I've got a question regarding interpretation of table 9.5(a) of ACI 318-11. The table gives minimum thicknesses (based on span) to avoid having to perform more detailed deflection calcs. The tables are based on the length "l". The question I have is whether the length "l" can be taken as clear distance between the supports for a member built integrally with the support. (What's code mean built integrally)..... thanks I'm unclear on this question because if you look at the definition of "l" in chapter 2, you are directed to section 8.9. Section 8.9 then proceeds to define span length of members not built integrally with the supports as clear span plus the depth of the member (not exceeding cl to cl of the supports). Does this then imply that when the member is built integrally with the support that you can take the length for purposes of Table 9.5a as the clear distance? What's code mean built integrally ? Thanks
هما بيفرغوا تحت الميد عشان هو مش مصمم أنها تحمل على التربة أسفلها. فمش عايز يحصل حاجه هو مش مصمم عليها ومش واخدها في اعتباره. هو مصمم أن الميدة متحملة على القواعد بس
ربنا يحفظك ويبارك فيك يارب
I've got a question regarding interpretation of table 9.5(a) of ACI 318-11. The table gives minimum thicknesses (based on span) to avoid having to perform more detailed deflection calcs. The tables are based on the length "l".
The question I have is whether the length "l" can be taken as clear distance between the supports for a member built integrally with the support. (What's code mean built integrally)..... thanks
I'm unclear on this question because if you look at the definition of "l" in chapter 2, you are directed to section 8.9. Section 8.9 then proceeds to define span length of members not built integrally with the supports as clear span plus the depth of the member (not exceeding cl to cl of the supports). Does this then imply that when the member is built integrally with the support that you can take the length for purposes of Table 9.5a as the clear distance? What's code mean built integrally ? Thanks
بارك الله فيك يا دكتور مجدى.
هما بيفرغوا تحت الميد عشان هو مش مصمم أنها تحمل على التربة أسفلها. فمش عايز يحصل حاجه هو مش مصمم عليها ومش واخدها في اعتباره. هو مصمم أن الميدة متحملة على القواعد بس
معلومات ممتازة. وبتأكد لي ما فكرت فيه وتوقعته. هي دي الهندسة يادكتور🌷🌷🌹
روووعه
ياريت يادكتور لو في معك محاضرات عن التحليل الزلزالي تنزلها ❤❤
دكتور اشمعني بتدي المحاضره في مكتب ايهاف؟