Live: Hyperfocal Focusing - Why Landscape Photographers NEED This.

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 109

  • @dmac5x1
    @dmac5x1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    This far and away the BEST explanation of hyperfocal distance and its application that I have seen. I'm an experienced photographer and felt that I understood the concept but your presentation solidified my understanding. Bravo !!

  • @rickgonzalez6345
    @rickgonzalez6345 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Best video on hyperfocal focusing I’ve ever seen!!! Thanks

    • @forestchaput
      @forestchaput  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wow, thanks!

  • @timryan894
    @timryan894 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great presentation and making the subject easy to understand - well done

  • @markstclair4471
    @markstclair4471 ปีที่แล้ว

    This made it so easy for me to understand! Thank you for sharing

  • @mlc3ifly
    @mlc3ifly 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Watched a lot of these videos and this one helped me.

  • @melaniegalvin8690
    @melaniegalvin8690 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Some acknowledge the complexity of hyperfocal and then give some semi lucid explanation. This is a concept that requires illustration so thank you for taking the time to provide those pieces especially for those of us who are new to the concept.

  • @BudBetz
    @BudBetz 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent presentation!!!

  • @heinz4841
    @heinz4841 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Finally, I understand how this works. What a great explanation! Bravo! You get 100 thumbs up from me!

  • @firstMillo
    @firstMillo 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Wow, you nailed it! By far the best and easiest to understand explanation I have ever found!
    Now I got it! Thanks a lot!
    With the modern live view modes it is no more that hard to find the correct settings but that basics need to be understood first!

  • @prashantpawar8969
    @prashantpawar8969 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    excellent lucid presentation

  • @SanPedro22
    @SanPedro22 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I never knew - each lens has its sharpest f stop. Wow! After all these years. This was a massive help.

  • @grephusingati7807
    @grephusingati7807 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very educative easily explained,thank you

  • @hyolee5223
    @hyolee5223 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Best video for hypofocal distance that I have seen so far. 👍

  • @pyercz5224
    @pyercz5224 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    your explanation is very understandable really good

  • @servicecatchers3190
    @servicecatchers3190 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing job guys

  • @vsk0709
    @vsk0709 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The best educative ( is that even a word or did I just make one?) and easy to understand vdo on hyperfocal focussing. Thanks a ton!!

  • @SniperPhotography
    @SniperPhotography 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is the best presentation on this subject I have ever seen.
    well done.

  • @livedeliciously
    @livedeliciously 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastic! One of the best explanations I've seen on hyperfocal distancing.

  • @jeffallinson8089
    @jeffallinson8089 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good explanation, thanks for a great upload.

  • @manishmishra6945
    @manishmishra6945 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastic video..the best on this topic I have ever watched and thanks a zillion for this...

  • @richardarmstrong1682
    @richardarmstrong1682 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This was a great explanation of a fairly complex subject. I found it easy to follow and understand. I appreciated the slides that helped to get the information across in a way that was easy to comprehend. Thank you.

  • @mt-nv4jd
    @mt-nv4jd 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent discussion, sir. You increased your aperture by 4 stops, and you increased your shutter speed by 4 stops, which resulted in the same exposure value. You did not gain 4 stops of light. IMO.

  • @mrbobb4989
    @mrbobb4989 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    A lot of info to take in but well worth it.. well on my way to understanding hyperfocal focusing..Thanks..

  • @JorgeBravoPratscher
    @JorgeBravoPratscher 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    seriously, perhaps the best hyperfocal tutorial there is out there. I wonder why you haven got more likes..... is it the video length? Thanks so much for eveything you've explained and the different examples. Hola from Spain :)

    • @forestchaput
      @forestchaput  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks so much! Glad you liked our video!

  • @hoodio
    @hoodio 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    do you have to take the meassure from the plane of the front of the lens or in a straight line from the lens to the closest object?

  • @ivyzhu394
    @ivyzhu394 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you, the best video I’ve found about hyper focal distance!!! This is so helpful.

    • @forestchaput
      @forestchaput  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      We’re so glad you enjoyed it!

  • @sachinkulkarni8742
    @sachinkulkarni8742 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Beautifully explained ... thank you so much.

  • @cool4fam99
    @cool4fam99 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    very helpful. the clearest explanation and examples i've seen. thanks!

  • @moshesani
    @moshesani 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    One of the best explanations I've ever seen
    I wanted to ask. You've got aperture examples of 5.6, but in that aperture you won't have sharpness in the far distance

    • @forestchaput
      @forestchaput  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thank you! Actually in many cases you will have sharpness at f/5.6 in the far distance, that's what you can use hyperfocal focusing for!

