measures the amount of argon produced from the radioactive decay of potassium in the lava rock, presumably after it had erupted and cooled. The rock was a mere ten years old, but the potassium-argon “clock” dated the rock at 350,000 years old, and minerals within the rock dated at up to 2.4 million years old.” answersingenesis.org/geology/four-lessons-mount-st-helens-eruption/ Here are some of our videos on dating methods: • th-cam.com/video/SyOzyUXfIDo/w-d-xo.html • th-cam.com/video/7faJlajj09g/w-d-xo.html • th-cam.com/video/ODEM_A9pK6s/w-d-xo.html • www.tiktok.com/@answersingenesisca/video/7115558936241081605 • th-cam.com/video/fW8VsuWevhk/w-d-xo.html
@@AnswersCanada This was a deliberate piece of trickery by CREATIONIST LIAR Steve Austin. Potassium Argon dating isn’t used on such young rock because it’ll give inaccurate results. I think it came back as 310,000 years old. Why is AIG still peddling this lie?
This is very similar to how dinosaurs were misconstrued originally to have scaly skin, instead of feathers. Science adapts its understanding over time. Homo erectus is still considered a precursor hominid because it existed outside the human timeline and because it is genetically distinct. Neanderthanal, on the other hand, is considered a coexistant hominid, since they were genetically distinct and were out-competed by humans. But Neanderthals also interbred with humans, contributing up to 3% of total human DNA variants according to some studies. Science has made a lot of errors, for sure. But despite the errors, there is still a fairly solid evidence for a history of human evolution. Does that make it true? No. But God could just as easily set up evolution as his means of creating humans. Or he could have snapped the world into existence and created a historical trail to amuse himself. There are many possibilities and God's decisions are often beyond our understanding. But frauds of the past, especially when anthropology and archeology were still relatively young, are not the evidence used today. Lucy is the one exception where she is displayed artistically as the assembly of many different bobes, and is included in the record even though she is too old to collect genetic samples from to confirm the accuracy.
You may as well be talking about how the Catholic church is a fraud because of their violent and rather unchristian history, and trying to say that disproves Christianity.
In the 70's we were force fed the brontosaurus. A 180 foot long monster. Dreamt up by one man and one fossilized piece of backbone. No need to question that, just teach it in schools.
@@hydrolito weii, I was in school in the early seveties and they most definitely said it was 180 ft long. When, in fact, the Apatosaurus you refer to is about 70 ft long at the maximum. They have told soooooo many lies and changed the narrative e soooo many times to fit their reality that it's not even funny. They told us you can't re-freeze thawed meat and then eat it because you would be poisoned. A lie perpetrated by JM Snieder simply because he thought it diminished the quality. They told us women in hunter/gatherer tribes hid excess food in their vaginas for future use, I don't think they ever found a neadertahl with food stuffed in her hoo ha. But they put it all out there like it was gospel in the bible. Thank God for Libraries, the internet and free thinking. In my experience, experts are expert in f@ck all.
What cartoon show said the brontosaurus was 180 foot long? Also coyotes generally run about twice as fast as roadrunners. Not by doing it on two feet though.
@@hydrolito don't exactly remember the books that we had in school in the late 60's , early 70's, but National Geographic once made a claim of 130 feet. That good enough for you?
@@RodCalidge I think they said some other dinosaur was but not a brontosaurus or apatosaurus so far as I am aware of, I don't think it was that long ago either.
@@mcmanustony Because they deal with topics with a Biblical worldview, point to God, and always stand on his consistent unchanging word instead of man’s inconsistent constantly changing word.
BTW: Evolutionary Science does NOT refute the Existence of God. Science studies the material world. God is of the religious or spiritual world. So God is not a relevant topic for Science to study. That does not refute God's existence. It merely means God is not a relevant topic for Science to study. For example: If you had problems with the transmission of your car you normally wouldn't reference a book on pastry making, because pastry making is not relevant to auto mechanics.
Well, yes, a transitional species would have many of the characteristics of the ancestral species. In fact many human fossils show exactly that. And by the way, Peking man didn't disappear. Peking man was merged into a more general species, homo erectus. Homo erectus includes Peking man, Java man, and reflects a change in naming, not a questioning of it's authenticity. And i complete contradiction of your stataement about disappearing "missing links", more and more human ancestor fossils are found all the time.
Flabbergasted! 👀Thank you for all these revelations. Most appreciated.🙏🏾 love from South Africa 🇿🇦 You bet ya I will be sharing these powerful videos far and wide. 🤌🏽
When i was preaching in the wilderness all those years ago, i never imagined that people in the future would believe we came from monkeys. Was God literally living on earth not enough for you to believe?
Hairless, slow moving , fragile but somehow we are "evolved" 🤣🤣 by their own logic we should be able to fly and breathe underwater by now but its so obvious we and everything that is seen and unseen was designed by all knowing all powerful creator
So you’re saying, by virtue of your argument, that God purposely created a “Hairless, slow moving , fragile” creation? Does that explain why God would also design a nerve that instead of going a couple inches from our brain to our voice box, actually goes from our brain, down into our chest, around arteries at the heart, then back up to the voice box? Does that explain why God would design a fragile spine that is much MUCH better suited for walking on all 4s, as it is so weak in compression and prone to injury when we are standing?
These "humanoid" bones are 1 of 2 things: extinct ape species that aren't related to humans at all, or 2, the bodies of human beings from the time of Adam. The brow ridge only continues to develop as the person gets older and older; people tend to look a bit strange when they are 1,000+ years old.
One of your complaints seems to be that the science doesn't stay fixed. That's true. We have so many more fossils today and more clever wats to analyze them that assumptions shuffle around. That's not a fault. It's a feature of science working as it should. New fossil finds and new methods of analysis lead to more modern interpretations. That's not a "fault." It's a "feature"!
He’s mostly just saying evolutionary theory was founded on bad evidence, and they started with their established belief as a basis for examining evidence instead of starting with the evidence and then analyzing what we can know from it. This is not good science, especially when such obvious frauds are touted for years to establish this ideology, and no new evidence has surfaced to tell us that, despite the lack of evidence and the bias towards examining the evidence, they were right all along, and if they were right it would just be a coincidence really.
If that’s your conclusion, you missed the entire point of the video. His complaint isn’t “science doesn’t stay fixed”, if anything it champions that fact, because the actual complaint is that ideologically-blinded science has repeatedly been shown time and again that it throws objectivity out the window readily accepting obvious frauds as genuine, or allow biased imagination to operate over sober examination when reaching their conclusions- only to later be proven completely false when subjected to actual science because thankfully it’s NOT fixed. The complaint goes deeper, showing these false claims were never treated as serious scientific discoveries to begin with and were always treated as hyped up marketing material for an ideology and an entire industry built on it. Further, the damage that’s done by these false claims instantly being accepted as fact to push a false narrative, used as propaganda peddled to the population and cementing a completely false reality, misinforming generations and undermining the credibility of science as a whole. AND it shows that while science isn’t fixed, the information presented to the public like museum exhibits that remain unfixed long after false claims have been exposed, or the fact there’s zero media circus or headline hype written when sensational claims are later proven false like they are when they are first made. So ya- it all went completely over your head apparently.
"In the words of John Adams, ‘Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence,’" He which testifieth these things saith, Surely I come quickly. Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus.◄ Revelation 22:20
WoW! I have been looking for someone who can explain away evolution for years. Thank God for the internet, well maybe. You sir, have drawn my interest to know end, as I have argued the existence of God over Evolution for years! My argument was simple, "prove to me how evolution started by explaining how LIFE started". No ne can answer that question because the obvious answer is God!
