Alsalamu alaykum ustadh, shouldn't you put a disclaimer regarding ibrahim ruhaylee as perhaps shaykh suhaymee said this before he saw the warning on him
sheikh ibrahim ruhaylee has been praised and nothing is wrong with him that deserves warning against him. People jva benefitted greatly from his aqeedah al hamawiyyah series.
Are we supposed to blind follow? Wouldn't we be exactly like those who blind follow Imam Abu Hanifa. I advise you to stay out of it and keep your tongue clean
@@SA-ux4qtinstead of copying and pasting replies to everyone, perhaps read what I said. My tongue is clean Alhamdulilah, I had a genuine question. And when it comes to “blind following” the mashaykh al rabaniyun like sheikh Rabee and Sheikh Ubayd, had their reasons for warning against them if you actually bothered to do your research
@procalla9107 These internal disputes don't need warnings. No one opposed any fundamentals of Ahlus Sunnah. It just started with Shaykh Muhammad attacking some students and said certain unnecessary words in it. Then it became a huge issue, and both groups tried to find faults from each other. Subhanallah, most of them were like they were having previous files on scholars and students, they were spreading those after this issue started. No one became Ashari, Mathuridi, Ikhwani or opposed major fundamentals. I rather follow the advice of Shaykh Salih As Suhaymee, Al Abbad, Al Fawzan and Shaykh Sulaymaan ar Ruhaylee in these types of internal issues.
Two esteemed scholars who were far from infallible especially in this context, may Allah have mercy on us but we do not taqleed in tabdee nor is the tabdee or warning of one man hujjah on the rest
Jazakallahukhaira
جزآك الله خيرا
جزاكم الله خيرا
جزاك الله خيرا
Much needed Barak Allahu Feekum
جزاكم الله خيرا وبارك الله فيكم
JazakAllah khair!
what is a rabbaniyeen scholar?
Alsalamu alaykum ustadh, shouldn't you put a disclaimer regarding ibrahim ruhaylee as perhaps shaykh suhaymee said this before he saw the warning on him
sheikh ibrahim ruhaylee has been praised and nothing is wrong with him that deserves warning against him. People jva benefitted greatly from his aqeedah al hamawiyyah series.
Didn’t Sheikh Rabee and Sheikh Ubayd warn against sheikh Al Ruhayli and Ibn Hadi? Or do they not know Arabic too? Genuine question
Are we supposed to blind follow? Wouldn't we be exactly like those who blind follow Imam Abu Hanifa. I advise you to stay out of it and keep your tongue clean
@@SA-ux4qtinstead of copying and pasting replies to everyone, perhaps read what I said. My tongue is clean Alhamdulilah, I had a genuine question. And when it comes to “blind following” the mashaykh al rabaniyun like sheikh Rabee and Sheikh Ubayd, had their reasons for warning against them if you actually bothered to do your research
@procalla9107 These internal disputes don't need warnings. No one opposed any fundamentals of Ahlus Sunnah. It just started with Shaykh Muhammad attacking some students and said certain unnecessary words in it. Then it became a huge issue, and both groups tried to find faults from each other. Subhanallah, most of them were like they were having previous files on scholars and students, they were spreading those after this issue started. No one became Ashari, Mathuridi, Ikhwani or opposed major fundamentals. I rather follow the advice of Shaykh Salih As Suhaymee, Al Abbad, Al Fawzan and Shaykh Sulaymaan ar Ruhaylee in these types of internal issues.
Two esteemed scholars who were far from infallible especially in this context, may Allah have mercy on us but we do not taqleed in tabdee nor is the tabdee or warning of one man hujjah on the rest
What fundamentals off Quran and Sunnah of sh Muhammad and sh Sulayman did they warn us from?
جزاكم الله خيرا