  • @Stone1108
    @Stone1108 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yep, the best explanation combining workflow. Thanks, this level earns the subs and likes which are so important to YT channels, got mine now. Thanks again. 👏

  • @Endoeart
    @Endoeart 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Best video I’ve seen on this subject so far thank you

  • @mortenthorpe
    @mortenthorpe ปีที่แล้ว

    The example with shutter speed, grass in the foreground, and potential breeze causing blur in the grass, highlights the main issue… it is not so much desirable to have everything in focus, the trick is to known when something needs to be in focus, or if it more a color-element in the scene, rather than a details-element… determining the role of the elements is far more important than achieving sharpness at all costs.

  • @Astrogator1
    @Astrogator1 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for this, have struggled with this for years and looked at various explanations of how to do this. yours is one of easiest to follow

    • @forestchaput
      @forestchaput  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you! Rob did a fantastic job!

  • @FLORAMORAITINI
    @FLORAMORAITINI 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent explanation, thank you

  • @LodiVet
    @LodiVet ปีที่แล้ว

    Great presentation thank you

  • @stuartayton8567
    @stuartayton8567 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi Rob. On the last example with the rocks at 1 ft away with the Fuji XT3 and using my Photopills app, It says that the Hyp dist at 10mm and f 5.6 is 3 ft.and not the 2 ft on your charts. If I use the full frame Nikon D810 at 10mm and f5.6 then the Hyp Dist is 2ft. Have you used the wrong chart for this last example or is Photopills wrong? Otherwise I thought it was a good example of what Hyp distance is all about and well explained.

  • @Gordonlanguam
    @Gordonlanguam 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for doing the examples with the table. I was actually looking for a tutorial like this today

  • @Anna-gv7vo
    @Anna-gv7vo ปีที่แล้ว

    Suh a great vídeo, thank you! I have a question, if I may, hor do I focus if I have nothing relevant in the foreground? Do I point ti the horizon and shoot? How do I know if the whole photo is in focus? TIA

    • @forestchaput
      @forestchaput  ปีที่แล้ว

      If your entire image is far away, you can usually just use a middle aperture like f/5.6 or f/8 and be good to go!

  • @thegodfather4713
    @thegodfather4713 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi big bro. I want to ask you a few questions
    1- Will we work with a single point of amnesty while focusing? Which af point do we use? Is it the center at the center or the lowest or highest point?
    2- Can we get the depth of field we want with hyper focal focus while taking 3 or 5 minutes long exposure photos with ND filter? Does our shutter speed affect how we work with depth of field?

  • @danieleniccoli3871
    @danieleniccoli3871 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastic vid. I always wondered even if you use the double distance method. How can you work out f-stop, now I know. One thing did spring to mind. I followed the process using the PhotoPills app. I got some very different results in your 2feet example - I guess the take away point is different charts could say different things. It might be worth adding a bit of leeway as a dead on 2feet, leaves very little error margin (according to photopills). great vid!

    • @forestchaput
      @forestchaput  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks! And yes, a bit of wiggle room is always good with this type of thing. A few inches can make a ton of difference.

  • @soak000
    @soak000 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This really good way, reverse way of explaining how you can go from distance to aperture instead of the other way around. Question - if your Fuji has 1.6 crop factor, won't the focal length be 16x1.6 = 25.6mm instead? I am curious because on my Canon 90D and 24mm ef-s lens, wouldn't my actual focal length be 32mm? Thanks.

    • @forestchaput
      @forestchaput  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, unless they app you use takes crop factor into effect automatically (many of them do).

    • @soak000
      @soak000 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@forestchaput Thanks. I am using PhotoPill, I will check to see if it does or not.

  • @peterwideman1425
    @peterwideman1425 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video but how would you work out where to focus on like in the canyon example? How do you work out where 8.9ft is off the edge of a cliff?

    • @forestchaput
      @forestchaput  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      You just need to get it close. Some photographers carry a tape measure or rangefinder, most just estimate.

    • @peterwideman1425
      @peterwideman1425 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@forestchaput so I understand that to an extent but you can't measure into dead ground as such because 8.9 ft off the edge of a cliff is actually more likely to be a few hundred feet away if that makes sense.

  • @thosearepinklemons
    @thosearepinklemons 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How do we find the sharpest aperture without using the website you mentioned? None of the RF lenses I own for my Canon have been tested on that site.

    • @forestchaput
      @forestchaput  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There aren’t many resources other than that one unfortunately. 😞 You could try shooting a test yourself at all of your different apertures though?