@@frankcardano4142 Sorry but that statement is just ignorant. I know of no one trying to claim that “they” are Jesus. The point is, evolution can not prove their claim any more than creationism can prove their claim. I choose to believe in an all powerful creator instead of believing that life started from nothing.
@@sheepdoglogic Correct. Well done. I was simply copying the ignorance of Conner who was demanding I prove everything came from nothing which nobody claims. Do you now see how pointless and ignorant such a comment is?
For those teachers i can't speak, for me and my classroom i can say we learn from the Lord!!! 🕊❤😇 At least that's what i'm aiming for, i'm still working on my teachers degree. It could be that God has other plans for me. We will see!!! 🕊❤😇
Thanks so much for this series! I have a severe physical disability called Spinal Muscular Atrophy type 2. The world doesn't understand that a biblical worldview is the only true solution to ableism. My husband and I are trying to show people this on our TH-cam channel. We all have value because we are made in the image of God, not evolved pond scum.
I won’t critique the “evolutionists just believe lies because they’re suckers who don’t want to be judged” commentary. Rebuttals to intelligent design throw shade at creationists all the time on youtube, so no shame in sinking down to a similar level. Calling the field museum’s four sentence FAQ about a diorama an “article” seems pretty disingenuous though. Or suggesting that changing a diorama is somehow an indicator that the scientific community is now viewing Neanderthals as modern humans. So is suggesting that Erik Trinkaus said that humans and Neanderthals are the same. He’s pretty clear that they’re different. By quoting his magazine article…from almost 50 YEARS ago…but leaving out the line directly after your reference that says, “Despite these revisions, it is apparent that there are significant anatomical differences between the Neanderthals and present day humans” is just straight up dishonest. That’s as far as I got. This really bummed me out. I’m always psyched to find challenges to current scientific consensus; it’s essential for keeping people honest and challenging preconceptions and bias. This vid has no interest in that, though. It’s not about information or education, it’s just for edification. The only props I can give are that the vid cited its quotes. Good on you for that. The rest is disappointing.
If anyone thinks they can disprove the scientific theory of evolution then present your verifiable scientific evidence for peer review then go collect your Nobel Prize.
@@MichaelMeridius Ad hominem. The point remains. The "academy" is filled with materialists. These closed-minded "peers" assume what they think they are proving.
@@goldenarm2118 smhl Now you have the burden of proof regarding your fallacious assertion about the Nobel academy, which we both already know you will fail at, again! . PS Since you continue to be fallacious and demonstrably wrong my work here is done. PS try harder and fail less, troll.
Where do you find serpents that speak and crawl on their belly. The animals that mimic human speech are birds such as mynah birds and parrots that fly contradicting crawling on belly story.
If Adam believed a tree could kill them why didn't he know how to start a fire to burn it down if he was as intelligent as modern humans? Also why leave tree of supposedly poison fruit in a garden with children?
Well done. This video is easy to understand and debunks the deception. I've heard it said, "If you took all the bones discovered and labeled as links toward the evolution to humans, it wouldn't even create a complete skeleton. I'm curious about the facts of that statement.
I regard what you say as valid. Which is important, because we have been mislead with a purpose. However... The biggest mistake in my regard that has ever happened on this earth was when mankind declared itself above everything else that exists, which lead to us removing ourselves from the regulation that occurs in nature. All things that exist regulate each other. Mankind started believing it is not to be so, and that was the start to the chaos we caused to this day. We spread like a virus and our genes are deteriorating. I don't believe in the bible. Too many contradictions are within it, especially when putting the two testaments together. Like for example an omnipotent omnipresent omniscient god having to completely change plans mid-game leading to the Jesus story. I am not convinced. Also there is all the theft of pagan rites and believes and recoating them to make it more appealing for other (/oppressed) tribes to make the switch. There is also the fact that the "religion of love" has been spread by hundreds of years of warfare and coercion. Can you question yourself as much as you can question those that oppose you?
To clarify, Jesus was not a change of plans. He has always existed and him coming to redeem mankind was always the plan. Read Genesis 3:15. The New Testament is merely the act of turning the light on in the room where the Old Testament resides.
Good show but curious, why the skulls in South America (Peru, I think) are never shown in thier evolution illustrations? I know they say binding of heads but is this true?
Australopithecus was considered a central player in human evolution for a long while. (And there are several species, I believe at least three. Lucy's species is just one type.) But not considered part of the human lineage anymore. Our genus, Homo is still considered to have emerged from genus Australopithecus, but the details are less clear. The March of Evolution cartoon picture you show near the end is very much refuted today. It springs from a time when men wanted to see man arising to be the pinnacle of evolution (partly for religious reasons.) We've wanted to see our species as unique in all creation. We know know that is incorrect! Between about 300,000 years ago and 40,000 years ago there were at least eight (8) or nine (9) hominid species on planet Earth. Our species, Homo Sapiens. But also within genus Homo were Neanderthals, Denisovans, Erectus, Antecessor, Longi, Floresiensis & Luzonensis. Also possibly Naledi. All of these were living contemporaneously in parts of Africa, Europe, Asia, Indonesia, the Philippines and across the Pacific. We know for certain that some of them cross-bred with each other, Neanderthals, Denisovans and modern Humans for sure. Their DNA is still in our DNA. There are traces of DNA from at least one other hominid species/variant, perhaps Antecessor. So the "Progression of Evolution" picture is refuted and replaced by family groups of species living near each other and perhaps together. The question is, "Why are we the sole survivors?" (There's lots of speculation and no clear answers. There may never be a clear answer.) If anybody is interested in this, look up TH-cam channel "History with Kayleigh." Kayleigh During has done a credible job making excellent videos for each member of genus Homo (and maybe a few others.) She is also into archeology, especially Egyptology.
@@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440 If that's the case then we should see less variety than we do. Because so many animals live in the same environment as others. So, your explanation isn't a very good one.
@@hogansheroes2793 it’s the exact same question at the end of the post, but the entire post is different from the last. And if the shoe fits … Haven’t got a response from Calvin Clown yet. Not on any of the points I made which were direct responses to his video. Point by point. So are you assuming I’m posting the same thing based on the question at the end of my posts? Are you even reading my comments? Calvin is a liar and he knows it. And given his replies, he’s an obnoxious one at that.
@@Bomtombadi1 I read your numerous posts, and they are all basically calling Calvin a liar. Evolution is science fiction. Endless speculation and theories stacked on more theories with zero actual evidence.
According to Calvin, chemistry is also fraudulent because there was once a guy who tried to insert a fake element into the period table. THAT’S how infantile Calvin’s line of thinking is.
Since early biblical man lived well past 100 years old, I believe that these elderly are the Neanderthal. Imagine living this long. Your walk is somewhat hunched, your bones continue to grow as well as your brow ridge until you turn into the Neanderthal.
Love to watch. Please no need for loud distractions from background music . We want to hear you without music competing for attention. This comment is a positive feed back . Please consider it for future videos. Thanks.
It's so funny how you can insert religious conmen instead of Evolutionists into this video and it would sound so convincing. If god created the human eye why do so many people need eyeglasses and contacts to correct poor vision. Why do so many people have bad backs and back problems if god created man? Either the intelligent creator isn't that intelligent, or god is not that good at creating, Maybe god is just lazy and does half assed work.
Because they were always skeptical of it and knew something was off. Why? Because it just didn’t fit anywhere within the framework at the time. Hence, closer examination and more advanced technology they were able to determine the alterations done and promptly made corrections. Yet Calvin Clown here decides to proliferate the clear creationist agenda. These are well-known hoaxes and misconceptions. Calvin Clown here wants his audience to think they’re these deep, dark secrets. He’s actually one of the more loony tunes creationists I’ve seen in a while.
