People tend to comment that they haven't seen certain Dave Gorman shows in years, sometimes decades. I can safely say that I have never seen most of his work and am a great deal happier now that I have. So it's a thanks from me as well.
Excellent! I've being trying to find this for years. ...I used to watch this on Sunday Nights with my sister. We used to eat Smiths scampi fries and drink Archers Aqua together. Very 2002.
This scoring system has bothered me for YEARS, and I've finally worked out why. It's not even that two criteria are capped at 144 (the size of the audiecne) and money isn't. So money is ultimately what drives the graph for the entire series. Although that does annoy me. Thing is, anyone working a job and not spending more than they earn, would be aceing this test for happiness. Even if they literally do nothing else, eat lard all day and never speak to another human being. This test heavily favours the dead-end job.
It isn't taking any count of things like wages and regular food shopping spend though, it's only counting extra spend and non work activities. You are right with the first point though. I never noticed that before.
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 86 | คู่เอก "คมเพชร vs ชาติพยัคฆ์"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/m3q_dRYDuU8/mqdefault.jpg)
Always come back to this. Love Mr Gorman!
People tend to comment that they haven't seen certain Dave Gorman shows in years, sometimes decades. I can safely say that I have never seen most of his work and am a great deal happier now that I have. So it's a thanks from me as well.
Been looking for this for ages, thank you for the upload!
Excellent! I've being trying to find this for years. ...I used to watch this on Sunday Nights with my sister. We used to eat Smiths scampi fries and drink Archers Aqua together. Very 2002.
£1 = €1.7...how times have changed!
I used to have this on a since corrupted hard drive. So happy I can watch it again
What's that done for your graph?
Brilliant! But I hadn't realised Dave Gorman's been around since 1972 - and I'm not just referring to his sideburns.
Seriously. This was 2002. I was in college then. I don't remember seeing anyone dressed like that unless they were going to a 70s party.
@@Sam_on_TH-cam Here in the U.S. It was actually kind of a thing for a bit in the early 2000s to dress like that.
@@Aster_Risk Where? I'm American and I was in college then. I don't remember anyone dressed like that.
Fucking hell man, look at his sideburns! Hahahahaha
Imagine having the same initials as Dave, amazing! 🙀
LOL Dave is a boy here, never knew he was a twin!
Why are we not seeing any new material from dave on dave?
This scoring system has bothered me for YEARS, and I've finally worked out why. It's not even that two criteria are capped at 144 (the size of the audiecne) and money isn't. So money is ultimately what drives the graph for the entire series. Although that does annoy me.
Thing is, anyone working a job and not spending more than they earn, would be aceing this test for happiness. Even if they literally do nothing else, eat lard all day and never speak to another human being.
This test heavily favours the dead-end job.
It isn't taking any count of things like wages and regular food shopping spend though, it's only counting extra spend and non work activities.
You are right with the first point though. I never noticed that before.
Hang on a second. If Duncan Goodhew is such a genuine friend, why wasn't he helping Dave gravel the school?!
Slightly worrying that the big leaps in happiness for Dave came as a result of gambling on sports. Not sure if that's a good message!
Wasn't the school bit a tie in with grange hill? Sure looked like the same school.
Ahh Duncan Goodhew achieved much more than some - ahem. Not mentioning any names.
Are You Nick Gorman?