    • @thosearepinklemons
      @thosearepinklemons 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@forestchaput thanks. I'll try it out

  • @momotow8286
    @momotow8286 ปีที่แล้ว

    what to do if we dont have a variable aperture lens?

    • @forestchaput
      @forestchaput  ปีที่แล้ว

      The best you can do in that case is look up what aperture your lens is, then reference a hyper focal chart and be sure you are focusing to the best distance to maximize your DOF at that aperture.

  • @stephenvanwijk9669
    @stephenvanwijk9669 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good explanation. But I can’t find the sharpness function as shown. Where on that site.

    • @forestchaput
      @forestchaput  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      www.imaging-resource.com/lenses/reviews/

  • @brycenew
    @brycenew 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for this teaching; really easy to understand and well presented! One question please: with zoom lenses that have the focal distances marked sporadically on the barrel, how are you calculating exactly what focal distance you are shooting at? My camera (5D MkIII) doesn’t show me what the focal length of the shot was, when I review it. I need to wait until I get the image into Lightroom to find that out. Thanks!

  • @MrMkariniot
    @MrMkariniot 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think this way is better from looking on the lens . I am using an app

  • @tjmanou6422
    @tjmanou6422 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, Why not focus on infinity? Wouldn't that be more accurate so we are not gambling where exactly the hyper focal is? Thank you

    • @forestchaput
      @forestchaput  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Because focusing on infinity would be wasting two thirds of your total depth of field range. Much better to at least get it close.

    • @tjmanou6422
      @tjmanou6422 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@forestchaput Thank you

  • @oyedejifiyin5243
    @oyedejifiyin5243 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    HYPERFOCAL DISTANCE MADE SIMPLE ! IT DOESEN'T GET SIMPLER. THANKS

  • @shivhaaha
    @shivhaaha 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    The best!
    where can i find Hyperfocal Charts? thank you!

    • @forestchaput
      @forestchaput  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks! I would use this one: www.photopills.com/calculators/hyperfocal-table

  • @martinmcglone8456
    @martinmcglone8456 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    very good

  • @Paul_i_is
    @Paul_i_is 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I can’t find any sharpness. Chart for my rf lenses just a load of adverts

  • @MrDaveB123
    @MrDaveB123 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    And then the lord above created PHOTO PILLS Thank the lord lol

  • @billmeador215
    @billmeador215 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good information, but I went to the www.imaging-resouorce.com link you referenced and I cannot find anyplace where they give charts on the aperture performance of any lenses.......are you sure this is the right sight?

    • @forestchaput
      @forestchaput  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yep! That’s the right website. Not every lens has that test done to it though.

    • @billmeador215
      @billmeador215 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      You are correct, sorry for my confusion........I was trying to find using iPhone and never had good navigation. Got on the laptop and did find the lenses as well as some that had charts. Envy your location, we love the Rockies and Yellowstone/Tetons area. Had planned an early fall visit to the park until this disease came along, with out age think we will have to wait for a vaccine before any long trips again (live in Texas). Will be subscribing to your channel and looking forward to more good videos!!

  • @Provolt
    @Provolt 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Isn't it easier just to focus stack? Looks like alot of work for one image

    • @forestchaput
      @forestchaput  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      In some cases yes! Although once you get used to Hyperfocal the total time to calculate everything is about 10 seconds which is quite a bit faster that capturing and editing a focus stacked image.

  • @johndwilliams
    @johndwilliams 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Disappointed you didn't mention diffraction at higher f stops. Gets pretty bad at f16 on my Fuji, never mind f22! I generally don't go any higher than f11 and still get excellent DOF. Using a cropped sensor makes a difference. I now use an app than takes diffraction into consideration when choosing the aparture. Has made a massive difference and stopped me from going back to a FF Sony!

    • @forestchaput
      @forestchaput  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Good point! Although if you use HFF correctly, you will rarely need anything more than f/8.

    • @johndwilliams
      @johndwilliams 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@forestchaput I've been trying to train myself to use HFF. Think its called slow photography these days! I'm amazed at how many landscape shots I'm taking at f5.6 and getting great sharpness as well as a much faster shutter speed without increasing ISO.

  • @nonoi9987
    @nonoi9987 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    on this magic web site most lens is not yet tested

    • @forestchaput
      @forestchaput  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I know! It's a bummer, but they are constantly testing more lenses.

  • @ErwinSerle
    @ErwinSerle 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It is acceptable UN-sharpness in fact

  • @Hoppy100
    @Hoppy100 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Probably the most complicated explanation ive ever seen! 🤣

  • @BudBetz
    @BudBetz 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent presentation!!!