People can never find the truth on their own. God is the creator and people should humble themselves to God. People have not been able to better themselves. There is more than the natural world. God's Word, which He has protected. Romans 1:18-32 New International Version God’s Wrath Against Sinful Humanity 18 The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people, who suppress the truth by their wickedness, 19 since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. 20 For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities-his eternal power and divine nature-have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse. 21 For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools 23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like a mortal human being and birds and animals and reptiles. 24 Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. 25 They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator-who is forever praised. Amen. 26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error. 28 Furthermore, just as they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, so God gave them over to a depraved mind, so that they do what ought not to be done. 29 They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice. They are gossips, 30 slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents; 31 they have no understanding, no fidelity, no love, no mercy. 32 Although they know God’s righteous decree that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to do these very things but also approve of those who practice them.
@@des711 People have not been able to better themselves? What?! The invention of penicillin what has saved countless millions of lives? The invention of synthetic fertilizer which feeds half of the world today? The invention of semiconductors and math which enables us to have this conversation?
@@nasonguy Those are advancements of technology (which brings both good and evil to people), but as a community of people there is still consistant crime, drug use, drunks, abuse, lying, manipulation, taking advantage of, selfishness, suicide, poverty, fraud, etc. I would rather live with people who focus less on the advancment of technology, but who are instead focusing to live a life of integrity. Living a life of integrity does not stop someone from gaining knowledge towards helping others.
@@des711 How is there any drawback to the discovery/invention of Antibiotics? And if you look at literally all of history, we are living in the safest, most prosperous and least violent time ever, and it continues to get better.
The only accurate statement made in this little ditty is “many are willing to believe a lie rather than the truth if it suit their purpose”. I find it funny how you described your own position in an attempt to discredit a process so well documented, only the foolish or ignorant oppose it.
Not only is he describing himself but his words are loosely copied from 2 Thessalonians, making him sound like a brainwashed muppet. Pretty high on the cringe scale.
God gave us His self-revelation, a contract in writing, and His signature appears on each page of the document. He is bound by what is stated within it, and we are given a choice. We can sign it and agree to live by its terms to reap its eternal benefits, or we can refuse to sign it, with the understanding that our temporary existence on this planet will conclude with death without the afterlife profits the contract stipulates to us as beneficiaries. Praise our Father God and our Savior Jesus Christ 💯🙏❤️
Why do all young earth creationists fail in their burden of proof, unlike the scientific theory of evolution which continues to stand the test of academic peer review.
I’m thoroughly convinced that AiG isn’t trying to actually convince any skeptics or convert anyone. I think they put this stuff out to make the hard-line YEC, literal interpretation group feel better about their blind beliefs and bigotry.
Jesus is Lord God Almighty clothed in unsinful humanity and He is the author of eternal life to all who trust Him alone for salvation. This means that saving repentance is realizing that you are a sinner deserving of God's just punishment in Hell and turn (repent) from whatever you trusted in before, if indeed you trusted in anything; to trusting in the person and finished work of Christ "alone" for salvation. There is only one God. He spoke everything into existence.
THERE IN NO REDEMTION THE STORIES OF LESUS ARE PATHETIC LIES FOR THE MASSES AND WHEN YOU DIE YOU ARE GOING TO HELL FOR THE LIES YOU CONTINUE TO PERPATRATE.
IMHO, Sir, you are promoting a major fallacy. The Bible is about the religious, mythical, spiritual world. Evolution is the science of the material world (as best as we can understand it.) It is a Great Fallacy to insist that the Bible (of the spiritual world) must be equal to, or congruent with, Scientific studies of the material world. It's like insisting that Oranges must equal Lamb Chops. It's not a relevant thing to do.
XD yeeeah lets lies about facts and lets keep education low because of à book.... I hope some will fact check this joke of à vidéo and learn for réal. That incluse all the quotes they take and twist. Si To quote à dear general: Lies! More lies!
No, in fact the Old Evolution Text Books said that Neanderthals didn't live next to homo sapiens but died out as an Evolutionary dead end. Of course they've changed their theories countless times.
@@hogansheroes2793 what is it with you people and “the textbooks?” Further, why is evolution your only focus here? You seem to have a problem with actually learning, which is what scientists do. Theories get updated. That’s a fact and the truth is they look very different from their original presentations. Creationists are the only ones who have problems with this. Also, name some old evolution textbooks, please. Are they still in use today? Evolution can’t be a thing because … why? Because old textbooks have outdated information?
@@hogansheroes2793 yes, it is! Because life changes and adapts and those changes happen over time and we’ve seen it in real time, too! Sorry to burst your bubble, but your flat out denial isn’t an argument.
@@Bomtombadi1 No we haven't ever seen a species evolving into another species. The original created gene pool for each " kind" simply selected for variations. That's an overall decrease in information. Evolution says that there is an increase in genetic information. Guess again later!
Then you quote a man who said they were humans suffering from rickets, when evidence 100+ years later gives no indication of such problems. Calvin, do you ever get tired of being a liar?
yeah get some answers to these questions instead of being emotional and angry. Find out what your motives are. If they are selfish, you will know, if you want to
@@mcmanustony what lies, this is why you atheists have no way of making sense of yourself, You are like politicians, much talk and platitudes but no focused objections, no solutions to the creationism questions
Oh Calvin, calling a liar and a clown for being demonstrably both isn’t ad hominem. It’s accurate. You’re wrong AND these things. If I said you’re wrong BECAUSE these things, that would be ad hominem. Though since I’ve pointed out your lies and tomfoolery, it’s an apt description of you.
So Calvin, you quote the world’s foremost authority on human evolution and use him to show evolution is wrong? Calvin, do you ever get tired of being a liar?
Yeah, it's funny that evolution is false because we can't find the remains of a missing link; but Christianity is true because we can't find the remains of Jesus. BTW, there are empty tombs all over the world, like the one for the Persian emperor Cyrus the Great at Pasargardae, Iran. When archeologists investigate an empty tomb, they assume that the body or bodies buried there were moved some time in the past, not that the people entombed there "rose from the dead."
Nebraska Man dates to 1922. There was a rush to find ape-man species in North America which lead to wild speculation. This was also proved incorrect by more careful science.
Peking-Man is now considered a sub-variant of Homo Erectus and not a separate species.
Java-Man is now also considered a variation of Home Erectus.
Ramapithecus was considered important for awhile, but later fossil finds demonstrated it to be less important.
"Obvious fraud to acomplish ideological goals." Well, this is happening a lot, especially in our time.
Especially in religion and politics.
Yes, and this video is an EXCELLENT example of one such!
@@coachhannah2403
How so?
Which example?
@@frankcardano4142 - Conjoining 'evolutionists' with the frauds.
@@coachhannah2403
No scientist has ever been involved in any frauds.
If you think they have can you give an example. There are none in this video.
This is propaganda.
You know lying is a sin….
Sadly when you know all these falsehoods and know the truth you tell people about them and they refuse to beleive or check things out for themselves. They would rather beleive a lie than the truth
That’s because you probably sound like a brainwashed idiot.
This video is deceitful nonsense.
@@frankcardano4142 this has been known for decades. This isn't new. DNA analysis has exposed all this. Then you speak of brainwashed. Your like the Twitter Twitts.
@@edwardwoods5977
Yes. These are creationist lies from decades ago.
It’s amazing they’re still peddling them.
Can you pick your favourite one and I’ll walk you through how these liars are tricking you?
@@edwardwoods5977
What about Piltdown man do you think was a hoax?
@@frankcardano4142 they mentioned this in the video and it was absolutely found to be a fraud. Skull of a man jaw of an orangutan and the teeth were altered filled down to more closely resemble a man.
Keep up the good labor, Thanks, all.
Thanks! Please share! - Cal
As far as I can tell the whole proto ape to human is just begging the question. They still haven't shown how constituent particles floating through the primordial soup would have spontaneously combined. Most chemical reactions require the input of energy into the system. You have to overcome the activation energy required to do the chemical reaction. Then one would need to explain how proteins would last in the primordial soup... Since, proteins have a half life of a day. I guess evolutionists need to pay more attention to biochemistry class.
And you are an expert on what? A Chimp has 98,6% the same as a human and if you look at how they behave they have a lot of "human" behaviour.
And you believe in a YT channel and this man is clearly a creationist , but the whole Neanderthal genome has been put together after many years its not easy to find DNA that isnt degraded and they compared it to our DNA and we have 2-5% DNA from Neanderthals.
This guy makes so many mistakes, of course scientists made much mistakes back then they didnt have DNA analysis nor other modern technology.
There is more evidence for almost every year and how much hard scientific evidence do we have that God made us ..none.
The evolution of species has nothing to do with how life came to be .
The evolution that nature changes animals/humans (Species) to adapt them to the environment they live in there is lots of evidence for that and you are looking at some things that have not been proven or explained yet because its complicated but give scientific evidence that God made everything.
If you want answers YT is not the best source but there are YT channels about human evolution or genetics you just have to find the good ones.
You do know that energy can be added into the system from gaseous pressure from the reductive atmosphere or hydrothermal vents, right? And who told you that proteins have a half-life of a day? Do you even know what half-life means?
@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440 So, you believe that 'hydrothermal vents' and 'atmospheric pressure' causes the myriad of chemical reactions responsible for keeping even the simplest single called organisms alive? I'm not using the colloquial term of energy. I'm referring to the specific typ of energy used to overcome the activation energy in chemical reactions that enzymes are responsible for.
As for your last question...
Yes, proteins have a half life. 🙃 It doesn't just refer to a radioactive element.
@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440 You have another problem with the hydrothermal vents theory. Heat denatured proteins. An analog to denaturing is if I put your car in a car crusher. You car will no longer have a function. It's the same with a protein. Protein folding is extremely important and very specific and it will lose its enzymatic ability if it's denatured.
ARE YOU A ORGANIIC CHENIST BECAUSE THIS DOSE NOT HAPPEN YOU ARE SO IGNORANT@@monkeyboy7681
I really enjoyed this one in that it gives "ammo" against the many of the false missing links that people will bring up to prove evolution.
Praise God for how he designed us in his own image, I pray more people may turn from the false teachings of Darwin’s evolution and to the truth found in the word of God.
None of this is correct.
He is tricking you.
@@frankcardano4142 prove it.
@@EADB72 no amount of proof can change the mind of somebody so gullible, that they believe some god impregnating a virgin is reality.
So basically he said everything you wanted to hear
@@EADB72 Weren't you listening? Your willingness to believe a lie if it suits your purpose. "There's a sucker born every minute" Why don't you prove God exists and the Bible tells the truth and that this "Theory" is correct. To be honest you could very well be that sucker that's willing to accept the lies. This discussion is 100% theoretical. You can't prove it just like I can't prove it. I don't get how you can ask for proof when all the answers are going to be based on the opinions of what people believe.
Nice to hear someone say it. God bless
Say what?
That there are always a small number of fakers liars and scumbags trying to sell something everywhere, Greg Locke, Jim Baker, Jimmy Swaggart, Kirk Cameron, Ray Comfort, Kent Hovind, Oral Roberts, Peter Popoff, Kenneth Copeland etc etc etc. Every single one of these at the very least has been caught bending the truth more than a little for their own benefit.
Yet, this list which if completed would be quite extensive and still be a very very very small percentage of "Christians" ... Were I a Christian though? These are the last group of people that I would want to be associated with.
You do remember what Christ said about casting stones, yes?
Thanks! Please share! - Cal
Matthew 6:33-34
33 But seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness, and all these things shall be added to you.
34 Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about its own things. Sufficient for the day is its own trouble
Word for today.
1st Timothy
Chapter 6:7-12
7 For we brought nothing into this world, and it is certain we can carry nothing out.
8 And having food and raiment let us be therewith content.
9 But they that will be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and hurtful lusts, which drown men in destruction and perdition.
10 For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.
11 But thou, O man of God, flee these things; and follow after righteousness, godliness, faith, love, patience, meekness.
12 Fight the good fight of faith, lay hold on eternal life, whereunto thou art also called, and hast professed a good profession before many witnesses...
Amen.
Isaiah 54-17
God's word for his people who believe ..
[17] No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn.
This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and their righteousness is of me, saith the LORD...
JESUS
Amen .🙂
If everyone was out preaching and no one was growing food the religious would starve. If it's cold tomorrow and you never bought a warm coat you could freeze tomorrow also. Wearing Sandals in the snow is not a good idea either so better to buy winter boots in advance than trying to find them after ground is covered with snow.
@@hydrolito as I'm sure you're aware, the theme of the text is God knows all things and excactly what you need and when. It is He who provides, not works of man. Buying boots or planting corn is a faith based act. You just hope you're right. Nothing but mankind worry about tomorrows food or next week's weather forecast.
AND THE LIES OF SALVATION KEEP THE IGNORANT FOR ASKING QUESTIONS OF REALITY NOT THE CRAP FRON SOME WANKER.
Excellent video. Thumb it up so it spreads. God Bless.
like a virus of misinformation
Thanks! Please share! - Cal
TYPICAL NONSENCE FROM A DELUSIONAL PERSON COMPOUNDED WITH IGNORENCE AND LIES
May the creator bless all the believers of creation.
Another excellent presentation! Please keep them rolling out, good sir.
No it isn’t.
It’s a catalogue of long ago debunked arguments.
It’s laughable that creationists still peddle Piltdown man and Nebraska man as evolutionary frauds.
@@frankcardano4142 They are frauds, just as you have become for promoting such nonsense.
@@SteveJones-ts4pb
One fraud Exposed by scientists.
Nebraska man was a sensationalised newspaper story until scientists revealed it was simply a pigs tooth.
Lucy is NOT a fraud.
The only fraud here is this cretin in the video.
@@frankcardano4142 People have been lied to about nearly EVERYTHING, you seem to be what I call "indoctrinated". Also easily upset about people waking up to their reality. Why so?
@@SteveJones-ts4pb
Piltdown Man was a hoax carried out by Charles Dawson, the land owner.
3 palaeontologists re-examined the fossil because it wasn’t consistent with other fossils being found in South Africa.
The larger braincase was the last thing to evolve.
If evolution is true then Piltdown Man had to be a fraud.
It was re-examined and bingo.
It had an orangutans jawbone and chimps teeth.
Confirming human evolution.
It's called science, it changes with better more relevant evidence. What we know today could be changed tomorrow. That's how science works, we know that we do not know everything.
its not science but clear deception & the willingness to believe a lie despite the truth! science cant interpret data its the scientist that do so, hence the bias of the individual is the most important factor!
Thank You.
Well done video... just wanted to say thanks and point out what a good job. You did on this video. Thanks again
Thanks! Please share. : )
@@calvinangela4348 you by chance a Calvinist? I'm just curious with the name no problem if you are I pretty much am so I had to ask.
Well done indeed. Well done in spouting religious diatribe that wiil keep generations of home schooled kids ignorant.
I went to a grace church before the pastor had to stop because of health issues. So yes I guess you could say I'm pretty much one very close anyway.
@@PortmanRd hey thank you and can you answer me a few very simple questions. Since your an atheist I have no doubt you'll be able to answer them as most tend to be very educated.
Can you give me the mechanism and one example of how an organism gains new never before seen Information? Next, can you give me an example of how soft tissue can last 65 to 500 million years? Name the mechanism as we know polymerization or cross linking won't last that long. So there is 2 simple questions I would love for you to answer. Don't bother saying sickle cell anemia that's not new its a loss of function. I have asked a lot of so called atheists these questions and they seem to stop talking lol. So let's see if your honest or a lying moron that knows nothing about science.
This was really cool. You should do one on how carbon dating is inaccurate. I always thought It was fascinating how the trees from From Mt S Helen’s if carbon dated would show they are thousands upon thousands of years old and not a couple 100 like they are. Am I correct?
You're wrong.
Perhaps you are thinking of this:
“In June, 1992 a large sample was collected from the surface of one of the last lava flows, probably from the year 1986. Samples were sent to a radioisotope laboratory in 1996 to be dated using the potassium-argon method. This method measures the amount of argon produced from the radioactive decay of potassium in the lava rock, presumably after it had erupted and cooled. The rock was a mere ten years old, but the potassium-argon “clock” dated the rock at 350,000 years old, and minerals within the rock dated at up to 2.4 million years old.”
answersingenesis.org/geology/four-lessons-mount-st-helens-eruption/
Here are some of our videos on dating methods:
• th-cam.com/video/SyOzyUXfIDo/w-d-xo.html
• th-cam.com/video/7faJlajj09g/w-d-xo.html
• th-cam.com/video/ODEM_A9pK6s/w-d-xo.html
• www.tiktok.com/@answersingenesisca/video/7115558936241081605
• th-cam.com/video/fW8VsuWevhk/w-d-xo.html
@@AnswersCanada
This was a deliberate piece of trickery by CREATIONIST LIAR Steve Austin.
Potassium Argon dating isn’t used on such young rock because it’ll give inaccurate results.
I think it came back as 310,000 years old.
Why is AIG still peddling this lie?
So sad for atheist
It is sad. But not for the reason you think.
@@jdrein9511 what reason do you think I have ?
@@ashwilliams5843
It’s sad that you are so easily fooled by these ridiculous propaganda creationist vids.
@@frankcardano4142 I hope you get it one day .... until then I am sad you won't accept a free gift
@@ashwilliams5843
The bible is made up youth.
Straight 🔥And look at those credits! :P
ANd the foorprints were found MILES away from LUCY...
This is very similar to how dinosaurs were misconstrued originally to have scaly skin, instead of feathers. Science adapts its understanding over time. Homo erectus is still considered a precursor hominid because it existed outside the human timeline and because it is genetically distinct. Neanderthanal, on the other hand, is considered a coexistant hominid, since they were genetically distinct and were out-competed by humans. But Neanderthals also interbred with humans, contributing up to 3% of total human DNA variants according to some studies.
Science has made a lot of errors, for sure. But despite the errors, there is still a fairly solid evidence for a history of human evolution. Does that make it true? No. But God could just as easily set up evolution as his means of creating humans. Or he could have snapped the world into existence and created a historical trail to amuse himself. There are many possibilities and God's decisions are often beyond our understanding. But frauds of the past, especially when anthropology and archeology were still relatively young, are not the evidence used today.
Lucy is the one exception where she is displayed artistically as the assembly of many different bobes, and is included in the record even though she is too old to collect genetic samples from to confirm the accuracy.
You may as well be talking about how the Catholic church is a fraud because of their violent and rather unchristian history, and trying to say that disproves Christianity.
better fossils show feathering
Perfect, thanks for sharing.
Thanks! Please share! : )
TYPICAL NONSENCE FROM A DELUSIONAL PERSON COMPOUNDED WITH IGNORENCE AND LIES
In the 70's we were force fed the brontosaurus. A 180 foot long monster. Dreamt up by one man and one fossilized piece of backbone. No need to question that, just teach it in schools.
Theres more than just a backbone theres literally tonnes of fossils and more to be found
@@hydrolito weii, I was in school in the early seveties and they most definitely said it was 180 ft long. When, in fact, the Apatosaurus you refer to is about 70 ft long at the maximum.
They have told soooooo many lies and changed the narrative e soooo many times to fit their reality that it's not even funny.
They told us you can't re-freeze thawed meat and then eat it because you would be poisoned. A lie perpetrated by JM Snieder simply because he thought it diminished the quality.
They told us women in hunter/gatherer tribes hid excess food in their vaginas for future use, I don't think they ever found a neadertahl with food stuffed in her hoo ha. But they put it all out there like it was gospel in the bible.
Thank God for Libraries, the internet and free thinking.
In my experience, experts are expert in f@ck all.
What cartoon show said the brontosaurus was 180 foot long? Also coyotes generally run about twice as fast as roadrunners. Not by doing it on two feet though.
@@hydrolito don't exactly remember the books that we had in school in the late 60's , early 70's, but National Geographic once made a claim of 130 feet. That good enough for you?
@@RodCalidge I think they said some other dinosaur was but not a brontosaurus or apatosaurus so far as I am aware of, I don't think it was that long ago either.
I like videos with this guy in them
Make more
I feel the same, I really like the way he presents the evidence.
@@seaknightvirchow8131
Lol. You mean you like him?
PLEASR DO NOT MAKE ANOTHER DELUSIONAL VIDEO OF NONSENCE
Found alot of this out years ago and I am shocked they still teach it.
Evolution is taught for the same reason as gravitation- because it's solid science. No amount of bible thumping liars fron AiG will change that.
They don’t teach this.
These are tired old creationist lies.
@@mcmanustony you have not truly looked at all the evidence, i shall for u my friend
@@zr7699 you are wrong. There is ZERO evidence for creationism in the fossil record.
@@zr7699
usually the people who say they’ve done their research are the ones who know the least.
Thanks for the info.
TYPICAL NONSENCE FROM A DELUSIONAL PERSON COMPOUNDED WITH IGNORENCE AND LIES
I love these videos
Thanks! Please share. : )
Why? What do you love about dishonest tripe?
@@mcmanustony Because they deal with topics with a Biblical worldview, point to God, and always stand on his consistent unchanging word instead of man’s inconsistent constantly changing word.
yeah me to such a laugh
@@feetyeet8538 do you know how books work?
BTW: Evolutionary Science does NOT refute the Existence of God. Science studies the material world. God is of the religious or spiritual world. So God is not a relevant topic for Science to study. That does not refute God's existence. It merely means God is not a relevant topic for Science to study.
For example: If you had problems with the transmission of your car you normally wouldn't reference a book on pastry making, because pastry making is not relevant to auto mechanics.
Facts!
Well, yes, a transitional species would have many of the characteristics of the ancestral species. In fact many human fossils show exactly that. And by the way, Peking man didn't disappear. Peking man was merged into a more general species, homo erectus. Homo erectus includes Peking man, Java man, and reflects a change in naming, not a questioning of it's authenticity. And i complete contradiction of your stataement about disappearing "missing links", more and more human ancestor fossils are found all the time.
Just found your channel today and I’m subscribed. Good work may God bless your hard work
Thanks so much! Please share!- Cal
TYPICAL NONSENCE FROM A DELUSIONAL PERSON COMPOUNDED WITH IGNORENCE AND LIES
REMEMDER LIES ARE A SIN
Always speak truth because all the nay Sayers will have their judgment before God Almighty.
Camera's Over here
Well done. Bunch of liars.
Flabbergasted! 👀Thank you for all these revelations. Most appreciated.🙏🏾 love from South Africa 🇿🇦 You bet ya I will be sharing these powerful videos far and wide. 🤌🏽
Thanks!
Im Horrified,will definitely share it as far wide as communication would allow.
TYPICAL NONSENCE FROM A DELUSIONAL PERSON COMPOUNDED WITH IGNORENCE AND LIES.
When i was preaching in the wilderness all those years ago, i never imagined that people in the future would believe we came from monkeys. Was God literally living on earth not enough for you to believe?
Hairless, slow moving , fragile but somehow we are "evolved" 🤣🤣 by their own logic we should be able to fly and breathe underwater by now but its so obvious we and everything that is seen and unseen was designed by all knowing all powerful creator
So you’re saying, by virtue of your argument, that God purposely created a “Hairless, slow moving , fragile” creation? Does that explain why God would also design a nerve that instead of going a couple inches from our brain to our voice box, actually goes from our brain, down into our chest, around arteries at the heart, then back up to the voice box?
Does that explain why God would design a fragile spine that is much MUCH better suited for walking on all 4s, as it is so weak in compression and prone to injury when we are standing?
@@nasonguy thats the best you could muster up? Cmon man you can do better than that use your evolved monkey brain
Excellent video!
Thanks! Please share. : )
PLEASE STOP WATCHING THE IGNORANT GARBAGE AND READ YOUR BIBLE !!!!!!
These "humanoid" bones are 1 of 2 things: extinct ape species that aren't related to humans at all, or 2, the bodies of human beings from the time of Adam. The brow ridge only continues to develop as the person gets older and older; people tend to look a bit strange when they are 1,000+ years old.
Just here for the lol's.
Yes👍👍👍
🙏💖🙏💖🙏💖🙏
One of your complaints seems to be that the science doesn't stay fixed. That's true. We have so many more fossils today and more clever wats to analyze them that assumptions shuffle around. That's not a fault. It's a feature of science working as it should. New fossil finds and new methods of analysis lead to more modern interpretations.
That's not a "fault." It's a "feature"!
He’s mostly just saying evolutionary theory was founded on bad evidence, and they started with their established belief as a basis for examining evidence instead of starting with the evidence and then analyzing what we can know from it. This is not good science, especially when such obvious frauds are touted for years to establish this ideology, and no new evidence has surfaced to tell us that, despite the lack of evidence and the bias towards examining the evidence, they were right all along, and if they were right it would just be a coincidence really.
If that’s your conclusion, you missed the entire point of the video. His complaint isn’t “science doesn’t stay fixed”, if anything it champions that fact, because the actual complaint is that ideologically-blinded science has repeatedly been shown time and again that it throws objectivity out the window readily accepting obvious frauds as genuine, or allow biased imagination to operate over sober examination when reaching their conclusions- only to later be proven completely false when subjected to actual science because thankfully it’s NOT fixed. The complaint goes deeper, showing these false claims were never treated as serious scientific discoveries to begin with and were always treated as hyped up marketing material for an ideology and an entire industry built on it. Further, the damage that’s done by these false claims instantly being accepted as fact to push a false narrative, used as propaganda peddled to the population and cementing a completely false reality, misinforming generations and undermining the credibility of science as a whole. AND it shows that while science isn’t fixed, the information presented to the public like museum exhibits that remain unfixed long after false claims have been exposed, or the fact there’s zero media circus or headline hype written when sensational claims are later proven false like they are when they are first made. So ya- it all went completely over your head apparently.
And what have these fossils proved?
@@philisii They have proven evolution!
@@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440 who? And how?
"In the words of John Adams, ‘Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence,’"
He which testifieth these things saith, Surely I come quickly. Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus.◄ Revelation 22:20
Our monkey j4r should opine on it.
However Neanderthals were a different sort of hominin....there were at one time 5 different species of hominin living at the same time.
Lucy? Mary Leakey REFUSED to put her in thr humsn family and DID NOT signed the publication. She is the one that discovered it
Lucy has a blanket of worms
WoW! I have been looking for someone who can explain away evolution for years. Thank God for the internet, well maybe. You sir, have drawn my interest to know end, as I have argued the existence of God over Evolution for years! My argument was simple, "prove to me how evolution started by explaining how LIFE started". No ne can answer that question because the obvious answer is God!
You need to demonstrate a god exists rather than trying to discredit superior explanations.
@@frankcardano4142 prove everything came from nothing. Oh right you can’t cause it’s nothing.
@@connerdozier6689
Prove you’re Jesus.
Oh that’s right you’re not.
Right back at ya buddy.
@@frankcardano4142 Sorry but that statement is just ignorant. I know of no one trying to claim that “they” are Jesus. The point is, evolution can not prove their claim any more than creationism can prove their claim. I choose to believe in an all powerful creator instead of believing that life started from nothing.
@@sheepdoglogic
Correct. Well done.
I was simply copying the ignorance of Conner who was demanding I prove everything came from nothing which nobody claims.
Do you now see how pointless and ignorant such a comment is?
What is the likelihood that today our schools and universities are correcting the lies that have been taught?
For those teachers i can't speak,
for me and my classroom i can say we learn from the Lord!!! 🕊❤😇
At least that's what i'm aiming for,
i'm still working on my teachers degree.
It could be that God has other plans for me.
We will see!!! 🕊❤😇
@@jpix96 bless you! We need Christian teachers in our public schools!
I was taught lies about Eden, Adam and Eve, burning bushes, talking snakes etc. Evolution is taught as it is solid science.
@@Sundayschoolnetwork
Which lies?
As none of what’s mentioned in this video is taught in schools.
@@frankcardano4142 yes, that was the point. It needs to be taught.
Thanks so much for this series! I have a severe physical disability called Spinal Muscular Atrophy type 2. The world doesn't understand that a biblical worldview is the only true solution to ableism. My husband and I are trying to show people this on our TH-cam channel. We all have value because we are made in the image of God, not evolved pond scum.
If the biblical worldview is true can you answer a question then?
@@katkit4281 What question?
This was awesome. Thank you!
It’s awful
@@frankcardano4142 If you don't like it, than don't watch it! That's silly.
@@Franquie
It’s disinformation throughout.
Very deceitful and dishonest.
@@frankcardano4142 Give me an example of the disinformation? With proof to back up what you are claiming :)
@@Franquie
And you’re a very beautiful young lady yet you’re being lied to by these awful people. They are not people to trust.
Darwin for president!
Thank you
Thanks! Please share. : )
I loved the content, but the background music was annoying.
As was calvin
The evolutionists have a lot of imagination, for sure.
I won’t critique the “evolutionists just believe lies because they’re suckers who don’t want to be judged” commentary. Rebuttals to intelligent design throw shade at creationists all the time on youtube, so no shame in sinking down to a similar level.
Calling the field museum’s four sentence FAQ about a diorama an “article” seems pretty disingenuous though. Or suggesting that changing a diorama is somehow an indicator that the scientific community is now viewing Neanderthals as modern humans.
So is suggesting that Erik Trinkaus said that humans and Neanderthals are the same. He’s pretty clear that they’re different. By quoting his magazine article…from almost 50 YEARS ago…but leaving out the line directly after your reference that says, “Despite these revisions, it is apparent that there are significant anatomical differences between the Neanderthals and present day humans” is just straight up dishonest.
That’s as far as I got. This really bummed me out. I’m always psyched to find challenges to current scientific consensus; it’s essential for keeping people honest and challenging preconceptions and bias. This vid has no interest in that, though. It’s not about information or education, it’s just for edification.
The only props I can give are that the vid cited its quotes. Good on you for that. The rest is disappointing.
If anyone thinks they can disprove the scientific theory of evolution then present your verifiable scientific evidence for peer review then go collect your Nobel Prize.
The spirit that caused all these (and others) frauds is the same spirit that controls your "peer review". So go screw yourself.
@@goldenarm2118 Obvious troll is obvious!
@@MichaelMeridius Ad hominem. The point remains. The "academy" is filled with materialists. These closed-minded "peers" assume what they think they are proving.
@@goldenarm2118 smhl Now you have the burden of proof regarding your fallacious assertion about the Nobel academy, which we both already know you will fail at, again! .
PS Since you continue to be fallacious and demonstrably wrong my work here is done.
PS try harder and fail less, troll.
@@MichaelMeridius My first piece of evidence is the evidence brought forward in this video, namely, the fraud by the materialists.
The atheist love to mock God but they leave satan alone.
Excellent! i will no longer "dis" people by calling the Neanderthals.
😆
TYPICAL NONSENCE FROM A DELUSIONAL PERSON COMPOUNDED WITH IGNORENCE AND LIES
If evolution is real then why do they call the universe creation?
what?
We don’t…
This has some serious “if God isn’t real then why does a banana fit in the hand so well” energy.
Adam was just as intelligent as today's humans. thanks for the video.
I believe the human race is devolving in intelligence 😉
He was way more intelligent and probably 12 feet tall.
If Adam and Eve existed and had no comprehension of lying how would Eve know a serpent was lying?
Where do you find serpents that speak and crawl on their belly. The animals that mimic human speech are birds such as mynah birds and parrots that fly contradicting crawling on belly story.
If Adam believed a tree could kill them why didn't he know how to start a fire to burn it down if he was as intelligent as modern humans? Also why leave tree of supposedly poison fruit in a garden with children?
Well done. This video is easy to understand and debunks the deception. I've heard it said, "If you took all the bones discovered and labeled as links toward the evolution to humans, it wouldn't even create a complete skeleton. I'm curious about the facts of that statement.
IF YOU BELEIVE THIS CRAP PLEASE GO BACK TO THE USE CANADIAN SOCIETY DOSE NOT WANT YOUR DELUSIONAL NONSENCE HERE !!!!!!
Great video
He that leads into captivity will go into captivity - Revelation
Amoralism is Devil's deception!!!!
IF WHAT YOU BEIEVE AS TRUE THEN TAKE A SECOND LOOK AT TRUMP THE ABITUAL LIAR THAT ONLY A DEMON WOULD DO TO GET ATTENTION.
I am utterly amazed at the blindly dogmatic bigotry upon which so much evolutionary 'science' is based !
Do you go to a doctor
I am continually amazed how easily bible believers are duped by their moronic leaders.
I guess it's true that Lucy got some 'splaining to do.
I regard what you say as valid. Which is important, because we have been mislead with a purpose. However... The biggest mistake in my regard that has ever happened on this earth was when mankind declared itself above everything else that exists, which lead to us removing ourselves from the regulation that occurs in nature. All things that exist regulate each other. Mankind started believing it is not to be so, and that was the start to the chaos we caused to this day. We spread like a virus and our genes are deteriorating. I don't believe in the bible. Too many contradictions are within it, especially when putting the two testaments together. Like for example an omnipotent omnipresent omniscient god having to completely change plans mid-game leading to the Jesus story. I am not convinced. Also there is all the theft of pagan rites and believes and recoating them to make it more appealing for other (/oppressed) tribes to make the switch. There is also the fact that the "religion of love" has been spread by hundreds of years of warfare and coercion. Can you question yourself as much as you can question those that oppose you?
To clarify, Jesus was not a change of plans. He has always existed and him coming to redeem mankind was always the plan. Read Genesis 3:15. The New Testament is merely the act of turning the light on in the room where the Old Testament resides.
Good show but curious, why the skulls in South America (Peru, I think) are never shown in thier evolution illustrations? I know they say binding of heads but is this true?
TYPICAL NONSENCE FROM A DELUSIONAL PERSON COMPOUNDED WITH IGNORENCE AND LIES
Australopithecus was considered a central player in human evolution for a long while. (And there are several species, I believe at least three. Lucy's species is just one type.) But not considered part of the human lineage anymore. Our genus, Homo is still considered to have emerged from genus Australopithecus, but the details are less clear.
The March of Evolution cartoon picture you show near the end is very much refuted today. It springs from a time when men wanted to see man arising to be the pinnacle of evolution (partly for religious reasons.) We've wanted to see our species as unique in all creation. We know know that is incorrect!
Between about 300,000 years ago and 40,000 years ago there were at least eight (8) or nine (9) hominid species on planet Earth. Our species, Homo Sapiens. But also within genus Homo were Neanderthals, Denisovans, Erectus, Antecessor, Longi, Floresiensis & Luzonensis. Also possibly Naledi. All of these were living contemporaneously in parts of Africa, Europe, Asia, Indonesia, the Philippines and across the Pacific. We know for certain that some of them cross-bred with each other, Neanderthals, Denisovans and modern Humans for sure. Their DNA is still in our DNA. There are traces of DNA from at least one other hominid species/variant, perhaps Antecessor.
So the "Progression of Evolution" picture is refuted and replaced by family groups of species living near each other and perhaps together. The question is, "Why are we the sole survivors?" (There's lots of speculation and no clear answers. There may never be a clear answer.)
If anybody is interested in this, look up TH-cam channel "History with Kayleigh." Kayleigh During has done a credible job making excellent videos for each member of genus Homo (and maybe a few others.) She is also into archeology, especially Egyptology.
Exactly! If these other hominids existed, why are we the only survivors surely the others would have been adapted enough to survive.
@@antiloser-NFS Because they inhabited the same ecological niche.
@@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440 If that's the case then we should see less variety than we do. Because so many animals live in the same environment as others. So, your explanation isn't a very good one.
Glory to God!
Piltdown man was not re-examined 40 years later. Scientists were always skeptical of it.
Calvin, do you ever get tired of being a liar?
Theyre not even skeptical. Theyre adimant. Adimant that it is a fraud, like nebraska man.
Do you ever get tired of posting the exact same thing over and over again, hoping to get a different response?
@@hogansheroes2793 it’s the exact same question at the end of the post, but the entire post is different from the last.
And if the shoe fits …
Haven’t got a response from Calvin Clown yet. Not on any of the points I made which were direct responses to his video. Point by point.
So are you assuming I’m posting the same thing based on the question at the end of my posts? Are you even reading my comments?
Calvin is a liar and he knows it. And given his replies, he’s an obnoxious one at that.
@@Bomtombadi1 I read your numerous posts, and they are all basically calling Calvin a liar.
Evolution is science fiction.
Endless speculation and theories stacked on more theories with zero actual evidence.
According to Calvin, chemistry is also fraudulent because there was once a guy who tried to insert a fake element into the period table.
THAT’S how infantile Calvin’s line of thinking is.
Reasoning like this fails to compel people desperately seeking to relieve the dissonance they feel when confronted with reality.
Since early biblical man lived well past 100 years old, I believe that these elderly are the Neanderthal.
Imagine living this long. Your walk is somewhat hunched, your bones continue to grow as well as your brow ridge until you turn into the Neanderthal.
Great program but why the 13+ age advisory?
DELUSIOMAL LIES
Love to watch.
Please no need for loud distractions from background music .
We want to hear you without music competing for attention.
This comment is a positive feed back .
Please consider it for future videos.
Thanks.
It's so funny how you can insert religious conmen instead of Evolutionists into this video and it would sound so convincing. If god created the human eye why do so many people need eyeglasses and contacts to correct poor vision. Why do so many people have bad backs and back problems if god created man? Either the intelligent creator isn't that intelligent, or god is not that good at creating, Maybe god is just lazy and does half assed work.
Why did the scientists re-examine Piltdown Man?
Because they were always skeptical of it and knew something was off. Why? Because it just didn’t fit anywhere within the framework at the time.
Hence, closer examination and more advanced technology they were able to determine the alterations done and promptly made corrections.
Yet Calvin Clown here decides to proliferate the clear creationist agenda.
These are well-known hoaxes and misconceptions. Calvin Clown here wants his audience to think they’re these deep, dark secrets.
He’s actually one of the more loony tunes creationists I’ve seen in a while.
Because it didn't fit into the fossil record
@@thegoblin957 Correct.
Not if evolution is true.
I like how Calvin Clown presents himself as a serious researcher.
People can never find the truth on their own. God is the creator and people should humble themselves to God. People have not been able to better themselves. There is more than the natural world.
God's Word, which He has protected.
Romans 1:18-32
New International Version
God’s Wrath Against Sinful Humanity
18 The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people, who suppress the truth by their wickedness, 19 since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. 20 For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities-his eternal power and divine nature-have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.
21 For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools 23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like a mortal human being and birds and animals and reptiles.
24 Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. 25 They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator-who is forever praised. Amen.
26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. 27 In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.
28 Furthermore, just as they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, so God gave them over to a depraved mind, so that they do what ought not to be done. 29 They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice. They are gossips, 30 slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents; 31 they have no understanding, no fidelity, no love, no mercy. 32 Although they know God’s righteous decree that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to do these very things but also approve of those who practice them.
Are you?
@@des711 People have not been able to better themselves?
What?!
The invention of penicillin what has saved countless millions of lives?
The invention of synthetic fertilizer which feeds half of the world today?
The invention of semiconductors and math which enables us to have this conversation?
@@nasonguy Those are advancements of technology (which brings both good and evil to people), but as a community of people there is still consistant crime, drug use, drunks, abuse, lying, manipulation, taking advantage of, selfishness, suicide, poverty, fraud, etc. I would rather live with people who focus less on the advancment of technology, but who are instead focusing to live a life of integrity. Living a life of integrity does not stop someone from gaining knowledge towards helping others.
@@des711 How is there any drawback to the discovery/invention of Antibiotics?
And if you look at literally all of history, we are living in the safest, most prosperous and least violent time ever, and it continues to get better.
God is the creator of all of us ✝️
AND SCREWED UP
The only accurate statement made in this little ditty is “many are willing to believe a lie rather than the truth if it suit their purpose”. I find it funny how you described your own position in an attempt to discredit a process so well documented, only the foolish or ignorant oppose it.
Not only is he describing himself but his words are loosely copied from 2 Thessalonians, making him sound like a brainwashed muppet.
Pretty high on the cringe scale.
I wish people who have biology degrees would listen to this. But they love the lie that’s taught in schools of “higher” learning.
God gave us His self-revelation, a contract in writing, and His signature appears on each page of the document. He is bound by what is stated within it, and we are given a choice. We can sign it and agree to live by its terms to reap its eternal benefits, or we can refuse to sign it, with the understanding that our temporary existence on this planet will conclude with death without the afterlife profits the contract stipulates to us as beneficiaries. Praise our Father God and our Savior Jesus Christ 💯🙏❤️
There is no such thing as evolutionist. There are just people that don't believe in a sky deity's creation.
Why do all young earth creationists fail in their burden of proof, unlike the scientific theory of evolution which continues to stand the test of academic peer review.
Everything that was said in the preface is straight out of Christianity's Playbook. You guys are so gullible it would be funny if it wasn't sad.
I’m thoroughly convinced that AiG isn’t trying to actually convince any skeptics or convert anyone. I think they put this stuff out to make the hard-line YEC, literal interpretation group feel better about their blind beliefs and bigotry.
More disgusting than sad was footage of Ken brain washing an auditorium full of children on how to handle "science" people.
Jesus is Lord God Almighty clothed in unsinful humanity and He is the author of eternal life to all who trust Him alone for salvation.
This means that saving repentance is realizing that you are a sinner deserving of God's just punishment in Hell and turn (repent) from whatever you trusted in before, if indeed you trusted in anything; to trusting in the person and finished work of Christ "alone" for salvation.
There is only one God.
He spoke everything into existence.
THERE IN NO REDEMTION THE STORIES OF LESUS ARE PATHETIC LIES FOR THE MASSES AND WHEN YOU DIE YOU ARE GOING TO HELL FOR THE LIES YOU CONTINUE TO PERPATRATE.
Scientific proof. A contradiction that highlights that you understand nothing about science
IMHO, Sir, you are promoting a major fallacy. The Bible is about the religious, mythical, spiritual world. Evolution is the science of the material world (as best as we can understand it.) It is a Great Fallacy to insist that the Bible (of the spiritual world) must be equal to, or congruent with, Scientific studies of the material world. It's like insisting that Oranges must equal Lamb Chops. It's not a relevant thing to do.
XD yeeeah lets lies about facts and lets keep education low because of à book....
I hope some will fact check this joke of à vidéo and learn for réal. That incluse all the quotes they take and twist.
Si To quote à dear general:
Lies! More lies!
They are not being depicted as ancestors to humanity. They existed alongside humans.
Calvin, do you ever get tired of being a liar?
No, in fact the Old Evolution Text Books said that Neanderthals didn't live next to homo sapiens but died out as an Evolutionary dead end.
Of course they've changed their theories countless times.
@@hogansheroes2793 what is it with you people and “the textbooks?”
Further, why is evolution your only focus here? You seem to have a problem with actually learning, which is what scientists do. Theories get updated. That’s a fact and the truth is they look very different from their original presentations. Creationists are the only ones who have problems with this.
Also, name some old evolution textbooks, please. Are they still in use today? Evolution can’t be a thing because … why? Because old textbooks have outdated information?
@@Bomtombadi1 Evolution is endless speculation and theories stacked on more theories with "zero" actual evidence.
It's science fiction!
@@hogansheroes2793 yes, it is! Because life changes and adapts and those changes happen over time and we’ve seen it in real time, too! Sorry to burst your bubble, but your flat out denial isn’t an argument.
@@Bomtombadi1 No we haven't ever seen a species evolving into another species.
The original created gene pool for each " kind" simply selected for variations.
That's an overall decrease in information.
Evolution says that there is an increase in genetic information.
Guess again later!
Then you quote a man who said they were humans suffering from rickets, when evidence 100+ years later gives no indication of such problems.
Calvin, do you ever get tired of being a liar?
Your having a bad day with all those negative vibes,provide some evidence against
yeah get some answers to these questions instead of being emotional and angry. Find out what your motives are.
If they are selfish, you will know, if you want to
@@dan9521 Creationism is riddled with lies. What's your problem?
@@mcmanustony what lies, this is why you atheists have no way of making sense of yourself, You are like politicians, much talk and platitudes but no focused objections, no solutions to the creationism questions
@@kjbbc
I can easily pull apart this entire video.
It’s laughable that creationists are still using these tired old arguments.
this is ridiculous.
The real liars are Answers in Genesis.
Oh Calvin, calling a liar and a clown for being demonstrably both isn’t ad hominem. It’s accurate. You’re wrong AND these things.
If I said you’re wrong BECAUSE these things, that would be ad hominem. Though since I’ve pointed out your lies and tomfoolery, it’s an apt description of you.
So Calvin, you quote the world’s foremost authority on human evolution and use him to show evolution is wrong?
Calvin, do you ever get tired of being a liar?
Yeah, it's funny that evolution is false because we can't find the remains of a missing link; but Christianity is true because we can't find the remains of Jesus.
BTW, there are empty tombs all over the world, like the one for the Persian emperor Cyrus the Great at Pasargardae, Iran. When archeologists investigate an empty tomb, they assume that the body or bodies buried there were moved some time in the past, not that the people entombed there "rose from the dead."
Liars for Jesus.